General Education Assessment Review: A Report to the Faculty Assembly SUNY Canton February 13, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Second Information Technology in Education Study (SITES) A Project of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)
Advertisements

Numeracy at Guelph Data Resource Centre Guelph University, Guelph, ON A. Michelle Edwards, Ph.D.
Understanding by Design Stage 3
Deena Sue Fuller Tennessee State University Adapted from a presentation by Brenda Marsteller Kowalewski at Weber State.
Refocusing General Education: A Dialectical Interplay of Accreditation Requirements, Assessment Methods, and Student Learning Competencies Bobby L. Matthews.
Outcomes Assessment. Many academic institutions measure the success of service- learning based on participation, number of hours, or estimated monies.
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
General Education Assessment 2013: Introduction
ACADEMIC DEGREE ASSESSMENT & GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay Arts & Sciences Faculty Meeting March 12,
1 Developing Tests for Departmental Assessment Deborah Moore, Assessment Specialist Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness University of Kentucky.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Metadisciplinary Outcomes for Science Literacy (Can Assess Now by Standardized Concept Inventory) STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO… 1. Define the domain of science.
Department of Mathematical Sciences August 15, /20 Math 1319 “Mathematics in the Modern World”
SENIOR SEMINARS Specifics & Example Performances CEPR Center for Educational Policy Research.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
What Behaviors Indicate a Student is Meeting Course Goals and Objectives? “Indicators”
The International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme Rockville High School.
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
A Parent’s Guide to Standardized Testing in Georgia
I Love Outcomes (or at least not dread them so much) Reedley College Institutional Learning Outcomes Workshop January 8, 2009.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Apples to Oranges to Elephants: Comparing the Incomparable.
1 General Education Assessment at Cleveland State University What We Have Accomplished What We Have Yet to Do.
Program Review and General Education Assessment at the University at Albany: Past, Present and Future Barbara Wilkinson Assistant Director for Assessment.
Stony Brook Model for General Education Assessment Pilot Report November 13, 2003 GEAR as a Catalyst for Change Beginning to Build a Campus- Wide Culture.
A Multi-method Approach: Assessment of Basic Communication Cheryl E Drout, Ph.D. SUNY-Fredonia.
Nassau Community College THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK G eneral E ducation A ssessment R eview Kumkum Prabhakar, Assistant Professor of Biology.
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
Basics of A-G Courses. UC ARTICULATION CONFERENCE Overview  Purpose of “a-g” subject requirements & course lists  Enhancements to “a-g” course criteria.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
LEARNING PROFILE Title of Degree Program PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS (Description, Unique Experiences, Inputs, Outcomes) (EXAMPLES) Year Established. Accreditation.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Improved Performance and Critical Thinking in Economics Students Using Current Event Journaling Sahar Bahmani, Ph.D. WI Teaching Fellow INTRODUCTION.
-SLO Development Progress -SLO Activity -Assessment Progress -Support Needs.
Sheila Roberts Department of Geology Bowling Green State University.
GE SLO Assessment Guide. Best Practices In the best practices for assessing GE SLOs, there are two dominant modes being used: – Common assessments – Common.
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Jason D. Powell Ferrum College Saturday, October 15, :30-2:30 PM ACA Summit Asheville, NC.
Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.
January 29, 2010ART Beach Retreat ART Beach Retreat 2010 Assessment Rubric for Critical Thinking First Scoring Session Summary ART Beach Retreat.
Assessing Program-Level SLOs November 2010 Mary Pape Antonio Ramirez 1.
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement January 2012.
ScWk 242 Course Overview and Review of ScWk 240 Concepts ScWk 242 Session 1 Slides.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Assessing Your Assessments: The Authentic Assessment Challenge Dr. Diane King Director, Curriculum Development School of Computer & Engineering Technologies.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
General Education Assessment Workshop: Spring 2016 Attributes General Education Assessment Committee (GEAC) SUNY Oneonta November 17 & 20, 2015.
784-1 Brooklyn College Sarah Kessar July 16, 2009.
Survey of American History Survey of European History.
An Institutional Writing Assessment Project Dr. Loraine Phillips Texas A&M University Dr. Yan Zhang University of Maryland University College October 2010.
General Education Assessment Report Assessment Cycle.
Incorporating Program Assessment into Your Annual Program Review June 29, 2006.
Systems Wide Learning at a Community College Developments in the last five years –SACS-COC (Course Outcomes to Program Outcomes) –The Texas Higher Education.
Laboratory Science and Quantitative Core Requirements.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Department of Physics and Goal 2 Committee Chair
Assessment Planning and Learning Outcome Design Dr
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Fullerton College SLOA Workshop:
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
Spring 2018 College Algebra Assessment
Chair: Nadine Jennings Date of Presentation: January 19, 2017
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 1, 2016
Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 3, 2017
Presentation transcript:

