Trademark enforcement in Belarus AIPPI Baltic, Vilnius, 2013 Darya Lando, Head of Legal Department LexPatent, Minsk, Belarus.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Latest Developments in Ukraines Intellectual Property Laws and Data Protection.
Advertisements

Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.ukIntellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk.
International Plant Protection Convention CPM 7, Rome March 2012
What is TRIPS ? TRIPS is The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Including Trade in Counterfeit Goods. TRIPS is one of.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
International Registration of Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Matthijs Geuze, WIPO National Seminar on the Use of Industrial Property.
Customs administration in the Customs Union and the Common Economic Space Prospects for further development Eurasian Economic Commission Department of.
Working world wide against HIV for the health and human rights of men who have sex with men Working world wide against HIV for the health and human rights.
Customs & Corporate Lawyers. Whats new Customs & Corporate Lawyers.
Genuine Use in inter partes cases 4th Liaison Meeting on Trade Marks June 2009.
Baker & McKenzie – CIS, Limited is a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance.
Counterfeit and Pirated Goods 6 th April Relevant Acquis Icelandic Legislation International Conventions Customs Intervention Preconditions Time.
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Dispute Settlement and Effective Enforcement of IP.
Patent Infringement—Statute Study 10 experts. Term of Protection Article 42 The duration of an invention patent shall be twenty years, the duration of.
DESIGN AND EUROPEAN LAW Two texts - Firstly a directive 98/71 in order to create a convergence between national laws - secondly a european protection :
National Remedies for the purposes of communication under the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Janka.
China on the way to a high-technology country: The legal policy perspective Stefan Luginbuehl Lawyer, International Legal Affairs.
Strengthening the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Ukraine Activity October 2014.
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
GENERAL ALBANIAN PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS OFFICE Sub-regional seminar on the commercialization and enforcment of intellectual property rights.
The Madrid system An update on the latest development Israel February 2012 Debbie Roenning Director, Legal Division, Brands and Designs Sector.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
Trademark II Infringement. Article 57 Infringement Article 57 Any of the following conduct shall be an infringement upon the right to exclusively use.
Baker & McKenzie Presented by Gabriela Vendlova 3 December 2002 Intellectual Property Rights: Importance of Trademark Protection in the Digital World.
THE MADRID SYSTEM Legal Framework (I) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries.
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA PROPOSED PATENT BILL AND ITS RELEVANCY.
U.S. Copyright Enforcement Benjamin Hardman Attorney / Advisor Office of Intellectual Property Policy & Enforcement, USPTO.
Access to Justice Development of Green Bench in the Court of Justice October 2005 : The Green Bench, a specialized division was officially set up at the.
LOGO The collective agreement. The labour contract.
November Lovells Trademark and Design Right Enforcement in the European Union Part I France Marie-Aimée de Dampierre, Paris.
1 Ensuring the protection of bidders’ rights.  The Federal Law of № 94-FZ "On placing orders for goods, works and services for state and municipal.
EEMAN & PARTNERS Border Measures WIPO seminar for judges and enforcement institutions Sofia, 22 & 23 November 2012 Marius Schneider Attorney-at-law Eeman.
STATE COMMITTEE for STANDARDIZATION of the REPUBLIC of BELARUS.
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA PROPOSED PATENT BILL AND ITS RELEVANCY.
Olivier Rukundo. Copyright provisions Article 6 A work, except a broadcast, programme-carrying signal or a traditional work, shall not be eligible for.
TRADE MARKS: LATEST EU CASE LAW ON ENFORCEMENT By Annick Mottet Haugaard Attorney at law, 2nd Vice President ECTA International Baltic Conference on Intellectual.
WARSAW May 2006 Seminar on Enforcement of Property Variety Rights.
“THE UNITARY PATENT AND THE UNIFIED PATENT COURT: A PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE” Prof Dr Paul L.C. Torremans School of Law University of Nottingham.
1 1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association U.S. Implementation of the Hague Agreement For Designs John (Jack) J. Penny, V Event.
Regional Seminar on Enforcement of IP rights Enforcement of IPR Hungarian implementation László Vass Legal and International Department HIPO.
The Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks Kiev March Noëlle Moutout Assistant Legal Officer.
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
INTRODUCTION TO CZECH BUSINESS LAW 1 Time & Location Thursday10-12 a.m. Grading – criteria Participation in lectures - 50% Presentations Discussion Test.
Legal Framework of Intellectual Property Protection during Exhibition The Intellectual Property Center of Shanghai University of Political Science and.
REFORMS ON IMPROVING KAZAKHSTAN’S POSITION IN «PROTECTING MINORITY INVESTORS» INDICATOR IN DOING BUSINESS.
EU legislation on customs brokers: overall view Jerzy Szczawiński Customs Service of the Republic of Poland TAIEX Workshop on the Functioning of the Customs.
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
AIPLA ANNUAL MEETING Joint Committee Meeting (Corporate Practice) (International & Foreign Law)
International Treaties regarding the Protection of Trademark.
Copyright Protection in Indonesia: General Information on the Implementation of Copyright Law in Indonesia; policies and planning Seoul, November 2007.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 5 – Public Procurement Bilateral screening:
ABA Annual Meeting All Rights Reserved Brief Overview of the Intellectual Property System in China Elizabeth Chien-Hale
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 29 – Customs union Bilateral screening:
Article 4 [Obligations of Applicant] 4.1. As a sole and exclusive owner of the Application, Applicant warrants that.
IP experiences and challenges of SMEs of the Republic of Tajikistan
Case C-174/14 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 29 October 2015
Participation in lectures - 50%
International IP Roundtable UNLV, 8 April Seizure of Goods in Transit
THE SCOPE OF PROTECTION OF WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARKS
Don’t get Burned: How to Protect Your Intellectual Property
Patent law update.
SPCs and the unitary patent package
IP Protection under the WTO
New Customs Legislation of the Eurasian Economic Union
U Than Maung Advocate IP Proprietors’ Association of Myanmar (IPPAM)
Global Business & Legal Issues
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin The Lisbon System facilitates the protection of appellations of origin.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
ON EUROPEAN TRADEMARKS AND DESIGNS
Presentation transcript:

Trademark enforcement in Belarus AIPPI Baltic, Vilnius, 2013 Darya Lando, Head of Legal Department LexPatent, Minsk, Belarus

Trademark registration (general information) LAW ON TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS Article 2 Legal Protection of Trademarks 1. The legal protection of a trademark in the Republic of Belarus shall be based on its registration with the State Authority National Center of Intellectual Property (hereinafter referred to as «the Patent Authority»), made in accordance with a procedure laid down by the trademark legislation or under international treaties to which the Republic of Belarus is party. 2. The trademark may be registered in the name of an organization or in the name of a citizen. 3. The right to the trademark is protected by the State. The registration of a trademark shall give rise to the issue of a trademark certificate. The trademark certificate shall attest the priority date of the trademark and the owners exclusive rights in the trademark in relation to the goods specified in the certificate; it shall contain a representation of the trademark.

Examination system of trademark registration The examination of the trademark application includes preliminary examination substantive examination of the applied mark

Agreements and registration procedure National TM registration – Belarus Patent Office International TM Registration – WIPO Registration of agreements in Belarus Patent Office: before January 25, 2010 – registration procedure January 25, January 14, 2013 – notification procedure since January 15, 2013 – registration procedure

Enforcement of the granted rights All civil disputes relating to intellectual property, irrespective of the parties involved, are considered by the Intellectual Property Chamber of the Supreme Court. Patent attorneys are entitled to be representatives in court.

Trademark infringement cases Article 29 Liability for Infringements of the Legislation on Trademarks 1. Any person who, in a manner contrary to the provisions of this Law, makes use of a trademark or of a sign confusingly similar to the trademark for goods of the same type shall incur liability in accordance with the legislation of the Republic of Belarus The goods or the labeling and packaging thereof in relation to which (on which) the trademark or the sign confusingly similar to the trademark is unlawfully affixed shall be counterfeit. 2. The unlawful use of a trademark may give rise, independently of the filing of a restraining injunction or a petition seeking compensation for damages sustained, to the following additional civil sanctions: 2.1 removal from the goods or the packaging thereof of the unlawfully used trademark or of the sign confusingly similar to the trademark, or destruction of existing reproductions of the trademark or of the sign confusingly similar to the trademark; 2.2 seizure or destruction of the goods for which the trademark was unlawfully used; 2.3 imposition of a fine for the benefit of the injured party amounting to the value of the goods for which the trademark was unlawfully used; 3. The remedies under paragraph (2) of this Article concerning persons guilty of the unlawful use of the trademark shall be applied as prescribed by the legislation of the Republic of Belarus. The guilty party shall pay the expenses in respect of the remedies specified under subparagraphs (2.1) and (2.2) of paragraph (2) of this Article.

Non-use cases Article 20.6 Use of the Trademark and Consequences of Failure to Use the Trademark The legal protection of the trademark may be terminated prematurely in relation to all or some of the goods for the distinguishing of which the trademark is registered, if the said trademark is not used without due cause during an uninterrupted period of three years from the date of registration thereof. The request to terminate prematurely the legal protection of the trademark for lack of use may be filed to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Belarus by any person after the said period of three years expires, provided that the trademark has not been used at all up to the date on which the request is filed.

Use of the Trademark Article 20.1 Use of the Trademark and Consequences of Failure to Use the Trademark The application of a trademark to goods for which it is registered and upon labeling, packaging, in the global computer network Internet (including domain names), in documents concerning the putting of the goods on the market, in connection with the performing of work and rendering of services, or the exploitation of a trademark with amendments to some of its elements, which amendments have no effect on its distinctive character and do not limit the scope of legal protection granted to the trademark, by the owner of the trademark or by any person to whom the right to use the trademark has been granted under a license contract as provided in Article 23 of this Law shall be deemed to constitute use of the trademark.

Use of the Trademark Supreme Court case 12-01/ in Belarus Since the use of the trademark with the consent of its owner does not contradict the legislation, the disputed registration should be kept in force.

Exhaustion of Trademark Rights National exhaustion Regional exhaustion Article 20.5: Use of the trademark in relation to goods that have been lawfully placed on the market in the territory of the Member States to the Agreement on Common Principles of Regulation in Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights signed on December 9, 2010 in Moscow, directly by the owner of the trademark or by other persons with his consent, shall not constitute infringement of the exclusive trademark right.

96 trademarks Customs Register as of April 05, 2013

Suspension of release of goods Suspension of release For 10 working days May be extended for another 10 working days, provided the rightholder has turned to the competent authority for protection of his rights Further proceedings Administrative procedure Civil procedure Criminal procedure

National Register vs. Common Register Agreement on the Common IP Customs Register of the Member States of the Customs Union Ratified by the Law of the Republic of Belarus of May 8, 2011 Application may be filed through the Customs Committee of Belarus – no applications by now Shall refer to an IP object protected in all three countries

Administrative sanctions Fine at the rate of: 20–50 basic units* USD – on a natural person up to 100 basic units 1200 USD – on a private entrepreneur up to 300 basic units 3600 USD – on a legal entity with or without confiscation of the object of administrative offence. * 1 basic unit 12 USD

Trademark Law Customs Code The goods or the labeling and packaging thereof in relation to which (on which) the trademark or the sign confusingly similar to the trademark is unlawfully affixed shall be counterfeit. Counterfeit goods are goods containing intellectual property, if transfer of such goods across the customs border or other actions with such goods placed under the customs control entail infringement of the rightholders rights. Destruction of goods

Common Economic Space Draft Agreement on Trademarks, Service Marks and Appellations of origin Trademark registration in Common Economic Space National trademark registration

Thank you for your attention! Minsk, Belarus