CMS PDR 101 ICE Presentation 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Independent External Review of Health Care Decisions in Vermont Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Health Care Administration.
Advertisements

Staff Development Emergency Operations 1. Identify 5 purposes of the offender/student grievance process Identify 5 grievable issues Identify 12 non-grievable.
Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield “Serving Hoosier Healthwise” State Sponsored Business Managed Care Forms October 2008 Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield.
2012 CMS Fall Conference Part D Coverage Determinations, Appeals & Grievances (CDAG) Jennifer Smith, Director Division of Appeals Policy Medicare Enrollment.
Issue Identification, Tracking, Escalation, and Resolution.
Mountain-Pacific Quality Health April Benefits Improvement and Protection Act (BIPA) §521 Federal Register, Friday, November 26, CFR
Claims Follow-up Claim Status Balance Billing Appeals.
Medicare Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) Reviews Under the Benefits Improvement and Protection Act §521 Presented by Alabama Quality Assurance Foundation.
© 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Career Education Computers in the Medical Office Chapter 1: The Medical Office.
Copyright © 2008 Delmar Learning. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Life Cycle of an Insurance Claim.
 Presented by Debra A. Pippen-Johnson 1.  In this session we will discuss the Authority’s administrative responsibilities related to a family’s move.
ATTACK of the RAC How to prepare and respond to RAC audits.
Utilization Review Update Durham Center Access February 23, 2011.
Notification of Hospital Discharge Appeal Rights (CMS-4105-F)
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Title: How to Interpret an EOB Session: R
Health Insurance in New York Laura Dillon, Principal Examiner New York Insurance Department Consumer Services Bureau One Commerce Plaza Albany NY
February 2007 Commercial Vehicle Drivers Hours of Service Module 24: Daily Log Audits.
Claims Compliance Analysis Amy Kanter, SBS Auditor Michigan Department of Health and Human Services 2015 SBS Conference – Traverse City, MI August 17 &
Module 13: Claims & Appeals. Module Objectives After this module, you should be able to: Identify claim basics and where to submit claims Recognize who.
NC CFW Expenditure reports How to complete and submit an expenditure report Expenditure reports How to complete and submit an expenditure report.
Looking for Improper Medicare Payments in All the Right Places.
TDCI TennCare Oversight Division Provider Complaint Process A Summary for TennCare Providers April 18, 2013.
HP Provider Relations October 2011 CMS-1500 – Medicare Crossover Claim Billing.
HP Provider Relations October 2011 Medical Review Team.
August 28, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Arbitration Process.
Draft Model Manufacturer Agreement Medicare Coverage Gap Discount Program Public Meeting June 1, 2010.
DOI Complaint Response Timeline Claims Services 2015 This timeline is applicable to DOI Inquiries/Complaints for all states where we do business. The dates.
RESEARCH AND RESOLVE Professional Claim Denials HP Provider Relations/June 2014.
Module 13: Claims & Appeals. 2 Module Objectives After this module, you should be able to: Explain who can file claims and where claims should be submitted.
NAPA COUNTY Conservation Development and Planning Department Code Compliance Flow Chart Building Code Violations 1 COMPLAINT Written complaint (form, letter,
© 2016 Universal Service Administrative Company. All rights reserved Applicant Training Audit Compliance September – November 2016.
Kelli Back, Attorney and APMA Consultant
Presented by: Antony N. Gichia Regional Audit Center Mombasa
The Peer Review Higher Weighted Diagnosis-Related Groups
Module 13: Claims & Appeals
With rosa sanchez pdr coordinator
Issue Codes Claim not on file Claim in process Claim forwarded to
LAKELAND CARE PAYER CONFERENCE OCTOBER 18, 2017
Electronic Data Interchange (EDI)
ENROLLEE DUE PROCESS for Medicaid Managed CARE 42 CFR § 438 et seq.
Welcome to Nebraska Total Care
Coretta Edmondson, CMS Gail Sexton, CMS
Medicaid 101 Chiropractic Services
Service Provider Training Schools and Libraries Division
SSA Adverse Decisions and Administrative Finality
RAC Update January 8, 2018.
Residential Placement Application 2011
Processing an Insurance Claim
SMAA SMAA 101 What is SMAA?.
Indian Policies and Procedures (IPPs) OASIS December 7, 2017
Chapter 9 Receiving Payments and Insurance Problem Solving.
DRAFT - FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY
How to Write an Effective Appeal Letter
Lesson 6 Topic 2 Claims Problems and Appeals
Chapter 3: Basics of Health Insurance
Lesson 6: Payments Topic 1: EOBs and Claim Tracking
Provider Outreach & Education Presentation
The Office of Open Records webinar will begin soon
Prompt response compliance TRAINING
What Are the “New” Basics?
MONITORING GRIJALVA 2005 Patricia Hokenson, RN, MSN, Region IX
Risk Adjustment User Group Session
Managed Care: Dealing with Problems
EU/IMF 15 Day Rule.
GACCP SPRING TRAINING Presentation to: GACCP NOW / COMP Providers
   Alameda County Behavioral Health
Flexible Spending and Transportation Benefit
SMAA SMAA 101 What is SMAA?.
Flexible Spending and Transportation Benefit
Presentation transcript:

CMS PDR 101 ICE Presentation 2014

CMS Provider Dispute Resolution Effective January 1, 2010, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will expand its current provider payment dispute resolution process for disputes between non-contracted and deemed providers and Private Fee for Service Plans to include disputes between non-contracted providers and all: Medicare Advantage Organizations (HMO, PPO, RPPO and PFFS) 1876 Cost Plans Medi-Medi Plans Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) organizations. Due to budgetary constraints, effective January 1, 2014, C2C will no longer be providing their services adjudicating provider disputes. C2C will adjudicate all payment disputes received by January 31, 2014, that meet the filing requirements. After January 31, 2014 C2C will return all provider disputes back to the provider, with the direction to contact the applicable MAO or designee.