General Education Assessment Review: A Report to the Faculty Assembly SUNY Canton February 13, 2007

What is the purpose of assessment at SUNY Canton? Assessment is a simple method faculty can use to collect feedback on how well the students are learning what the faculty believe the students are being taught. Assessment is a simple method faculty can use to collect feedback on how well the students are learning what the faculty believe the students are being taught. The purpose of assessment is to provide faculty and students with information and insights needed to improve teaching effectiveness and learning quality. The purpose of assessment is to provide faculty and students with information and insights needed to improve teaching effectiveness and learning quality.

College instructors use feedback gleaned through assessment to inform adjustments in their teaching. College instructors use feedback gleaned through assessment to inform adjustments in their teaching. Faculty also share feedback with students, using it to help them improve their learning strategies and study habits in order to become more independent and successful learners. Faculty also share feedback with students, using it to help them improve their learning strategies and study habits in order to become more independent and successful learners.

History and Types of Assessment 1. General Education Assessment GER 1GER 10 GER 1GER 10 GER 11GER 12 (Infused competencies) GER 11GER 12 (Infused competencies) 2. Assessment in the Major 3. Student Opinion Survey (SOS) 4. Strengthened Campus Based Assessment --Math GER 1 --Math GER 1 --Basic Communication GER 10 --Basic Communication GER 10 --Critical Thinking (Infused) --Critical Thinking (Infused) --NSSE --NSSE

Other forms of Assessment at SUNY Canton: Student Opinion Survey (SOS) Student Opinion Survey (SOS) National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

STUDENT OPINION SURVEY (SOS): SUNY sponsored for all state-operated schools SUNY sponsored for all state-operated schools Comparison Group: Technology Colleges and all state-operated campuses Comparison Group: Technology Colleges and all state-operated campuses Purpose: determine student satisfaction with academics, student life and other services and facilities Purpose: determine student satisfaction with academics, student life and other services and facilities

(SOS cont.) Started in 1985 and administered every three years Started in 1985 and administered every three years Most recent survey Spring 2006 Most recent survey Spring 2006 Used to help with benchmarking and to understand better how students view services offered by SUNY Canton Used to help with benchmarking and to understand better how students view services offered by SUNY Canton Results will be available on reserve in the Library, Institutional Research office, and the Provosts office, and will be published on the SUNY Canton web site. Results will be available on reserve in the Library, Institutional Research office, and the Provosts office, and will be published on the SUNY Canton web site.

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE): National Survey National Survey SUNY mandated for Strengthening Campus Based Assessment (SCBA) SUNY mandated for Strengthening Campus Based Assessment (SCBA) SUNY pays administrative and scoring costs. SUNY pays administrative and scoring costs.

Comparison Group: Comparison Group: Technology Colleges, all state-operated campuses, and National Comparisons Purpose: assess student learning Purpose: assess student learning Started: 2000 and offered every year but SUNY Canton has not participated Started: 2000 and offered every year but SUNY Canton has not participated SUNY Canton will participate in Spring 2008 with other State Operated Campuses. SUNY Canton will participate in Spring 2008 with other State Operated Campuses. (NSSE cont.)

Future Plans Website Approved courses Approved courses Assessment cycles for Gen-Ed, Assessment in the Major, SOS, and NSSE Assessment cycles for Gen-Ed, Assessment in the Major, SOS, and NSSE GER requirements GER requirements SUNY Canton Rubrics SUNY Canton Rubrics GEAR report GEAR report Resources Resources

General Education Assessment GER 112

According to Barbara E. Valvord, an Ideal system for Assessment and Improvement of Student Learning includes the following characteristics: 1. Exams, assignments, and classroom participation are valid indicators of the actual learning that the teacher desires 2.Evaluations/analyses accurately reflect learning and are appropriately diagnostic and explicit for their purposes

3.The system promotes healthy motivation and fair treatment at every level. 4.Evaluations are communicated appropriately to their various audiences and serve their purposes

