Volume 119, Issue 2, Pages (October 2004)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Role of Bmi-1 and Ring1A in H2A Ubiquitylation and Hox Gene Silencing
Advertisements

by Toshibumi Shimokawa, and Chisei Ra
A Novel Cofactor for p300 that Regulates the p53 Response
BRCA1 Is Associated with a Human SWI/SNF-Related Complex
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
The dsRNA Binding Protein RDE-4 Interacts with RDE-1, DCR-1, and a DExH-Box Helicase to Direct RNAi in C. elegans  Hiroaki Tabara, Erbay Yigit, Haruhiko.
Marios Agelopoulos, Daniel J. McKay, Richard S. Mann  Cell Reports 
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Ho-Geun Yoon, Doug W. Chan, Albert B. Reynolds, Jun Qin, Jiemin Wong 
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages (July 1999)
Polina Iakova, Samir S Awad, Nikolai A Timchenko  Cell 
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages (May 1997)
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
The Nuclear Hat1p/Hat2p Complex
Daniel Wolf, Stephen P. Goff  Cell 
Ras Induces Mediator Complex Exchange on C/EBPβ
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
The Spinal Muscular Atrophy Disease Gene Product, SMN, and Its Associated Protein SIP1 Are in a Complex with Spliceosomal snRNP Proteins  Qing Liu, Utz.
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
An Acetylation Switch in p53 Mediates Holo-TFIID Recruitment
Volume 125, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
lin-35 and lin-53, Two Genes that Antagonize a C
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 136, Issue 6, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (October 2002)
Theodora Agalioti, Guoying Chen, Dimitris Thanos  Cell 
NAD+-Dependent Modulation of Chromatin Structure and Transcription by Nucleosome Binding Properties of PARP-1  Mi Young Kim, Steven Mauro, Nicolas Gévry,
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
Volume 67, Issue 3, Pages e5 (August 2017)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 11, Issue 24, Pages (December 2001)
Andrei Kuzmichev, Thomas Jenuwein, Paul Tempst, Danny Reinberg 
Volume 121, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
tRNA Binds to Cytochrome c and Inhibits Caspase Activation
SUMO-1 Modification Represses Sp3 Transcriptional Activation and Modulates Its Subnuclear Localization  Sarah Ross, Jennifer L Best, Leonard I Zon, Grace.
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Jin Mo Park, Janis Werner, Jung Mo Kim, John T Lis, Young-Joon Kim 
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Nucleoporin Nup98 Associates with Trx/MLL and NSL Histone-Modifying Complexes and Regulates Hox Gene Expression  Pau Pascual-Garcia, Jieun Jeong, Maya.
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 1998)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 123, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Role of Bmi-1 and Ring1A in H2A Ubiquitylation and Hox Gene Silencing
Presentation transcript:

Volume 119, Issue 2, Pages 181-193 (October 2004) Native E2F/RBF Complexes Contain Myb-Interacting Proteins and Repress Transcription of Developmentally Controlled E2F Target Genes  Michael Korenjak, Barbie Taylor-Harding, Ulrich K. Binné, John S. Satterlee, Olivier Stevaux, Rein Aasland, Helen White-Cooper, Nick Dyson, Alexander Brehm  Cell  Volume 119, Issue 2, Pages 181-193 (October 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.034

Figure 1 Native RBF Complexes in Drosophila (A) Nuclear extracts were subjected to Superose 6 gel filtration. Fractions were analyzed by Western blot using specific antibodies as indicated. Fraction numbers are denoted on top, size standards on the bottom. IN, input. (B) Nuclear extracts were fractionated over Q Sepharose. Fractions were analyzed by Western blot using specific antibodies as shown. Three RBF1 peaks are indicated on top. IN, input; FT, flowthrough. Cell 2004 119, 181-193DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.034)

Figure 2 Purification of dREAM Complexes (A) Schematic representation of procedure. (B) Fractions eluting from the final column were visualized by silver staining. Polypeptides coeluting with RBF1, RBF2, dE2F2, and dDP Western signals are marked with solid black circles. SDS PAGE and gel filtration size markers are shown on the left and on the bottom, respectively. dREAM subunits are indicated by arrows. MW, molecular weight markers; IN, input. (C) Fractions shown in (B) were analyzed by Western blot using specific antibodies as indicated. (D) Fractions derived from Q Sepharose peak III (see Figure 1B) were precipitated with antibodies directed against RBF1, RBF2 and c-Myc (control) in the presence of 50 μg/ml ethidium bromide, as indicated on top. Immunoprecipitates were subjected to Western blot using specific antibodies as indicated on the left. IN, input. (E) Extracts derived from an S2 line (S2 control) and from S2 lines stably expressing Flag-tagged RBF1 (S2 F-RBF1) and RBF2 (S2 F-RBF2) were precipitated with α-Flag antibodies as shown on top. Immunoprecipitates were subjected to Western blot using specific antibodies as indicated. Precipitations were carried out in absence or presence of 200 μg/ml ethidium bromide (EtBr) as indicated. IN, input; α-Flag-IP, α-Flag immunoprecipitates. Cell 2004 119, 181-193DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.034)

