GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23, 2013 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Commissions Expectations for the Assessment of Student Learning and Institutional Effectiveness Beth Paul Interim Provost and Vice President for Academic.
Advertisements

Joint ATS-WASC Accreditation Reviews Please join the audio portion of this training: Access code * *
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Transforming Secondary Education in New Jersey Lucille E. Davy, Commissioner Willa Spicer, Deputy Commissioner Jay Doolan, Assistant Commissioner New Jersey.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Career and College Readiness Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Assessment Literacy MODULE 1.
Assessment Literacy Kentucky Core Academic Standards Characteristics of Highly Effective Teaching and Learning Career and College Readiness MODULE 1.
When Students Can’t Read…
1 SESSION 5- RECORDING AND REPORTING IN GRADES R-12 Computer Applications Technology Information Technology.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 4: S.M.A.R.T. Goals and Educator Plan Development August 2012 I. Welcome (3 minutes)
Refocusing General Education: A Dialectical Interplay of Accreditation Requirements, Assessment Methods, and Student Learning Competencies Bobby L. Matthews.
Reform and Innovation in Higher Education
General Education Assessment 2013: Introduction
Next Steps for General Education Jonathan Rosenthal Associate Provost for Undergraduate Education.
Student Focus Groups UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY 1 Formative Evaluation Using Student Focus Groups Heidi M. Anderson, Ph.D. University of.
ACADEMIC DEGREE ASSESSMENT & GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay Arts & Sciences Faculty Meeting March 12,
Mesa County Valley School District #51 STANDARDS - BASED GRADING AND REPORTING
1 Developing Tests for Departmental Assessment Deborah Moore, Assessment Specialist Institutional Research, Planning, & Effectiveness University of Kentucky.
An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
Bronwyn Kosman, Office of the DVC (Provost) No 1 TEACHING MATTERS DEVELOPING INDICATORS OF TEACHING QUALITY Researching (e)Learning and Teaching Presentation.
Online Rubric Assessment Tool for Marine Engineering Course
Introduction to Creating a Balanced Assessment System Presented by: Illinois State Board of Education.
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
What is LEAP? Roundtable Discussions October 19 & 20.
Maths Counts Insights into Lesson Study
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System 0 August 2012.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
PROCEDURES TO USE TO ESTABLISH STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEES TO REPLACE COMMON CORE'S STANDARDS 1.
APSU QEP. Explore practical learning experiences and opportunities to excel in life. APSU QEP.
Documentation of the BVCTC General Education Student Learning Outcomes
ANDREA BROWN DIRECTOR, PROGRAM ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH How to Use Student Survey Data (NSSE) to Improve Your Teaching.
Working with Rubrics: Using the Oral Communication, Writing, and Critical Thinking Rubrics VALUE Rubrics Ashley Finley, Ph.D Senior Director of Assessment.
Assessment Consultant to THECB’s Undergraduate Education Advisory Committee (UEAC): Danita McAnally, Chief of Planning and Advancement.
1 General Education Senate discussion scheduled for April 11 and 25 1.Proposal to base General Education on outcomes that can be assessed 2.Proposal for.
Program Review and General Education Assessment at the University at Albany: Past, Present and Future Barbara Wilkinson Assistant Director for Assessment.
The Current Refocusing of General Education. Objectives for the Workshop Proposing and/or Renewing a Course Assessing the general education aspect of.
University Of North Alabama General Education Assessment Paradigm Shift: A plan for Revising General Education Assessment at UNA.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Susan Agre-Kippenhan, Portland State University Professor, Art Department Evaluating the Effectiveness of Service Learning.
Undergraduate Core at Doane March 14, Overview of Undergraduate Core at Doane Philosophy of the Undergraduate Core at Doane (aligned with mission)
1 General Education Assessment Institutional Portfolio Model.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
Evidence of Student Learning Fall Faculty Seminar Office of Institutional Research and Assessment August 15, 2012.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
General Education at Oakland University. General Education  Broad-based knowledge  Skills  Preparation for citizenship, further study, and careers.
Susan A. Ambrose Senior Vice Provost, Undergraduate Education & Experiential Learning Professor of Education & History NEASC Annual Meeting & Conference.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
General Education Model Presentation Report from the General Education Oversight Committee to the UMKC Faculty Senate Feb. 21 st, 2012.
Assessment of Student Learning: Phase III OSU-Okmulgee’s Evidence of Student Learning.
MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.
Orientation Meeting Humanities Distribution- Cycle B Fall 2012.
Assessment Instruments and Rubrics Workshop Series Part 1: What is a rubric? What are the required elements? What are VALUE rubrics? February 24, 2016.
Service Learning: What is it and how can it enhance student learning? Kim Buch Psychology.
Assessment and Evaluation of CAREER Educational Components Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment Research.
Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017
Consider Your Audience
ASSESSMENT OF THE GEN ED PROGRAM –
First-Stage Draft Plans for Gen Ed Revision
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
We VALUE HIPs Utilizing VALUE Rubrics and HIP QA Tools in Course Revitalization Presented by Melynda Conner, TBR OSS HIP Specialist 2019.
HART RESEARCH A S O T E C I AAC&U Members On Trends In Learning Outcomes, General Education, and Assessment Key findings from online survey among 433 Chief.
Presentation transcript:

GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,

2 What is General Education Assessment at UMKC What assessment would mean for you if you teach a Gen Ed course How to get a course approved as a Gen Ed course (the Approval Form)

Goals for Revision 3 General Education goals are: a.To increase student engagement b.To provide an opportunity to define student learning outcomes for general education c.To facilitate transfer from other higher education institutions d.To ensure alignment with state and national guidelines

Which of the following is not a UMKC Gen Ed learning outcome? 4 1.Culture and Diversity 2.Civic Engagement 3.Communication Skills 4.Technology and Information Literacy 5.Leadership 6.Scientific Reasoning and Quantitative Analysis

The Great Eight 5 General Education Learning Outcomes 1.Communication skills 2.Technology and information literacy 3.Scientific reasoning and quantitative analysis 4.Arts and humanities 5.Interdisciplinary and innovative thinking 6.Culture and diversity 7.Human values and ethical reasoning 8.Civic and community engagement learning-outcomes.pdf

Blooms Taxonomy 6 Measurement of student learning outcomes and General Education assessment across the nations higher learning institutions have focused on: Two Year outcomes – Knowledge, Comprehension, and Application Four Year outcomes – Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation

Who is primarily responsible for General Education Assessment? 7 1. Faculty 2. Department Chairs 3. Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment 4. General Education Committee 5. University Assessment Committee

Measurements 8 There will be a combination of: Formative and Summative Assessments Direct and Indirect Assessments

Direct Assessments 9 Course Embedded Assessments Final papers from discourse, anchor, and platform classes, which are graded with a rubric Final projects from capstone courses, which are assessed with an evaluation form Final Exams in which test items are linked to learning outcomes Rubrics can be formulated and/or enhanced for these signature assignment evaluations at

Direct Assessment (cont.) 10 Standardized Assessment Educational Testing Service Proficiency Profile (ETS-PP) is given to all students after they have completed 70 credit hours. Completion is a requirement of graduation. Assesses student skills in: 1.Reading 2.Writing 3.Critical Thinking, and 4.Mathematics

Indirect Assessment 11 Office of Institutional Research & Planning Each year, a survey is conducted of all graduating seniors regarding their experiences at UMKC. Questions solicit students perception of their general learning that are based upon Gen Ed learning outcomes.