5. The system is efficient: no valuable information is lost; no useless information is communicated 6. The system is sustainable in terms of time and resources 7. Appropriate autonomy is protected (Walvoord )

Specific Assessment Areas (Complete assessment plans are in the report Appendix.) (GER 1) MATHEMATICS: Students will demonstrate the ability to: -interpret and draw inferences from mathematical models such as formulas, graphs, tables and schematics; -interpret and draw inferences from mathematical models such as formulas, graphs, tables and schematics; -represent mathematical information symbolically, visually, numerically and verbally; -represent mathematical information symbolically, visually, numerically and verbally;

(GER 1 cont.) -employ quantitative methods such as, arithmetic, algebra, geometry or statistics to solve problems; -employ quantitative methods such as, arithmetic, algebra, geometry or statistics to solve problems; -estimate and check mathematical results for reasonableness; and -estimate and check mathematical results for reasonableness; and -recognize the limits of mathematical and statistical methods. -recognize the limits of mathematical and statistical methods.

(GER 1 cont.) METHODS: The learning outcomes will be assessed by course embedded questions on hourly and final exams for each of the designated math courses. The mathematics department will collect a random sample (20%) from these exams and employ the rubrics proposed by the Discipline Panel in Mathematics – (09/08/05) as the assessment tool. The learning outcomes will be assessed by course embedded questions on hourly and final exams for each of the designated math courses. The mathematics department will collect a random sample (20%) from these exams and employ the rubrics proposed by the Discipline Panel in Mathematics – (09/08/05) as the assessment tool. The mathematics department assessment team will develop and pilot exam questions, conduct a training session on the use of the rubrics, and will establish guidelines for levels of competence according to the SUNY discipline panels rubric levels. The mathematics department assessment team will develop and pilot exam questions, conduct a training session on the use of the rubrics, and will establish guidelines for levels of competence according to the SUNY discipline panels rubric levels.

The actual grading process will include at least two (2) mathematics faculty members per exam question with the introduction of additional faculty in cases of disagreement. Papers will be scored as defined by the rubric and success will be determined per outcome if 70% of participants score 2 or 3. The actual grading process will include at least two (2) mathematics faculty members per exam question with the introduction of additional faculty in cases of disagreement. Papers will be scored as defined by the rubric and success will be determined per outcome if 70% of participants score 2 or 3. (GER 1 cont.)

(GER 2) NATURAL SCIENCE: Students will demonstrate: -understanding of the methods scientists use to explore natural phenomena, including observation, hypothesis development, measurement and data collection, experimentation, evaluation of evidence, and employment of mathematical analysis; and -understanding of the methods scientists use to explore natural phenomena, including observation, hypothesis development, measurement and data collection, experimentation, evaluation of evidence, and employment of mathematical analysis; and -application of scientific data, concepts, and models in one of the natural sciences. -application of scientific data, concepts, and models in one of the natural sciences.

(GER 2 cont.) Methods: Student learning outcome one will be assessed by administering a fifteen- question test developed by the science faculty work group. Student learning outcome two will be assessed by course embedded questions on hourly exams or final exams. Student learning outcome two will be assessed by course embedded questions on hourly exams or final exams.

(GER 3) SOCIAL SCIENCE: Students will demonstrate: Students will demonstrate: -understanding of the methods social scientists use to explore social phenomena, including observation, hypothesis development, measurement and data collection, experimentation, evaluation of evidence, and employment of mathematical and interpretative analysis; -understanding of the methods social scientists use to explore social phenomena, including observation, hypothesis development, measurement and data collection, experimentation, evaluation of evidence, and employment of mathematical and interpretative analysis;

And knowledge of major concepts, models and issues of at least one discipline in the social sciences. knowledge of major concepts, models and issues of at least one discipline in the social sciences.Method: Course embedded questions will be used to assess both objectives. All courses listed that are taught within the Social Science cycle will be assessed. Course embedded questions will be used to assess both objectives. All courses listed that are taught within the Social Science cycle will be assessed. (GER 3 cont.)

(GER 4) AMERICAN HISTORY: Students will demonstrate: -knowledge of a basic narrative of American history: political, economic, social, and cultural, including knowledge of unity and diversity in American society; -knowledge of a basic narrative of American history: political, economic, social, and cultural, including knowledge of unity and diversity in American society; -knowledge of common institutions in American society and how they have affected different groups; and -knowledge of common institutions in American society and how they have affected different groups; and -understanding of Americas evolving relationship with the rest of the world. -understanding of Americas evolving relationship with the rest of the world.

Method: All students completing American History (HIST 103, HIST 105, ECON 105, HIST 204, HIST 205, HIST 304) will be assessed. All students completing American History (HIST 103, HIST 105, ECON 105, HIST 204, HIST 205, HIST 304) will be assessed. Mid-term and final examination questions will be evaluated by the individual instructor and another history faculty member. Mid-term and final examination questions will be evaluated by the individual instructor and another history faculty member. A rating rubric will be used with individual student scores averaged to indicate level of performance. A rating rubric will be used with individual student scores averaged to indicate level of performance. The instructor will provide a point scale of 0- 4 points indicating key content required for each level. The instructor will provide a point scale of 0- 4 points indicating key content required for each level. (GER 4 cont.)

(GER 5) WESTERN CIVILIZATION: Students will: -demonstrate knowledge of the development of the distinctive features of the history, institutions, economy, society, culture, etc., of Western civilization; and -demonstrate knowledge of the development of the distinctive features of the history, institutions, economy, society, culture, etc., of Western civilization; and -relate the development of Western civilization to that of other regions of the world. -relate the development of Western civilization to that of other regions of the world.

(GER 5 cont.) Method: The assessment tool for Western Civilization (HIST 101, HIST 102) will be course embedded. The assessment tool for Western Civilization (HIST 101, HIST 102) will be course embedded. A comprehensive question in the final exam will reflect the two student outcomes listed for (GER 5). A comprehensive question in the final exam will reflect the two student outcomes listed for (GER 5). All students present at the final exam will be evaluated by the individual instructor utilizing a rubric indicating exceeding meeting, approaching, and not meeting general education outcomes. All students present at the final exam will be evaluated by the individual instructor utilizing a rubric indicating exceeding meeting, approaching, and not meeting general education outcomes. An additional history faculty member will also evaluate the selected outcomes using the same standards. An additional history faculty member will also evaluate the selected outcomes using the same standards.

(GER 6) OTHER WORLD CIVILIZATIONS : Students will demonstrate: -knowledge of either a broad outline of world history, -knowledge of either a broad outline of world history,or -the distinctive features of the history, institutions, economy, society, culture, etc., of one non-Western civilization. -the distinctive features of the history, institutions, economy, society, culture, etc., of one non-Western civilization.

(GER 6 cont.) Method: The assessment tool for courses addressing (GER 6) will be course embedded. The assessment tool for courses addressing (GER 6) will be course embedded. For assessment key components of the stated objectives in (GER 6) will be incorporated into assigned research papers and/or examinations. For assessment key components of the stated objectives in (GER 6) will be incorporated into assigned research papers and/or examinations. All the students evaluated on the basis of a rating rubric by the instructor responsible for the course will have an additional faculty member in the discipline also evaluate the selected outcomes using the same standards. All the students evaluated on the basis of a rating rubric by the instructor responsible for the course will have an additional faculty member in the discipline also evaluate the selected outcomes using the same standards.

(GER 7) HUMANITIES: Students will demonstrate: -knowledge of the conventions and methods of at least one of the humanities in addition to those encompassed by other knowledge areas required by the General Education program. -knowledge of the conventions and methods of at least one of the humanities in addition to those encompassed by other knowledge areas required by the General Education program.

(GER 7 cont.) Method: Students in all humanities courses designated as general education, ones which are not encompassed by other knowledge areas required by the General Education program, will be provided with the outcome/objectives at the start of the semester. Students in all humanities courses designated as general education, ones which are not encompassed by other knowledge areas required by the General Education program, will be provided with the outcome/objectives at the start of the semester. Students will complete at least one writing assignment that addresses the learning outcomes/objectives. Students will complete at least one writing assignment that addresses the learning outcomes/objectives. These writing products may vary from class to class but will be assessed in terms of the learning outcomes/objectives and by the same rubric. These writing products may vary from class to class but will be assessed in terms of the learning outcomes/objectives and by the same rubric. When assessment occurs, writing samples from all departments within the humanities will be chosen randomly, an equal number of writing products from each department (on a course by course basis). When assessment occurs, writing samples from all departments within the humanities will be chosen randomly, an equal number of writing products from each department (on a course by course basis).

(GER 8) THE ARTS: Students will demonstrate: -understanding of at least one principal form of artistic expression and the creative process inherent therein. -understanding of at least one principal form of artistic expression and the creative process inherent therein.

