ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cancer of Unknown Primary
Advertisements

Eyas M. Hattab, M.D. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Scientific Committee of the ADIAP 25th Annual Congress and the 5th JSP International.
Audit of Impact of NICE guidelines for Ovarian Cancer Helen Losty Royal United Hospital Bath 17th November 2011.
Cancer of Unknown Primary Dr Chris Jones Consultant Medical Oncologist North of England Cancer Network Annual Conference 20 September 2013.
Tumor Markers Useful tool or part of the problem? Dr. Grant MacLean.
Introduction to Neoplasia
Delving into the Occult. Introduction Occult From the Latin word occultus meaning clandestine, hidden or secret Occult Cancer Carcinoma of unknown primary.
Guidance on Cancer Services Improving Outcomes for People with Skin Tumours including Melanoma NICE Stateholder Consultation version July 2005.
Otis W. Brawley, M.D. Chief Medical and Scientific Officer Executive Vice President American Cancer Society Professor of Hematology, Medical Oncology,
Neoplasia Lecture 2 Dr. Maha Arafah.
Metastatic Carcinoma of Unknown Primary: A Diagnostic Dilemma
Joint Hospital Surgical Grand Round 21 st July, 2012 RH.
Eleni Galani Medical Oncologist
Mediterranean School of Oncology Rome, March 6, 2010 Università degli Studi di Palermo Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia Dipartimento di Oncologia Cattedra.
How to manage suspected cancer
Resection For Lung Metastases M62 Coloproctology Course.
MRS PC, 63YO WOMAN  Initially presented with chronic RIF pain  Found to have cholelithiasis, underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy  On the laparoscopy,
Principles of Surgical Oncology Salah R. Elfaqih.
Unknown primary tumors : common misdiagnosis Oscar Nappi UOSC di Anatomia patologica AORN A. Cardarelli - Napoli.
Introduction It is not too rare 3-5% year of newly diagnosed malignant tumours 4° most common cause of cancer- related death in both sex.
Tumor markers Present; by Dr. Andalib Isfahan Medical School
Statistics about unknown primary tumors Riccardo Capocaccia National Centre for Epidemiology, Surveillance and Health Promotion Istituto Superiore di Sanità,
Chemotherapy Audit  Audit of patients who died within three months of their last dose of chemotherapy at Airedale General Hospital  The records of 50.
Clinical Division of Oncology Department of Medicine I Medical University of Vienna, Austria Tumormarkers.
Changes in Breast Cancer Reports After Second Opinion Dr. Vicente Marco Department of Pathology Hospital Quiron Barcelona. Spain.
Neoplasia-2.
Diagnostic Challenge Pathology for Neurosurgery & Neurology Residents Department of Pathology University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City,
First author: Roman Adina Co-author: Andone Sebastian
Principles of Surgical Oncology Done by : 428 surgery team surgery team.
Diagnostic Challenge Pathology for Neurosurgery & Neurology Residents Department of Pathology University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City,
April 2014 Dr J King Dr K Syred.  90% mesotheliomas are linked to asbestos exposure  May be eligible for compensation  3 yr survival rate 8%  Subtype.
Tumor Markers American cancer society British Journal of Cancer By B.Heidari.
Diagnostic Biomarkers in Metastatic Breast Cancer Lei Huo MD PhD The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Laboratory Diagnosis of Cancer 1.Histological methods 2.Cytopathology - FNAC/Exfoliative 3.Immunohistochemistry/ EM 4.Molecular diagnosis 5.Tumor Markers.
Principles of Surgical Oncology
Lecture # 42 NEOPLASIA - 3 Dr
Pathology of lung cancer: Case #1 presentation. 38-year-old man, non smoker, unremarkable family and personal clinical history productive cough since.
The Cancer Registry of Norway Jan F Nygård Head of the IT-department.
Unit 6: Tumor markers. Introduction… Cancer is the second leading cause of death in North America, accounting for > 2.7 million deaths annually Although.
Annals of Oncology 23: 298–304, 2012 종양혈액내과 R4 김태영 / prof. 김시영.
case report Title: uterine mass Master: Dr.Mahzooni Resident: Dr.Soleimani 92/7/6.
R2 김재민 / Prof. 정재헌 Journal conference 1.
Cancer Facts MS JYOTI SHAH CONSULTANT UROLOGICAL SURGEON SOURCE: CANCER RESEARCH UK.
Common pitfall in Oncology Luangyot Thongthieang, MD MEDICAL ONCOLOGY UNIT INTERNAL MEDICINE, KHONKAEN HOSPITAL.
Diagnostic Intervals in Breast, Colorectal, Lung, Pancreatic, Oesophageal and Gastric Cancers and : Database Study Richard D NealBangor.
Woo Cheal Cho MD1, Fabiola Balarezo, MD1
Consultant Medical Oncologist
Oesophago–Gastric Cancer
National Oesophago–Gastric Cancer Audit 2015.
Wijendra Senarathne1, Peggy Gates1, Semir Vranic2, Zoran Gatalica1
Principles of Surgical Oncology
Improved diagnosis, therapy and outcomes for patients with CUP
CUP SSG May 2016 Dr Matt sephton
Dorset County Hospital Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) Service
Cancer Unknown Primary
Neoplasia (6 of 6) Ali Al Khader, M.D. Faculty of Medicine
Hybrid Model Integrating Immunohistochemistry and Expression Profiling for the Classification of Carcinomas of Unknown Primary Site  Barbara A. Centeno,
What’s New for 8th Edition
An Audit on Complex hyperplasia reporting at Derriford Hospital
Figure 2 Examples of histopathological validation
From NICE CG 104, 2010 Table 1 Terms used in this guideline
Handling and Evaluation of Breast Cancer Biopsy
NEOPLASM DIAGNOSIS CODING AND SEQUENCING
CUP is a clinico-pathological syndrome of many specific cancer
Esteller, New England Journal of Medicine, 2008
Talk outline Brief history of gene-expression profiling for cancer type classification Current commercially available tests - development and performance.
Overview of cancer genetics in the SMP1 cohort: lung cancer (A), breast cancer (B), colorectal adenocarcinoma (except mucinous subtype) (C), prostate cancer.
Pertinence of the WHO 2010 guideline on NEC diagnosis Reliable pathology reporting of extra-pulmonary large cell NEC JM van der Zwan Ph.D., IACR, Vancouver.
Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
Figure 3.1 Death Rates by States All Dialysis Patients
Presentation transcript:

ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS,                State of the art immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of tissue of origin, with Royal College of Pathologists standard - and evolving towards morpho-molecular pathology Prof John Schofield Kent Cancer Centre Dr Karin Oien University of Glasgow CUP CONFERENCE    ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS, LONDON 3 May 2019

Outline Cancer of Unknown Primary Pathology classification for cancer in general and CUP in particular including immunohistochemistry (IHC) (morphomolecular part 1) Performance & practice RCPath dataset CUP management through MDT approach Morphomolecular approaches beyond IHC (part 2) What is CUP today - MUO through to provisional CUP, confirmed CUP - “residual CUP”? Main challenges in “residual CUP” and therefore unmet needs Approaches, implementation and next steps

Cancer of Unknown Primary: The Problem Most cancers present at their primary site 10-15% present as metastasis In two-thirds or more, primary becomes evident In up to one-third (5%), primary site is not found and this becomes CUP Cancers of unknown primary site (CUPs) are a heterogeneous group of metastatic tumours for which a standardised diagnostic work-up fails to identify site of origin at time of diagnosis Definition: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines (European Society of Medical Oncology) This overlaps with epidemiology slide Merge with epidemiology slide?

CUP Epidemiology Up to 1980’s, CUP made up 10-15% of patients referred to oncology Site of origin now more often identified but CUP still forms 3-5% of all malignancies Worldwide, CUP is fourth most common cause of cancer death Median age 60 with 53% M: 47% F Median survival: 3-10 months historically Add in overall survival? Merge with “The Probllem” slide? Overall attitude nihilistic incl. treatment (few papers and those that existed were from tertiary referral centres and oncologists seemingly without realisation that most CUP patients didn’t get as far as oncology Since then: much improved diagnostics: imaging and pathology, understanding of disease, and clinical care incl. guidelines And in community setting, many/most (CHECK community papers e.g. Pimiento) patients don’t get as far as oncologists: often diagnosed/stay with primary care or e.g. physicians or surgeons in secondary care

CUP common presenting sites for metastasis Solid organs: liver, lung, bone & brain Lymph nodes: cervical, supra- clavicular, axillary, mediastinal/ retroperitoneal and inguinal Serous cavities: peritoneal and pleural (i.e. common sites of metastasis overall) Check (i.e. common sites of metastasis overall) and I’m a liver pathologist 

CUP tumour types Most clinical studies of CUP exclude lymphoma, metastatic melanoma and metastatic sarcoma And often require histological confirmation Therefore cancer of unknown primary generally equates to carcinoma of unknown primary Other main tumour types need considered and excluded during pathological work-up CUP is a “diagnosis of exclusion” Many CUP patients do not have histological confirmation (check % in our Brewster paper)

CUP common histological sub-types Once other tumour types excluded… Adenoca and poorly diff often grouped together and make up 90%

CUP common sites of origin at autopsy Historically, after CUP diagnosis, primary site identified only in: <20–25% in life; 30-80% at autopsy Gives (historical) common sites of origin

CUP: classification for clinical benefit Despite CUP representing metastatic malignancy, outlook is not uniformly poor Clinical subsets with better or worse outcomes identified, based on: Histopathological type of tumour: (Lymphoma), neuroendocrine, germ cell Anatomical site: LN = good exc. supraclav Number of metastatic sites involved Overall performance status And associated with better or worse response to therapy: “favourable” & “unfavourable” Not nihilistic

Outline Cancer of Unknown Primary Pathology classification for cancer in general and CUP in particular including immunohistochemistry (IHC) (morphomolecular part 1) Performance & practice RCPath dataset CUP management through MDT approach Morphomolecular approaches beyond IHC (part 2) What is CUP today - MUO through to provisional CUP, confirmed CUP - “residual CUP”? Main challenges in “residual CUP” and therefore unmet needs Approaches, implementation and next steps

CUP Pathology: H&E “CUP” generally equates to carcinoma Other cancers need to be considered and excluded Cancer classification for type & site classically based on morphology Resemblance to normal tissue counterpart For adenocarcinomas, H&E morphology alone can predict primary site in up to 50% of cases Adenoca and poorly diff often grouped together and make up 90% In CUP, the most common primary sites for adenocarcinoma are pancreas and lung; then colon, stomach and oesophagus, breast, ovary and prostate

Classification..or “reduction of uncertainty”... In cancer pathology and CUP, our aim is to provide optimal cancer classification We’re trying to reduce uncertainty For clinical colleagues and patients On behalf of pathology Can we improve classification with more or better biomarkers? Anecdote? Image?

Tissue-specific/restricted genes Morphology reflects gene expression Around 12,000 genes are active in any one tissue type Over 8,000 genes are widely expressed Minority of genes are tissue-specific or tissue-restricted, related to function i.e. differentiation Regulatory genes in nucleus e.g. ER, TTF1, CDX2, PAX8 Protein products in cytoplasm or membrane e.g. PSA, CK7 Can assess at all of these levels.

Where does this fit in pathology workup Where does this fit in pathology workup?... Towards standardised approaches in CUP Attempt to predict primary site is at end of pathology work-up, as part of diagnosis of exclusion to establish CUP Step-wise work-up is familiar to pathologists In difficult cases, e.g. eventual CUP, systematic approach ensures all differential diagnoses considered Adenoca and poorly diff often grouped together and make up 90% Oien 2009 Semin Oncol.

Classification of cancer including CUP: A stepwise pathological approach Step 1: identify broad cancer type Carcinoma Melanoma Lymphoma/ leukaemia Sarcoma (Neuroglial tumours) 1. Carcinoma 4. Sarcoma 3. Lymphoma 2. Melanoma Used for all cancers not just CUP

Immunohistochemistry for CUP: Step 1: identify broad cancer type Carcinoma (Pan-)Cytokeratins and other epithelial markers e.g. AE1/3, CK7, CK20, CK5, EMA Melanoma S100, Melan-A, HMB45 Lymphoma/ leukaemia CLA, CD20, CD3, CD138, CD30 etc. Sarcoma Vimentin, actin, desmin, S100, c-kit etc Used for all cancers not just CUP

Classification of cancer including CUP: A stepwise pathological approach Step 2: if carcinoma or related, identify subtype Adenocarcinoma Squamous ca. Transitional ca. Solid organ ca. (hepatocellular, renal, thyroid, adrenal) Neuroendocrine ca. (Germ cell tumour) (Mesothelioma) Used for all cancers not just CUP

Immunohistochemistry for CUP: Step 2: if carcinoma, identify subtype Adenocarcinoma CK7, CK20, PSA and other adenoca markers Squamous ca CK5, p63 Transitional ca CK7, CK20, uroplakin , GATA3 Neuroendocrine ca Chromogranin, CD56, synaptophysin, TTF1 Solid ca: renal RCC, CD10, PAX8, Napsin A Solid ca: liver Hepar1, CD10, glypican-3 Solid ca: thyroid TTF1, thyroglobulin, PAX8 Solid ca: adrenal Melan-A, inhibin (Germ cell tumour) OCT4, PLAP, HCG, AFP (Mesothelioma) Calretinin, mesothelin, WT1, D2-40 Used for all cancers not just CUP Many overlap so multiple markers, morphology and clinical context vital

Expression of cytokeratins 7 and 20 in carcinomas and related tumours   CK7 positive CK7 negative CK20 positive Gastro-intestinal adenocarcinomas and transitional cell carcinoma Pancreas & biliary tract (one-third) Stomach (one-quarter) Ovary (mucinous: but many of these likely to be metastatic from gut) Transitional cell carcinoma (two-thirds) Gastro-intestinal adenocarcinomas Colorectum Stomach (one-third) Neuroendocrine tumor of Merkel cell type (poorly differentiated) CK20 negative Many adenocarcinomas Breast Lung (adenocarcinoma) Ovary (serous & endometrioid) Pancreas & biliary tract (two-thirds) Stomach (one-sixth) Endometrium Salivary tumors Thyroid tumors Transitional cell carcinoma (one-third) Neuroendocrine, poorly differentiated: small cell carcinoma (one-quarter) Malignant mesothelioma (two-thirds) Prostatic and other adenocarcinomas plus solid organ, squamous and most neuroendocrine carcinomas Prostate Squamous carcinoma Germ cell tumor Hepatocellular carcinoma Renal (clear) cell carcinoma Adrenocortical carcinoma Neuroendocrine, poorly differentiated: small cell carcinoma (three-quarters) Malignant mesothelioma (one-third)

Classification of cancer including CUP: A stepwise pathological approach Step 3: if adeno-carcinoma, predict possible primary sites Lung Pancreas Colon Stomach Breast Ovary Prostate, etc Used for all cancers not just CUP

Selection of further or newer biomarkers for carcinoma type and site Carcinoma subtype Also identifies GATA3 Breast carcinoma, transitional cell carcinoma Salivary gland, skin adnexal tumours (Villin) Colorectal Some renal, lung, ovarian and endometrial carcinomas SATB2 Colorectal (c.f. not in other gastro-intestinal neoplasms) Some renal cell carcinomas, osteosarcomas Arginase Hepatocellular carcinoma Napsin A Lung adenocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma Gynaecological clear cell carcinoma WT1 Ovarian serous Mesothelioma PAX8 Ovarian serous, endometrioid, clear cell and mucinous; renal cell carcinoma Thyroid p40 Squamous and transitional cell carcinoma Salivary gland tumours, thymoma & trophoblastic tumours Steroidogenic Factor 1 Adrenocortical neoplasms (c.f. other clear cell neoplasms)

Outline Cancer of Unknown Primary Pathology classification for cancer in general and CUP in particular including immunohistochemistry (IHC) (morphomolecular part 1) Performance & practice RCPath dataset CUP management through MDT approach Morphomolecular approaches beyond IHC (part 2) What is CUP today - MUO through to provisional CUP, confirmed CUP - “residual CUP”? Main challenges in “residual CUP” and therefore unmet needs Approaches, implementation and next steps

Standardised & multi-disciplinary approaches “CUP” is a diagnosis of exclusion, at the end of pathological work-up In difficult cases, e.g. eventual CUP, (usual) systematic approach ensures all possibilities to be considered So most appropriate markers and tests can be requested (early) and assessed To lead to tumour (exclusion &) classification Guidelines & standards can help: RCPath CUP dataset Based on systematic approach & exclusion Adenoca and poorly diff often grouped together and make up 90% e.g. flowcharts

Outline Cancer of Unknown Primary Pathology classification for cancer in general and CUP in particular including immunohistochemistry (IHC) (morphomolecular part 1) Performance & practice RCPath dataset CUP management through MDT approach Morphomolecular approaches beyond IHC (part 2) What is CUP today - MUO through to provisional CUP, confirmed CUP - “residual CUP”? Main challenges in “residual CUP” and therefore unmet needs Approaches, implementation and next steps

CUP clinical guidelines ESMO (European Society Medical Oncology), Fizazi et al 2015 UK NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, UK) (Richard Osborne, John Symons from CUP Foundation - Jo's friends) http://www.cupfoundjo.org/ And Peer Review Include recommended: Investigations and workup At least a minimal IHC panel In clinical context: MDT ESMO (European Society Medical Oncology), Fizazi et al 2015

Malignancy of undefined primary origin (MUO) NICE guidance on metastatic malignant disease of unknown primary origin CUP definitions with (and within) MDT approach Malignancy of undefined primary origin (MUO) Metastatic malignancy identified on the basis of a limited number of tests, without an obvious primary site, before comprehensive investigation. Provisional carcinoma of unknown primary origin (provisional CUP) Metastatic epithelial or neuro-endocrine malignancy identified on the basis of histology or cytology, with no primary site detected despite a selected initial screen of investigations, before specialist review and possible further specialised investigations. Confirmed origin (confirmed Metastatic epithelial or neuro-endocrine malignancy identified on the basis of final histology, with no primary site detected despite a selected initial screen of investigations, specialist review, and further specialised investigations as appropriate. Malignancy of undefined primary origin (MUO) Provisional CUP Confirmed CUP More cancers of known type & origin Consider ESMO and other definitions NICE guidance/guideline on CUP, 2010 https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg104/resources/metastatic-malignant-disease-of-unknown-primary-origin-diagnosis-and-management-of-metastatic-malignant-disease-of-unknown-primary-origin-35109328970437