Use of p2mp BFD in PIM-SM (over shared-media segment) draft-mirsky-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case Greg Mirsky gregimirsky@gmail.com Ji Xiaoli ji.xiaoli@zte.com.cn.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Draft-ietf-pim-port-06. port-06 update Changes made in response to second wglc comments and following discussion Many minor editorial issues fixed Changed.
Advertisements

MPLS-TP BFD for CC-CV proactive and RDI functionalities
OSPF Two-part Metrics Jeffrey Zhang Lili Wang Juniper Networks 88 th IETF, Vancouver.
Directed BFD Return Path draft-mirsky-mpls-bfd-directed-03 Greg Mirsky Jeff Tantsura
Proactive fault detection in E-VPN (draft-vgovindan-l2vpn-evpn-bfd-00) Vengada Prasad Govindan, Samer Salam, Ali Sajassi IETF 88, November 2013 Vancouver.
Signaling & Routing Extension for Links with Variable Discrete Bandwidth draft-long-ccamp-rsvp-te-availability-03 draft-long-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-02.
LSP-Ping and BFD encapsulation over ACH draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-bfd-procedures Nitin BahadurRahul Aggarwal Dave WardTom Nadeau Nurit SprecherYaacov.
Draft-ietf-pim-source- discovery-bsr-01 IJsbrand Wijnands, Stig Venaas, Michael Brig,
73rd IETF - Minneapolis I. T. N. M. draft-wijnands-mpls-mldp-in-band-signaling-00.
Desired Behavior  This proposed mechanism provides a robust means of electing an RP from a subset of the domain’s PIM routers which are configured and.
NVO3 Overlay P2MP Ping draft-xia-nvo3-overlay-p2mp-ping-00 Liang Xia, Weiguo Hao, Greg Mirsky July 2014 Toronto.
Multicast State Advertisement in EVPN draft-li-l2vpn-evpn-multicast-state-ad Zhenbin Li Junlin Zhang Huawei Technologies July, 2013 Berlin Germany.
Agenda Problem Statement Solution Overview and Applicability
BGP extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery in a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN draft-kumaki-pce-bgp-disco-attribute-03.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI R&D Labs,
draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-02
Residence Time Measurement draft-mirsky-mpls-residence-time-02
IETF 67, MPLS WG, San Diego 11/08/2006
In-Band Authentication Extension for Protocol Independent Multicast (PIM) draft-bhatia-zhang-pim-auth-extension-00 Manav Bhatia
78th IETF Meeting - Maastricht 27th, July 2010
Greg Mirsky Vero Zheng Mach Chen Giuseppe Fioccola
draft-ietf-pim-source-discovery-bsr-05
draft-lts-pim-hello-mtu-01
draft-haas-bfd-large-packets
Greg Mirsky IETF-99 July 2017, Prague
Greg Mirsky Jeff Tantsura Mach Chen Ilya Varlashkin
Charles E. Perkins RFC 2002bis Charles E. Perkins
Greg Mirsky Erik Nordmark Nagendra Kumar Deepak Kumar Mach Chen
Encapsulation for BIER in Non-MPLS IPv6 Networks
Use of p2mp BFD in PIM-SM over shared-media segment draft-mirsky-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case Greg Mirsky Ji Xiaoli
BFD Directed Return Path draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed-07
Draft-jain-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05.txt Parag Jain, Samer Salam, Ali Sajassi (Cisco), Sami Boutros (VMware), Greg Mirsky (ZTE) IETF 99, July 2017 Prague.
draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-01
BFD for VXLAN draft-spallagatti-bfd-vxlan
MPLS-TP BFD for CC-CV proactive and RDI functionalities
Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP): base protocol and data model draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp draft-mirsky-ippm-stamp-yang Greg Mirsky
Jeffrey Haas Reshad Rahman
Technical Issues with draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
PW security measures PWE3 – 65th IETF 21 March 2005 Yaakov (J) Stein.
PIM Backup DR Mankamana Mishra IETF-102
PW Control Word Stitching
Jeffrey Haas Reshad Rahman
IETF BIER, November 2017, Singapore
Use of p2mp BFD in PIM-SM (over shared-media segment) draft-mirsky-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case Greg Mirsky Ji Xiaoli
Jeffrey Haas Reshad Rahman
Extended BFD draft-mirmin-bfd-extended
OAM for Deterministic Networks with IP Data Plane draft-mirsky-detnet-ip-oam Greg Mirsky Mach Chen IETF-105 July 2019, Montreal.
draft-liu-pim-mofrr-tilfa-00
BFD draft-adubey-bfd-service-redundancy-02
BIER in IPv6 draft-zhang-bier-bierin6-03
OAM for Deterministic Networks with MPLS Data Plane draft-mirsky-detnet-mpls-oam Greg Mirsky Mach Chen IETF-105 July 2019, Montreal.
PW Control Word Stitching
Active OAM in Geneve draft-mmbb-nvo3-geneve-oam
Quan Xiong(ZTE) Gregory Mirsky(ZTE) Chang Liu(China Unicom)
OAM for Deterministic Networks draft-mirsky-detnet-oam
PIM DR IMPROVEMENT draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement-05
PIM Assert Message Packing
Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for EVPN Ethernet Segment Failover Use Case draft-zwm-bess-es-failover-00 BESS WG IETF104# Prague Sandy Zhang.
Parag Jain, Samer Salam, Ali Sajassi (Cisco),
IETF Montreal BFD YANG Data Model
draft-ietf-pim-ipv4-prefix-over-ipv6-nh
IETF BIER, November 2018, Bangkok
Supporting Flexible Algorithm Prefix SIDs in LSP Ping/Traceroute
IETF 102 pim wg meeting.
MLDP Signaling over BIER
draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-04
Reliable PIM Registers draft-anish-reliable-pim-register
IESG LC: BFD for VXLAN draft-ietf-bfd-vxlan
Presenter: Raunak Banthia
Inter-AS OAM for SR Networks IETF 105, Montreal
Presentation transcript:

Use of p2mp BFD in PIM-SM (over shared-media segment) draft-mirsky-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case Greg Mirsky gregimirsky@gmail.com Ji Xiaoli ji.xiaoli@zte.com.cn IETF-105, July 2019, Montreal

Proposed solution RFC 8562 BFD for Multipoint Networks extends BFD for use in multipoint and multicast networks PIM DR advertises its BFD My Discriminator in PIM Hello packet (extension to RFC 7761) to bootstrap p2mp BFD session Non-DR creates a MultipointTail session and uses My Discriminator value from PIM Hello packet and DR’s IP address to demultiplex BFD control packets Thus the p2mp BFD session has PIM DR router as the MultipointHead and non-DR routers as MultipointTail. The DR uses the same IP address it uses in PIM Hello as the source IP address for p2mp BFD control packets In p2mp BFD there’s no P-F sequence with interval negotiation and Your Discriminator must always be zero Detection time is the product of the value in the Desired Min Tx Interval and the value in the Detect Mult. Field of the last received valid BFD control packet

Extend PIM Hello Checksum PIM Ver Type Reserved OptionType1 OptionLength1 OptionValue1 OptionType2 OptionLength2 OptionValue2 Type Length My Discriminator

Procedures with draft-ietf-pim-dr-improvement DR MUST include BFD TLV in its PIM-Hello message. BFD TLV MUST be included after DR Address TLV BDR is RECOMMENDED to include BFD TLV in its PIM-Hello message. BFD TLV MUST be included after BDR Address TLV

Next steps Comments are welcome WG LC? Thank you!