Volume 110, Issue 5, Pages (September 2002)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Advertisements

Global Conformational Rearrangements in Integrin Extracellular Domains in Outside-In and Inside-Out Signaling  Junichi Takagi, Benjamin M. Petre, Thomas.
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Mapping of the Interaction Interface of DNA Polymerase β with XRCC1
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
by Chungho Kim, Tong-Lay Lau, Tobias S. Ulmer, and Mark H. Ginsberg
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Barley lipid-transfer protein complexed with palmitoyl CoA: the structure reveals a hydrophobic binding site that can expand to fit both large and small.
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Myosin VI Undergoes Cargo-Mediated Dimerization
James J Chou, Honglin Li, Guy S Salvesen, Junying Yuan, Gerhard Wagner 
Cooperation between Fixed and Low pH-Inducible Interfaces Controls Lipoprotein Release by the LDL Receptor  Natalia Beglova, Hyesung Jeon, Carl Fisher,
Solution Structure of the Core NFATC1/DNA Complex
Solution Structure of a Telomeric DNA Complex of Human TRF1
Structure of Bax  Motoshi Suzuki, Richard J. Youle, Nico Tjandra  Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 2, Issue 11, Pages (November 1994)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Solution Structure of the RAIDD CARD and Model for CARD/CARD Interaction in Caspase-2 and Caspase-9 Recruitment  James J Chou, Hiroshi Matsuo, Hanjun.
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Structural Diversity in Integrin/Talin Interactions
Volume 143, Issue 2, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Autoinhibitory Structure of the WW Domain of HYPB/SETD2 Regulates Its Interaction with the Proline-Rich Region of Huntingtin  Yong-Guang Gao, Hui Yang,
ICAT Inhibits β-Catenin Binding to Tcf/Lef-Family Transcription Factors and the General Coactivator p300 Using Independent Structural Modules  Danette.
Phosphatidylinositol 3-Phosphate Recognition by the FYVE Domain
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Structural Basis for Recognition of Diubiquitins by NEMO
Volume 94, Issue 6, Pages (September 1998)
Structural Determinants of Integrin Recognition by Talin
The Structure of the β-Catenin/E-Cadherin Complex and the Molecular Basis of Diverse Ligand Recognition by β-Catenin  Andrew H. Huber, William I. Weis 
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2009)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Thomas A Graham, Wilson K Clements, David Kimelman, Wenqing Xu 
Backbone Dynamics of the 18
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Structure and Interactions of PAS Kinase N-Terminal PAS Domain
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Protein–Protein Communication: Structural Model of the Repression Complex Formed by CytR and the Global Regulator CRP  Birgitte H Kallipolitis, Mads Nørregaard-Madsen,
Characterization of Structure, Dynamics, and Detergent Interactions of the Anti-HIV Chemokine Variant 5P12-RANTES  Maciej Wiktor, Oliver Hartley, Stephan.
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
A Plug Release Mechanism for Membrane Permeation by MLKL
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
The Mad2 Spindle Checkpoint Protein Undergoes Similar Major Conformational Changes Upon Binding to Either Mad1 or Cdc20  Xuelian Luo, Zhanyun Tang, Josep.
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Autoinhibitory Structure of the WW Domain of HYPB/SETD2 Regulates Its Interaction with the Proline-Rich Region of Huntingtin  Yong-Guang Gao, Hui Yang,
Three-Dimensional Structure of the Complexin/SNARE Complex
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 110, Issue 5, Pages 587-597 (September 2002) A Structural Mechanism of Integrin αIIbβ3 “Inside-Out” Activation as Regulated by Its Cytoplasmic Face  Olga Vinogradova, Algirdas Velyvis, Asta Velyviene, Bin Hu, Thomas A. Haas, Edward F. Plow, Jun Qin  Cell  Volume 110, Issue 5, Pages 587-597 (September 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00906-6

Figure 1 Sequences of Integrin αIIb/β3 Tails and Their Interaction (A) Primary sequences of the αIIb and β3 tails and their alignment with other integrins. Highly conserved residues involved in the membrane-proximal interface are indicated by red (identical) and pink (similar). (B) Expanded region of HSQC spectra of 15N-labeled αIIb in the absence (blue) and presence (red) of the unlabeled β3 tail. Residue labels correspond to free αIIb cytoplasmic tail. (C) Expanded region of HSQC spectra of 15N-labeled β3 tail in the absence (blue) and presence (red) of the unlabeled αIIb tail. Residue labels underlined indicate significant changes upon αIIb/β3 interaction. Asterisks indicate signals from His tag. Cell 2002 110, 587-597DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00906-6)

Figure 2 Summary of Spectral Perturbation for αIIb/β3 and β3/Talin-H Interactions (A) Chemical shift changes of the αIIb tail upon binding to β3 tail. The change of each residue was calculated based on a sum of absolute values of 1H and 15N chemical shift changes in Hz. (B) Chemical shift changes of the β3 tail upon binding to αIIb tail. (C) Difference between 13Cα shifts of each residue of the free β3 tail in water and the corresponding random coil value. The large positive values of the Cα shift differences in the I721–A737 of the β3 tail indicate that this region is predominantly α-helical (Spera and Bax, 1991). The helix is well defined upon binding to αIIb (see the structure in Figure 4). (D) Chemical shift changes for the β3 tail upon binding to talin-H. The three-dot triangles for I719–T720 indicate that the signals underwent substantial change upon talin binding and disappeared due to either large chemical shift change or line broadening. The asterisk indicates the change of the N744 side chain. Cell 2002 110, 587-597DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00906-6)

Figure 3 Spectroscopic Evidence for αIIb/β3 Tail Interaction (A) Intermolecular NOEs between αIIb and 15N/13C-labeled β3 tail fused to MBP (mixing time 250 ms). The asterisk peak appears to be the NOE between MBP and maltose ligand, which was also observed in the control experiment (see B). (B) Control experiment showing no corresponding intermolecular NOEs between αIIb and 15N/13C-labeled MBP. (C) Spectral overlay of HSQC spectra for β3 cytoplasmic tail fused to His-tag (black) and β3 cytoplasmic tail fused to MBP (red) collected at 500 Mhz, 25°C (pH 6.5). The signals of β3 tail in both forms are essentially superimposable, although those from MBP-β3 are much broader due to the large size of fusion MBP (42 kDa). Many signals from MBP are too broad to be observed at 25°C. Most of the signals from His-tag (20 aa) of β3 cytoplasmic tail are exchanged with water at pH 6.5 and only a few of them are observed (indicated by arrows). (D) 2D NOESY spectra of free αIIb tail (red); αIIb tail in the presence of MBP (blue, control experiment showing no transferred NOEs); αIIb tail mutant (F992A) (orange); and αIIb tail mutant (R992D) (green) in the presence of MBP-β3 showing that the mutations diminished the transferred NOE effect. Slight chemical shift changes occur due to mutations. (E) 2D NOESY spectrum of αIIb tail in the presence of MBP-β3. Substantial transferred NOEs appear as compared to (D), indicating that αIIb tail is bound to β3 tail fused to MBP. The zoomed region shows some long-range NOEs. The region was plotted at lower contour levels to reveal weak NOEs. Mixing time for each spectrum in (D) and (E) was 400 ms. Cell 2002 110, 587-597DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00906-6)

Figure 4 Structural Illustration of αIIbβ3 Tail Complex and Binding Interface (A) Backbone superposition of 20 best structures of the αIIb/β3 tail complex. (B) Backbone ribbon diagram of αIIb/β3 tail complex structure in the same view as (A). The figure was generated by the program MOLMOL (Koradi et al., 1996). (C) Expanded view of the αIIb/β3 binding interface showing the hydrophobic and electrostatic interfaces. Cell 2002 110, 587-597DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00906-6)

Figure 5 Talin-H Binds to the β3 Tail and Activates αIIbβ3 (A) Talin-H activates purified αIIbβ3 in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, the control protein BSA had little effect on the αIIbβ3 activation state. Talin and purified, resting αIIbβ3 (6.6 μg) were added to wells coated with mAb AP3 to the receptor. After an overnight incubation, the wells were washed, and 125I-fibrinogen (300 nM) was added. After an additional 4 hr, the wells were washed and counted for radioactivity. The 125I-fibrinogen binding to αIIbβ3 was normalized with the resting state integrin activity (no fibrinogen binding) as 1.0. (B) Expanded region of HSQC spectrum of the 15N-labeled β3 in the absence (blue) and presence (red) of talin-H (see also Figure 2D). Substantial line broadening occurs due to the binding to large-sized talin-H. The inserted region denotes the side chain region showing perturbed N744 side chain. (C) 2D NOESY of αIIb tail in the presence of MBP-β3 (red) and in the presence of both MBP-β3 and talin-H (blue), showing that talin-H perturbs the αIIb/β3 tail interaction and abolishes the transferred NOE effect. Cell 2002 110, 587-597DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00906-6)

Figure 6 A Model for Talin-Induced Integrin Activation Upon agonist stimulation, talin undergoes a conformational change that exposes the talin head domain and binds to the β3 tail. The β3/talin-H interaction displaces the αIIb/β3 tail interaction, leading to the opening of the C-terminal stalks and conformational rearrangement of the headpiece for high-affinity ligand binding. The αIIb/β3 transmembrane helices in the figure were extended manually from the structures of αIIb and β3 tails, respectively, by using InsightII program (Molecular Simulation, Inc.). Cell 2002 110, 587-597DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00906-6)