Nebraska Supreme Court rules on interpreters Additions & Amendments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Allegation An allegation may be submitted by : Any Person. An allegation may be filed with the PLSB through: The Department of Education A Public.
Advertisements

Alabama Real Estate License Law & The REALTORS Code of Ethics
Your Community Association Partner Community Association Meetings: Owner Meetings & Board Meetings Trish Harris April 5, 2014.
2007 Annual Conference Professional Discipline Ruby E. Brice, J.D. S.C. Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation.
Grand Jury Practice and Indictments
Mid-America Regulatory Conference Kansas City, Missouri June 8, 2010.
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
Student Code of Conduct Revision Process Student Code of Conduct Committee Assistant principals, parents, interventionists, AEA representatives.
The Judicial Branch. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
 "Judicial agency" means the district court and officers thereof, including the judge, the prosecutor, and the clerk of court, the Crime Victims Reparations.
The New Mediation Regulation October 16, 2012 Commissioner Derrick L. Williams.
Pro Hac Vice & the Unauthorized Practice of Law Kevin D. Balkwill, TBA UPL Committee Chair.
Aging.ohio.gov/services/ombudsman Guardianship in Ohio Ombudsman Continuing Education.
Driving While Impaired
THE BILL OF COSTS JULY 2014 Ted Wood Assistant General Counsel Office of Court Administration (512) (512)
Nor-Cal EMS. What’s on fire this time? Assembly Bill-2917 Passed in 2008, authored by Assembly Member Alberto Torrico, 20th District, Fremont area. Passed.
Florida Real Estate Principles, Practices & Law 38th Edition
CFP Board’s Disciplinary Rules and Procedures. Topic 78: CFP Board’s Disciplinary Rules and Procedures Learning Objectives Identify the grounds for disciplining.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 4 Diversion and Probation: How Most Offenders Are Punished 1.
Starring: Ofelia Calderón, Esq. – Calderón Seguin, as Immigration Judge Ivan Yacub, Esq. – Yacub Law Offices, LLC as Private Immigration Counsel Edward.
E. DISCIPLINE THE DISCIPLINARY SYSTEM IN MISSOURI  Structure: 4 S.Ct.- appointed agencies  Advisory Committee (AC) (state-wide jur.)  at least 6 lawyers.
1 ICAOS 2008 Rule Amendment Presentation for Deputy Compact Administrators & Compact Office Staff Presented by:
IFTA DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS AMENDMENT PROPOSALS Present by Rick LaRose, Chair Dispute Resolution Committee Annual IFTA Business Meeting July 18-19,
Chapter 10 Trustees, Examiners & Creditors Committees.
The Judicial Branch Unit 5. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
CROSS TRAINING PRESENTATION OFFICE OF JUDICIAL AFFAIRS Presented By: K.R. Kennedy Associate Vice President Student Development DAYTONA STATE COLLEGE.
ICAOS Mini Training Probable Cause Process Rule Presented by: Training Committee [Revision 5/30/2014] Be Ready for a Test at the End.
An Introduction to the ABCD For the Casualty Actuarial Society Course on Professionalism Copyright © 2015 American of Academy of Actuaries. All Rights.
STATE BUILDING CODE Board of Appeals & Construction Supervisor License Complaints From the Denial Letter or Complaint From the Denial Letter or Complaint.
Indigent Representation Fund Pam Hancock, Fiscal Services Director Administrative Office of the Courts Rule 13 and Pertinent Tennessee Statutes David Byrne,
The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Ethical Decision Making from A – Z & Protocol for Prosecution of Cases Before the Regulatory Board.
P.O.S.T. SANCTIONING and HEARING PROCESS. Timeline MUST REPORT WITHIN15 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF INFRACTION OR DISCIPLINARY ACTION.
Fall  Alternative Enforcement : The City of Mankato has established an Administrative Enforcement and Hearing Program as an enforcement option.
Article III: The Judicial Branch Chapters: 11,12
Changes to Chapter 8 of the Code of Ordinances May 10,
Regulation and Discipline. LAWYER’S ROLES Representative of the client Officer of the court Public citizen.
LEGAL BACKGROUND …reasonable cause to know or suspect that a child has been subjected to abuse or neglect or who has observed the child being subjected.
GETTING STARTED: Notices of appeal & the initial appellate documents.
Criminal Justice Process: The Investigation
TOPICS – THIS SESSION Domestic Enquiry Principles of Natural Justice
Videoconferencing for Juvenile Detention Hearings
Outline of the U.S. and Arizona Criminal Justice Systems
The Changing World of Guardianships
Mandatory Child Abuse Reporting
Code of Ethics and Ethics Panel
Fair Justice for All – Implementation of Recommendations
VITAL STATISTICS CONFERENCE 2013
Florida Real Estate Principles, Practices & Law 39th Edition
Prosecution Process.
Municipal Code Amendment Suspension of Utility Services for Violation of Specified Code Sections of the Pasadena Municipal Code City Council May 15,
Crouse Health Hospital
Jury System.
Responding to and Resolving Complaints against Interpreters
Dependency Court Flowchart
Harassment and Discrimination
ENROLLEE DUE PROCESS for Medicaid Managed CARE 42 CFR § 438 et seq.
Idaho Sign Language Interpreter Licensure
Texas Secretary of State Elections Division
Judicial Proceedings & The Media
Mandatory Child Abuse Reporting
CHALLENGES TO VOTER REGISTRATION APPLICATIONS AND REGISTERED VOTERS
JUVENILE RECORDS Leslie Barrett Kinkead Court Improvement Program
Mandatory Child Abuse Reporting
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
DFS Contested Case Hearing Process
Initial Licensure Process, Survey Types & Licensure Action
Panel Discussion on Hearings Case Management Projects
Harassment and Discrimination
Defending the Family in the Fight Against Criminal and Civil Protection Orders – Collaborating to Keep Families Together Jill Gookin, Esq.
Presentation transcript:

Nebraska Supreme Court rules on interpreters Additions & Amendments Drafted and recommended by the Supreme court language access committee approved and adopted by the Nebraska supreme court ~ December 12, 2018.

Rule § 6-704. Examination for interpreter certification In order to protect the integrity of court proceedings and the safety of the public, a court interpreter should be one whose record of conduct justifies the trust of the courts, witnesses, jurors, attorneys, parties, and the public. Rule § 6-704. Examination for interpreter certification

Examination for Interpreter Certification Supreme court rule § 6-704 additions and amendments

Upon application for the interpreter written examination after successful completion of interpreter orientation, the applicant shall execute a criminal history record check release form, and the state court administrator will evaluate the application and conduct a criminal background check to verify the absence of criminal convictions and/or pending charges. Rule § 6-704(B)(2). Examination for interpreter certification

Impediments to Certification Rules § 6-704(B)(2) and § 6-704(C) Examination for interpreter certification Felony Conviction: SHALL warrant denial of participation within the certification program, or removal from the roster of court interpreters. Misdemeanor Conviction in Preceding 5 years: manifesting a significant deficiency in the honesty, trustworthiness, diligence, or reliability of an applicant MAY warrant denial of participation within the certification program, or removal from the roster of court interpreters. Revocation or suspension of court interpreter certification in any other jurisdiction: WILL preclude certification as a Nebraska court interpreter.

Certified & Provisionally Certified Court Interpreter Requirements Supreme court rules § 6-705 and 6-706 additions and amendments

Had no past felony convictions or pending felony criminal charges Had no past felony convictions or pending felony criminal charges. Disposition of any felony charges less than 5 years in the past other than by acquittal or dismissal (e.g., pretrial diversion) shall be the basis for denial of certification.

In the preceding 5 years had no misdemeanor convictions or pending charges manifesting a significant deficiency in honesty, trustworthiness, diligence, or reliability. Disposition of misdemeanor charges manifesting a significant deficiency in honesty, trustworthiness, diligence, or reliability less than 5 years in the past other than by acquittal or dismissal (e.g., pretrial diversion) may be the basis for denial of certification

Registered Court Interpreter Requirements Supreme court rule § 6-707 additions and amendments

Had no past felony convictions or pending felony criminal charges Had no past felony convictions or pending felony criminal charges. In addition, in the preceding 5 years had no misdemeanor convictions or pending charges manifesting a significant deficiency in honesty, trustworthiness, diligence, or reliability. § 6-707(B)(2). Registered court interpreter requirements

Disposition of any felony charges or those misdemeanor charges less than 5 years in the past other than by acquittal or dismissal (e.g., pretrial diversion) shall be the basis for denial of registered court interpreter status § 6-707(B)(2). Registered court interpreter requirements

Investigation of complaints & imposition of sanctions Supreme court rule § 6-708 additions and amendments

state court administrator’s complete and continuing discretion In order to protect the integrity of court proceedings and the safety of the public, the Supreme Court authorizes the State Court Administrator to investigate complaints and impose sanctions.

Policy statement: The opportunity to provide interpreter services to the courts under the direction of the state court administrator is at the administrator’s complete and continuing discretion because of the critical reliance the courts must have on the skills, performance, and integrity of the interpreter in performing duties for the court this discretion applies to any interpreter who is certified or registered with the administrative office of the court. A court interpreter should be one whose record of conduct justifies the trust of the courts, witnesses, jurors, attorneys, parties, and the public.

Grounds for Imposition of Sanctions Supreme court rule § 6-708 additions and amendments

Any of the following may be grounds for imposition of sanctions against a certified or registered interpreter: Unprofessional or unethical conduct that violates the Code of Professional Responsibility Conviction of any felony criminal charge. Conviction, within the past 5 years, of a misdemeanor criminal charge manifesting a significant deficiency in honesty, trustworthiness, diligence, or reliability. Dispositions of either felony or misdemeanor criminal charges other than by acquittal or dismissal (e.g., pretrial diversion), or the filing of a probation violation or the revocation of probation may also constitute grounds for suspension or revocation

Additional grounds for possible imposition of sanctions against a certified or registered interpreter: Incompetence as an interpreter Failure to report in writing to the Statewide Language Access Coordinator any misdemeanor or felony charge, or motion to revoke probation within 5 business days. Failure to report in writing to the Statewide Language Access Coordinator within 5 business days any revocation or suspension of certification as a court interpreter in any other jurisdiction

Investigation and Notification of Grounds for Imposition of Sanctions Supreme court rule § 6-708(b) additions and amendments

Upon receipt and initial investigation of any such complaint, if the State Court Administrator determines formal action is necessary, the Administrator may take any of the following formal actions: Dismiss the complaint Allow the interpreter to retain certification for the pendency of the process and schedule a hearing to consider the complaint; or  Immediately suspend the certification of the interpreter and schedule a hearing to consider the complaint Supreme court rule § 6-708(B) additions and amendments

State Court Administrator actions: In any case where the State Court Administrator deems a hearing necessary, written notice of the complaint shall be sent by certified mail to the interpreter, and that interpreter shall have 15 days to file a written response with the Office of the State Court Administrator. In any case where the State Court Administrator dismisses the complaint, written notice of the complaint and notice of its dismissal shall be sent by certified mail to the interpreter and the complainant.

Scheduling of Hearing If the State Court Administrator elects to schedule a hearing: Hearing shall be held within 45 days of the receipt of interpreter's written response A panel of three Language Access Committee members appointed by the LAC Chair shall be responsible for the conduct of the hearing One Judge , one certified interpreter, and one court staff

Conduct of Hearing The hearing panel shall receive such information and/or documentation as it sees fit, including, if deemed appropriate by the panel, the taking of testimony. The rules of evidence do not apply to these hearings, and the interpreter is not entitled to representation by counsel. At the conclusion of the hearing, the panel shall within 45 days of the date of the hearing recommend in writing to the State Court Administrator any § 6-708(E) sanctions it determines appropriate.

Sanctions may be imposed: If the State Court Administrator, based upon the information and documentation provided in the complaint, the interpreter’s response, and the hearing panel recommendation, determines sufficient cause exists, The State Court Administrator may within 45 days of receipt of the Hearing Panel’s recommendation impose one or more of the following sanctions in order to protect the integrity of court proceedings and the safety of the public:

Possible sanctions under rule § 6-708: Issue a written reprimand Specify corrective action with which the interpreter must fully comply in order to remain on the statewide register of interpreters, including the completion of educational courses and/or re-taking one or more parts of the legal interpreting competency examination Suspend the interpreter from serving as an interpreter in the Nebraska courts or Probation Services for a specified period of time, or until corrective action is completed; Revoke the standing of and permanently prohibit the interpreter from serving as an interpreter in Nebraska courts or Probation Services

No interpreter who has been suspended or revoked shall be utilized as an interpreter in any state judicial proceeding in the state of Nebraska, nor shall such interpreter be entitled to any compensation from the state court administrator’s office, during his or her suspension or revocation. Supreme Court Rule § 6-708(F) additions and amendments

New Supreme court rule § 6-710 Recommended by Nebraska Supreme Court Language Access Committee, Adopted by the Nebraska Supreme Court on December 12, 2018 CRIMINAL HISTORY & REVOCATION OR SUSPENSION OF CERTIFICATION REPORTING REQUIREMENT.

Rule § 6-710 Requirements: Any applicant seeking certification or registration as a Nebraska court interpreter must report in writing to the Statewide Language Access Coordinator any misdemeanor or felony charge or conviction incurred during the course of the certification process. All certified, provisionally certified, registered, or other interpreters on the Nebraska court interpreter roster shall report in writing to the Statewide Language Access Coordinator any misdemeanor or felony charge or conviction, or motion to revoke probation within 5 days and shall acknowledge this responsibility on their biannual Continuing Education Report form. Any certified, provisionally certified, registered, or other interpreter on the Nebraska court interpreter roster who fails to report in writing to the Statewide Language Access Coordinator any misdemeanor or felony charge or conviction, or motion to revoke probation within 5 days may be subject to imposition of sanctions pursuant to § 6-708.

Requirements, continued: All certified, provisionally certified, registered, or other interpreters on the Nebraska court interpreter roster shall report in writing to the statewide language access coordinator any: Revocation or suspension of certification as a court interpreter in any other jurisdiction; Acts that indicate abuse of or disrespect for the judicial process.

Consequences: Any certified, provisionally certified, registered, or other interpreter on the Nebraska court interpreter roster who fails to report in writing to the Statewide Language Access Coordinator any revocation or suspension of certification in any other jurisdiction or acts that indicate abuse of or disrespect of the judicial process within 30 days may be subject to imposition of sanctions pursuant to Rule § 6-708.

For more information: Review all the Supreme Court Rules on Interpreters in Court here https://supremecourt.nebraska.gov/supreme-court-rules/chapter-6-trial-courts/article- 7-interpreters-court Email Statewide Language Access Coordinator Jennifer Verhein jennifer.Verhein@Nebraska.gov Email Nebraska Court Interpreter Coordinators NSC.Interpreters@Nebraska.gov