Atomic Structure of Scallop Myosin Subfragment S1 Complexed with MgADP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Sampath Koppole, Jeremy C. Smith, Stefan Fischer  Structure 
How Actin Initiates the Motor Activity of Myosin
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2003)
Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoprotein D Bound to the Human Receptor HveA
by Andrew D. Ferguson, Eckhard Hofmann, James W
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages (July 1995)
Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
How Myosin Generates Force on Actin Filaments
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Crystal Structure of a Vertebrate Smooth Muscle Myosin Motor Domain and Its Complex with the Essential Light Chain  Roberto Dominguez, Yelena Freyzon,
The Structural Basis for the Large Powerstroke of Myosin VI
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Fifty Ways to Love Your Lever: Myosin Motors
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Myosin Structure, Allostery, and Mechano-Chemistry
Structure of CheA, a Signal-Transducing Histidine Kinase
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
Site-specific recombination in plane view
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
The Signaling Pathway of Rhodopsin
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Myosin VI Rewrites the Rules for Myosin Motors
Structure of the Human IgE-Fc Cε3-Cε4 Reveals Conformational Flexibility in the Antibody Effector Domains  Beth A. Wurzburg, Scott C. Garman, Theodore.
RIα Subunit of PKA Structure
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 2, Issue 8, Pages (August 1994)
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (July 2004)
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Myosin structure: Does the tail wag the dog?
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
The Structure of the β-Catenin/E-Cadherin Complex and the Molecular Basis of Diverse Ligand Recognition by β-Catenin  Andrew H. Huber, William I. Weis 
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
NSF N-Terminal Domain Crystal Structure
E.Radzio Andzelm, J Lew, S Taylor  Structure 
Volume 48, Issue 1, Pages (October 2012)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
The swinging lever-arm hypothesis of muscle contraction
Kinesin and myosin: molecular motors with similar engines
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Wag the Tail: Structural Dynamics of Actomyosin
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Thomas Kampourakis, Yin-Biao Sun, Malcolm Irving  Biophysical Journal 
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Atomic Structure of Scallop Myosin Subfragment S1 Complexed with MgADP Anne Houdusse, Vassilios N. Kalabokis, Daniel Himmel, Andrew G. Szent-Györgyi, Carolyn Cohen  Cell  Volume 97, Issue 4, Pages 459-470 (May 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80756-4

Figure 1 A Third State for the Myosin Head Stereo diagram of the structure of scallop S1 complexed with MgADP (state III) (A) compared to ribbon diagrams of the chicken striated S1 (state I) (B) and the chicken smooth MDE–AlF4− (state II) (C) structures. The structures are oriented so that the lower 50 kDa subdomains (white) superimpose. Note that the converter (green) and the lever arm (heavy chain, cyan; ELC, pink; RLC, purple) adopt very different positions in the three structures. The four subdomains of the motor domain are labeled, as are three structural elements that articulate movements within the head: switch II (residues Ile461–Asn470, orange); the relay (residues Asn489–Asp515, yellow); and the SH1 helix (Cys693–Phe707, red). The region that is most different among these three structures is the SH3 motif (black). Note that the SH1 helix is unwound in the scallop structure (A). To illustrate the unusual position of the lever arm in this structure (which we believe is not bound to actin), we have included the approximate direction of the actin filament (shown by an arrow), relative to the lower 50 kDa subdomain, deduced from an actomyosin docking model (Whittaker et al. 1995). Note, however, that since both this structure and the pre–power stroke state represent weak actin-binding states, no data are available to describe their interactions with actin. We assume here that the actin filament axis and the lower 50 kDa subdomain would remain in similar relative orientations. Cell 1999 97, 459-470DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80756-4)

Figure 2 Subdomain Arrangement in the Three States of Myosin Left, ribbon diagrams of chicken S1 (A), scallop S1 complexed with MgADP (B), and smooth MDE–AlF4− (C); right, schematic drawing of the subdomains. (The SH3 motif and both light chains are omitted for clarity.) The structures are oriented so that the N-terminal and upper 50 kDa subdomains superimpose. Note the different positions of the lower 50 kDa subdomain and the converter (green). Changes in the orientation of the converter are amplified by the lever arm. The black arrows indicate the direction of movement of the lower 50 kDa subdomain and the converter from that in the chicken S1 structure (A). Movement of the subdomains from one state to another is controlled by coupled conformational changes of the three joints: switch II (orange), the relay (yellow), and the SH1 helix (red). Cell 1999 97, 459-470DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80756-4)

Figure 3 The ELC/Converter Interactions Modulate the Position of the Lever Arm Different positions of the converter in the three states result in major movements of the lever arm (see Figure 1 and Figure 2). This diagram illustrates how the converter and the ELC interact differently in chicken S1 (A), scallop S1 complexed with MgADP (B), and smooth MDE–AlF4− (C). In this view, the converter (green) and the HP helix (yellow) appear to be in similar positions. Note that differences in the interactions between the C-terminal lobe of the ELC (pink) and the motor domain in these structures result in different bending of the heavy chain helix (cyan) after the first three turns (green) that are part of the converter. Cell 1999 97, 459-470DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80756-4)

Figure 4 Coupling of the Conformational Changes of the Joints in the Three States Ribbon diagram illustrating the differences in the conformation of the joints in chicken S1 (A), scallop S1 complexed with MgADP (B), and smooth MDE–AlF4− (C). The N-terminal (gray) and upper 50 kDa (blue) subdomains of these structures (on the right side) superimpose. (Note that here the structures are oriented similarly to those in Figure 2.) Near the nucleotide-binding pocket, changes in the first five residues of switch II (orange) affect the position of the lower 50 kDa subdomain. The rest of switch II is invariant because of interactions with three asparagine residues (purple) of the HP helix (white and yellow). Note that in (C), the HP helix must bend, since the conformation of switch II has positioned the lower 50 kDa subdomain closer to the N-terminal and upper 50 kDa subdomains than in (A) or (B). The SH1 helix is unwound in (B), and the two cysteine residues (black balls) are only 7 Å apart. A small conformational change of switch II positions the lower 50 kDa subdomain ∼3 Å “higher” in (B) than in (A) and induces the unwinding of this helix. To estimate the amplitude of this movement, the Cα of Y583 (green ball in [B]) can be compared to that of the equivalent residue of chicken S1 (orange ball) or smooth MDE–AlF4− (cyan ball). Comparison of the environment of the residues of the bend between the SH2 (pink) and SH1 (red) helices shows that they can interact with switch II in (A) and the β strands of the lower 50 kDa subdomain in (A) and (C), but that none of these interactions can occur in (B). The different conformations of these joints result in very different positions of the converter (e.g., note the β sheet in green). Cell 1999 97, 459-470DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80756-4)

Figure 5 The Relay Controls the Position of the Converter to which It Is Linked by Strong Conserved Interactions Ribbon diagram of the interface between the relay (yellow) and the converter (β sheet and last helix in green) in chicken S1 (A), scallop S1 complexed with MgADP (B), and smooth MDE–AlF4− (C) oriented so that the converters superimpose. Note that the orientation of the last three turns of the HP helix (yellow) is similar in all these structures, since three glutamate residues of this helix (brown) interact with residues of the converter (cyan) in all three states. In contrast, the conformation of the loop of the relay (yellow) is very different and is most rigid in (C) where it interacts with the SH1 helix (red). Conformational changes at both ends of the relay allow the orientation of the lower 50 kDa subdomain (white, HP and HQ helices) to differ with respect to that of the converter in these three states. Note also how the environment around the tryptophane residue (blue) of the relay varies in the three states. Cell 1999 97, 459-470DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80756-4)