HEW Beamforming Enhancements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1355r2 11ah Submission Date: Authors: Nov 2012 James Wang, MediaTek Slide 1.
Advertisements

Discussion on OFDMA in HEW
Doc.: IEEE /0871r0 Submission Jul 2013 Timo Koskela, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion on Potential Techniques for HEW Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2013 Juho Pirskanen, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 On Future Enhancements to Technology Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0831r0 Submission July 2010 Yusuke Asai (NTT)Slide 1 Frame Sequence of Interference Management Using Beamforming Technique in OBSS.
Doc.: IEEE /0637r0 Submission May 2014 James Wang et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Spatial Reuse and Coexistence with Legacy Devices Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1395r2 Simultaneous Transmission Technologies for HEW Date: November 2013 Koichi Ishihara, NTTSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0081r0 Submission Title –Author List Date: Authors: January 2013 Name, Company.Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission July 2013 James Wang (MediaTek)Slide 1 HEW Beamforming Enhancements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /xxxx SubmissionSlide 1 Summary and Discussions of Proposals on Potential PHY Technologies in HEW Date: Authors: Jianhan.
1 Wireless Networking Understanding the departure from wired networks, Case study: IEEE (WiFi)
DL-OFDMA Procedure in IEEE ax
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
Wide Scanning Requests and Responses
Possible Approaches for HEW
Wireless LANs Wireless proliferating rapidly.
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 September, 2015
40 MHz Coexistence in 2.4 GHz Tutorial
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
IEEE Wireless LAN wireless LANs: untethered (often mobile) networking
Full-Duplex based MAC enhancements
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
Multi-AP Enhancement and Multi-Band Operations
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
120MHz channelization solution
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 September 2010
The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator
Enhancement on resource utilization in OBSS environment
Enhancement on resource utilization in OBSS environment
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
EDCA Enhancement to Improve Link Reliability for Multicast Streams
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Wireless LAN Simulation IEEE MAC Protocol
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Consideration on Interference Management in OBSS
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Space Division Multiplex for OBSS Interference Suppression
Multi-AP Enhancement and Multi-Band Operations
HT Features in Mesh Network
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Increased Network Throughput with Channel Width Related CCA and Rules
Spatial Sharing Mechanism in aj (60GHz New Technique Proposal)
RTS&CTS Exchange in wideband transmission
VTS Robust Multicast/Broadcast Protocol
Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
[Multi-RTS Proposal] Date: Authors: September 2010
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
Considerations on MU-MIMO Protection in 11ac
SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO link access
Outdoor Mesh MAC Protocol Issues & Considerations
Channelization for China’s Spectrum
Reserving STA Date: Authors: January 2011 January 2011
D2D Technology for HEW Date: Authors: January 2010
OBSS_PD simplification
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
LC MAC submission – follow up
Consideration on System Level Simulation
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 August 2019
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
LC MAC submission – follow up
Utilizing Unused Resources by Allowing Simultaneous Transmissions
Presentation transcript:

HEW Beamforming Enhancements May 2013 doc.: IEEE 802.11-12/xxxxr0 July 2013 HEW Beamforming Enhancements Date: 2013-07-17 Authors: James Wang (MediaTek) James Wang (MediaTek)

2019/6/29 Background “Area throughput/Average Throughput per STA” is a new metric in HEW for dense deployment scenarios1 Performance enhancement for cell edge has also been highlighted as a key issue in dense deployment2 Current CSMA baseline channel access protocol is based on the omni-directional transmission This contribution presents some possible beamforming enhancement ideas for HEW Slide 2 James Wang (MediaTek)

Cell-Edge Performance 2019/6/29 Cell-Edge Performance Improved cell edge performance with TX or RX beamforming, more graceful degradation in dense deployment James Wang (Mediatek )

Beamforming for Cell Edge Performance Enhancement 2019/6/29 Beamforming for Cell Edge Performance Enhancement Beamforming is an effective way to enhance cell edge performance Higher phy rate can be achieved (versus non-beamformed) Reduced interference to OBSS (beamformed transmission) Reduced interference from OBSS interference (beamformed reception) Reduced delay spread When more energy is delivered to the targeted receiver through TX beamforming, the less interference toward others. RX beamforming mitigates the interference level. Higher number of antennas results in less interference. Potential to increase spatial reuse (higher area throughput) James Wang (MediaTek)

Scenario : Station at the cell edge 2019/6/29 Scenario : Station at the cell edge STA1 at the cell edge of BSS1 typically suffers from Difficulty with channel access (CCA busy) due to OBSS interference Higher packet collision rate from OBSS hidden nodes STA1 becomes interference to OBSS Goal: How to use beamforming to improve STA1 situation while reducing interference to OBSS (STA2 and AP2). Specifically, we want to explore the possibility of spatial reuse to improve network capacity AP1 STA3 STA1 BSS1 STA2 AP2 James Wang (MediaTek)

Spatially Reciprocal Transmission 2019/6/29 Spatially Reciprocal Transmission Define spatial reciprocity as a device capable of transmitting and receiving with same antenna pattern, via implicit or explicit calibration or other means. Spatially reciprocal devices provides the following benefits : A spatially reciprocal device can use its channel knowledge derived the received signal in its transmission It reduces the overhead of the over-the-air calibration if a device has already been calibrated. AP1 STA3 STA1 BSS1 STA2 AP2 James Wang (MediaTek)

Condition 1 - Spatially Orthogonal Condition 2019/6/29 Condition 1 - Spatially Orthogonal Condition Supposed that OBSS STA2 and AP2 are communicating and STA1 wishes to transmit to AP1 at the same time… To avoid STA1 interfering with OBSS STAs (STA2 and AP2), STA1 should satisfy spatially orthogonal (SO) condition before it transmits (allowing it to reset NAV) SO condition: STA1 does not receive AP2 and STA2 signal under beamformed condition during an observation duration * Note if STA1’s CCA is idle, the STA1 is allowed to transmit. AP1 STA3 STA1 BSS1 SO condition STA2 AP2 James Wang (MediaTek)

Condition 1- Spatially Orthogonal Condition 2019/6/29 Condition 1- Spatially Orthogonal Condition STA1 decides the beamforming weight for SO detection based on its knowledge of channel to AP1 and the OBSS interference (STA2&AP2) situations. STA1’s is only interested in communicating to AP1. SO condition can be established via beamforming toward AP1 to suppress interference, or using active nulling toward interference source (STA2/AP2) AP1 STA3 STA1 BSS1 SO condition STA2 AP2 James Wang (MediaTek)

Condition 2 – Use RTS/CTS to start a SO Frame Exchange 2019/6/29 Condition 2 – Use RTS/CTS to start a SO Frame Exchange STA1 should start the frame exchange with RTS/CTS with AP1 to avoid AP1 from interfering with AP2 or STA2 Note that the intended recipient of RTS (AP1) will not transmit CTS if its NAV≠0*. AP1 would not cause interference to OBSS STAs (AP2 and STA2). * REVmb: 9.3.2.6 CTS procedure: If the NAV at the STA receiving the RTS indicates the medium is not idle, that STA shall not respond to the RTS frame. AP1 CTS STA3 RTS STA1 BSS1 STA2 AP2 James Wang (MediaTek)

Spatial Reuse of the Wireless Medium 2019/6/29 Spatial Reuse of the Wireless Medium A spatially reciprocal (SR) HEW device should be allowed to gain access to the channel when SO condition is satisfied, with beamforming weights determined by the HEW device based on its channel knowledge Under the SO condition, the HEW device can start a SO frame exchange by employing the beamformed (preamble & payload) transmission and reception for the TXOP starting with a RTS/CTS Note that spatial re-use of the wireless medium is be achieved in this condition. AP1 STA2 STA1 BSS1 STA3 AP3 TXOP RTS Bemaformed Transmission and Reception Duration AP WM Access (SO Detection) WM Access (SO Detection) CTS STA James Wang (MediaTek)

Beamformed Transmission Issues 2019/6/29 Beamformed Transmission Issues PPDU-based Beamforming: Switching between a omni-preamble to a beamformed-transmission after omni-preamble is also hard for OBSS receiver to predict the channel conditions Omni-preamble AP Beamformed Time Beamformed STA James Wang (MediaTek)

TXOP-based Beamformed Frame Exchange When an AP is engaged in a frame exchange with a selected STA, it should inform all STAs within the BSS defer properly. This requires some omni-directional transmission. TXOP-based beamformed frame exchange: A proposed solution is to employ the omni-beam transmission at the beginning of an TXOP to set up protection duration (NAV) and then to switch to the beamformed (both preamble and payload) transmission and reception for the remainder of the TXOP duration Desirable to have minimum omni-beam duration and then to maintain beamformed transmission thru the TXOP  minimum interference to OBSS TXOP Omni-Beam Duration Bemaformed Transmission and Reception Duration AP WM Access NAV WM Access STA NAV More Interference to OBSS Reduced Interference to OBSS James Wang (MediaTek)

TXOP-based Beamformed and SO Frame Exchange July 2013 TXOP-based Beamformed and SO Frame Exchange During a TXOP-based beamformed frame exchange (AP1 & STA2), an OBSS device (STA3 or AP3) should be allowed to start a frame exchange starting with a RTS/CTS if the SO condition is satisfied  spatial reuse cab be achieved AP1 can have more antennas for beamforming resulting in less interference TXOP-based beamformed FX enable simple STAs to spatially re-use the medium (only need to detect SO condition either with or without beamforming) AP1 STA2 BSS1 STA1 STA3 AP3 An OBSS STA can start a SO frame exchange (RTS/CTS) upon detecting the SO condition James Wang(MediaTek)

Combined SR beamformed and TXOP-based Beamformed FXs 2019/6/29 Combined SR beamformed and TXOP-based Beamformed FXs Note that the beamformed FX (by STA) and the TXOP-based beamformed FX (by AP) can be combined in an TXOP TXOP AP uses TXOP-based Beamformed FX Omni-Beam Duration Bemaformed Transmission and Reception Duration AP WM Access NAV WM Access STA NAV Bemaformed Transmission and Reception Duration STA uses SR Beamformed FX TXOP AP uses TXOP-based Beamformed FX Omni-Beam Duration Bemaformed Transmission and Reception Duration AP CTS WM Access NAV WM Access STA RTS NAV Beamformed Transmission and Reception Duration STA uses SR beamformed FX James Wang (MediaTek)

2019/6/29 Summary Discuss potential beamforming enhancement ideas with the following benefits: increase likelihood of channel access under dense deployment condition reduce interference to OBSS reduce collision during reception increase likelihood of spatial re-use in dense deployment scenario, leading to higher network throughput The proposed beamforming enhancement is suitable for HEW, because there is no control of the WLNA deployment scenario due to unlicensed spectrum no BSS-BSS coordination is required distributed algorithm accommodates mobile APs/devices and changing channel conditions James Wang (MediaTek)

2019/6/29 References Ref 1: 11-13-0675 Usage models and requirements for IEEE 802.11 High Efficiency WLAN study group (HEW SG) – Liaison with WFA, Laurent Cariou, Orange Ref 2: 11-12-1123-00-0-WNG Carrier-oriented WiFi for cellular offload, Laurent Cariou, Orange James Wang (MediaTek)