Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989) Alysha Gerba.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2010 The Florida Law Related Education Association, Inc. For classroom use only. Not for publication or distribution. Revised.
Advertisements

TEXAS V. JOHNSON. WHAT HAPPENED 1984 Gregory Lee Johnson was a member of the Revolutionary Communist Youth Brigade At a rally he burned the American flag.
Landmark Cases.
Section 5 Introduction-1
Texas v. Johnson DECIDED: June 21, 1989 ARGUED: March 21, 1989.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES/ GOALS/ SWBAT
Our First Amendment Rights
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or.
SUPREME COURT CASES. Marbury v. Madison (1803)  William Marbury was commissioned Justice of the Peace of the District of Columbia at the end of President.
Important Supreme Court Cases …and the affect the courts’ decisions have on our lives.
2/11/11 B- Day Do Now: 1.Write down your homework Chapter 7 quiz review due on Tuesday Chapter 7Quiz on Wednesday Bring headphones to class on Monday 2.
Freedom of Expression Laura Lantrip Alina Mihelin.
The Rights of Individuals Analyze court cases that demonstrate how the U.S. constitution and the bill of rights protect the rights of individuals.
ET: What Would You Decide? DIRECTIONS: On a clean sheet of paper, place a heading in the upper- right corner. Read the brief case synopsis and then answer.
SUPREME COURT CASES. Marbury v. Madison (1803)  William Marbury was commissioned Justice of the Peace of the District of Columbia at the end of President.
Supreme Court Case Story Project George Doyle. Island Trees School District Board of Education v. Pico The board of education ordered certain books deemed.
Made it a crime:  To convey information with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the U.S. armed forces or to promote the success of its.
Texas v. Johnson What are the facts of the case? What is the constitutional issue before the US Supreme Court? What was the Supreme Court’s ruling.
Chapter 19: Civil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms Section 4
Freedom of Speech.
Texas vs. Johnson Argued: March 21, 1989 Decided: June 21, 1989 By: Garialdy De Jesus.
Civil Liberties and Public Policy. The Bill of Rights- Then and Now Civil Liberties are individual and legal constitutional protections against the government.
TEXAS VS. JOHNSON 1989 By: Nick Limon Aliah Medina 7 th.
Texas vs. Johnson and Tinker vs. Des Moines By Emily Franklin.
Morse v. Frederick A U. S. Supreme Court Case.
US Government: Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Supreme Court Case Project By: Meadow Noonan.
1. In 1896, the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was legal. This was called the “separate but equal” case. In 1954, it was overturned by Brown v. Board.
Baker v. Carr Facts  Charles Baker was a Republican who lived in Shelby County, Tennessee who argued that although the Tennessee Constitution requires.
Freedom of Speech: First Amendment “The test of democracy is freedom of criticism.” ~David Ben-Gurion.
COURT CASE BRIEFINGS XAVIER CUMMINS MICHAEL VIZZI CHRISTIAN DALUSUNG ALYSSA NEWSOM.
The Supreme Court Today…. RECENT SUPREME COURT NEWS Supreme Court & Chicago Gun Ban Obama’s Nominee to the Supreme Court Supreme Court in the News Chicago.
1 ST AMENDMENT; FREE SPEECH AND FREEDOM OF THE PRESS ELIZABETH MANWILL MIA MAY RAMI KHALAF MATT MARTY.
CIVIL LIBERTIES Chapter 4. What Are Civil Liberties?  civil liberties: Those rights, such as freedom of speech and religion, that are so fundamental.
Argued: March 19, 2007 Decided: June 25, =2&i= &w=580&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&r=
100 The Judicial Branch Kinds Of Courts Court Terms The Supreme Court Decisions Round 2.
Court Cases. Wisconsin v. Yoder 1972 Jonas Yoder / Wallace Miller: Members of the Old Order Amish religion Prosecuted under Wisconsin law: required children.
Aim: What are the landmark First Amendment cases of the 20 th Century? Do Now: What does the First Amendment protect?
Freedom of Speech Patriotism, flag burning and the first amendment – Texas v Johnson (1989) Contributions as Free Speech Citizens United v Federal Election.
Texas v. Johnson. Background Facts Johnson took place in a Republican national convention in Dallas, Texas. The purpose of the demonstration was to protest.
YOUR NAME DATE OF PRESENTATION COURSE NAME Texas vs. Johnson Flag Burning/Freedom of Speech.
Essential Questions: How have courts defined (protected/denied) individual rights over time?
The Supreme Court Intro The Court of Last Resort.
The Judiciary.
Chapter 13 Constitutional Freedoms Section 5
Brennan Novak and Robert Gardner
First Amendment in Schools
First Amendment in Schools
Mapp v. Ohio (1961) 367 U.S. 643.
Texas v. Johnson(1989)Flag Burning, Freedom of Speech
1st Amendment.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 8 Section 1 CLUES.
The Supreme Court Today…
Freedom of Speech GOVT Notes 6-3.
Freedom of Speech 1.
Texas Vs Johnson.
Landmark Freedom of Speech Cases
Landmark Supreme Court cases
By Katherine Ramirez & Alicia reta
Other Civil Liberties Issues
Freedom of Speech GOVT Notes 6-3.
First Amendment in Schools
Freedom of Speech – Symbolic Speech
Speech Clauses III (Tests and Guidelines; Symbolic Speech)
Chapter 19: Civil Liberties: First Amendment Freedoms Section 4
Texas v Johnson Decided 1989.
Warm Up – February 13 Read the article on Engel v. Vitale that is on my website under today’s date and answer the following questions: 1. Who was Steven.
Other Civil Liberties Issues
Texas v. Johnson By Kane Deyell.
Texas v. Johnson (1989) 491 U.S. 397 Morgan Fraley Pd. 7/8.
Texas v. johnson (1989) Snyder v. phelps (2011)
Presentation transcript:

Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989) Alysha Gerba

Summary Issue: Whether flag burning constitutes "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment Modern case, so Democrats and Republicans were involved Argued March 21, 1989 and decided June 21, 1989 Occurred in Dallas, Texas

Preceding Events Gregory Lee Johnson, part of a group that had gathered to protest Reagan’s policies, doused an American flag with kerosene and lit it on fire in front of the Dallas City Hall arrested for violating Texas’s state law that prohibited desecration of the U.S. flag and eventually was convicted fined and sentenced to one year in jail conviction subsequently was overturned by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (the state’s highest appeals court for criminal cases), which argued that symbolic speech was protected by the First Amendment

Historical Context Ronald Reagan was current president sought to stimulate the economy with large, across-the-board tax cuts expansionary fiscal policies soon became known as "Reaganomics" considered by some to be the most serious attempt to change the course of U.S. economic policy of any administration since the New Deal Johnson was protesting Reagan’s policies

Supreme Court Ruling ruled on June 21, 1989, that the burning of the U.S. flag was a constitutionally protected form of speech under the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment In June the Supreme Court released a controversial 5–4 ruling in which it upheld the appeals court decision that desecration of the U.S. flag was constitutionally protected, calling the First Amendment’s protection of speech a “bedrock principle” and stating that the government could not prohibit “expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable”

Can the government prohibit the act of flag burning as an infringement on the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment? (Opposing Viewpoints) The Court has interpreted the First Amendment to grant a higher level of protection to speech than it grants to conduct because not all conduct is considered a form of speech. The First Amendment does protect symbolic speech, but some actions do not always rise to the level of “symbolic speech” so as to require protection under the First Amendment. Flag burning is the destruction of a symbol of national unity. Even if the flag that is destroyed is private property, the government has a legitimate interest in regulating its protection because of what the flag represents to the nation. Lines must be drawn when it comes to expressive speech to make sure that otherwise criminal conduct is not couched in “First Amendment” terms.

My Opinion I personally do not agree with burning an American flag but I understand why it is legal to and that it is protected by the first amendment.

Majority Opinion Justice William Brennan wrote for a five-justice majority in holding that defendant Gregory Lee Johnson's act of flag burning was protected speech under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. Johnson was represented by attorneys David D. Cole and William Kunstler. The majority said that the government could not discriminate in this manner based solely upon viewpoint. Writing for the dissent, Justice Stevens argued that the flag's unique status as a symbol of national unity outweighed "symbolic speech" concerns, and thus, the government could lawfully prohibit flag burning.

Related Court Cases Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969) Speech that supports law-breaking or violence in general is protected by the First Amendment unless it directly encourages people to take an unlawful action immediately. Morse v. Frederick, 551 U.S. 393 (2007) the First Amendment does not prevent educators from suppressing, at or across the street from a school-supervised event, student speech that is reasonably viewed as promoting illegal drug use

Why a “landmark” case? The lasting legacy of the Johnson case was to demonstrate the First Amendment protection of forms of political expression, extends even to those as unpopular and provocative as burning the national flag.