Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Networks of Dynamic Allostery Regulate Enzyme Function
Advertisements

Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Mapping of the Interaction Interface of DNA Polymerase β with XRCC1
Conformational Heterogeneity in the Activation Mechanism of Bax
Marcelo J. Berardi, James J. Chou  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Key Interactions for Clathrin Coat Stability
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 113, Issue 6, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
HyeongJun Kim, Jen Hsin, Yanxin Liu, Paul R. Selvin, Klaus Schulten 
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Myosin VI Undergoes Cargo-Mediated Dimerization
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Yizhou Liu, Richard A. Kahn, James H. Prestegard  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
A Functional Proline Switch in Cytochrome P450cam
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Structural Diversity in Integrin/Talin Interactions
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2012)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Conformational Heterogeneity in the Activation Mechanism of Bax
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
A Self-Sequestered Calmodulin-like Ca2+ Sensor of Mitochondrial SCaMC Carrier and Its Implication to Ca2+-Dependent ATP-Mg/Pi Transport  Qin Yang, Sven.
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Structural Basis for Recognition of Diubiquitins by NEMO
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 110, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 Ligase Siz1 and Determinants Required for SUMO Modification of PCNA  Ali A. Yunus, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Structure and Interactions of PAS Kinase N-Terminal PAS Domain
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
A Plug Release Mechanism for Membrane Permeation by MLKL
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 109, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages 1371-1379.e3 (September 2017) Specific Interaction of the Human Mitochondrial Uncoupling Protein 1 with Free Long- Chain Fatty Acid  Linlin Zhao, Shuqing Wang, Qianli Zhu, Bin Wu, Zhijun Liu, Bo OuYang, James J. Chou  Structure  Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages 1371-1379.e3 (September 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2017.07.005 Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2017 25, 1371-1379.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.07.005) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Specific GDP Binding of UCP1 Reconstituted in FC-12 (A) 2D 1H-15N TROSY-HSQC spectrum of 0.5 mM U-[15N,13C,2H]UCP1 in the presence of 60 mM FC-12 recorded at 600 MHz (1H frequency) and 30°C. (B) SPR binding sensorgrams of GDP binding to UCP1 at various GDP concentrations in the presence of 3 mM FC-12. The GDP concentrations are 0.031 μM (purple), 0.061 μM (blue), 0.122 μM (cyan), 0.488 μM (green), 0.977 μM (yellow), 1.950 μM (orange), and 3.910 μM (red). (C) Fitting data in (B) to the equilibrium binding equation yielded apparent KD of 160 nM. (D) 2D 1H-15N TROSY-HSQC spectrum of 30 μM U-[15N,13C,2H]UCP1 in the presence of 3 mM FC-12 recorded as in (A). Structure 2017 25, 1371-1379.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.07.005) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Primary and Secondary Structure Alignment of Human UCP1 and Mouse UCP2 The cylinders above the sequence indicate the helical regions of the mouse UCP2 NMR structure (PDB: 2LCK). Asterisks below the sequence indicate the UCP1 residues with NMR chemical-shift assignment, and dots indicate helical regions of UCP1 predicted by TALOS+ based on chemical-shift values, i.e., TALOS+ output shows “GOOD” prediction with ϕ/ψ = −60°/−40° ± 30°. UCP2 residues previously shown to interact with FA are highlighted with red boxes (Berardi and Chou, 2014). Structure 2017 25, 1371-1379.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.07.005) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Characterization of C16FA Binding to UCP1 by Chemical-Shift Titration (A) Examples of residue-specific chemical-shift perturbations at various C16FA concentrations: 0 mM (red), 0.5 mM (pink), 1 mM (orange), 2 mM (green), 4 mM (cyan), 8 mM (blue), and 10 mM (purple). The peaks are from 2D 1H-15N TROSY-HSQC spectra recorded at 600 MHz (1H frequency) with a 0.5 mM U-[15N,13C,2H]UCP1 sample. (B) Simulated binding curves (Equation 2) at various KD values used to match the titration data from (A). (C) Mapping the residues with higher apparent C16FA affinities onto the UCP1 model. Spheres represent the analyzed residues. Spheres are colored such that red represents KD ≤ 700 μM, magenta represents 700 μM < KD <1,200 μM, and white represents KD ≥ 1,200 μM. Structure 2017 25, 1371-1379.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.07.005) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Unambiguous Identification of FA Binding to UCP1 Using Paramagnetic Probes (A) Specific broadening of 1H-15N correlation peaks by different nitroxide-labeled FAs (16NO-FA and 5NO-FA) and recovery of the broadened peaks upon addition of ascorbic acid. (B) Mapping the PREs induced by 16NO-FA (left) and 5NO-FA (right) onto the UCP1 model derived from the UCP2 NMR structure (PDB: 2LCK). Spheres represent analyzed residues. Blue spheres represent residues with I/I0 < 0.4. Structure 2017 25, 1371-1379.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.07.005) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Stability of C16FA Binding to UCP1 Model in MD Simulation (A) The initial positions of C16FAs at three helix-helix interface sites that afford charge-charge interactions with the FA carboxylate head group. These sites include the PRE-derived site at the H1-H6 interface (pink), the K73/R153 site at H2-H3 interface (orange), and the K175/K249 site at the H4-H5 interface (green). (B) The average positions of C16FAs after 50 ns of MD simulation. Structure 2017 25, 1371-1379.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.07.005) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Effects of Mutating the FA Binding Site on UCP1-Mediated H+ Flux (A) Schematic illustration of the liposome assay for measuring UCP1-mediated H+ flux. Valinomycin was used to generate K+ electrochemical potential to drive H+ efflux, leading to excitation of the pH-sensitive fluorescent probe HPTS. (B) Time traces of fluorescence (F.U.) from the assay in (A) in the absence (blue) and presence (orange) of 8 mM GDP. (C) Bar graph showing the ratios of H+ flux of the mutants to that of the wild-type (WT). The error bars denote the SDs from three independent measurements. Structure 2017 25, 1371-1379.e3DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2017.07.005) Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions