Separating E and B types of CMB polarization on an incomplete sky Wen Zhao Based on: WZ and D.Baskaran, Phys.Rev.D 82 023001 (2010) 2019/9/3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CMB Power spectrum likelihood approximations
Advertisements

Primordial perturbations and precision cosmology from the Cosmic Microwave Background Antony Lewis CITA, University of Toronto
CMB Constraints on Cosmology Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Planck 2013 results, implications for cosmology
Foreground cleaning in CMB experiments Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA, Trieste.
FastICA as a LOFAR-EoR Foreground Cleaning Technique Filipe Abdalla and Emma Woodfield University College London with Saleem Zaroubi, Vibor Jelic, Panos.
Systematic effects in cosmic microwave background polarization and power spectrum estimation SKA 2010 Postgraduate Bursary Conference, Stellenbosch Institute.
Photo: Keith Vanderlinde Detection of tensor B-mode polarization : Why would we need any more data?
Galaxy and Mass Power Spectra Shaun Cole ICC, University of Durham Main Contributors: Ariel Sanchez (Cordoba) Steve Wilkins (Cambridge) Imperial College.
Distinguishing Primordial B Modes from Lensing Section 5: F. Finelli, A. Lewis, M. Bucher, A. Balbi, V. Aquaviva, J. Diego, F. Stivoli Abstract:” If the.
Contamination of the CMB Planck data by galactic polarized emissions L. Fauvet, J.F. Macίas-Pérez.
WMAP. The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe was designed to measure the CMB. –Launched in 2001 –Ended 2010 Microwave antenna includes five frequency.
Component Separation of Polarized Data Application to PLANCK Jonathan Aumont J-F. Macías-Pérez, M. Tristram, D. Santos
The Cosmic Microwave Background. Maxima DASI WMAP.
A Primer on SZ Surveys Gil Holder Institute for Advanced Study.
1 On the road to discovery of relic gravitational waves: From cosmic microwave background radiation Wen Zhao Department of Astronomy University of Science.
CMB large angular scale, full sky polarization anisotropy has been measured moderately well, but not well enough – The value of reionization fraction derived.
(Rajib Saha,Pankaj Jain,Tarun Souradeep, astro-ph/ ) A Blind Estimation of Angular Power Spectrum of CMB Anisotropy from WMAP.
Introduction to Power Spectrum Estimation Lloyd Knox (UC Davis) CCAPP, 23 June 2010.
Separating Cosmological B-Modes with FastICA Stivoli F. Baccigalupi C. Maino D. Stompor R. Orsay – 15/09/2005.
The Implication of BICEP2 : Alternative Interpretations on its results Seokcheon Lee SNU Seminar Apr. 10 th
Polarization-assisted WMAP-NVSS Cross Correlation Collaborators: K-W Ng(IoP, AS) Ue-Li Pen (CITA) Guo Chin Liu (ASIAA)
L. Perivolaropoulos Department of Physics University of Ioannina Open page.
The Cosmic Microwave Background Lecture 2 Elena Pierpaoli.
Probing fundamental physics with CMB B-modes Cora Dvorkin IAS Harvard (Hubble fellow) Status and Future of Inflationary Theory workshop August 2014, KICP.
The CMB TE Cross Correlation and Primordial Gravitational Waves Nathan Miller CASS Journal Club 11/6/07.
US Planck Data Analysis Review 1 Christopher CantalupoUS Planck Data Analysis Review 9–10 May 2006 CTP Working Group Presented by Christopher Cantalupo.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
Determination of tensor spectral index in the CMB Wen IHEP
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT. OUTLINE  What is SZE  What Can we learn from SZE  SZE Cluster Surveys  Experimental Issues  SZ Surveys are coming: What.
1SBPI 16/06/2009 Heterodyne detection with LISA for gravitational waves parameters estimation Nicolas Douillet.
Collaborators within DK-Planck community Lung-Yih Chiang (NBI) Andrei Doroshkevich (TAC,ASC FIRAN) Per Rex Christensen (NBI) Igor D. Novikov ( NBI) Pavel.
Array for Microwave Background Anisotropy AMiBA SZ Science AMiBA Team NTU Physics Figure 4. Simulated AMiBA deep surveys of a 1deg 2 field (no primary.
EBEx foregrounds and band optimization Carlo Baccigalupi, Radek Stompor.
L2: The Cosmic Microwave Background & the Fluctuation History of the Universe & the Basic Cosmological Parameters Dick Bond.
The Planck Satellite Hannu Kurki-Suonio University of Helsinki Finnish-Japanese Workshop on Particle Cosmology, Helsinki
1 The Planck view of CMB Contamination from Diffuse Foregrounds Carlo Baccigalupi On Behalf of the Planck Collaboration KITP Conference, April 2013.
3rd International Workshop on Dark Matter, Dark Energy and Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry NTHU & NTU, Dec 27—31, 2012 Likelihood of the Matter Power Spectrum.
Blind Component Separation for Polarized Obseravations of the CMB Jonathan Aumont, Juan-Francisco Macias-Perez Rencontres de Moriond 2006 La.
On the detection of the tensor-to-scalar ratio r using the CMB B-modes
The Cosmic Microwave Background
150GHz 100GHz 220GHz Galactic Latitude (Deg) A Millimeter Wave Galactic Plane Survey with the BICEP Polarimeter Evan Bierman (U.C. San Diego) and C. Darren.
Measuring shear using… Kaiser, Squires & Broadhurst (1995) Luppino & Kaiser (1997)
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
BICEP2 Results & Its Implication on inflation models and Cosmology Seokcheon Lee 48 th Workshop on Gravitation & NR May. 16 th
Detecting the CMB Polarization Ziang Yan. How do we know about the universe by studying CMB?
T. Vachaspati (ASU), W. Chen, F. Ferrer (WUS) or Search for Parity-odd signatures in the gamma ray sky Hiroyuki TASHIRO Nagoya University 2016 Jan. 13.
The Planck view of CMB Contamination from Diffuse Foregrounds
CMB physics Zong-Kuan Guo 《现代宇宙学》
Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization
Nicolas Fagnoni – Cosmology on Safari – 14th February 2017
A 2 veto for Continuous Wave Searches
P.Astone, S.D’Antonio, S.Frasca, C.Palomba
Towards the first detection using SPT polarisation
Testing Primordial non-Gaussianities in CMB Anisotropies
Constraining the redshift of reionization using a “modest” array
Dust-polarization maps and interstellar turbulence
Data Taking and Samples
Supporting Observations TPX – dust Polarized Sources
Beam Deconvolution Map-Making
Simulating Interferometers for the CMB Sky
A polarimetric approach for constraining the dynamic foreground spectrum for global 21-cm measurements (with applications for DARE) Bang D. Nhan University.
12th Marcel Grossman Meeting,
Spherical Measuring Device of Secondary Electron Emission Coefficient Based on Pulsed Electron Beam Kaile Wen Shulin Liu Baojun Yan Yuzhen Yang Yang.
Physics Seminar Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave Background anisotropies and polarization with Planck Assoc. Prof. Guillaume Patanchon Astroparticle.
Bayesian Estimation of the isotropy violation in the CMB sky
A Measurement of CMB Polarization with QUaD
Abstract Observed CMB polarization maps can be split into gradient-like (E) and curl-like (B) modes. I review the details of this decomposition, and the.
E-B mixture and E-B separation in CMB
Presentation transcript:

Separating E and B types of CMB polarization on an incomplete sky Wen Zhao Based on: WZ and D.Baskaran, Phys.Rev.D 82 023001 (2010) 2019/9/3

OUTLINE Polarization of the CMB fields Separating E and B types of polarization Unbiased estimators of B-mode polarization Summary 2019/9/3

E and B types of polarization of the CMB fields 2019/9/3

E-Polarization & B-Polarization Thomson Scatter and Generation of Polarization Two factors: ** Temperature Anisotropies ** Free electrons Two stages: @ recombination stage @ reionization stage E-Polarization & B-Polarization 2019/9/3

CMB power spectra 2019/9/3

Various contaminations in observations instrumental noises foreground noises including synchrotron, dust, free-free emissions cosmic weak lensing various systematics including differential gain, differential beam width, first order pointing error, differential ellipticity of the beam, differential rotation, et al. E-B mixture for the incomplete sky survey 2019/9/3

Separating E and B-modes on an incomplete sky ------- The problem: E-B mixture 2019/9/3

Separating E and B-modes on an incomplete sky -------- Difficulty of the general method 2019/9/3

Separating E and B-modes on an incomplete sky -------- A new method We adopt a different but related definition for electric and magnetic polarization maps: The relation between this definition and the general definition: 2019/9/3

Separating E and B-modes on an incomplete sky -------- Applying to the incomplete sky So, in principle, we can construct the pure E and B types of polarization in the area where the window function 2019/9/3

Separating E and B-modes on an incomplete sky -------- Separation in the pixel space We assume a toy model: (1) observe the northern hemisphere; (2) no B-mode in the input model. We adopt a typical window function: 2019/9/3

Separating E and B-modes on an incomplete sky -------- Numerical errors 2019/9/3

Separating E and B-modes on an incomplete sky -------- Numerical errors 2019/9/3

Separating E and B-modes on an incomplete sky -------- Applying small-sky surveys From now, we shall discuss the application of our method to the small partial sky surveys, which could be the case of various ground-based (i.e. QUIET, PolarBear) or balloon-borne (i.e. EBEX, PAPPER) experiments. We shall work with a small fraction of the sky characterized by the window function with (corresponding to a 3% sky survey) The input model, we assume the B-mode is generated by the cosmic weak lensing and gravitational waves (tensor perturbations) with r=0.1. 2019/9/3

Separating E and B-modes on an incomplete sky -------- Applying to small-sky surveys We simulate 1000 random samples of (Q, U), and construct the pure B-type polarization. We study the average of these samples. This figure shows the averaged power spectrum of the B-mode polarization. N.B. - adopt N_{side}=512 - edge removal at W=0.1 2019/9/3

Separating E and B-modes on an incomplete sky -------- Comparing with the analytical results 2019/9/3

Separating E and B-modes on an incomplete sky -------- Unbiased estimators for C_l^{BB} There are mainly three ways to build the unbiased estimators of the power spectra: * Estimation using the pseudo-Cl (PCL) Fast, but having larger error bars! * Maximum likelihood estimation (ML) Smaller error bars, but slow! * Unbiased hybrid estimator Combining a ML at low multipoles and PCL at high multipoles! 2019/9/3

Separating E and B-modes on an incomplete sky -------- Estimation using the pseudo-Cl 2019/9/3

Separating E and B-modes on an incomplete sky -------- Ideal case without instrumental noise Best choice of the weight function (future work)? 2019/9/3

Separating E and B-modes on an incomplete sky -------- loss of information The information loss is only caused by the edge removal (in order to decrease the numerical errors). In above case, we have removed 0.6% of the full sky, i.e. W=0.1 (conserved consideration). This information loss can be reflected by increasing the error bars of the data (blue: ideal lossless case; red: realistic case). 2019/9/3

Separating E and B-modes on an incomplete sky -------- Applying to QUIET experiment 2019/9/3

Summary We propose a new method to separate the E and B types of polarization on an incomplete sky. The characters of this method are: The E and B fields are constructed in real space with minimal loss of information. The method is fast and can be applied to high resolution maps. The constructed maps are scalar fields. So various techniques (i.e. unbiased estimator, non-Gaussian analysis and so on) developed to deal with T maps can be directly applied to analyze these fields. The method can be applied to the future observations, including Planck mission, ground-based and balloon-borne experiments. 2019/9/3

Thanks! 2019/9/3