First Level Provider Payment Disputes Subject to the CMS PDR Process: 3 Includes decisions where a non-contracted provider contends that the amount paid by the payer for a covered service is less than the amount that would have been paid under Original Medicare. See §§1852(a)(2)(A) of the Act for Medicare Advantage plans; 1876 for Cost plans; and 1866(a)(1)(O) for PACE organizations. Provider payment disputes also include instances where there is a disagreement between a non-contracted provider and the payer about the plan’s decision to make payment on a more appropriate code (down coding).

CMS PDR Process Does Not Include: 4 Payment denials by payers that result in zero payments being made to a non-contracted provider. Payment disputes for contracted providers. Local and National Coverage Determinations. Medical necessity determinations. Payment disputes for which no initial determination has been made.

CMS PDR Deadline for Submission Submission of a first level Provider Dispute must be filed within a minimum of 120 calendar days after the notice of initial determination (i.e. EOB’s/ RA’s/ Letters). Payer may allow an additional 5 calendar days for mail delivery. Regulations at 42 CFR 405.940-405.942 The payer may extend the time limit for filing a provider dispute if good cause is shown.

Extension of Time Limit for Filing a CMS Provider Dispute – Good Cause When a provider or supplier has failed to establish a good cause for late filing of a provider dispute, the payer dismisses the provider dispute as untimely filed. Resolution must explain the reason for dismissal and that the provider or supplier has up to 180 calendar days from the date of the dismissal notice to provide additional documentation for good cause. If provider or supplier submits evidence within 180 calendar days of dismissal that supports a finding of good cause for late filing, the payer makes a favorable good cause determination and issues a redetermination. If the payer does not find good cause, the dismissal remains in effect and payer issues a letter or EOB/RA explaining that good cause has not been established.

Requesting Documentation for Review of the CMS Provider Dispute When necessary documentation has not been submitted for review of the Provider Dispute, the payer advises the provider to submit the required documentation. Request can be made via phone or in writing. If the additional documentation that was requested is not received within 14 calendar days from the date of request, the payer conducts the review based on the information in the file. In the event that the documentation is received after the 14 calendar day deadline, the payer must consider the evidence before making and issuing the final determination. PLEASE NOTE: THE CMS PROVIDER DISPUTE MUST BE RESOLVED WITHIN 30 CALENDAR DAYS FROM RECEIPT.

Time Frame for Making a CMS Payment Dispute Decision: 8 Payers decision on the Payment Dispute must be within 30 calendar days from the date the Payment Dispute is first received by the payer. Must be in writing Include facts and rational pertaining to the resolution Inform provider about their right to the MAO-Health Plan or designee, Provider Dispute Resolution (Second Level) review process.

CMS Provider Dispute Resolution Letter Format Provider Dispute correspondence shall follow these recommended guidelines: Use at least 12 point font/type Use an easy to read font style; for example Universal or Times New Roman If procedure codes are cited, the actual name of the procedure must be associated with the code – services should not be abbreviated

CMS PDR: Payment of Interest Effective May 1, 2011; CMS Region IX has reviewed its policy with respect to payment of interest on disputed claims, including claims from non-contracted providers. Interest must be paid on such claims in the same manner as provided for all other claims. If the original claim was underpaid in error, then interest would be required on the additional amount of the payment due, from the date of the original claim until the date the claim was reprocessed. Interest would be calculated in the same manner as interest on all claims, which is discussed in the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Section 80. Additional information on the calculation of late interest penalties including examples can be accessed on the Prompt Pay Web site at http://www.fms.treas.gov/prompt/formulas.

Second Level Independent Payment Dispute Resolution 11 The non-contracted provider may submit a second level written request to the applicable MAO-Health Plan or designee for a second level review, by email, fax or mail within 180 calendar days of written notice from the payer. The PDD request may be filed if: 30 calendar days has elapsed from the date the payer received the dispute and the payer has not responded.

Second Level Independent Payment Dispute Resolution Review Process – will depend on MAO. 12 Once the Provider Payment Dispute is requested, the MAO-Health Plan or designee may request documentation from the payer that processed the first level provider dispute.

CMS PDR: Retaining Documents and Records Copies of all provider disputes and corresponding documentation must be kept for a period of not less than ten years. 42 C.F.R § 422.504

ICE Provider Dispute Resolution Request Form

CMS PDR Overturn Resolution Letter

CMS PDR Uphold Resolution Letter

ICE CMS Provider Payment Dispute Resolution Workflow

ICE CMS PDR Audit Worksheet

Delegated Payer Must Ensure: Payers internal payment dispute process for non-contracted providers is well defined. Develop written policy and procedure. Information on submitting first level internal payment disputes to the payer is communicated to the non-contracted provider. Payers website should have the CMS Provider Dispute Resolution Process detailed with timeframes, forms and 2nd level appeal process stated. Appeals information is communicated to the non-contracted provider via: Explanation of Benefits or Remittance Advise

Delegated Payer Must Ensure: Continued All areas of the organization are aware of the internal payment dispute process including customer service, claims and appeals staff. First-level internal payment dispute decisions inform non-contracted providers about their right to CMS’ provider payment dispute resolution process (second level – MAO-Health Plan or designee). As a best practice, forward all misdirected CMS Provider Disputes to correct payer within 8 – 10 calendar days from receipt. CMS provider disputes must be tracked in a manner allowing linkage with payer’s original claim number.