A brief update on b-tagging of High P jets

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tentative flow chart of CMS Multi-Muon analysis 1 – DATASETS 2 - RESOLUTIONS 3 – FAKE RATES 4 – NUCLEAR INT MODEL 5 – IP TEMPLATES MODEL 6 – SAMPLE COMPOSITION.
Advertisements

1 B-tagging meeting overview Li bo Shandong University.
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
April 1, Beam measurement with -Update - David Jaffe & Pedro Ochoa 1)Reminder of proposed technique 2)Use of horn-off data 3)Use of horn2-off data?
Data results for inclusive all-hadronic (RA  with 318 nb -1 SUSY Hadronic/GMSB Meeting [C. Rogan et al.] Data Plots Towards.
The Physics of Generations (Update) 11-Dec-03 Don Lincoln f.
 Candidate events are selected by reconstructing a D, called a tag, in several hadronic modes  Then we reconstruct the semileptonic decay in the system.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
1 2vtx tagged diBjets mass cross section measurement Univeristy of Notre Dame Hong Luo Mar 3 th 2005.
Unfolding jet multiplicity and leading jet p T spectra in jet production in association with W and Z Bosons Christos Lazaridis University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinZEUS Monday Meeting, Apr. 18th Preliminary Request: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
Performance of Track and Vertex Reconstruction and B-Tagging Studies with CMS in pp Collisions at sqrt(s)=7 TeV Boris Mangano University of California,
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Measurement of b-tagging Fake rates in Atlas Data M. Saleem * In collaboration with Alexandre Khanov** F. Raztidinova**, P.Skubic * *University of Oklahoma,
B-Tagging Algorithms for CMS Physics
Improving b-jet energy resolution b-resolution mtg Sept. 26, 2007 P. Grannis Improving b-jet energy resolution and raising the di-b jet tag efficiency.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
The inсlusive produсtion of the meson resonanсes ρ 0 (770), K * (892), f 0 (980), f 2 (1270) in neutrino- nuсleon сharged сurrent (CC) interaсtions Polyarush.
Marcel Vreeswijk (NIKHEF) B tagging, performance vertexing Neural Net studies tt event selection mass reconstruction in tt events conclusions B tagging.
Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN.
Data-based background predictions for new particle searches at the LHC David Stuart Univ. of California, Santa Barbara Texas A&M Seminar March 24, 2010.
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
Measurement of inclusive jet and dijet production in pp collisions at √s = 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector Seminar talk by Eduardo Garcia-Valdecasas Tenreiro.
1 Heavy Flavour Content of the Proton Motivation Experimental Techniques charm and beauty cross sections in DIS for the H1 & ZEUS Collaborations Paul Thompson.
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
A. Bertolin on behalf of the H1 and ZEUS collaborations Charm (and beauty) production in DIS at HERA (Sezione di Padova) Outline: HERA, H1 and ZEUS heavy.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
14/06/11 Jet physics meetingV.Kostyukhin 1 Flavour fractions in di-jet system V.Kostyukhin C.Lapoire M.Lehmacher Bonn.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.
B-Tagging Algorithms at the CMS Experiment Gavril Giurgiu (for the CMS Collaboration) Johns Hopkins University DPF-APS Meeting, August 10, 2011 Brown University,
1 Underlying Event studies & Charged particle multiplicities in inelastic pp events with the ATLAS.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
VHF working meeting, 4 Oct Measurement of associated charm production in W final states at  s=7TeV J. Alcaraz, I. Josa, J. Santaolalla (CIEMAT,
Moriond 2001Jets at the TeVatron1 QCD: Approaching True Precision or, Latest Jet Results from the TeVatron Experimental Details SubJets and Event Quantities.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
B Tagging studies with non prompt J/Ψ's
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
Diphoton+MET: Update on Plans and Progress
Observation of a “cusp” in the decay K±  p±pp
on top mass measurement based on B had decay length
Jet Production Measurements with ATLAS
CDS comments on supporting note
Top quark search update
B Tagging Efficiency and Mistag Rate Measurement in ATLAS
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Data Analysis in Particle Physics
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
2vtx tagged dijets mass resolution study
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
An Important thing to know.
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Event Shape Analysis in minimum bias pp collisions in ALICE.
EM Linearity using calibration constants from Geant4
Investigation on QCD group
Event Shape Variables in DIS Update
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
Studies of EPR-type flavor entangled states in Y(4s)->B0B0
CP violation in Bs→ff and Bs → K*0K*0
Preliminary Request: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS
Top mass measurements at the Tevatron and the standard model fits
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Heavy Flavour Content of the Proton
Study of Top properties at LHC
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
A brief Update on secondary vertex tagged jets
Presentation transcript:

A brief update on b-tagging of High P jets 8/4/2019 A brief update on b-tagging of High P jets Data p14 and MC p14 based study 8/4/2019 Eugene Galyaev

Definition (simplified): A brief reminder: 2D Decay Length Significance as a discriminating variable Definition (simplified): Two-dimensional Decay Length Significance is Two-dimensional Decay Length divided by its uncertainty s It was decided to take log(DlSig2) to further bring out the shape differences and to alleviate future fitting procedure Fit for b frac. 8/4/2019 Eugene Galyaev

Previous results and observations, MC vs. Data Efficiency and Purity dependence on Pt (no cut applied): b – vertex finding efficiency in MC is slowly decreasing with Pt b – content in data seems to be in disagreement with the MC, especially at low Pt - The fitting procedure is inefficient at low Pt?… - Data IS different 8/4/2019 Eugene Galyaev

Check the fitting procedure’s consistency Try to fit the templates to the inclusive QCD MC Good “Simulation” Yield >>perfect<< fits EVERY TIME!!! Fitting is NICE with Monte Carlo! So the DATA must be different………. c2 = 0.75 At 100 GeV Pt bin ! 37% Vs. 34% MC ‘Truth’ purity 8/4/2019 Eugene Galyaev

Another look at the templates and Data shapes Ways the b-template “finds its place” Log(2D Dl Significance) The extracted fractions inconsistency may come from Wrong template position Incorrect MC description (UNLIKELY) MC Templates positions might be affected by the difference in the uncertainty between MC and Data This will result in horizontal template(s) shift 8/4/2019 Eugene Galyaev

Can build Vertex Error Ellipses Taking a detailed look at the 2D Decay Length Significance: Uncertainty s up close… q 2a 2b SV PV 2D Decay Length Significance is defined through the combined (PV+SV) covariance matrix elements Variances Can build Vertex Error Ellipses Parameters ‘a’ and ‘b’ of the Error Ellipses as well as the orientation angle q are drawn for the PV and SV from their covariance matrix elements, respectively. 8/4/2019 Eugene Galyaev

Taking a detailed look at the 2D Decay Length Significance: Error ellipse on Event Display Default Event display A close-up view SV Error Ellipse PV SV PV SV 2a ! The uncertainty associated with the PV was found do be small compared to the SV By configuration of the PV and SV Error Ellipses it was found that only parameter ‘a’ of the Secondary Vertex is of the most importance to the MC vs. Data difference 8/4/2019 Eugene Galyaev

Exploring the Error Ellipsoids, parameter ‘a’ (major axis) SV ‘a’ vs. Pt MC and Data’s difference in parameter ‘a’ for the SV is visible both in the mean value profiles and the distribution shapes The idea is to make MC and Data’s uncertainties agree better Find a way to SCALE the MC to agree with the data Ratio vs. Pt Jet Pt 8/4/2019 Eugene Galyaev

Exploring the Error Ellipsoids, parameter ‘a’ , continued … It might be possible to come up with the k-factor(s) to alter slightly the MC’s parameter ‘a’ thus affecting the Decay Length Significance Might yield in better template positions Better description of the Data and better agreement with the measured properties Need universality of the effect on b, c, and Light MC Need to explore errors properties more…! SV Parameter ‘a’ distributions shape difference QCD MC, inclusive Data Scaled MC, trial 8/4/2019 Eugene Galyaev

Exploring the Error Ellipsoids, parameter ‘a’ , continued … Sample plots… Sample plots… Sample plots… Currently many variables are being looked at in b,c,light MC and Data in search of universal behavior of the parameter ‘a’ with respect to them in various Pt bins… Among variables looked at were: Decay Length 2VTX Mass dR (2VTX, CalJet) 2 VTX Track Multiplicity… 8/4/2019 Eugene Galyaev

Work in progress…! Status and plans… Yielded a better understanding of the Decay Length Significance The nature of the variable is better understood, explicit formula driven The major source of the difference in uncertainties in MC and Data have been found (The ‘a’ parameter of the 2VTX). Have the tools to operate with the Error Ellipses, uncertainties for vertices Active work is being done to emerge the agreement between MC and the Data Search for the universal variable(s) in hope of the possibility to correct the MC with correct corresponding k-factors for b, c, udsg MC Will allow to have more reliable templates Promise for a better, more sound description of the Detector resulting a agreement of the experiment and theoretical prediction Goals Find a reliable way to correct MC Make corrected MC templates in Decay Length Significance Extract b-fraction in Data as well as we can! Work in progress…! 8/4/2019 Eugene Galyaev