New Tools for Genome Modification in Human Embryonic Stem Cells

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Site-specific recombination
Advertisements

Making Transgenic Plants and Animals Why? 1.Study gene function and regulation 2.Generate new organismic tools for other fields of research. 3.Cure genetic.
Recombination Homologous recombination Site-specific recombination Transposition Different sets of proteins are responsible for the different types of.
Gene editing: From biblical times to the present
The beginnings of gene editing
Genome Editing by Matthew Porteus Department of Pediatrics,
Genome editing to breed better plants
Genetically Engineered Mouse Models of Prostate Cancer
Pluripotent stem cell based gene therapy for hematological diseases
Gene Knockout 査向东 安徽大学生命科学学院.
Recombination based transformation technologies
CRISPR-Cas Systems: Prokaryotes Upgrade to Adaptive Immunity
Volume 140, Issue 2, Pages e2 (February 2011)
Genome-editing Technologies for Gene and Cell Therapy
Mouse Models in Preclinical Studies for Pachyonychia Congenita
Figure 2 Use of CRISPR/Cas9 for genome editing
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Figure 3 Endogenous repair of double-strand DNA breaks
DNA-Damage Response in Tissue-Specific and Cancer Stem Cells
Correction of a Genetic Disease in Mouse via Use of CRISPR-Cas9
Genetically Engineered Mouse Models of Prostate Cancer
Harnessing CRISPR–Cas systems for bacterial genome editing
Astrid Breitbart, Charles E. Murry  Cell Stem Cell 
CRISPR-Cas Systems: Prokaryotes Upgrade to Adaptive Immunity
Addison V. Wright, James K. Nuñez, Jennifer A. Doudna  Cell 
Transgenic Mouse Technology in Skin Biology: Generation of Knockin Mice  Frederik Tellkamp, Farida Benhadou, Jeroen Bremer, Maria Gnarra, Jana Knüver,
Epigenetics Drives RAGs to Recombination Riches
Transgenic Mouse Technology in Skin Biology: Generation of Complete or Tissue- Specific Knockout Mice  Lukas Scharfenberger, Tina Hennerici, Gábor Király,
Research Techniques Made Simple: The Application of CRISPR-Cas9 and Genome Editing in Investigative Dermatology  Joan Ramon Guitart, Jodi L. Johnson,
Mouse Genome Engineering via CRISPR-Cas9 for Study of Immune Function
Gene Therapy for Autosomal Dominant Disorders of Keratin
Feasibility of new breeding techniques for organic farming
HIV Receives a “One Two Knockout Punch”
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Astrid Breitbart, Charles E. Murry  Cell Stem Cell 
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
CRISPR-Cas9 for in vivo Gene Therapy: Promise and Hurdles
Therapeutic editing of hepatocyte genome in vivo
Itai M. Pessach, MD, PhD, Luigi D. Notarangelo, MD 
CRISPR genome-editing: A medical revolution
Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
Current Progress in Therapeutic Gene Editing for Monogenic Diseases
Do DNA Double-Strand Breaks Drive Aging?
Volume 140, Issue 2, Pages e2 (February 2011)
Genome-editing Technologies for Gene and Cell Therapy
VDJ Recombination Cell Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering
Advances in Industrial Biotechnology Using CRISPR-Cas Systems
Cancer Modeling in the Modern Era
Translocation Mapping Exposes the Risky Lifestyle of B Cells
Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development
A CRISPR Approach to Gene Targeting
William T. Hendriks, Curtis R. Warren, Chad A. Cowan  Cell Stem Cell 
Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids
Gene Targeting in Embryonic Stem Cells Scores a Knockout in Stockholm
Ignazio Maggio, Manuel A.F.V. Gonçalves  Trends in Biotechnology 
Mouse Models in Preclinical Studies for Pachyonychia Congenita
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
Gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9 for gene inactivation and targeted sequence replacement. Gene editing by CRISPR/Cas9 for gene inactivation and targeted sequence.
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Natalay Kouprina, Vladimir Larionov 
At Loose Ends: Resecting a Double-Strand Break
CRISPR/Cas9: Transcending the Reality of Genome Editing
Are Mouse Telomeres Going to Pot?
Chemical Biology Approaches to Genome Editing: Understanding, Controlling, and Delivering Programmable Nucleases  Johnny H. Hu, Kevin M. Davis, David R.
Nuclease Target Site Selection for Maximizing On-target Activity and Minimizing Off- target Effects in Genome Editing  Ciaran M Lee, Thomas J Cradick,
Thomas Gaj, Benjamin E Epstein, David V Schaffer  Molecular Therapy 
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Kevin Huang, Guoping Fan  Cell Stem Cell 
Presentation transcript:

New Tools for Genome Modification in Human Embryonic Stem Cells Leon M. Ptaszek, Chad A. Cowan  Cell Stem Cell  Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages 600-602 (December 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.11.004 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Gene Editing Systems (A) The research groups led by Mario Capecchi and Oliver Smithies were central to the development of gene targeting technology based on homologous recombination. In this system, targeting occurs through recombination of an exogenous DNA fragment containing a mutated segment of a target gene flanked by “arm” segments that are identical to surrounding segments of the same gene. The exogenous, “donor” fragment also includes a reporter element—frequently an antibiotic resistance gene, here depicted as “res”—to allow selection of cells in which successful recombination events have occurred. Only endogenous cellular machinery is involved in this process. This system allows for the insertion of exogenous DNA segments into a host cell genome in multiple organisms, including mammals. Martin Evans and coworkers applied this homologous recombination technology to mouse embryonic stem cells, allowing for the introduction of edited gene segments into the mouse germline. Drs. Capecchi, Evans, and Smithies were awarded the 2007 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for this contribution. This technology has created a revolution in mouse genetics but has been difficult to apply to the human system. (B) The site-specific gene editing system developed by Thyagarajan and coworkers is based on the PhiC31 integrase, which catalyzes site-specific integration events. Specifically, the PhiC31 integrase catalyzes a DNA integration reaction only when it is simultaneously bound to two different cognate DNA sequences: attB and attP. This is distinct from the Flp and Cre recombinases, which recognize two identical DNA sites. Application of PhiC31-mediated integration to the human system is made possible by the presence of multiple pseudo-attP sequences in the human genome. The “donor” DNA segment in this system contains a mutated target gene segment, as well as an attB site and a reporter gene. The investigators use a GFP expression cassette as well as an antibiotic resistance gene as reporters. When this donor segment and a PhiC31 integrase expression vector are simultaneously introduced into a human cell, the exogenous integrase is transiently expressed and catalyzes site-specific integration events with reportedly high fidelity. Integration into the attP site is directional, as indicated through the presence of residual attL and attR sites. (C) Lombardo and coworkers have developed a gene targeting strategy based on the use of engineered zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs). Simultaneous introduction of expression vectors for two ZFNs (ZFN A and ZFN B), whose cognate DNA sequences flank a gene segment of interest, leads to transient expression of these proteins and the production of two double-stranded DNA breaks just upstream of the 5′ end of the cognate sequences. These breaks can be repaired via either nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) or homology-directed repair (HDR). If a donor DNA segment that is homologous to the gene of interest is present, this donor is used as the template for HDR-mediated repair, leading to gene replacement. Mutations in the “donor” sequence can be thus introduced into the chromosome. When ZFN cognate sequences are configured such that their 5′ ends are distal to the gene of interest, no residual sequence remains after HDR. As with the above-mentioned systems, reporter genes are included in the donor fragment to allow for selection of successful integration events. Cell Stem Cell 2007 1, 600-602DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2007.11.004) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions