Yinon Shafrir, Stewart R. Durell, H. Robert Guy  Biophysical Journal 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Voltage-Dependent Hydration and Conduction Properties of the Hydrophobic Pore of the Mechanosensitive Channel of Small Conductance  Steven A. Spronk,
Advertisements

Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages (October 2015)
Hydroxide and Proton Migration in Aquaporins
Molecular Biophysics of Orai Store-Operated Ca2+ Channels
Vishwanath Jogini, Benoît Roux  Biophysical Journal 
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Richard J. Law, Keith Munson, George Sachs, Felice C. Lightstone 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (March 2010)
Amy Y. Shih, Stephen G. Sligar, Klaus Schulten  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Po-Chao Wen, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
The Influence of Amino Acid Protonation States on Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Bacterial Porin OmpF  Sameer Varma, See-Wing Chiu, Eric Jakobsson 
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Coupling of Retinal, Protein, and Water Dynamics in Squid Rhodopsin
Exterior Site Occupancy Infers Chloride-Induced Proton Gating in a Prokaryotic Homolog of the ClC Chloride Channel  David L. Bostick, Max L. Berkowitz 
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Molecular Recognition of CXCR4 by a Dual Tropic HIV-1 gp120 V3 Loop
Tianjun Sun, Peter L. Davies, Virginia K. Walker  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 98, Issue 8, Pages (April 2010)
G. Fiorin, A. Pastore, P. Carloni, M. Parrinello  Biophysical Journal 
Tzur Paldi, Michael Gurevitz  Biophysical Journal 
Structural Locus of the pH Gate in the Kir1.1 Inward Rectifier Channel
J.L. Robertson, L.G. Palmer, B. Roux  Biophysical Journal 
A Gating Mechanism of the Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor
Ligand Binding to the Voltage-Gated Kv1
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Simone Furini, Carmen Domene  Biophysical Journal 
Marcos Sotomayor, Klaus Schulten  Biophysical Journal 
Crystal Structure of the Borna Disease Virus Nucleoprotein
Sundeep S. Deol, Peter J. Bond, Carmen Domene, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Zara A. Sands, Alessandro Grottesi, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Volume 101, Issue 4, Pages (May 2000)
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Investigating Lipid Composition Effects on the Mechanosensitive Channel of Large Conductance (MscL) Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations  Donald E. Elmore,
Activation of the Edema Factor of Bacillus anthracis by Calmodulin: Evidence of an Interplay between the EF-Calmodulin Interaction and Calcium Binding 
Grischa R. Meyer, Justin Gullingsrud, Klaus Schulten, Boris Martinac 
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Insight into Early-Stage Unfolding of GPI-Anchored Human Prion Protein
Structural Models of the KtrB, TrkH, and Trk1,2 Symporters Based on the Structure of the KcsA K+ Channel  Stewart R. Durell, H. Robert Guy  Biophysical.
Coupled Motions between Pore and Voltage-Sensor Domains: A Model for Shaker B, a Voltage-Gated Potassium Channel  Werner Treptow, Bernard Maigret, Christophe.
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 94, Issue 2, Pages (July 1998)
Coupling of S4 Helix Translocation and S6 Gating Analyzed by Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of Mutated Kv Channels  Manami Nishizawa, Kazuhisa Nishizawa 
Mechanism of Anionic Conduction across ClC
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Gennady V. Miloshevsky, Peter C. Jordan  Structure 
Tianjun Sun, Peter L. Davies, Virginia K. Walker  Biophysical Journal 
Symmetry, Selectivity, and the 2003 Nobel Prize
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (October 2008)
Mechanism of Interaction between the General Anesthetic Halothane and a Model Ion Channel Protein, III: Molecular Dynamics Simulation Incorporating a.
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Sebastian Fritsch, Ivaylo Ivanov, Hailong Wang, Xiaolin Cheng 
Structural Models of the MscL Gating Mechanism
Volume 78, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Structure of GABARAP in Two Conformations
Volume 94, Issue 11, Pages (June 2008)
Presentation transcript:

Models of the Structure and Gating Mechanisms of the Pore Domain of the NaChBac Ion Channel  Yinon Shafrir, Stewart R. Durell, H. Robert Guy  Biophysical Journal  Volume 95, Issue 8, Pages 3650-3662 (October 2008) DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.108.135327 Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Ribbon representation of NaChBac model pore domains colored from orange to blue, superimposed on template structures represented by gray tubes. Each tetramer is composed of four identical subunits, only two of which are shown in these side views. Labels indicate L4–5, S5, P, and S6 segments. (A) Closed conformation model compared with MlotiK template. (B) Open2 conformation model compared with Kv1.2 template. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 3650-3662DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.108.135327) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Helical net representation of NaChBac (top) and Kv (bottom) channel protein sequences. Positions are colored according to mutability (13) within a family, as indicated at bottom. Solid circles represent nonconserved residues, likely exposed to lipids (mainly hydrophobic). Open circles represent nonconserved residues, likely exposed to water (mainly hydrophilic). Gray circles represent nonconserved residues, likely exposed to lipid headgroups (hydrophobic and nonacidic hydrophilic). Special residue types are denoted by diamonds for basic residues (R and K), squares for acidic residues (D and E), and triangles for prolines. A number inside a residue corresponds to the actual position of the residue in the NaChBac sequence. The shaded region represents the lipid membrane. Note the deletion in S6 of the potassium channel. This deletion ensures maximal alignment between conserved residues in S6 of both families, and may cause differences in gating mechanisms between the two families. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 3650-3662DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.108.135327) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Closed model PD shows side chains, with backbone given rainbow colors from orange to blue. (A) Side view of two diagonal subunits, with all aromatic side chains colored purple. The lines approximate boundaries between cross sections shown in parts B–D. (B–D) Cross sections show all side chains, as colored by element or type (red, oxygen; blue, nitrogen; white, hydrogen; gray, carbon; and purple, aromatic). A set of salt-bridging interactions between E172, E204, and R199 is circled in B. A cluster of signature residues is circled in C. Interactions among L190, F221, F224, and F227 in the central-cavity region is shown in D. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 3650-3662DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.108.135327) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Stick representation of selectivity filter residues 185–199, with side view of only two diagonal subunits. Atoms are colored by element, with backbone in lighter shades. Dashed lines represent hydrogen bonds. (A) Closed model. Signature residues (F185, T189, E191, and W193) interact to form a dense, stable network of hydrogen bonds and aromatic-aromatic interactions best seen in the right subunit. (B) Possible model for an open pore. The primary differences from the closed model are that the E191 side chain has moved into the inner pore where it may be hydrated, and the L190 side chain has moved farther from the pore, where it may interact with hydrophobic residues of S6 segments. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 3650-3662DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.108.135327) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Side view of one subunit of Open1 conformation PD. Most subunit are colored as in Fig. 1 and only the backbone is shown, but the C-terminus half of S6 is in gray for apolar residues, and red for polar residues, and side chains are colored by atom. A kink in the S6 helix is stabilized by hydrogen bonds between the N225 side chain and the backbone oxygen atoms of T220 and F221 (for details, see inset). S6 is amphipathic below this distortion. The hydrophobic face (gray) interacts with hydrophobic residues on L45, S5, and the S6 from adjacent subunit (not shown), whereas polar residues (red) are exposed to water in the pore and cytoplasm. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 3650-3662DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.108.135327) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 View from inside the PD of S6 (blue), surrounded by L4–5 and S5 segments (orange). Segments and S6 side chains are colored as in Fig. 3. In the closed conformation (A), the pore is lined with hydrophobic residues F224 (purple), I231, and V235, and polar asparagine side chains (N225, N233, and N234) are oriented away from the pore. In the Open1 (B) and Open2 (C) models, the hydrophilic S6 side chains of N225, N233, N234, E236, and K237 are exposed to water in the cytoplasm or pore, whereas most of the hydrophobic side chains interact with other hydrophobic residues of adjacent segments. (D) SCAM results from S6 segments of a homologous Cav2.1 channel superimposed on the NaChBac Open2 model. Red indicates that analogous residues in Cav2.1 were accessible to MTSET in all four repeats. Green and yellow indicate accessibility to MTSET in some (but not all) repeats. Blue indicates no accessibility in any repeat. White residues in S5 and S6 were not mutated. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 3650-3662DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.108.135327) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Models of how a mutation of L226 to proline may reverse the polarity of channel gating. (Top) The channel modeled in its wild-type forms: open (A, blue) and closed (B, red). (Bottom) Mutated structures. Whereas structure in C (purple) is in “open” conformation, the rotational kink at N225 introduced by the proline causes the hydrophobic residues in the C-terminus of S6 to occlude the pore, hence rendering the channel closed for ion permeation. Likewise, most of the structure depicted in D (orange) is the original closed structure. However, the additional rotational kink causes hydrophobic residues to point away from the pore, effectively opening the channel for ion permeation. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 3650-3662DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.108.135327) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Ribbon representations of deviation of backbone structure, averaged over last nanosecond of the simulation (gray) from the original symmetric structure (rainbow-colored) in the (A) Closed0a and (B) Open2 models. For an uncluttered view, only domains from two opposite subunits are shown. Structures at bottom are rotated by 90° about the y axis relative to the top structures, so that all four subunits can be seen. Segment labels are colored according to color of the segment in symmetric models. Biophysical Journal 2008 95, 3650-3662DOI: (10.1529/biophysj.108.135327) Copyright © 2008 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions