© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Trends in Farm Household Economic Well-Being Jeremy Weber USDA Agricultural Outlook Forum, February 20-21, 2014.

Advertisements

Page 1 Local Economic Development Team PICO Mr. Blackly PICO Mr. Alundeth SME Junior Advisor Mr. Khuanchai SME Advisor Mr. Karsten PICO Mr. Santisay Division.

Agriculture in Canada. Land Forms of Canada Agricultural Lands of Canada (1971) Land in agricultural use Land not in agricultural use but capable of.

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Table 1. The export value of agro complex (000 $)

Table 1. Advantageous points of contract farming system

Table 4. The summary of the Iranian consumer wine purchasing behavior

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Hospital live Deliveries

NAGARKOT… Reward for the early birds.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

and Economics, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 3, doi: /jfe-5-3-2

Forests in the Livelihoods of Rural Households in Ghana

Prefer dry wine Prefer sweet wine

Table 1. Structural Form Parameter Estimates of inflation rate

Table 1. Delivery Care Utilization in The Two Areas

Table 4. RTEC Consumption in Terms of Place of Residence

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

Per capita Food Poverty Line (Zf)*

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Livelihood Activities chosen by beneficiaries

Table 3. Descriptive Statistics – All Banks

Management Philosophy

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

HFRI Equity Hedge (Total) Index HFRI Event- Driven (Total) Index

Variables Coefficient Prob.

Table 4. Percentage of post-harvest waste reported by the farmers

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 12. Grouping regression of scale

Table 1. Definition of model variables

Table 6. Control sample industry distribution

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Year range Rainfall (mm) ∆s in rainfall Temp (°C) ∆s in temp RH (mm)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Labor cost/Handling cost

Program 1. Computing the using the general formula (26)

Table 8. Income and expenditure of CFUGs in Nepal

Table 1. Social capital comparison of adopters and non-adopters

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Table 1. Rice yield in MT (Source-USDA, Foreign Agricultural Service)

Table 8. Residual Test Results

Table 2. Modal parameters estimated by Pulse Reflex®

Table 7. Status of CF in Nepal as of 2009

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. ADF and PP Unit Root Test Results

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Standard Deviation of R&D Institutional Ownership

Financial Development

Table 8. Respondents distribution about malaria

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Reasons why students sometimes choose not to eat

Independent Variables Neither land no livestock

Table 1. Use of productivity-enhancing technologies in farming

Table 2. SUMMARIZED OBSERVATIONS FROM MODEL ANALYSIS

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Number of garment factories

Economic Geography, 2016, Vol. 2, No. 1, doi: /seg-2-1-1

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Capital budgeting methods, recommended or not by textbooks

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Average Execution Time in seconds

Sum of Square df Mean Square F Sig Health Between Groups

Estimated Coefficient

Presentation transcript:

© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing. Table 1. Contribution of different livelihood sources to total income after diversification Source of livelihood Average HH income based on total HH (Rs.) (n= 323) Percent Number of Households reporting income Percent of HH reporting income Average income of reporting household Crops 65340 15.08 262 81.11 80553 Fodder 1891 0.44 64 20.43 9227 Vegetable 786 0.18 11 3.41 23091 Fruits 5461 1.26 125 38.70 14111 (All crops) 73479 16.95 - Livestock 17453 4.03 137 42.41 41147 Agric: wages 3796 0.88 66 18576 [Agriculture] 94727 21.86 Forest 20293 4.68 201 62.23 32609 {Agriculture and forestry} 115020 26.54 Rented out land 9111 2.10 78 24.15 37731 Farm machinery 8489 1.96 27 8.36 101556 Farm sources total 132620 30.60 Small scale business 61412 14.17 122 37.77 162590 Wages 11593 2.67 30598 Home remittance 41406 9.55 149 46.13 89758 Foreign remittance 29554 6.82 48 14.86 198875 (Remittances) 70960 16.37 Public private services 113687 26.23 157 48.61 233892 Pension 3065 1.21 9 2.48 108750 Other sources 40466 9.34 190 58.82 68792 Non-Farm sources Total 300811 69.40 All source 433390 100.00 323 Farm: Non-farm Ratio 0.440876 Source: Field data Muhammad Israr et al. Livelihood Diversification: A Streatagy for Rural Income Enhancement. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2014, Vol. 2, No. 5, 194-198. doi:10.12691/jfe-2-5-10 © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing.