Prostate cancer screening beyond PSA – STHLM3 and/or MRI

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DIAGNOSI E STADIAZIONE DEL CARCINOMA PROSTATICO Maurizio Brausi Direttore Urologia Ausl Modena Chairman ESOU Director Prostate Cancer Unit.
Advertisements

PSA Testing William J Catalona MD Northwestern University.
RESULTS TITLE; Prospective randomized controlled trial of the role of PSA and PCA3 testing in a sequential manner in an opportunistic screening protocol.
Prostate Cancer Detection in Men with an Initial Diagnosis of Atypical small Acinar Proliferations Dr Charles Chabert The Wollongong Hospital.
Prostate Cancer Genetics and Diagnosis
Prostate Cancer Screening: Con
High-grade Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia on Needle Biopsy Risk of Cancer on Repeat Biopsy Related to Number of Involved Cores and Morphologic Pattern.
Prostate Needle Biopsy: The Pitfalls and the Role of the Pathologist – Patient Track Prostate Cancer Symposium “Intriguing Cases / Emerging Strategies.
EVIDENCE AND DEBATE SCREENING FOR PROSTATE CANCER.
PSA & Prostate Cancer Dan Burke Consultant Urological Surgeon
Prostate Cancer Screening Assistant Professor Charles Chabert Men’s health Seminar Ballina April 2011 prostates.com.au.
Medical Therapy of Prostate Symptoms (MTOPS) Jeannette Y. Lee, Ph.D. University of Alabama at Birmingham.
Professor Abhay Rane OBE
Prostate Cancer in 2009, part I. Now and the future! Why we have ‘Active surveillance, its purpose, its outcome and other matters. Monique J. Roobol, PhD,
Should I have that blood test for Prostate Cancer?
RISK OF NON SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER IN PROSTATE CANCER PATIENTS DIAGNOSED BY AN EXTENDED PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY PROCEDURE AND TREATED BY RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY.
Where have we been in the last 20 years?
Urology Update Sanofi- Aventis
Prostate Cancer: A Case for Active Surveillance Philip Kantoff MD Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School.
The PCA3 Assay improves the prediction of initial biopsy outcome and may be indicative of prostate cancer aggressiveness de la Taille A, Irani J, Graefen.
Biostatistics Case Studies Peter D. Christenson Biostatistician Session 2: Diagnostic Classification.
Overdetection of prostate cancer ESMO Brussel 2007 Chris H.Bangma Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer Prostate Cancer Symposium The Prostate Net September 17, 2011 Steven Lucas Wayne State University School of Medicine Karmanos.
PCa Screening New Areas of Research Francesco Montorsi Milan.
Prevention with Finasteride Ian M. Thompson, MD October, 2009.
Prostate Cancer Screening Risk Management Ben Inch.
Il PSA nello screening del carcinoma della prostata PRO Franco Gaboardi Urologia Ospedale San Raffaele Turro Milano.
MpMRI in Prostate cancer A Urologist’s Perspective Diagnosis Treatment Choice Surgical Planning Dr. Peter Heathcote, Adjunct Professor APCRC-Q QUT, Senior.
Active surveillance in prostate cancer Dr John Yaxley Urological & robotic surgeon.
Blood and Tissue Based Molecular Signatures in Predicting Prostate Cancer Progression Tarek A. Bismar, MD Professor, University of Calgary Departments.
Per-Anders Abrahamsson, Department of Urology Malmö University Hospital Sweden EAU, Berlin, March 24, 2007 What´s New in Prostate Cancer?
V. Scattoni Biopsia ecoguidata. Bioptic strategies: targerted biopsy.
V. Scattoni mpMRI of the prostate: Does it change indications for biopsy and repeat biopsy?
Preventative Care and Monitoring for Prostate Disease Joshua Broghammer, MD FACS Assistant Professor, Dept of Urology University of Kansas Medical Center.
Prostate cancer update Suresh GANTA Consultant urological surgeon Manor Hospital.
PSA screening Cost Conscious Project Kristopher Huston January 2016.
Network meeting Taunton Rugby club January 20th
PSA, PCA-3 and peace of mind in suspected prostate cancer
Per-Anders Abrahamsson Department of Urology Malmö University Hospital
Risk-adapted prostate cancer (PCa) early detection study based on a “baseline” PSA value in young men – a prospective multicenter randomized trial (PROBASE)
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Prevention of Prostate Cancer. Fact or Fiction?
What would you recommend?
Prostate Cancer: Highlights from 2006
Figure 3 Semantic model of the active surveillance (AS) timeline
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
V. Scattoni Biopsia ecoguidata.
Evaluation and Medical Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
HERBERT C. RUCKLE, M. D. , GEORGE G. KLEE, M. D. , PH. D. ,, JOSEPH E
Prostate Cancer Screening- Update
Towards Early and More Specific Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
Ongoing Gleason Grade Migration in Localized Prostate Cancer and Implications for Use of Active Surveillance  Adam B. Weiner, Ruth Etzioni, Scott E. Eggener 
Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Steering Committee: PI-RADS v2 Status Update and Future Directions  Anwar R. Padhani, Jeffrey Weinreb, Andrew.
Luis Martínez-Piñeiro  European Urology Supplements 
Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. doi: /nrclinonc
Is It Necessary to Detect All Prostate Cancers in Men with Serum PSA Levels
Volume 58, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Prostate-Specific Antigen, Digital Rectal Examination, and Transrectal Ultrasonography: Their Roles in Diagnosing Early Prostate Cancer  MICHAEL R. CUPP,
Risk Factors for the Development of Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer
Active Surveillance for Low Risk Prostate Cancer
PSA Levels and the Probability of Prostate Cancer on Biopsy
Prostate Cancer Update
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
HERBERT C. RUCKLE, M. D. , GEORGE G. KLEE, M. D. , PH. D. ,, JOSEPH E
Does PSA Testing Influence the Natural History of Prostate Cancer?
Figure 4 Algorithm for when to determine PTEN
Standardised follow-up
European Urology Oncology
Assessing a Patient’s Individual Risk of Biopsy-detectable Prostate Cancer: Be Aware of Case Mix Heterogeneity and A Priori Likelihood  Jan F.M. Verbeek,
Presentation transcript:

Prostate cancer screening beyond PSA – STHLM3 and/or MRI Prostate cancer screening beyond PSA – STHLM3 and/or MRI? Goran Ahlgren, M.D. Ph.D. Lund University, Malmö Sweden

Diagnostic goals 2017 To diagnose intermediate – high risk in time To avoide overdiagnosis of low risk tumour To correctly classify tumour at diagnosis

Why screening of prostate cancer? Cancer i siffror 2015

Almost 30% of 10 000 new cases yearly in Sweden is ”very low” or ”low risk”

”Latent prostate cancer” At autopsy a microscopic prostate cancer is detectable in Men 30-40 years: 10% Men 40-50 years: 20% Men 50-60 years: 30% Men 60-70 years: 40% Men 70-80 years: 50% Men >80 years: 60%

Avoide overdiagnosis = less biopsies! Swedish guidelines: Biopsy not indicated if Normal DRE PSA 3-10 ng/ml (unless fast rise) PSA-f/T > 0,2 PSA-density < 0,1 ng/ml/cm3 BPH - Finasterid? If PSA rise: STHLM3? MRI?

Andriole, J Urol 2006 (ARIA-studierna) Effect of dutasteride on PSA-kinetic in patients with BPH and prostate cancer Andriole, J Urol 2006 (ARIA-studierna)

Avoid Rebiopsy; Gothenburg part of the ERSPC study 322 with PSA >3 ng/ml without PCa at first biopsy. What happened? 56 normalised PSA (17%) 182 har benign repeat biopsies (56%) 84 had prostate cancer (26%) 2nd biopsy – 52/246 PCa (21,9%) 3rd biopsy – 32/194 PCa (16,5%) All patients with PSA >3ng/ml and a Prostate volume < 20cc hade PCa None of patients with P vol >70cc had PCa Zachrisson et al Eur Urol 2003;43

Better use of PSA tests? STHLM0 EUROPEAN UROLOGY 6 3 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 4 1 9 – 4 2 5

STHLM0 study shows that present PSA testing in Sweden also underdetects significant tumours Percent of men with an elevated PSA that had a biopsy taken within 2 years from the first PSA above normal! PSA-value Age 50-59 years Age 60-69 years 3-4 45% 30% 4-10 65% 55% >10 70% 17.5% of all men who was diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer (T3/4, N1, M1, PSA>20) had a PSA ≥3 taken more than 6 months before without diagnostic action EUROPEAN UROLOGY 6 3 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 4 1 9 – 4 2 5

Patients that had a prostate biopsy

STHLM3 - algotithm

STHLM3 is a algoritm for risk of significant prostate cancer >10% risk för Sign cancer GS≥7

Eur Urol 2016

Eur Urol 2016

Eur Urol 2016

Can we trust a negative MRI?? Itatani, Eur J Radiol 2014 193 men with negative mpMRI = PI-RADS 1-2 F-U 5 years: PSA + biopsy + mpMRI NPV mpMRI: 90 %

Conclusions STHLM3 can reduce benign biopsies with 44% STHLM3 does not increase Gleason score ≥7 but reduces GS6 with 17% mpMRI double the significant cancer detection rate mpMRI significantly reduces the detection rate of GS6 cancer (≈50%) and benign biopsies (≈25-30%) Patients without clinical suspicion of prostate cancer should be evaluated with mpMRI