Rb Interacts with Histone Deacetylase to Repress Transcription

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CREB Binding Protein Recruitment to the Transcription Complex Requires Growth Factor–Dependent Phosphorylation of Its GF Box  Kerstin Zanger, Sally Radovick,
Advertisements

Casper Is a FADD- and Caspase-Related Inducer of Apoptosis
Up-Regulation of Activating Transcription Factor-5 Suppresses SAP Expression to Activate T Cells in Hemophagocytic Syndrome Associated with Epstein-Barr.
From: The role of acetylation in rDNA transcription
Zilong Qiu, Anirvan Ghosh  Neuron 
Differential responses of the right ventricle to abnormal loading conditions in vivo: Possible pathophysiologic mechanisms  Anthony Azakie, MD, Jeffrey.
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
E6 Oncoprotein Represses p53-Dependent Gene Activation via Inhibition of Protein Acetylation Independently of Inducing p53 Degradation  Mary C. Thomas,
Ho-Geun Yoon, Doug W. Chan, Albert B. Reynolds, Jun Qin, Jiemin Wong 
RNAi-Mediated PTB Depletion Leads to Enhanced Exon Definition
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Pim-1 Kinase and p100 Cooperate to Enhance c-Myb Activity
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Pim-1 Kinase and p100 Cooperate to Enhance c-Myb Activity
Sp1 Is Required for Glucose-Induced Transcriptional Regulation of Mouse Vesicular Glutamate Transporter 2 Gene  Tao Li, Liqun Bai, Jing Li, Suzu Igarashi,
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (April 1996)
Eun-Joo Kim, Jeong-Hoon Kho, Moo-Rim Kang, Soo-Jong Um  Molecular Cell 
Ras Enhances Myc Protein Stability
Polina Iakova, Samir S Awad, Nikolai A Timchenko  Cell 
HDAC Activity Is Required for p65/RelA-Dependent Repression of PPARδ-Mediated Transactivation in Human Keratinocytes  Lene Aarenstrup, Esben Noerregaard.
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (February 2005)
Daniel Wolf, Stephen P. Goff  Cell 
Enxuan Jing, Stephane Gesta, C. Ronald Kahn  Cell Metabolism 
Regulation of CSF1 Promoter by the SWI/SNF-like BAF Complex
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
An Acetylation Switch in p53 Mediates Holo-TFIID Recruitment
Glucose-Induced β-Catenin Acetylation Enhances Wnt Signaling in Cancer
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Xiaolong Wei, Hai Xu, Donald Kufe  Cancer Cell 
Yuming Wang, Jennifer A. Fairley, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Current Biology 
Volume 98, Issue 6, Pages (September 1999)
Volume 119, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Andrew W Snowden, Philip D Gregory, Casey C Case, Carl O Pabo 
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Linking the Rb and Polycomb Pathways
Volume 16, Issue 24, Pages (December 2006)
Site α Is Crucial for Two Routes of IFNγ-Induced MHC Class I Transactivation: The ISRE-Mediated Route and a Novel Pathway Involving CIITA  Sam J.P Gobin,
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
p300 Transcriptional Repression Is Mediated by SUMO Modification
Phosphorylation on Thr-55 by TAF1 Mediates Degradation of p53
Volume 127, Issue 4, Pages (October 2004)
Both Natural and Designed Micro RNAs Can Inhibit the Expression of Cognate mRNAs When Expressed in Human Cells  Yan Zeng, Eric J Wagner, Bryan R Cullen 
Regulation of Skeletal Myogenesis by Association of the MEF2 Transcription Factor with Class II Histone Deacetylases  Jianrong Lu, Timothy A. McKinsey,
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 27, Issue 5, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 2, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
PUMA, a Novel Proapoptotic Gene, Is Induced by p53
Robin M. Ricke, Anja-Katrin Bielinsky  Molecular Cell 
IFN-γ Represses IL-4 Expression via IRF-1 and IRF-2
Casper Is a FADD- and Caspase-Related Inducer of Apoptosis
The PHD Finger/Bromodomain of NoRC Interacts with Acetylated Histone H4K16 and Is Sufficient for rDNA Silencing  Yonggang Zhou, Ingrid Grummt  Current.
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Formation of the Androgen Receptor Transcription Complex
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Active Repression of Antiapoptotic Gene Expression by RelA(p65) NF-κB
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (October 2001)
A Smad Transcriptional Corepressor
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

Rb Interacts with Histone Deacetylase to Repress Transcription Robin X Luo, Antonio A Postigo, Douglas C Dean  Cell  Volume 92, Issue 4, Pages 463-473 (February 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80940-X

Figure 1 Rb Interacts with HDAC1 In Vivo, whereas p107 Does Not (A) Binding of Rb to HDAC1 requires both Rb domains A and B. Flag-tagged HDAC1 and Gal4-tagged Rb or Mad proteins were coexpressed in Rb (−) C33A cells, and a monoclonal anti-Gal4 antibody was used to immunoprecipitate the Gal4 proteins (Experimental Procedures). The precipitated proteins were Western blotted for the presence of flag-HDAC1. “G-Mad-mut” indicates a point mutation in Mad that does not interact with HDAC1 (Ayer et al. 1995). (B) Western blot of the immunoprecipitated Gal4 proteins. The membrane in (A) was stripped and reblotted with a polyclonal antibody to Gal4. (C) Direct Western blot of flag-HDAC1, showing equal expression in the transfection assays. (D) Association of Rb domains A and B forms a site for interaction of HDAC1. Expression vectors for domains A or B were transfected either alone or together along with flag-HDAC1, and association was followed by coimmunoprecipitation as in (A). (E) The indicated Gal4 proteins were transfected into C33A cells along with flag-tagged HDAC1, and coimmunoprecipitation was followed as in (A). (F) Western blot of the immunoprecipitated proteins. The membrane in (E) was stripped and reblotted with a polyclonal antibody to Gal4. (G) Direct Western blot of flag-HDAC1, showing equal expression in the transfection assays. (H) Rb interacts with HDAC1 in vivo without overexpression of the proteins. Extract from Rb (+) CV1 cells was split into two equal fractions, and the fractions were immunoprecipitated with anti-HDAC1 antisera (Santa Cruz) or a nonspecific control antibody to histone H3. Precipitated proteins were then Western blotted for Rb. The antibody is detected because monoclonal antibodies were used for both immunoprecipitation and Western blotting. A direct Western blot for Rb is shown on the left. The direct Western blot contains approximately 10% of the protein extract used for immunoprecipitation. Molecular size markers in kilodaltons are shown on the right. Cell 1998 92, 463-473DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80940-X)

Figure 2 Rb Can Repress Transcription by Recruiting Histone Deacetylase The indicated expression vectors were cotransfected with G5MLPCAT, which contains Gal4 DNA-binding sites upstream of the MLP driving the CAT gene; pCAT, a minimal promoter containing Gal4 sites upstream of the adenovirus E1b TATA box driving the CAT gene; or pE2F-CAT, which contains E2F sites upstream of the TATA box in pCAT, into Rb (−) C33A cells (Experimental Procedures). “TK” indicates the herpes virus thymidine kinase promoter driving the CAT gene—Gal4 sites are located approximately 50 bp upstream of the promoter (Starostik et al. 1996). Where indicated, transfected cells were treated with Trichostatin A (TSA) (Experimental Procedures). As a control, Trichostatin A enhanced activation by the G-Mad-VP16 fusion protein as described (Laherty et al. 1997). “G” indicates Gal4. Results are representative of at least three separate experiments, each in duplicate. Cell 1998 92, 463-473DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80940-X)

Figure 3 Histone Deacetylase Activity Is Not Required for Rb to Repress the SV40 Enhancer, the ETS Family Transcription Factor PU.1, or the NFκB Family Member p65 Experiments were done together with those in Figure 2. The indicated reporters and expression vectors were cotransfected into Rb (−) C33A cells (similar results were seen in CV-1 cells). The reporters are pGL-CAT (Chow and Dean 1996), containing both Gal4- and Lex A–binding sites driving CAT; pG-CAT, where the Lex A sites are deleted; and pSVEC, containing the SV40 72 bp repeats upstream of the E1B TATA box driving CAT (Chow and Dean 1996). Expression vectors were cotransfected as indicated (Experimental Procedures). “G” indicates Gal4 and “L” Lex A. Results are representative of at least three separate experiments, each in duplicate. Cell 1998 92, 463-473DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80940-X)

Figure 4 Recruitment of Rb or Mad Decreases Acetylated Histone H3 (Ac-Histone) on the MLP In Vivo (A) Diagram of the effect of histone acetylation/deacetylation on promoter activity. (B) Flow chart of the experimental design. (C) G5MLPCAT (see Figure 2) was transfected into CV1 cells along with expression vectors for Gal4-Rb (G-Rb), Gal4-Rb706 (G-Rb706), Gal4-Mad (G-Mad), or the parent expression vector expressing only Gal4 (see Figure 2 and Figure 3). Acetylated histone H3 on the MLP was determined by a CHIP assay as described in Experimental Procedures. Cell lysate from the transfections was split into two parts. One-third was used to determine total transfected MLP DNA by ethanol precipitation of cell lysates followed by PCR amplification of promoter sequences (total MLP). The other two-thirds of the extract was then used to analyze MLP associated with acetylated histone H3 (Ac-Histone MLP). Association was analyzed by immunoprecipitation with an antibody specific for the acetylated form of histone H3 followed by PCR amplification of the coimmunoprecipitated promoter. The PCR product (248 bp) was then separated on an agarose gel. “Total MLP-no Ab” indicates total MLP from assays where anti-acetylated histone H3 was not added. Results are representative of three independent experiments. Cell 1998 92, 463-473DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80940-X)

Figure 5 Histone Deacetylase Activity and Rb-Mediated Repression of Endogenous Genes Containing E2F Sites (A) The Rb (−) osteosarcoma SAOS-2 cell line stably transfected with a tetracycline (Tet)-repressible Rb expression vector was cultured in the presence of Tet or in the absence of the drug for 30 hr to induce Rb expression. Where indicated, cells were treated with Trichostatin A (TSA) to inhibit histone deacetylase activity. Total RNA was isolated and cDNA was prepared in a single reverse transcriptase reaction using random hexamers as primer (Experimental Procedures). The cDNA from this reverse transcriptase reaction was then subjected to PCR amplification with primer specific for the indicated E2F site–containing genes. PCR reactions were done at both 28 and 22 cycles to insure linearity. (B) Inhibition of histone deacetylase activity induces a subset of genes containing E2F sites in the Rb (+) osteosarcoma cell line U2OS. U2OS cells were treated with Trichostatin A for 30 hr, and expression of cell cycle genes containing E2F sites was followed by reverse transcriptase-PCR as in (A). RR1, ribonucleotide reductase; TK, thymidine kinase; DHFR, dihydrofolate reductase; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Cell 1998 92, 463-473DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80940-X)