Structure of the N-WASP EVH1 Domain-WIP Complex

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Advertisements

Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Structure of the Angiopoietin-2 Receptor Binding Domain and Identification of Surfaces Involved in Tie2 Recognition  William A. Barton, Dorothea Tzvetkova,
The Nuclear Xenobiotic Receptor CAR
Structure of the TPR Domain of p67phox in Complex with Rac·GTP
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 86, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
Diabetes Mutations Delineate an Atypical POU Domain in HNF-1α
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Markus Zettl, Michael Way  Current Biology 
Hong Ye, Young Chul Park, Mara Kreishman, Elliott Kieff, Hao Wu 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Structural Analysis of the Voltage-Dependent Calcium Channel β Subunit Functional Core and Its Complex with the α1 Interaction Domain  Yarden Opatowsky,
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages (August 2013)
Structural Basis for Protein Recognition by B30.2/SPRY Domains
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2000)
Structure of the Enabled/VASP Homology 1 Domain–Peptide Complex
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Crystal Structure of a Phosphoinositide Phosphatase, MTMR2
Structural Basis of Caspase-7 Inhibition by XIAP
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Mirjana Lilic, Milos Vujanac, C. Erec Stebbins  Molecular Cell 
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Ulp1-SUMO Crystal Structure and Genetic Analysis Reveal Conserved Interactions and a Regulatory Element Essential for Cell Growth in Yeast  Elena Mossessova,
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA
Maria Spies, Stephen C. Kowalczykowski  Molecular Cell 
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2000)
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
The Structure of the GGA1-GAT Domain Reveals the Molecular Basis for ARF Binding and Membrane Association of GGAs  Brett M. Collins, Peter J. Watson,
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Joshua J. Sims, Robert E. Cohen  Molecular Cell 
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Structure of the N-WASP EVH1 Domain-WIP Complex Brian F. Volkman, Kenneth E. Prehoda, Jessica A. Scott, Francis C. Peterson, Wendell A. Lim  Cell  Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages 565-576 (November 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01076-0

Figure 1 The N-Terminal Region of N-WASP Is an EVH1 Domain that Binds WIP via an Extended Peptide Ligand (A) Proposed domain structure of N-WASP, as well as putative ligands for each domain. (B) Example PIP2 vesicle binding assays. S indicates supernatant, P indicates pellet. Bound protein is retained in the pellet. The PLCδ PH domain and the N-WASP EVH1 fragment were expressed as fusions to glutathione-S-transferase (GST). Remaining proteins were expressed as His6-tag fusions. (C) Example far-Western protein binding assays. Probe proteins were biotinylated by expressing them as fusions to the Promega Pinpoint vector (see Experimental Procedures). Each protein was tested for binding to a GST-fusion to WASP Interacting Protein (WIP) fragment containing residues 457–490 and to the ActA sequence DFPPPTDEEL, which is a ligand for the Mena EVH1 domain. (D) Summary of PIP2 and WIP (457–490) binding using various N-WASP constructs. None of the constructs bind PIP2, but all those that precisely encompass the predicted EVH1 region can bind the WIP fragment. (E) Deletion mapping reveals that a 25 residue polypeptide from WIP (residues 461–485) is the minimal fragment required for binding to the N-WASP EVH1 domain (residues 26–147) in a far-Western gel overlay binding assay. Cell 2002 111, 565-576DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01076-0)

Figure 2 N-WASP EVH1 Domain Sequence (A) Constructs of the N-WASP EVH1 domain fused to the minimal WIP peptide. Fusions are linked via a (Gly-Ser-Gly-Ser-Gly) linker. Only the top fusion yielded highly soluble protein amenable to structural analysis. (B) Structure-based alignment of the Rat N-WASP EVH1 domain with its close homologs WASP (H. sapiens) and Bee1p (S. cerevisiae). Also shown are sequences of other more distantly related, but structurally characterized EVH1 domains. Secondary structure elements in the N-WASP structure are indicated above the sequence. Sites that show a direct NOE contact with the WIP peptide are marked by filled triangles. Sites in WASP where missense mutation cause the disease WAS are circled (lavender, strong/moderate phenotype; green, mild phenotype). A conserved charged residue array in the WASP family EVH1 domains, described in Figure 5, are indicated in red (negative) or blue (positive). Cell 2002 111, 565-576DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01076-0)

Figure 3 Structure of the N-WASP/WIP Complex Determined by NMR and Comparison to Other EVH1 Domain-Mediated Complexes (A) N-WASP EVH1 domain in complex with WIP residues 461–485. Note that residues 480–485 are required for binding but are poorly defined in the structure because of a lack of assignments and constraints. The likely path of those residues is indicated by the dotted line. The red arrow indicates the site of the most common severe WAS missense mutation, Arg76 [86]. This site falls at the opposite surface from the canonical EVH1 binding surface. (B) Structure of the Mena EVH1 domain in complex with an 8 residue peptide from ActA. (C) Structure of the Homer EVH1 in complex with a 5 residue peptide from mGluR. (D) Structure of the RanBP EVH1 domain in complex with an extended, >25 residue polypeptide from Ran. Note that contacts between the EVH1 domain and other parts of Ran are made in the complex. Top and bottom images show two views rotated by 90° around a horizontal axis in the plane of the page. Note that in the N-WASP complex, the peptide ligand is recognized in the reverse N- to C-terminal orientation from other EVH1 complexes. Cell 2002 111, 565-576DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01076-0)

Figure 4 The N-WASP EVH1 Surface Used to Recognize the Proline-Rich Element in the WIP Ligand Is Similar to that Used by Other EVH1 Domains (A) Close-up view of region of N-WASP EVH1 domain that contacts residues 481–487 of the WIP ligand. The ligand adopts a polyproline II (PPII) helical conformation that docks over Trp 54. The carbonyl oxygen between the apical ligand prolines also makes a hydrogen bond to the Trp nitrogen. Pockets surrounding Trp 54 are made by residues 46 and 104 or 48 and 106. (B) Corresponding residues in the Homer and Mena EVH1 domains are also used in recognition of the proline-rich peptide ligand. In these structures, however, the PPII helix binds in the opposite N- to C-terminal orientation. Cell 2002 111, 565-576DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01076-0)

Figure 5 Structural Basis of Mutations that Cause the Disorder WAS (A) Residues in the core of the N-WASP EVH1 domain that when mutated lead to WAS are shown in space-filling depiction. Severe/moderate mutations are colored in lavender; mild mutation are colored in green. Residue numbering is that of N-WASP, with the corresponding numbering from WASP given in square brackets. Peptide is colored orange, with the postulated path of the peptide C terminus indicated by small orange spheres. (B) Front face of N-WASP EVH1 domain indicating surface mutations associated with WAS. Residues are colored as above. (C). Back face of N-WASP EVH1 domain, indicating surface mutations associated with WAS. Molecular has been rotated 180° from the view in (B). (D) Transparent surface view identical to that in (C) reveals a conserved network of charged residues, centered around Arg76 [86] (see Figure 2 for conservation). (E) Alignment of WIP homologs in the WASP binding peptide reveals two regions of high conservation, including the C-terminal PSKxxR/K motif that is likely to dock at the surface shown in (D). Charged residues are colored in red (negative) or blue (positive). (F) Cartoon of how the extended WIP peptide and its homologs may wrap around the N-WASP EVH1 domain to contact two distant but energetically important binding surfaces. Cell 2002 111, 565-576DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01076-0)