(GER 8 cont.) Methods: General Education Arts Assessment will be accomplished by reviewing two embedded assignments designed for the student to discuss the creative process in reference to a students creative writing, performance, or studio piece (with one assignment as a benchmark) General Education Arts Assessment will be accomplished by reviewing two embedded assignments designed for the student to discuss the creative process in reference to a students creative writing, performance, or studio piece (with one assignment as a benchmark) OR one comprehensive exam from a random sample of students drawn from all Arts approved courses being offered during the sampling semester. OR one comprehensive exam from a random sample of students drawn from all Arts approved courses being offered during the sampling semester.

(GER 9) FOREIGN LANGUAGE: Students will demonstrate: -basic proficiency in the understanding and use of a foreign language; -basic proficiency in the understanding and use of a foreign language;and -knowledge of the distinctive features of culture(s) associated with the language they are studying. -knowledge of the distinctive features of culture(s) associated with the language they are studying.

(GER 9 cont.) Method: The assessment tool for Spanish I and Spanish II will be course embedded. The assessment tool for Spanish I and Spanish II will be course embedded. Questions on the Comprehensive Final Examination will be mapped to each of the two student learning outcomes listed for (GER9) Foreign Language. Questions on the Comprehensive Final Examination will be mapped to each of the two student learning outcomes listed for (GER9) Foreign Language.

(GER 10) BASIC COMMUNICATION: Students will: -produce coherent texts within common college-level written forms; -produce coherent texts within common college-level written forms; -demonstrate the ability to revise and improve such texts; -demonstrate the ability to revise and improve such texts; -research a topic, develop an argument, and organize supporting details; -research a topic, develop an argument, and organize supporting details;

-develop proficiency in oral discourse; and -develop proficiency in oral discourse; and -evaluate an oral presentation according to established criteria. -evaluate an oral presentation according to established criteria. (GER 10 cont.)

Method: The first two student learning outcomes will be assessed using the national normed test developed and administered by ACT. The last three objectives will be measured using rubrics developed by the Humanities faculty. The first two student learning outcomes will be assessed using the national normed test developed and administered by ACT. The last three objectives will be measured using rubrics developed by the Humanities faculty. The Director of Institutional Research will select classes of ENGL 101 and ENGL 102 students to be assessed for the student learning outcomes. The Director of Institutional Research will select classes of ENGL 101 and ENGL 102 students to be assessed for the student learning outcomes.

INFUSED COMPETENCIES (GER 11) CRITICAL THINKING (REASONING): Students will: -identify, analyze, and evaluate arguments as they occur in their own or others work, -identify, analyze, and evaluate arguments as they occur in their own or others work,and -develop well-reasoned arguments. -develop well-reasoned arguments.

( GER 11 cont.)Method: Critical Thinking skills will be measured in the Writing Intensive courses. Critical Thinking skills will be measured in the Writing Intensive courses. All Writing Intensive Courses are subject to assessment. All Writing Intensive Courses are subject to assessment. The nationally normed test developed and administered by ACT will be used. This was be tried at SUNY Canton for the first time Spring semester The nationally normed test developed and administered by ACT will be used. This was be tried at SUNY Canton for the first time Spring semester The courses to be tested will be selected by the Director of Institutional Research. Since this method of testing is new to the campus, there is much to learn about the reports that will be generated after the tests have been scored. The courses to be tested will be selected by the Director of Institutional Research. Since this method of testing is new to the campus, there is much to learn about the reports that will be generated after the tests have been scored.

(GER 12) INFORMATION MANAGEMENT: Students will: -perform the basic operations of personal computer use; -perform the basic operations of personal computer use; -understand and use basic research techniques; and -understand and use basic research techniques; and -locate, evaluate, and synthesize information from a variety of sources. -locate, evaluate, and synthesize information from a variety of sources.

Method: A forty (40) question multiple choice test will be administered in Writing Intensive sections. A forty (40) question multiple choice test will be administered in Writing Intensive sections. (GER 12 cont.)

General Education Assessment Team Amani Awwad Mary Bucher Nadine Jennings Raymond Krisciunas Christopher (Kit) Sweeney Christopher Nouryeh Michael Peebles Linda Pellett, Chair Alice Reed Judith Singh

Reference Walvoord, Barbara E. Strengthening Campus-Based Assessment. SUNY Assessment Workshop handout. Walvoord, Barbara E. Strengthening Campus-Based Assessment. SUNY Assessment Workshop handout.