Figure 3 Localization of dREAM Complex on Polytene Chromosomes (A) Polytene chromosomes were stained using α-RBF1 (red), α-dE2F2 antibody (green), or Hoechst (blue) as indicated. Bottom panels show a magnified image. Colocalization is visualized by merging (yellow bands, upper panel) and by splitting the magnified image (lower panel). Sites of colocalization are shown by white arrows. (B) Colocalization visualized by α-RBF1 (red) and α-Mip130/TWIT (green), (C) by α-RBF1 (red) and α-Mip120 (green), and (D) by α-Mip120 (red) and α-Mip130/TWIT (green) antibodies. Cell 2004 119, 181-193DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.034)

Figure 4 Mip130/TWIT Binds to Transcriptionally Silent Chromatin Polytene chromosomes were stained (A) with α-pol II (red) and α-Pc (green), (B) with α-pol II (red) and α-Mip130/TWIT (green), and (C) with α-Pc (red) and α-Mip130/TWIT (green) antibodies. (D) Aliquots of Q Sepharose fractions I (RBF monomer), II (dE2F1/RBF1), and III (dREAM) were incubated with paramagnetic beads loaded with histone H4 peptide (H4), tetraacetylated H4 peptide (H4-Ac), or no peptide (ctrl); extensively washed; and analyzed by Western blot as indicated on the left. IN, input. Cell 2004 119, 181-193DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.034)

Figure 5 dREAM Complexes Repress E Group Genes (A) S2 cells were treated with double-stranded RNAs specific for luciferase (NS), Mip130/TWIT, RBF1, dE2F2, and Mip120, as indicated on top. Transcription of three A group genes (rnr2, dnk, and pcna), three E group genes (arp53D, CG17142, and CG3505), and one control gene (rp49) was monitored by Northern blot, as indicated on the left. (B) Extracts from RNAi-treated cells were analyzed by Western blot using specific antibodies, as indicated on the left. (C) ChIP from S2 cells using α-dE2F2 and α-Mip130/TWIT antibodies, as shown on top. Specific primers were used to amplify enriched promoter sequences, as indicated on the right. IN, genomic DNA input, NS Ab, nonspecific antibody. (D) Total RNA isolated from wild-type male and female adults (wt) and from twit mutant male and female adults was analyzed by RT PCR for the expression levels of dE2F2-regulated genes. Cell 2004 119, 181-193DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.034)

Figure 6 Mip120- and Mip40-Related Genes Antagonize C. elegans Vulva Development (A) lin-15(n767) animals were subjected to RNAi depleting lin-9, lin-35, JC8.6, or odr-10 (control). Average percentage of animals with multiple vulvae from three independent experiments (average % Muv) and standard errors (±SEM) are shown (n = 30–115 animals). (B) Color-coded multiple sequence alignment of Mip40-related and Lin-37 proteins. A putative nuclear localization sequence in the vertebrate sequences (NLS), three segments of similarity (A, B, and C), and a predicted globular region (green line) are shown. Cell 2004 119, 181-193DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.034)

Figure 7 pRb Binds Human Homologs of dREAM Subunits (A) Immobilized GST (GST) or GST-pRb (pRb) fusions were incubated with 35S-labeled, in vitro-translated luciferase, hMip130/TWIT, hMip120, or hMip40 as indicated. Bound material was subjected to SDS-PAGE and visualized by autoradiography. IN, 5% input. (B) α-hMip130/TWIT was used in Western blot to probe in vitro-translated luciferase (lanes 1 and 2) and hMip130/TWIT (lanes 5 and 6). −DNA, no DNA control (lanes 3 and 4). (C) Immobilized GST fusions were incubated with (+HeLa) or without (−HeLa) HeLa nuclear extract as indicated. Bound material was analyzed by Western blot using α-hMip130/TWIT antibody. The position of antibody-reactive bands is shown by open arrows. Cell 2004 119, 181-193DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.034)