The central offices matters substantially to district-wide teaching and learning improvement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Strengthening Your HR Capacity The Government of Canada Perspective
Advertisements

Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley.
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Working with your Central Office Staff, Leadership Team, and Board Dennis R. Coe, Superintendent Henry County Schools.
A Guide to Implementation
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
TOSS-BFK Administrators’ Evaluation Crosswalk to School-wide Changes
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
© Copyright 2004 Tony Wagner, CLG, Harvard University 1 Improving Teaching and Learning Tony Wagner, Co-Director Change Leadership Group Harvard University,
RE-THINKING HOW SCHOOLS IMPROVE
1 Evaluating the Emergence of Leadership Within Networks and Communities of Practice Boston LLC September 21, 2007.
1 Core Module Three – The Summative Report Core Module Three: The Role of Professional Dialogue and Collaboration in the Summative Report.
Council of the Great City Schools Annual Fall Conference October 21, 2010 Developing and Measuring Principals’ Ability to Analyze Instruction and Lead.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
District Central Office Transformation for Teaching & Learning Improvement What’s the core? Meredith I. Honig Associate Professor & Co-Principal Investigator.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
IMPROVING LEARNING IN LOW- PERFORMING SCHOOLS: INSTRUCTIONAL COACHING AND LEADERSHIP PRACTICE RICHARD F. ELMORE HARVARD UNIVERSITY AND GENERATION READY.
NAUGATUCK HIGH SCHOOL STRATEGIC PLAN Presentation to Board of Education November 13, 2014 A collaborative effort between teachers, students, and administrators.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Educator Effectiveness (Central Office View) Mike Clemens and Chris Bigger December 10 th, news/ /# http://
Leadership for Powerful Instruction Central Office Transformation June 2, 2011 Sandy Austin Consultant, Center for Educational Leadership Mark Johnson.
Collaborations and Partnerships. Vannevar Bush Pasteur’s Quadrant.
Differentiating Instruction Professional Development.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Pontotoc City School District. Pontotoc City School District believes LEARNING is a priority, a need, and a desire. To be successful, we must nurture.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Classroom Data Feedback, Follow Up and Follow Through Feedback, Follow Up and Follow Through CSDE CSDE CAS CAS C.E.S. C.E.S.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.
Building Teacher Capacity in Chicago Options Schools AAPF San Diego, CA November 14, 2014 Office of Education Options.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
RAPID DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT Academy of Pacesetting States July 20, 2009 Brett Lane Technical Advisor to the Center on Innovation & Improvement.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
Adamsville Elementary January A Culture of Learning and professional Learning Communities The new way of doing business.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
1 To the reader: With support from the Hewlett Foundation, RAND is studying district-wide instructional improvement efforts in three urban districts: Austin,
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
AEA 267 Support System for Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance The KASAB June, 2011 KASAB: Knowledge Attitude Skills Aspiration Behavior.
Coaching at Haddon Primary School The journey begins..… together.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
Presented by: Barbara A. Deane–Williams, Superintendent Christopher Marino, Teacher Leader Susan Streicher, Principal Strengthening Teacher & Leader Effectiveness.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Office of Service Quality
Principal Learning Teams S.I.M. May 1 st, 2013 Principal Learning Teams.
Leading Student Achievement: Our Principal Purpose Taking the Project to the Next Level Kenneth Leithwood.
Celebrating Caddo’s Success & Designing the Future Eric Thomas Chief Support Officer Darden/Curry Partnership for Leaders in Education.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
A Policy-oriented Board of Trustees A Review of Selected Research.
Australian Council for Educational Research School Improvement Christian Schools National Policy Forum Canberra, 26 May 2014.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Doc Data Do’s and Don’ts *Developed by the New Teacher Center.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
You ARE the Leader of Learning Frederick Brown Learning Principal Supervisor Summit Ft. Lauderdale, FL May 12-13,
Fostering a Culture of Data Use
Board on science education
Why some schools succeed ?
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
Intelligent Responsive System
Presentation transcript:

The central offices matters substantially to district-wide teaching and learning improvement

Structural reforms alone generally have not been sufficient for district-wide teaching and learning improvements Deep changes in teaching and learning district wide did not materialize, in part, because the reform effort did not adequately support fundamental shifts in what people in central offices knew and could do (Hubbard, Mehan, & Stein 2006) Deep changes in teaching and learning district wide did not materialize, in part, because the reform effort did not adequately support fundamental shifts in what people in central offices knew and could do (Hubbard, Mehan, & Stein 2006) High-performance depends not only on formal structures but also fundamentally on the practice of peoplehow central office administrators understand and go about their work day-to-day in leading for teaching and learning improvement High-performance depends not only on formal structures but also fundamentally on the practice of peoplehow central office administrators understand and go about their work day-to-day in leading for teaching and learning improvement

Teaching and learning improvements in schools depend not only on what happens in schools but how school district central offices create and implement supports for change Central office administrators knowledge of high-quality instruction has been emerging as fundamental to implementing ambitious standards-based curricular reforms Central office administrators knowledge of high-quality instruction has been emerging as fundamental to implementing ambitious standards-based curricular reforms Improvements depend heavily on the ready capacity of central office administrators to engage in new work practices supportive of district-wide teaching and learning improvements Improvements depend heavily on the ready capacity of central office administrators to engage in new work practices supportive of district-wide teaching and learning improvements

Implementation of reforms hinges on central office administrators engaging in new partnership relationships with schools and community agencies to build the central offices and schools collective capacity for implementation Central office leadership for teaching and learning demands ongoing learning on the part of central office administrators - ongoing learning about the kinds of capacity, work practices, and relationships that might enable demonstrable improvements in teaching and learning. Central office leadership for teaching and learning demands ongoing learning on the part of central office administrators - ongoing learning about the kinds of capacity, work practices, and relationships that might enable demonstrable improvements in teaching and learning.

The reform effort must focus centrally and meaningfully on teaching and learning improvement Central offices should be able to demonstrate how their work matters in concrete terms to teaching and learning improvement Central offices should be able to demonstrate how their work matters in concrete terms to teaching and learning improvement Central office transformation involves remaking how ALL central office administrators work with schools Central office transformation involves remaking how ALL central office administrators work with schools Central office administrators fundamentally remake their work practices and their relationships with schools in support of teaching and learning improvements for all students. Central office administrators fundamentally remake their work practices and their relationships with schools in support of teaching and learning improvements for all students.

The Five Dimensions of Central Office Transformation Dimension 1: Learning-focused partnerships with school principals to deepen principals instructional leadership practice. Dimension 1: Learning-focused partnerships with school principals to deepen principals instructional leadership practice. Create direct, personal relationships between individual central office administrators and school principals focused on helping every school principal become a stronger instructional leader. Provide Instructional Leadership Directors (ILDs) who focused most of their time on helping school principals improve their practice. ILDs differentiated supports for principals instructional leadership consistently over the entire academic year. ILDs model for principals how to think and act like an instructional leader; develop and use tools that supported principals engagement in instructional leadership, and broker external resources to help principals become more powerful instructional leaders.

The Five Dimensions of Central Office Transformation Dimension 2: Assistance to the central office–principal partnerships. Dimension 2: Assistance to the central office–principal partnerships. Provide professional development to the ILDs that engaged them in ongoing challenging conversations about their work with principals and how to strengthen it. Provide professional development to the ILDs that engaged them in ongoing challenging conversations about their work with principals and how to strengthen it. Others in the central office reinforce the importance of ILD leadership to the overall teaching and learning improvement effort. Others in the central office reinforce the importance of ILD leadership to the overall teaching and learning improvement effort. The entire system holding principals accountable for improving The entire system holding principals accountable for improving

The Five Dimensions of Central Office Transformation Dimension 3: Reorganize and reculture each central office unit to support the central office– principal partnerships and teaching and learning improvement. Dimension 3: Reorganize and reculture each central office unit to support the central office– principal partnerships and teaching and learning improvement. Everyone shifted the focus from primarily delivering the services that they controlled to taking responsibility for solving problems that promised to help schools improve teaching and learning Everyone shifted the focus from primarily delivering the services that they controlled to taking responsibility for solving problems that promised to help schools improve teaching and learning intentional efforts to develop the capacity of people throughout the central office to support teaching and learning improvement. intentional efforts to develop the capacity of people throughout the central office to support teaching and learning improvement. created and used new ways to hold central office administrators accountable for high-quality performance. created and used new ways to hold central office administrators accountable for high-quality performance.

The Five Dimensions of Central Office Transformation Dimension 4: Stewardship of the overall central office transformation process. Dimension 4: Stewardship of the overall central office transformation process. central office administrators engaged in continuously developing the theory of action underlying central office transformation, while communicating it and engaging others in understanding it. central office administrators engaged in continuously developing the theory of action underlying central office transformation, while communicating it and engaging others in understanding it. strategically brokered external resources and relationships to support the overall central office transformation efforts. strategically brokered external resources and relationships to support the overall central office transformation efforts.

The Five Dimensions of Central Office Transformation Dimension 5: Use of evidence throughout the central office to support continual improvement of work practices and relationships with schools. Dimension 5: Use of evidence throughout the central office to support continual improvement of work practices and relationships with schools. engaged in the ongoing collection of evidence from their own experience with the transformation process and attempted to use lessons from experience to inform how they engaged in the other four dimensions of central office transformation. engaged in the ongoing collection of evidence from their own experience with the transformation process and attempted to use lessons from experience to inform how they engaged in the other four dimensions of central office transformation.

Central Office Transformation Focuses centrally and meaningfully on teaching and learning improvement. Focuses centrally and meaningfully on teaching and learning improvement. Central office staff are able to demonstrate how their work matters in concrete terms to teaching and learning improvement. They actually change their work to leverage specific supports for teaching and learning improvement. Central office staff are able to demonstrate how their work matters in concrete terms to teaching and learning improvement. They actually change their work to leverage specific supports for teaching and learning improvement.

Central Office Transformation Engages the entire central office in reform. Engages the entire central office in reform. involves remaking how all central office administrators work with schools and with each othereveryone from the entire central office, no matter what department, unit, or function. involves remaking how all central office administrators work with schools and with each othereveryone from the entire central office, no matter what department, unit, or function.

Central Office Transformation Calls on central office administrators to fundamentally remake their work practices and their relationships with schools to support teaching and learning improvements for all schools. Calls on central office administrators to fundamentally remake their work practices and their relationships with schools to support teaching and learning improvements for all schools. a transformation strategy is fundamentally about remaking what the people in central offices dotheir daily work and relationships with schools. a transformation strategy is fundamentally about remaking what the people in central offices dotheir daily work and relationships with schools.

Central Office Transformation Constitutes an important focus for reform in its own right Constitutes an important focus for reform in its own right transformation involves ongoing work on central office practice that supports teaching and learning improvement that transcends particular programs or initiatives. transformation involves ongoing work on central office practice that supports teaching and learning improvement that transcends particular programs or initiatives.