Alexandre Baron, Patrick Chazette, Julien Totems

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEMS-Aerosol WP_AER_4: Evaluation of the model and analysis Lead Partners: NUIG & CNRS-LOA Partners: DWD, RMIB, MPI-M, CEA- IPSL-LSCE,ECMWF, DLR (at no.
Advertisements

UPRM Lidar lab for atmospheric research 1- Cross validation of solar radiation using remote sensing equipment & GOES Lidar and Ceilometer validation.
Mars’ North and South Polar Hood Clouds Jennifer L. Benson Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology July 22, 2010 Copyright 2010 California.
Data assimilation of trace gases in a regional chemical transport model: the impact on model forecasts E. Emili 1, O. Pannekoucke 1,2, E. Jaumouillé 2,
NDACC Working Group on Water Vapor NDACC Working Group on Water Vapor Bern, July 5 -7, 2006 Raman Lidar activities at Rome - Tor Vergata F.Congeduti, F.Cardillo,
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
Model and remote-sensing data SOEE1400 Lecture 5.
4 th COPS Workshop, Hohenheim, 25 – 26 September 2006 Modeling and assimilation efforts at IPM in preparation of COPS Hans-Stefan Bauer, Matthias Grzeschik,
Scanning Raman Lidar Error Characteristics and Calibration For IHOP David N. Whiteman/NASA-GSFC, Belay Demoz/UMBC Paolo Di Girolamo/Univ. of Basilicata,
1 Satellite Remote Sensing of Particulate Matter Air Quality ARSET Applied Remote Sensing Education and Training A project of NASA Applied Sciences Pawan.
David N. Whiteman/NASA-GSFC, Belay Demoz/UMBC
July 2001Zanjan, Iran1 Atmospheric Profilers Marc Sarazin (European Southern Observatory)
Introduction A new methodology is developed for integrating complementary ground-based data sources to provide consistent ozone vertical distribution time.
GEWEX/GlobVapour Workshop, Mar 8-10, 2011, ESRIN, Frascati, Italy WATER VAPOUR RAMAN LIDARS IN THE UTLS: Where Are We Now? or “The JPL-Table Mountain Experience”
1. The MPI MAX-DOAS inversion scheme 2. Cloud classification 3. Results: Aerosol OD: Correlation with AERONET Surface extinction: Correlation with Nephelometer.
G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R Goddard Lidar Observatory for Winds (GLOW) Wind Profiling from the Howard University Beltsville Research.
Observation of a Saharan dust outbreak on 1-2 August 2007: determination of microphysical particle parameters Paolo Di Girolamo 1, Donato Summa 1, Rohini.
Penn State Colloquium 1/18/07 Atmospheric Physics at UMBC physics.umbc.edu Offering M.S. and Ph.D.
Diagnosing Climate Change from Satellite Sounding Measurements – From Filter Radiometers to Spectrometers William L. Smith Sr 1,2., Elisabeth Weisz 1,
Intercomparisons of AIRS and NAST retrievals with Dropsondes During P- TOST (Pacific Thorpex Observational System Test) NASA ER-2 NOAA G-IV Dropsonde.
Leah Kos Sara Lavas Lauryn Gonzalez Mentor: Dr. Michael Douglas, NSSL.
Indianapolis flux (INFLUX) in-situ network: quantification of urban atmospheric boundary layer greenhouse gas dry mole fraction enhancements 18 th WMO/IAEA.
1/30 2-year observation of Organic Aerosol properties In Cape Corsica J. Sciare, and LSCE.
Validating the GHG production chain at multiple levels Julia Marshall (MPI-BGC), Richard Engelen (ECMWF), Cyril Crevoisier (LMD), Peter Bergamaschi (JRC),
Determination of atmospheric structures, aerosol optical properties and particle type with the R-MAN 510 Raman dual polarization lidar super ceilometer.
Slide 1 Wind Lidar working group February 2010 Slide 1 Spaceborne Doppler Wind Lidars - Scientific motivation and impact studies for ADM/Aeolus Erland.
Berechnung von Temperaturen aus Lidar-Daten Michael Gerding Leibniz-Institut für Atmosphärenphysik.
A fine vertical wave structure & its relation with trace gas transport ATTREX/CONTRAST/CAST Science Team Meeting, Oct, 2014 Ji-Eun Kim University of Colorado,
IGARSS 2011, July 24-29, Vancouver, Canada 1 A PRINCIPAL COMPONENT-BASED RADIATIVE TRANSFER MODEL AND ITS APPLICATION TO HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING Xu.