Measurements 12 Assessing General Education at UMKC will focus on the eight learning outcomes and will consist of: 1.Course embedded assessments 2.Standardized instruments (ETS-Proficiency Profile) 3.Student surveys/reflections (Senior Student Survey)

Curriculum Mapping 13 GEOC Model Proposed Courses Level I Courses Level II Courses Prerequisite: Discourse I Platform Courses Prerequisite: Discourse I or II Level determined by learning outcomes of the course. Level III Courses Prerequisite: Discourse II; Upper-level course required by all transfer students Assessment UMKC General Education Student Learning Outcomes Anchor I (3) Discourse I (3) Anchor II (3) Discourse II (3) Platform I (3) Platform II (3) Platform III (3) Platform IV-Elective (3) Anchor III (3) Discourse III (3) Co-Requisites Communication Skills X X X Technology & Information Literacy X X Interdisciplinary & Innovative Thinking X Human Values & Ethical Reasoning (X) X Culture & Diversity X Civic & Community Engagement X Scientific Reasoning & Quantitative Analysis (X) X Arts & Humanities X (X) As new General Education courses gain approval during 2012–2013, a curriculum map will be developed similar to the one seen here. It is important to notice that the courses will be ordered in relation to their specific learning outcomes. The Office of Assessment and the General Education Curriculum Committee will work to ensure these outcomes are properly assessed, and will continue to tweak all outcomes that need further development moving forward.

Gen Ed Course Review 14 Initially, courses will be reviewed and/or revised on a 1-3 year, rotating basis. Determination in the review process will primarily focus on the three Ws: 1.Whether and/or how learning outcomes are being assessed 2.Whether students performance is meeting expectations 3.Whether faculty are using assessment results to make improvements in their pedagogy and curriculum

Reporting 15 Each year, instructors who are teaching a Gen Ed course will submit the following details of their assessment plan in a report to the Assistant Vice Provost for Assessment: Learning outcomes Measurements Achievement targets Findings, and Action plans Assessment findings are not required for each semester, but should be collected at least once a year. Based on the individual course reports, summaries of the assessments for each of the 8 Learning Outcomes across campus will be submitted in WEAVE each year by the Assistant Vice Provost.

Course Approval Form 16 Question 1 Which of the General Education learning outcomes does this course address? You should mark no more than one, because whatever is marked, must be assessed.

Course Approval Form 17 Question 2 How will the learning outcomes be addressed? Looking for specifics about how the course meets or is related to the learning outcome listed in the previous question. How is the content of the course conceptually linked to the learning outcome? What content or activities are related to the learning outcome? Refer to and reference the language from the Eight Learning Outcomes assessment.cfm, but make the description more specific for your course. assessment.cfm Course-specific learning outcomes should be written for the course, which are related to one of the Eight Learning Outcomes.

Course Approval Form 18 Question 3 Will the course include any of the following high-impact experiences? Service Learning Undergraduate Research Learning Communities Study Abroad Internship Other

Course Approval Form 19 Questions Specific to the Anchor Courses How will the course connect or interact with the Discourse class? How will the course be interdisciplinary in nature? How will instructors interact in this course (what percentage of class time will be shared and how) and how will team-teaching be integrated into this course?

Course Approval Form 20 Question 4 How will the learning outcomes be assessed? This answer requires a description of both the means and frequency of assessment to be administered. This might include essays, quizzes, exams, group projects, portfolios, etc. Using the final test or paper in the course is the most typical means of assessing the learning outcome. A rubric or an evaluation form connected to your learning outcomes is highly recommended. If you are using a test, you should connect specific items on the test to the learning outcomes. Do NOT list course grades. The data you collect should give you insights regarding where students are stronger and weaker (in terms of specific sub-outcomes measured on your test or rubric).

Course Approval Form 21 Question 5 What is the achievement target for the students learning outcomes? Includes expectations of general performance and percentage of students expected to perform at higher levels. The achievement target is usually between 70-90%, and should be a goal to strive for.

Discuss 22 What are the next steps for you and your colleagues to address General Education course design and assessment?

23 Questions?