MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Advertisements

Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May F. Willeke, DESY.
V.N. Litvinenko, ElC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, May, 2008 Staging of eRHIC Increased Reach in c.m. Energy and Luminosity Vladimir.
Brain Gestorme: Status of the LHeC Ring-Ring / Linac- Ring Basic Parameters I appologise to talk about things you already know...
Kevin Jordan Beam Diagnostics Collaboration Meeting 3/18/15 MEIC Design Overview.
Toward a Test Facility for an ERL Circulator Ring Based e-Cooler MEIC Electron Cooler Test Facility Planning Retreat January 31, 2012.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Polarized Proton Acceleration and Collisions Spin dynamics and Siberian Snakes Polarized proton acceleration.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
ERHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring V.Ptitsyn, J.Kewisch, B.Parker, S.Peggs, D.Trbojevic, BNL, USA D.E.Berkaev, I.A.Koop, A.V.Otboev, Yu.M.Shatunov,
MEIC Overview and Pre-Project R&D Fulvia Pilat MEIC Collaboration Meeting March
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
Progress on Design Studies of a High-Luminosity Ring-Ring Electron-Ion Collider at CEBAF and Its Low to Medium Energy Staging Approach* S. A. Bogacz, P.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Calculation of Beam Equilibrium and Luminosities for
MEIC Design Update Fulvia Pilat POETIC 2015 September
Primary estimation of CEPC beam dilution and beam halo
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS
Space Charge Effect Simulation Using DA Based FMM and Electron Cooling Simulation for JLab’s MEIC Project.
eRHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS/i-RCS
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring 2017
Accelerator and Interaction Region
JLEIC ELECTRON COOLING SIMULATION
Simulation check of main parameters (wd )
Low Energy Electron-Ion Collision
Polarized Positrons in JLEIC
Sawtooth effect in CEPC PDR/APDR
Injection design of CEPC
JLEIC Reaching 140 GeV CM Energy: Concept and Luminosity Estimate
MEIC New Baseline: Part 10
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
Ion bunch formation options for 400GeV JLEIC
JLEIC 200 GeV Ion Injector Chain and Bunch Formation
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
Beam Beam effects for JLEIC
Summary of Working Group 1
Deuteron and Small Aperture
HE-JLEIC: Boosting Luminosity at High Energy
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Alternative Ion Injector Design
Update on Crab Cavity Simulations for JLEIC
JLEIC Main Parameters with Strong Electron Cooling
Non-pairwise Collision
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Progress Update on the Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
More on MEIC Beam Synchronization
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
Some Thoughts on the JLEIC Ion Injector
He Zhang, David Douglas, Yuhong Zhang MEIC R&D Meeting, 09/04/2014
MEIC beam path change with e-ring bypass lines
SC Magnets with Small Apertures for JLEIC*
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
Beam Synchronization in MEIC: The Problem, Scale and Prospect
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
HE-JLEIC Luminosity Estimate
Presentation transcript:

MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path

New MEIC Baseline New major components: Energy range: Design points: Electron collider ring: PEP-II magnet Ion collider ring: super-ferric magnet Ring circumference: ~2200 km Single booster ring: 285 MeV to 8 GeV Electron ring RF: PEP-II, 476 MHz (to be decided) Energy range: Electron: 3 to 12 GeV Proton: (8) 20 to 100 GeV Lead ions: ? to 40 GeV Design points: Low energy: 30 GeV x 4 GeV (space charge dominated) Medium energy: 85 GeV x 6 GeV (beam-beam dominated) High energy: 100 GeV x 8 GeV (synchrotron radiation dominated) (another set? (20x3), 50x5, 100x5, 100x10, proton 50x5 deuterium, 67x10 He3, 40x5 Pb, 40x10 Pb )

Low Energy (Ecm~21.9 GeV) Point Parameters Detector type Full acceptance Large Acceptance Proton Electron Beam energy GeV 30 4 Collision frequency MHz 750 Particles per bunch 1010 0.37 2.5 Beam Current A 0.44 3 Polarization % > 70 ~ 80 RMS bunch length cm 1.2 emittance, normalized µm rad 0.35 / 0.12 74 / 24.7 Horizontal and vertical β* 6 / 2 6.9 / 2.3 4 / 0.8 2.8 / 0.93 Spot size at IP, horiz. and vert. µm 25.6 / 8.5 16.2 / 5.4 Vertical beam-beam tune shift 0.013 0.017 Laslett tune shift 0.06 Very small Distance from IP to 1st FF quad m 7 3.5 4.5 Hour-glass effect 0.77 0.51 Luminosity per IP, 1033 cm-2s-1 1.9 3.1 Slide 3 3

Medium Energy (Ecm~45.2 GeV) Point Parameters Detector type Full acceptance Large Acceptance Proton Electron Beam energy GeV 85 6 Collision frequency MHz 750 Particles per bunch 1010 0.42 2.5 Beam Current A 0.5 3 Polarization % > 70 ~ 80 RMS bunch length cm 2 1.2 emittance, normalized µm rad 0.3 / 0.06 130 / 26 0.35 / 0.06 Horizontal and vertical β* 10 / 2 7.5 / 1.5 6 / 1.2 4 / 0.8 Spot size at IP, horiz. and vert. µm 18.2 / 3.6 28.8 / 5.8 14.2 / 2.8 21 / 4.2 Vertical beam-beam tune shift 0.007 0.03 0.008 0.027 Laslett tune shift 0.028 Very small Distance from IP to 1st FF quad m 7 3.5 4.5 Hour-glass effect 0.85 0.71 Luminosity per IP, 1033 cm-2s-1 4.6 6.9 Slide 4 4

High Energy (Ecm~56.6 GeV) Point Parameters Detector type Full acceptance Large Acceptance Proton Electron Beam energy GeV 100 8 Collision frequency MHz 750 Particles per bunch 1010 0.42 1.46 Beam Current A 0.5 1.75 Polarization % > 70 ~ 80 RMS bunch length cm 2 1.2 emittance, normalized µm rad 0.45 / 0.09 290 / 58 Horizontal and vertical β* 10 / 2 7.5 / 1.5 6 / 1.2 4 / 0.8 Spot size at IP, horiz. and vert. µm 20.6 / 4.1 37.3 / 7.5 15.9 / 3.2 27.2 / 5.4 Vertical beam-beam tune shift 0.002 0.018 Laslett tune shift 0.02 Very small Distance from IP to 1st FF quad m 7 3.5 4.5 Hour-glass effect 0.85 0.7 Luminosity per IP, 1033 cm-2s-1 1.7 2.6 Slide 5 5

Reusing PEPP-II RF: 748 MHz  476 MHZ Number of bunches in the ring is reduced by 36% Same current, bunch intensity is increased by 36% Same current, beam-beam parameter is increased by 36% To the first order, In a beam-beam limited parameter regime, the luminosity is decreased by 36% In a non-beam-beam-limited parameter regime, the luminosity is increased by 36%

Low Energy (Ecm~21.9 GeV) Point Parameters @ 476 MHz Detector type Full acceptance Large Acceptance Proton Electron Beam energy GeV 30 4 Collision frequency MHz 476 Particles per bunch 1010 0.37 2.8 2.9 Beam Current A 0.28 2.1 2.2 Polarization % > 70 ~ 80 RMS bunch length cm 1.2 emittance, normalized µm rad 0.35 / 0.12 74 / 24.7 Horizontal and vertical β* 6 / 2 6.9 / 2.3 4 / 0.8 2.8 / 0.93 Spot size at IP, horiz. and vert. µm 25.6 / 8.5 16.2 / 5.4 Vertical beam-beam tune shift 0.015 0.017 Laslett tune shift 0.06 Very small Distance from IP to 1st FF quad m 7 3.5 4.5 Hour-glass effect 0.77 0.51 Luminosity per IP, 1033 cm-2s-1 1.35 2.3 Slide 7 7

Medium Energy (Ecm~45.2 GeV) Point Parameters @ 476 MHz Detector type Full acceptance Large Acceptance Proton Electron Beam energy GeV 85 6 Collision frequency MHz 476 Particles per bunch 1010 0.66 3.9 Beam Current A 0.5 3 Polarization % > 70 ~ 80 RMS bunch length cm 2 1.2 emittance, normalized µm rad 0.3 / 0.06 130 / 26 0.35 / 0.12 74 / 24.7 Horizontal and vertical β* 10 / 2 7.5 / 1.5 6 / 1.2 4 / 0.8 Spot size at IP, horiz. and vert. µm 18.2 / 3.6 28.8 / 5.8 14.2 / 2.8 21 / 4.2 Vertical beam-beam tune shift 0.011 0.047 0.042 Laslett tune shift 0.028 Very small Distance from IP to 1st FF quad m 7 3.5 4.5 Hour-glass effect 0.85 0.71 Luminosity per IP, 1033 cm-2s-1 7.1 10.8 Slide 8 8

High Energy (Ecm~56.6 GeV) Point Parameters @ 476 MHz Detector type Full acceptance Large Acceptance Proton Electron Beam energy GeV 100 8 Collision frequency MHz 476 Particles per bunch 1010 0.66 2.3 Beam Current A 0.5 1.75 1.46 Polarization % 70 ~ 80 > 70 RMS bunch length cm 2 1.2 emittance, normalized µm rad 0.45 / 0.09 290 / 58 Horizontal and vertical β* 10 / 2 7.5 / 1.5 6 / 1.2 4 / 0.8 Spot size at IP, horiz. and vert. µm 20.6 / 4.1 37.3 / 7.5 15.9 / 3.2 27.2 / 5.4 Vertical beam-beam tune shift 0.003 0.028 0.004 0.025 Laslett tune shift 0.02 Very small Distance from IP to 1st FF quad m 7 3.5 4.5 Hour-glass effect 0.85 0.7 Luminosity per IP, 1033 cm-2s-1 2.7 4.0 Slide 9 9