Planetary Boundary-layer Ozone Flux using Ozone DIAL and Compact Wind Aerosol Lidar (CWAL) in Huntsville AL Guanyu Huang 1, Michael J. Newchurch 1, Shi.
Bauru November 2004 Modelling interpretation of in situ H2O, CH4 and CO2 measured by  SDLA balloon borne instrument (SF2 and SF4 flights). N. Huret(1),G.
USE OF AIRS/AMSU DATA FOR WEATHER AND CLIMATE RESEARCH Joel Susskind University of Maryland May 12, 2005.
Project goals Evaluate the accuracy and precision of the CO2 DIAL system, in particular its ability to measure: –Typical atmospheric boundary layer - free.
1 « TReSS » ATMOSPHERIC OPTICAL REMOTE SENSING TRANSPORTABLE-MOBILE PLATFORM Pierre H. Flamant, Claude Loth Juan Cuesta, Dimitri Edouard, Florian Lapouge*
Introduction 1. Advantages and difficulties related to the use of optical data 2. Aerosol retrieval and comparison methodology 3. Results of the comparison.
Meteorological Observatory Lindenberg – Richard Assmann Observatory (2010) GCOS Reference Upper Air Network Holger Vömel Meteorological Observatory Lindenberg.
AIRS science team meeting Camp Springs, February 2003 Holger Vömel University of Colorado and NOAA/CMDL Upper tropospheric humidity validation measurements.
Airborne/ground-based sensor intercomparison: SRL/LASE Paolo Di Girolamo, Domenico Sabatino, David Whiteman, Belay Demoz, Edward Browell, Richard Ferrare.
Monitoring of Eyjafjallajökull Ash Layer Evolution over Payerne- Switzerland with a Raman Lidar Todor Dinoev, Valentin Simeonov*, and Mark Parlange Swiss.
A new method for first-principles calibration
Daily observation of dust aerosols infrared optical depth and altitude from IASI and AIRS and comparison with other satellite instruments Christoforos.
Instrument location ceilo pyro radar 10m Ground-based remote sensing instruments of clouds and precip at Princess Elisabeth.
Relating Aerosol Mass and Optical Depth in the Southeastern U.S. C. A. Brock, N. L. Wagner, A. M. Middlebrook, T. D. Gordon, and D. M. Murphy Earth System.
ITSC-1227 February-5 March 2002 Use of advanced infrared sounders in cloudy conditions Nadia Fourrié and Florence Rabier Météo France Acknowledgement G.
II GALION workshop - Geneva, Switzerland – September 21-23, 2010 EARLINET contribution to SDS-WAS Europe – North Africa regional node Lucia Mona Istituto.
Validation of Satellite-derived Clear-sky Atmospheric Temperature Inversions in the Arctic Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Axel Schweiger 3, Jennifer.
Validation of OMI and SCIAMACHY tropospheric NO 2 columns using DANDELIONS ground-based data J. Hains 1, H. Volten 2, F. Boersma 1, F. Wittrock 3, A. Richter.
UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA CNR-IMAA (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Metodologie per l’Analisi Ambientale) Tito Scalo (PZ) Analysis and interpretation.
The Course of Synoptic Meteorology
1. Analysis and Reanalysis Products
Use of radar data in the HIRLAM modelling consortium
Latmos UPMC/CNRS - ILRC 2015
G. Mevi1,2, G. Muscari1, P. P. Bertagnolio1, I. Fiorucci1
CAST – sonde activities
Aeolus in heterogeneous atmospheric conditions
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Data Assimilation Training
Huiqun Wang1 Gonzalo Gonzalez Abad1, Xiong Liu1, Kelly Chance1
A New Method for Evaluating Regional Air Quality Forecasts
G. Mevi1,2, G. Muscari1, P. P. Bertagnolio1, I. Fiorucci1
Constant Pressure Maps
Emma Hopkin University of Reading
Upper Air Data The Atmosphere is 3D and can not be understood or forecast by using surface data alone.
Item Taking into account radiosonde position in verification
GOES -12 Imager April 4, 2002 GOES-12 Imager - pre-launch info - radiances - products Timothy J. Schmit et al.
Comparison of Aircraft Observations With Surface Observations from
MIPAS-2D water database and its validation
The Mars Pathfinder Atmospheric Structure Investigation/Meteorology (ASI/MET) Experiment by J. T. Schofield, J. R. Barnes, D. Crisp, R. M. Haberle, S.
Atmospheric reanalysis at ECMWF
Presentation transcript:

Cold wave of February 2018 above Europe observed by rotational Raman lidar Alexandre Baron, Patrick Chazette, Julien Totems LSCE – IPSL, Gif-sur-Yvette, France

Presentation plan The Weather and Aerosol LIdar (WALI) Observations in February 2018 Its calibration against radiosonde Origins of the air masses Associated weather situations Comparison with: Model reanalyses Spaceborne observations

WALI, its characteristics and assets Fig. 1: WALI 60 cm 130 cm Fig. 2: The Mobile Atmospheric Station (MAS) Eye safe lidar operating at 355 nm Compact (Fig. 1) and transportable (Fig. 2) Aerosols, WVMR, Temperature Short overlap function (~ 200 m) Temporal resolution 30 min Vertical resolution 100 m T uncertainty < 1 K T profile up to 6 km / 2 km Nigh / Day Using lens, it is compact, as shown in this picture It is also easily transportable in an instrumented truck named MAS for « mobile atmospheric station » represented here WALI measures aerosols optical properties, water vapor mixing ratio and atmospheric temperature with a short overlap function, full overlap at about 2 hundred meters For temperature measurements, error is below 1 k up to 5 km of altittude for profiles averaged 30min with a spatial resolution of 100m This system has proven its worth in different campaigns where you can find more specifications on this lidar system especially for the Aerosol and the WVMR Involvement in former field studies: HyMeX and ChArMEx (P.Chazette et al, 2014; AMT), PARCS (J.Totems et al, 2019; QJRMS) …

WALI, its temperature measurements in February 2018 Cold air Free troposphere Warm air PBL Top Cold air advection PBL Temperature in color in the interval -20 to 5 Celsius degree, in function of altitude from the 21 Feb to the 27 Feb 2018 In the PBL = diurnal cycle with thermal inertia of atmosphere Two air masses stand out: a warm one on the 24 Feb and a very cold one on the 26 and 27 of Feb

Calibration of the Rotational Raman channel 𝑄 𝑇,𝑧 = 𝑆 𝑅𝑅2 𝑇,𝑧 𝑆 𝑅𝑅1 𝑇,𝑧 =𝑓(𝑇) Night time radiosondings: Meteo-France site of Trappes ~15 km from the lidar [1] 20deg smoothed RMSN Z < 6 km = 0.96 K RMSD Z < 3 km = 1.14 K [1] A. Behrendt, “Temperature measurement with Lidar,” in Lidar Range-Resolved Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere (C. Weitkamp, 2005), Ch. 10.

Origins of the air masses and synoptic weather situation Backward Ensemble mode: Every 6h from 26/02 0000 UTC to 28/02 1200 UTC Every 250m from 1250m to 2750m 77 runs ; 5 days calculation H Lagrangian model HYSPLIT from NOAA H L L L Backward Ensemble mode: 24/02 at 0000, 0600 and 1200 UTC Starting altitude: 2000 m (AGL) 3 days calculation Blocked weather situation with an high above Scandinavia = polar air from Siberia guided through Europe to a low off the coast of Portugal

Consistency with modeling Noter quelques differences et faire seulement 2 à trois profiles max ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis (hourly, 33 pressure levels)

Lidar – Model differences (unbiased) PBL Top issue Correlation > 0.92 Max(Cor) > 0.99 around Z = 2 km Mean bias = -1.35 K Root Mean Square Deviation (unbiased) ~ 1 K

Consistency with modeling P1 P2 Noter quelques differences et faire seulement 2 à trois profiles max

Comparison of lidar, ERA5 and AIRS profiles AIRS/AQUA transit  AIRS Level 3 daily Temperature product Daily average of Lidar and ERA5 data Weighting function of AIRS is peaked above 1 km agl AIRS does not observed the slope discontinuity of T(z) (P1) Good agreement of the 3 datasets, for a ~constant T gradient (P2) Profile journalier plutot que horaire

Conclusions & Perspectives Successful calibration with RS (RMS ~1 K). Differences induced by Lidar and RS not co-located  can be improved using ultra-light aircraft and/or UAV to calibrate the RR channel right on site Complementarity with spaceborne measurements (e.g. AIRS, IASI B&C) especially where spaceborne spectrometers failed, in the low troposphere (PBL) Suitable tool for validation of next generation of spaceborne spectrometers (e.g. IASI NG) Reliable performances for model assimilation of lidar network into meteorological model Unmanned aerial vehicul