Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Structure of the Replicating Complex of a Pol α Family DNA Polymerase
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Structural Roles of Monovalent Cations in the HDV Ribozyme
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
The Structure of Chorismate Synthase Reveals a Novel Flavin Binding Site Fundamental to a Unique Chemical Reaction  John Maclean, Sohail Ali  Structure 
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Crystal Structures of the Thi-Box Riboswitch Bound to Thiamine Pyrophosphate Analogs Reveal Adaptive RNA-Small Molecule Recognition  Thomas E. Edwards,
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 89-100 (January 2012) Structure of the Yersinia pestis FabV Enoyl-ACP Reductase and Its Interaction with Two 2-Pyridone Inhibitors  Maria W. Hirschbeck, Jochen Kuper, Hao Lu, Nina Liu, Carla Neckles, Sonam Shah, Steffen Wagner, Christoph A. Sotriffer, Peter J. Tonge, Caroline Kisker  Structure  Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 89-100 (January 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2011.07.019 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overall Structure of ypFabV in Comparison to Known Isoenzymes of the SDR Family (A) The FabV structure is shown as a ribbon diagram with helices (η = 310helix) in red and β strands in yellow. (B) The ypFabV structure (cyan) is superimposed with ecFabITCL (PDB ID code 1C14) (magenta) and B. subtilis FabLTCL (PDB ID code 3OID) (blue), both in the triclosan-bound state. Two orientations are shown, with the substrate-binding loop marked as helix α8. (C and D) Topology diagrams of ypFabV and ecFabITCL. Similar structural elements are shown in cyan, and differing elements in yellow. See also Figure S1 and Supplemental Information. Structure 2012 20, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.07.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Sequence Alignment of ypFabV and ecFabI Sequence alignment (CLUSTAL W; Thompson et al., 1994) of ypFabV and ecFabI, with the cofactor binding motif shown in a blue box. Conserved active site residues are marked by blue asterisks. Secondary structure elements are indicated by arrows and spirals for β strands and α helices, respectively and shown above (ypFabV) and below (ecFabI) the sequence. 310helixes are labeled with η and β turns with TT. The conserved residues are highlighted in the blue boxes, with the most conserved residues colored in white with a red background. Structure 2012 20, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.07.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Cofactor Binding Site Is Structurally Conserved (A) The cofactor NADH (yellow) is shown with its SIGMAA-weighted 2Fo − Fc electron density omit map (σ = 1.5); the protein is shown in ribbon presentation. (B) Stereo view of cofactor binding. The cofactor NADH (yellow) is bound through a variety of hydrogen bonds (dashed lines) partially connected by water molecules (red spheres) and a sodium ion (violet sphere) as well as through hydrophobic interactions. See also Supplemental Information. Structure 2012 20, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.07.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Substrate-Binding Loop and the Active Site (A) The active site residues and the cofactor of ypFabV (cyan) and FabI (violet) are superimposed and shown in all-bonds representation. (B) The conserved residue K245 interacts with N237 and W236 and thereby stabilizes the position of the active site residues Y235 and K244 (violet) relative to each other (helices α7 to η1). A water molecule interacts with Y235 in place of the substrate. (C) The substrate-binding loop (yellow) is stabilized by van der Waals interactions (violet residues) and hydrogen bonds (cyan residues). Many stabilizing interactions arise from the additional secondary structure elements such as α12, α14, β7, β8, and β10. Structure 2012 20, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.07.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Inhibition of ypFabV (A) Chemical structure of the inhibitors triclosan, PT70, PT172, and PT173. (B) The inhibition of ypFabV in the presence of 50 μM (●), 100 μM (□), or 200 μM triclosan (▪) and in the absence of inhibitor (○). (C) The inhibition of ypFabV in the presence of 1 μM (●), 2 μM PT172 (□), or 4 μM PT172 (▪) and in the absence of inhibitor (○). (D) The inhibition of ypFabV in the presence of 0.5 μM (●), 1 μM (□), or 2.5 μM PT173 (▪) and in the absence of inhibitor (○). Structure 2012 20, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.07.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 The Substrate-Binding Loop Shifts upon Inhibitor Binding (A) The binary FabV-NADH structure (cyan/yellow) is superimposed onto the ternary FabV-PT173-NADH (carbon atoms of the ligands are shown in black/grey) complex structure (dark violet/red). Differing parts of the FabV structure are highlighted in yellow and red. The substrate-binding loop is shifted away from the active site together with the N-terminal β hairpin in the inhibitor structures. (B) Zoom into the active site. Structure 2012 20, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.07.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Inhibitor Binding (A) PT172 (magenta sticks) forms hydrogen bonds (dashed lines) to FabV and parallel displaced π-π stacking interactions to the nicotinamide ring of NADH. The substrate loop is shown in yellow. (B) The conformation of the bound inhibitors PT172 (magenta) and PT173 (black) differs in a rotation of the B ring by 24°. (C) Residues of FabV interacting with PT172 via hydrogen bonds or through van der Waals interactions are shown in all-bonds representation, with hydrogen bonds as dashed lines. (D) Residues of FabV interacting with PT173 via hydrogen bonds or through van der Waals interactions are shown in all-bonds representation, with hydrogen bonds as dashed lines. See also Supplemental Information and Figure S2. Structure 2012 20, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.07.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Substrate-Binding Channels (A) Potential entry channels (calculated with CAVER) of the binary FabV-NADH complex structure through the minor (left) and major portals (right) are shown as gray clouds. (B) The channel through the major portal is broader than through the minor portal. Close to the channel entrance three basic residues, K4, R6, and R8 (blue), could potentially interact with ACP. The enoyl substrate could be accommodated in the hydrophobic patch (shown in light orange) next to the basic residues. (C) Hypothetical substrate-binding mode: the PT173 complex structure is colored according to its temperature factors (red, high; blue, low). The basic residues K4, R6, and R8 are shown as sticks next to the major portal. The cofactor is shown as sticks. ACP might interact through its acidic residues with the basic residues of the N-terminal β hairpin, thereby moving the substrate-binding loop (red) out of the pocket and opening the major portal for the substrate. Structure 2012 20, 89-100DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2011.07.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions