DISCO-mcDESPOT Nov. 6, 2011 Jason Su.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
July 31, 2013 Jason Su. Background and Tools Cramér-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) Automatic Differentiation (AD) Applications in Parameter Mapping Evaluating.
Advertisements

Are our results reliable enough to support a conclusion?
Journal Club: mcDESPOT with B0 & B1 Inhomogeneity.
Segment 3 Introduction to Random Variables - or - You really do not know exactly what is going to happen George Howard.
Mathematics in Today's World
More MR Fingerprinting
Relaxometry & Image Processing Technical Update Clinical Findings/Product Need Competitive Info Recommendations T1 (DESPOT1 and LL) parameter fitting via.
MSmcDESPOT A look at the road behind and ahead October 30, 2009.
MSmcDESPOT: Follow-Ups November 1, Where We Are Baseline cross-section conclusions: – DVF is sensitive to early stages of MS where other measures.
Graphs of the form y = x n for n ≥ 1. Graphs of the form y = x n all go through the point (1, 1) The even powers, y = x 2, x 4, x 6 … also go through.
Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Characteristics of Cherenkov light at low momenta (180 < p < 280 MeV/c) 2. Layout and characterization of the neutron beam.
1 Psych 5500/6500 The t Test for a Single Group Mean (Part 5): Outliers Fall, 2008.
MSmcDESPOT: Baseline vs. 1- year Diagnosis. N008 Baseline SPGR.
EE369C Final Project: Accelerated Flip Angle Sequences Jan 9, 2012 Jason Su.
Graphs of the form y = x n for n ≥ 0. Graphs of the form y = x n all go through the point (1, 1) The even powers, y = x 0, x 2, x 4 … also go through.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
J OURNAL C LUB : Lankford and Does. On the Inherent Precision of mcDESPOT. Jul 23, 2012 Jason Su.
A CCELERATED V ARIABLE F LIP A NGLE T 1 M APPING VIA V IEW S HARING OF P SEUDO -R ANDOM S AMPLED H IGHER O RDER K-S PACE J.Su 1, M.Saranathan 1, and B.K.Rutt.
MSmcDESPOT A Brief Summary April 2, The Technique mcDESPOT (multi-component driven equilibrium single pulse observation of T1/T2) is a quantitative.
Experiment in PS G. Franchetti, GSI CERN, 20-21/5/ /05/14G. Franchetti1.
Optimal Bayes Classification
J OURNAL C LUB : Deoni et al. One Component? Two Components? Three? The Effect of Including a Nonexchanging ‘‘Free’’ Water Component in mcDESPOT. Jan 14,
Checks with the Fourier Method A. Cerri. Outline Description of the tool Validation devices –“lifetime fit” –Pulls Toy Montecarlo –Ingredients –Comparison.
Optimal Design with Automatic Differentiation: Exploring Unbiased Steady-State Relaxometry Jan 13, 2014 Jason Su.
Regression Analysis: Part 2 Inference Dummies / Interactions Multicollinearity / Heteroscedasticity Residual Analysis / Outliers.
J OURNAL C LUB : Lin and Song. (Philips and UPenn) Improved Signal Spoiling in Fast Radial Gradient-Echo Imaging: Applied to Accurate T1 Mapping and Flip.
Texture Synthesis by Image Quilting CS766 Class Project Fall 2004 Eric Robinson.
P025 MPRAGE Pre-Contrast. P025 MPRAGE w/ Z-Score < -4.
In your groups, go through all four steps of a confidence interval: The “Country Taste” bread making company wants to estimate the actual weight of their.
A CCELERATED V ARIABLE F LIP A NGLE T 1 M APPING VIA V IEW S HARING OF P SEUDO -R ANDOM S AMPLED H IGHER O RDER K-S PACE J.Su 1, M.Saranathan 1, and B.K.Rutt.
Phase-Cycled SSFP Accelerated via DISCO May 31, 2012 Jason Su.
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Using the T-test Topic 1.
CS 591 S1 – Computational Audio
Fisher Information Matrix of DESPOT
Searching for pulsars using the Hough transform
Examining mcDESPOT Mar 12, 2013 Jason Su.
Liquidpope’s Truck Tire Tread Tutorial
Linear Filters and Edges Chapters 7 and 8
Dimension Review Many of the geometric structures generated by chaotic map or differential dynamic systems are extremely complex. Fractal : hard to define.
Fuzzy verification using the Fractions Skill Score
Error Correcting Code.
Accuracy Assessment of Thematic Maps
Dome C, Antarctica 2012.
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Setting significance levels at the correct level
Introduction to Summary Statistics
Sampling Distribution of the Sample Mean
Are our results reliable enough to support a conclusion?
BSSFP Simulations The goal of these simulations is to show the effect of noise on different pcSSFP reconstruction schemes Further examine the uniformity.
Estimating with Confidence
ISMRM 2012 Prelim. Abstracts Oct 17, 2011 – Jason Su
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Are our results reliable enough to support a conclusion?
Are our results reliable enough to support a conclusion?
Are our results reliable enough to support a conclusion?
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
CHAPTER 18: Inference about a Population Mean
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Are our results reliable enough to support a conclusion?
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
2/5/ Estimating a Population Mean.
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Chapter 8: Estimating with Confidence
Are our results reliable enough to support a conclusion?
Presentation transcript:

DISCO-mcDESPOT Nov. 6, 2011 Jason Su

Methods In vivo, 3T Possible issue with collection 2mm in-plane resolution 5mm slice resolution Rect 200us SPGR (13 angles from up to 18) and SSFP (13 angles up to 65) Left out B1 correction Running into issues with HIFI producing completely wrong T1 Still some work to do incorporating Ives’s Bloch-Siegert -> kappa map code into pipeline Possible issue with collection May need more samples on low end of SPGR signal curve, was enough for DESPOT1 but perhaps not mcDESPOT, only 1-2 points before Ernst angle

Results Performance is mixed for the different output maps Overall good performance with T1 Worse performance with T2, probably because bands caused by off-resonance affect high-freq. k-space MWF % difference histogram is poor but looks decent, could be a dividing by small numbers issue Stochastic nature of optimization makes interpretation difficult, i.e. how much variation is due to randomness or view sharing?

MWF – offline.recon

MWF – DISCO

MWF – % Difference Mean: 11.3056 SD: 75.637

Fast T1 – offline.recon

Fast T1 – DISCO

Fast T1 – % Difference Mean: -0.75528 SD: 11.4194

Slow T1 – offline.recon

Slow T1 – DISCO

Slow T1 – % Difference Mean: -0.84407 SD: 10.024

Fast T2 – offline.recon

Fast T2 – DISCO

Fast T2 – % Difference Mean: 1.9265 SD: 31.8879

Slow T2 – offline.recon

Slow T2 – DISCO

Slow T2 – % Difference Mean: -0.34274 SD: 12.2981

Off-Resonance – offline.recon

Off-Resonance – DISCO Pattern shift is quite apparent here, I suspect because DISCO is losing a lot of the information that happens at the banding edges

Off-Resonance – % Difference Mean: 10.7222 SD: 105.1012 The histogram is clearly non-Gaussian, more reason to believe that this is a particularly affected map. Large SD is due to large tail on + side not shown in histogram.

Residence Time – offline.recon

Residence Time – DISCO

Residence Time – % Difference Mean: 0.0097232 SD: 16.17

More Images From the performance in T1 mapping, we know that our SPGRs are fairly high-fidelity SSFPs are probably the source of error The first flip angle is again problematic In the future, should probably start with improving DESPOT-FM performance, much easier to look at

SSFP fa5 – offline.recon

SSFP fa5 – DISCO

SSFP fa5 – % Difference