Injection design of CEPC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CEPC BoosterDesign CEPC Booster Design FCC Week 2015, March, 2015 Marriot Georgetown Hotel Huiping Geng Presented for Chuang Zhang.
Advertisements

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007 Injection System with a Booster in Separate Tunnel T. Shaftan for the NSLS-II team.
Design and Performance Expectation of ALPHA accelerator S.Y. Lee, IU 2/26/ Introduction 2. Possible CIS re-build and parameters 3. Issues in the.
CESR-c Status CESR Layout - Pretzel, Wigglers, solenoid compensation Performance to date Design parameters Our understanding of shortfall Plans for remediation.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
DR 3.2 km Lattice Requirements Webex meeting 10 January 2011.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
SPring-8 upgrade : a fast kicker system for beam injection Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI) SPring-8 T. Nakamura CFA Beam Dynamics.
CEPC Booster Zhang Chuang, Cui Xiaohao September 11,2015.
LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.
Damping Ring Specifications S. Guiducci ALCPG11, 20 March 2011.
Investigation of Injection Schemes for SLS 2.0
FCC-ee injector complex including Booster Yannis Papaphilippou, CERN Thanks to: M.Aiba (PSI), Ö.Etisken (Ankara Un.), K.Oide (KEK), L.Rinolfi (ESI-JUAS),
Injection scheme for ultimate storage ring with double RF system Bocheng Jiang SSRF AP group SINAP. CAS LOWεRING 2014.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
CEPC APDR Study Zhenchao LIU
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
Primary estimation of CEPC beam dilution and beam halo
Cui Xiaohao, Zhang Chuang,Bian Tianjian January 12,2016
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Cavity-beam interaction and Longitudinal beam dynamics for CEPC DR&APDR 宫殿君
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
Junji Urakawa (KEK) for ATF International Collaboration
Top-Up Injection for PEP-II and Applications to a Higgs Factory
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
Status of CEPC lattice design
CEPC Booster Design Dou Wang, Chenghui Yu, Tianjian Bian, Xiaohao Cui, Chuang Zhang, Yudong Liu, Na Wang, Daheng Ji, Jiyuan Zhai, Wen Kang, Cai Meng, Jie.
Beam Loading Effect in CEPC APDR
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
CEPC Booster Design Progress (Low field)
DA study for CEPC Main Ring
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Cui Xiaohao, Bian Tianjian, Zhang Chuang 2017/11/07
Design Study of the CEPC Booster
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Lattice design for the CEPC collider ring
CEPC APDR and PDR scheme
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Lattice design for the CEPC collider ring
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
CEPC Ring RF System Jiyuan Zhai (IHEP) Workshop on the Circular Electron Positron Collider Rome, May 25, 2018.
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
Parameter Optimization in Higgs Factories Beam intensity, beam-beam parameters, by*, bunch length, number of bunches, bunch charge and emittance.
CEPC optics and booster optics
Update of lattice design for CEPC main ring
Simulation check of main parameters (wd )
Lattice Design of the Collider Ring toward TDR
CEPC APDR and PDR scheme
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
CEPC SRF Parameters (100 km Main Ring)
JLEIC ion fullsize booster (2256m) space charge limit (Δν=0
MEIC New Baseline: Part 10
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Presentation transcript:

Injection design of CEPC Cui Xiaohao And CEPC Group 2018/11/12

1. Introduction: A Linac accelerate electrons and positrons to 10 GeV. A booster with the same circumference with the collider. For high luminosity, top-up injection is needed. For the simplicity and robustness of the injection system, a conventional off-axis injection is chosen as our baseline design. For Higgs mode, an swap-out on axis injection is chosen as another choice, in case of small DA in the collider.

Some key parameters of the collider ring   Higgs W Z Energy (GeV) 120 80 45.5 Bunch number 242 1524 12000 Bunch Charge (nC) 24 19.2 12.8 Bunch Current (mA) 17.4 87.9 461 Revolution Period (ms) 0.3336 Emittance x/y (nm) 1.21/0.0031 0.54/0.0016 0.17/0.004 Life time (Hour) 0.67 1.4 4

The geometry of the injection system

2. Off-Axis Injection: Injection from Linac to booster Booster ramping to Extraction Energy Inject from booster to collider Booster ramping to 10 GeV repeat

Injection time structure: Different injection time Structure for different mode

This injection system fulfills the 3% top-up injection and full injection. Mode Higgs W Z Injection Mode Top-up Full Bunch number 242 1220 6000 Bunch Charge (nC) 0.72 1 0.384 0.55 Beam Current (mA) 0.5227 0.726 2.63 3.67 6.91 10 Current threshold 1 mA 4 mA 10 mA Number of Cycles 2 Current decay 3% Ramping Cycle (sec) (Up + Down) 6.6 3.8 Filling time (sec) (e+,e-) 25.84 39.6 275.2 Injection period (sec) 47 131 438 Full Injection time 10 min 15 min 2.2 Hour (collide from 230mA

Acceptance >4sxc + 6sxi + S For Higgs: e_x = 1.21 nm.rad; e_inject = 3.1 nm.rad sx = 0.47 mm, s_inject = 0.45 mm Septum = 2 mm Acceptance > 13 s X’ X Bumped Stored beam Septum 2mm Injected beam For W: e_x = 1.21 nm.rad; e_inject = 1.59 nm.rad sx = 0.47 mm, s_inject = 0.45 mm Septum = 2 mm Acceptance > 14 s For Z: e_x = 0.17 nm.rad; e_inject = 0.51 nm.rad sx = 0.18 mm, s_inject = 0.16 mm Septum = 2 mm Acceptance > 16 s Bump Height Acceptance >4sxc + 6sxi + S

Current evolution in collider-Higgs Top up  one injection (26s/35s) every 47s Full injection from empty  10 min Collider lifetime (non-collision) 924 hours: dominated Toucheck lifetime Top up Full injection

Current evolution in collider-W Top up  one injection (46s) every 153s Full injection from empty  15 min Collider lifetime (non-collision) 105 hours: dominated Toucheck lifetime Top up Full injection

Current evolution in collider-Z Top up  one injection (4.6min) every 7.3min Full injection from empty  2.2 hours (bootstrapping start from half of the design current) Collider lifetime (non-collision) 53 hours: dominated Toucheck lifetime Top up Full injection

Kickers and Septums for booster injection and extraction: Component Length (m) Waveform Deflection angle (mrad) Field (T) Beam-Stay-clear H(mm) V(mm) Septum 2 DC 9.1 0.152 63 Kicker 0.5 Half_sin 0.034 Booster Extraction Component Length (m) Waveform Deflection angle (mrad) Field (T) Beam-Stay-clear H(mm) V(mm) Septum 10 DC 10.4 0.41 20 Kicker 2 Half_sin 0.2 0.04

Kickers and Septums for collider injection: Component Length (m) Waveform Deflection angle (mrad) Field (T) Beam-Stay-clear H(mm) V(mm) Septum 8.75 DC 14 0.64 20 7 0.32 3.5 0.16 1.75 0.08 Kicker 2 Half_sin 0.1 0.02

3. On-Axis Injection: 1. Inject 242 small bunches into the booster. Linac booster collider 2. Ramp the booster to high energy and inject several (7 for example) bunches from the collider into the booster. Ramp up booster collider 3. Large bunches stay in the booster for 4 damping time(200ms), so that the injected bunches merge with booster bunches. booster collider Repeat 4. Inject the merged large bunches back to the same empty buckets left by the last step. 5. Repeat the last steps. booster collider

Merge bunches in the booster 1. The booster is used as an accumulator ring. 2. Inject the large bunch in the collider into the booster, not the other way around. 3. off-axis injection and bunch mergence are performed in the booster, whose dynamic aperture is large enough. 4. With this on-axis injection, the required dynamic aperture in the collider is only 8 sx. 5. For W, Z mode, the dynamic aperture in the collider is large enough, and we don’t need this on-axis injection.

DA requirement: Off-axis 13sx X 15 sy On-axis 8sx X 15 sy The required horizontal DA in the booster reduce from 13sx to 8sx. The required vertical DA also decrease a little. X Y On-axis 8sx X 15 sy X

Time structure of the booster: Exchange bunches between the booster and collider 26 times. 2.4 s 5.2 s 5 s Linac to booster Ramp up Ramp down Injection cycles Positron injection Electron injection 3% current decay in the collider The small bunch charge in booster is 3% of the charge of the colliding bunch in the collider. With a 3% current decay, the injection period of CEPC should be less than 47s. Current limit in the booster The bunch charge in the collider is 24nC, which is less than the booster's single bunch charge limit of 100 nC. At the beginning, only 7 bunches are injected into the booster, so that the current in the booster does not exceed the 1mA threshold limited by the RF power. 35.2 s

Injection from the collider to booster Bunch after injection Bunch before injection Septum A vertical off-axis injection Transfer beam from the collider to booster vertically. 4-kicker bump in the booster. Septum kicker Phase space of the first 100 turns

Injection from booster to the collider Bunch after injection Bunch before injection A vertical on-axis injection Septum Transfer beam back to the collider vertically. Septum quad kicker Phase space of the first 100 turns

Longitudinal phase shift We need to inject the bunch back into the same bucket after damping in the booster. The booster and collider has the same circumference, which makes this easier. Due to the different paths traveled by the injection beam and the circulating beam, a longitudinal deviation is introduced. Booster 261.2 m 2.4 m collider 261.189 m Longitudinal phase shift The length of the transport line is 261.2 meters, and the path difference between the injected beam and the circulating beam is only 0.011 meters, or 0.037 ns in time. This is equivalent to a 17 degree phase shift in the booster, and is in the stable region. This phase shift can be damped by synchrotron radiation. Or move the RF phase of the booster Did experiment at BEPC II, we found that 200 ms is enough to move a 17 degree.

Beam loading effect is weak Transient beam loading in the booster by the injection of large bunch and larger total beam current With 7 large bunches (0.07mA) evenly distributed among the other small bunches. Max cavity voltage drop is 0.48 %. Max phase shift is 0.63 deg. For 13 large bunches. Assume they are in a very short bunch train. Max cavity voltage drop is 5.8% . The maximum phase shift is 7.7 deg.

flip-flop instability We considered bunch instability due to the absence of several bunches in the collider. A beam-beam simulation shows that there is no flip-flop instability. Simulation result of Zhang Yuan

4. Summary An baseline injection design from Linac to the collider is discussed, which can work for Higgs, W, Z mode. An on-axis injection is designed to reduce the required dynamic aperture for Higgs energy injection. Future work will be more focused on the optimization of the injection design, and considering the hardware.

Thank you For your attention!