Interaction of the NK Cell Inhibitory Receptor Ly49A with H-2Dd

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supplementary figure S1. Sequence and secondary structure of wt and R416A influenza A virus nucleoprotein. The difference between the sequences at position.
Advertisements

Volume 13, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Hsp104, Hsp70, and Hsp40  John R Glover, Susan Lindquist  Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 11, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
High- and Low-Potency Ligands with Similar Affinities for the TCR
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 1998)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 1997)
TCR Binding to Peptide-MHC Stabilizes a Flexible Recognition Interface
Volume 91, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
The Interaction Properties of Costimulatory Molecules Revisited
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Direct Binding of Cholesterol to the Purified Membrane Region of SCAP
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Mutations Changing the Kinetics of Class II MHC Peptide Exchange
A Tripartite Protein Complex with the Potential to Couple Synaptic Vesicle Exocytosis to Cell Adhesion in Brain  Stefan Butz, Masaya Okamoto, Thomas C.
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
TCR Binding to Peptide-MHC Stabilizes a Flexible Recognition Interface
Volume 109, Issue 8, Pages (October 2015)
Crystal Structures of Oligomeric Forms of the IP-10/CXCL10 Chemokine
Homo-Oligomerization of Human Corneodesmosin Is Mediated by Its N-Terminal Glycine Loop Domain  Cécile Caubet, Nathalie Jonca, Frédéric Lopez, Jean-Pierre.
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages (October 2003)
Shu-Chun Cheng, Gu-Gang Chang, Chi-Yuan Chou  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Peter A. Savage, Mark M. Davis  Immunity 
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages (May 1997)
MHC Class I Molecules Can Direct Proteolytic Cleavage of Antigenic Precursors in the Endoplasmic Reticulum  Nathalie Brouwenstijn, Thomas Serwold, Nilabh.
Splice Form Dependence of β-Neurexin/Neuroligin Binding Interactions
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2004)
Johnson Cheung, Michael E.P. Murphy, David E. Heinrichs 
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (July 1996)
Variable-Field Analytical Ultracentrifugation: I
Tom E. Williams, Shanmugam Nagarajan, Periasamy Selvaraj, Cheng Zhu 
The Relationship of MHC-Peptide Binding and T Cell Activation Probed Using Chemically Defined MHC Class II Oligomers  Jennifer R Cochran, Thomas O Cameron,
Cécile Bouneaud, Philippe Kourilsky, Philippe Bousso  Immunity 
αβ T Cell Receptor Ligand-Specific Oligomerization Revisited
Structural Basis for Specific Recognition of Reelin by Its Receptors
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
The Binding Site of NK Receptors on HLA-C Molecules
Scarlet S. Shell, Christopher D. Putnam, Richard D. Kolodner 
Jennifer D. Stone, Jennifer R. Cochran, Lawrence J. Stern 
Volume 84, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 1998)
Volume 84, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Binding of Natively Unfolded HIF-1α ODD Domain to p53
Benjamin Misselwitz, Oliver Staeck, Tom A Rapoport  Molecular Cell 
The Inhibitory Receptor LIR-1 Uses a Common Binding Interaction to Recognize Class I MHC Molecules and the Viral Homolog UL18  Tara L Chapman, Astrid.
Increased TCR Avidity after T Cell Activation
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Crystal Structure of the Extracellular Domain of a Human FcγRIII
Dissecting the Multifactorial Causes of Immunodominance in Class I–Restricted T Cell Responses to Viruses  Weisan Chen, Luis C. Antón, Jack R. Bennink,
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Hybrid Structural Model of the Complete Human ESCRT-0 Complex
Elias T. Spiliotis, Manuel Osorio, Martha C. Zúñiga, Michael Edidin 
Volume 109, Issue 8, Pages (October 2015)
Characterization of a Specificity Factor for an AAA+ ATPase
The Relationship of MHC-Peptide Binding and T Cell Activation Probed Using Chemically Defined MHC Class II Oligomers  Jennifer R Cochran, Thomas O Cameron,
αβ T Cell Receptor Ligand-Specific Oligomerization Revisited
Presentation transcript:

Interaction of the NK Cell Inhibitory Receptor Ly49A with H-2Dd Kannan Natarajan, Lisa F Boyd, Peter Schuck, Wayne M Yokoyama, Dan Eilat, David H Margulies  Immunity  Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 591-601 (November 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80134-X

Figure 1 Construction and Expression of Soluble Ly49A Fragments (A) The indicated regions of the C57BL/6 Ly49A cDNA were amplified and cloned as described in the Experimental Procedures. The expected molecular mass of the encoded monomer is listed. (B) Following expression as inclusion bodies, solubilization, refolding, and purification as described in the Experimental Procedures, Ly49A EC was examined by size exclusion chromatography on a Superdex 75 column. The recovered peak was also examined in SDS-PAGE under reducing (R) and nonreducing (NR) conditions as shown in the inset. Immunity 1999 11, 591-601DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80134-X)

Figure 2 Anti-Ly49A Monoclonal Antibodies Specifically Bind to Ly49A EC and Ly49A NKD-L Purified preparations of the three indicated molecules were immobilized to a CM-5 chip and analyzed for binding to the indicated mAbs by SPR using the BIACore 2000 as described in the Experimental Procedures. Solution phase analytes (mAbs) were injected at t = 83 s. Dissociation washout was initiated at t = 365 s. To evaluate the potential for deterioration of the coupled surfaces with successive cycles of binding and regeneration, mAb A1 was used in the first (solid circle) and last (open square) runs. Immunity 1999 11, 591-601DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80134-X)

Figure 3 AUC Analysis of Ly49A EC, and Its Interaction with H-2Dd/P18-I10 Experiments and data analysis were carried out as described in the Experimental Procedures. (A) Sedimentation equilibrium distributions of H-2Dd/P18-I10 complexes, scanned at 280 nm. Data from two independent experiments are shown, one at a rotor speed of 16,000 rpm (O) and one in sequential sedimentation equilibria at 16,000 rpm (Δ) and 24,000 rpm (+), respectively. The solid line is the global curve fit for a single, noninteracting species of the molar mass as predicted from the amino acid composition. Residuals of the difference between the data points and the curve fits are shown in the inset below. (B) Ly49A EC at loading concentrations of 8.3 and 5 μM, scanned at a wavelength of 280 nm, in sedimentation equilibrium at rotor speeds of 16,000 rpm (+) and 21,000 rpm (Δ), respectively, and with a loading concentration of 0.7 μM, scanned at 230 nm, at a rotor speed of 25,000 rpm (O). The solid lines are the best-fit result from a global analysis of 13 data sets based on a monomer-dimer self-association model, resulting in a dimerization constant of 7.1 × 10−6 M (range 3.7 × 10−6 M to 1.7 × 10−5 M). Residuals are shown in the lower panel. (C) Sedimentation equilibrium distribution of Ly49A EC (5.9 μM) and H-2Dd/P18-I10 (1.7 μM), scanned at 280 nm, at rotor speeds of 16,000 rpm (+), 20,000 rpm (x), and 24,000 rpm (Δ), respectively. Solid lines are global best-fit distributions of a model with free H-2Dd/P18-I10, Ly49A EC in a monomer-dimer equilibrium, and mixed complexes of Ly49A EC binding to H-2Dd/P18-I10 with a microscopic binding constant, KD, of 750 nM, independent of the oligomeric state of Ly49A EC. Virtually identical fits can be achieved for all binding constants, KD < 1 μM, and for interaction models assuming exclusively the Ly49A EC monomer or dimer, respectively, to represent the H-2Dd/P18-I10 binding site. Residuals are shown in the lower panel. For comparison, the best-fit distribution for the same model without Ly49A EC H-2Dd/P18-I10 interaction is shown by dotted lines, with the corresponding residuals in the middle panel. Immunity 1999 11, 591-601DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80134-X)

Figure 4 Binding of MHC/Peptide Complexes to Ly49A CM-5 biosensor chips were coupled with Ly49A EC (A, D, and G–J), Ly49A NKD-L (B and E), Ly49A NKD-S (C and F), or the clonotypic scTCR (K) by standard procedures and were then exposed to either H-2Dd/P18-I10 (A–C, G, and K), H-2Dd/motif (D–F and I), H-2Dd/P18N8 (H), or H-2Kb/VSV (J) complexes as solution phase analytes. The injection of analyte commenced at t = 83 s. Washout was initiated at t = 365 sec. Curves shown have had background values subtracted. Immunity 1999 11, 591-601DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80134-X)

Figure 5 Staining of Splenocytes with Biotinylated Ly49A EC (A) Splenocytes (1 × 106) from C57Bl/6 (H-2b), BALB/c (H-2d), and C3H/HeJ (H-2k) mice were incubated with biotinylated Ly49A EC and PE-SA and analyzed by flow cytometry as described in the Experimental Procedures. Background staining with PE-SA alone was identical for all three strains. Staining of splenocytes from BALB/c (B), C57BL/6 (C), and β2m−/− (D) mice was performed as above, using a lower concentration of the bio-Ly49A (dark lines). Competition with unlabeled Ly49A (dotted lines) was carried out (see the Experimental Procedures). Immunity 1999 11, 591-601DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80134-X)

Figure 6 Ly49A EC Can Form Ternary Complexes with scTCR and H-2Dd CM-5 chips were covalently coupled with either Ly49A EC (A), scTCR (B and C), or mAb 34-2-12S (D–G) as described in the Experimental Procedures. (A) Soluble H-2Dd/P18-I10 complexes were offered to the Ly49A EC coupled surface in the presence of scTCR at the indicated concentrations. (B) H-2Dd/P18-I10 complexes were offered to the scTCR surface in the presence of the indicated concentrations of Ly49A EC. (C) scTCR competes for H-2Dd/P18-I10 binding to an scTCR surface. (D and E) H-2Dd/motif was captured on a mAb 34-2-12S surface and then exposed to either Ly49A EC (D) or Ly49A NKD-L (E) as indicated. Initiation of buffer washout is indicated. (F and G) Mixtures of Ly49A EC, scTCR, and H-2Dd/P18-I10 were offered to mAb 34-2-12S coupled biosensor surfaces. Mixtures consisted of 0.08 μM H-2Dd/P18-I10, 1.8 μM scTCR, and either 0.10 μM (F) or 0.32 μM (G) Ly49A EC. Initiation of injection of analyte and of washout are indicated by arrowheads. (H) Model of a possible ternary complex of an MHC I molecule with TCR and Ly49A. Superposition of the MHC segment of the structure of the murine H-2Kb/dEV8/2C TCR complex (pdb designation 2CKB [Garcia et al. 1996]) with the MHC of an H-2Dd/Ly49A complex (Tormo et al. 1999) was accomplished as described in the Experimental Procedures. Location of the TCR V domains, the MHC I domains, and the Ly49A NKD are shown. Immunity 1999 11, 591-601DOI: (10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80134-X)