Consideration of MEIC Upgrade Path Present approach First stage baseline (MEIC) up to 100 GeV x 12 GeV (10 years) Energy upgrade (EIC) up to 250 GeV x 20 GeV Alternative approach First stage baseline (MEIC) up to 100 GeV x 10 GeV (5 years) Luminosity upgrade (HL-MEIC) same, luminosity x 3~4 (5 years) Energy upgrade (HE-MEIC=EIC) up to 250 GeV x 14(?) GeV What is the first stage baseline? Very conservative, all based on “ready-to-build” technologies Acceptable starting performance Significant relaxation of the machine design Minimum technical uncertainty and R&D requirement (weak cooling) Minimum cost (PEP-II RF station (476 MHz)

Consideration of MEIC Upgrade Path What constitutes a luminosity upgrade? (A factor of 4) Doubled the bunch repetition rate (476 MHz  952 MHz) Increase of the beam current Reduction of beam emittance (better cooling? Better electron lattice?) Redesign of IR (beta-star reduction by a factor 2?), including DA Unmatched beam size? More aggressive hour-glass effect? A little large beam-beam? Space charge compensation? Electron lens? Small cost (a fraction of energy upgrade cost)

Low Energy (Ecm~21.9GeV) Parameters Detector type: full acceptance Phase 1 Luminosity upgrade Proton Electron Beam energy GeV 30 4 Collision frequency MHz 476 952 Particles per bunch 1010 0.26 3.9 0.43 2.9 Beam Current A 0.2 3 0.65 4.5 Polarization % > 70 ~ 80 70 RMS bunch length cm 2 1.2 emittance, normalized µm rad 0.6 / 0.2 74 / 24.7 0.35 / 0.12 Horizontal and vertical β* 6 / 2 12 / 4 4.2 / 1.4 4.8 / 1.6 Spot size at IP, horiz. and vert. µm 33.6 / 11.2 21.4 / 7.2 Vertical beam-beam tune shift 0.012 0.015 0.019 Laslett tune shift 0.05 Very small 0.062 Distance from IP to 1st FF quad m 7 3.5 Hour-glass effect 0.91 0.67 Luminosity per IP, 1033 cm-2s-1 0.95 3.7 Slide 12 12

Medium Energy (Ecm~45.2 GeV) Parameter Detector type: full acceptance First Stage Luminosity Upgrade Proton Electron Beam energy GeV 85 6 Collision frequency MHz 476 952 Particles per bunch 1010 0.66 2.9 0.79 2.6 Beam Current A 0.5 2.2 1.2 4 Polarization % > 70 ~ 80 RMS bunch length cm 2 emittance, normalized µm rad 0.5 / 0.1 160 / 32 0.4 / 0.08 130 / 26 Horizontal and vertical β* 18.5 / 3.7 7.5 / 1.5 6 / 1.2 9 / 1.8 Spot size at IP, horiz. and vert. µm 32 / 6.6 20 / 4 25.8 / 5.15 Vertical beam-beam tune shift 0.012 0.015 0.008 0.038 Laslett tune shift 0.026 Very small 0.04 Distance from IP to 1st FF quad m 7 3.5 Hour-glass effect 0.87 0.82 Luminosity per IP, 1033 cm-2s-1 3.1 12.1 ~3.9 Slide 13 13

High Energy (Ecm~56.6 GeV) Parameter Detector type: full acceptance First Stage Luminosity Upgrade Proton Electron Beam energy GeV 100 8 Collision frequency MHz 476 Particles per bunch 1010 0.66 2.3 0.92 Beam Current A 0.5 1.75 0.7 Polarization % > 70 ~ 80 RMS bunch length cm 2 1.2 emittance, normalized µm rad 0.6 / 0.12 290 / 58 0.3 / 0.06 180 / 36 Horizontal and vertical β* 25 / 5 7.5 / 1.5 6 / 1.2 Spot size at IP, horiz. and vert. µm 37.5 / 7.5 14.5 / 1.5 26.3 / 5.0 Vertical beam-beam tune shift 0.008 0.005 0.062 Laslett tune shift 0.016 Very small 0.04 Distance from IP to 1st FF quad m 7 3.5 Hour-glass effect 0.89 0.81 Luminosity per IP, 1033 cm-2s-1 1.8 7.2 ~4 Slide 14 14