Radar-lidar retrievals of water cloud parameters

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ewan OConnor, Anthony Illingworth, Robin Hogan and the Cloudnet team Cloudnet.
Advertisements

Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth Drizzle comparisons.
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth, Nicolas Gaussiat Liquid water path from microwave radiometers.
Ewan OConnor, Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth, Nicolas Gaussiat Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds.
Radar/lidar observations of boundary layer clouds
Robin Hogan Anthony Illingworth Ewan OConnor Nicolas Gaussiat Malcolm Brooks University of Reading Cloudnet products available from Chilbolton.
Robin Hogan, Richard Allan, Nicky Chalmers, Thorwald Stein, Julien Delanoë University of Reading How accurate are the radiative properties of ice clouds.
Robin Hogan Julien Delanoe University of Reading Remote sensing of ice clouds from space.
Integrated Profiling at the AMF
Application of Cloudnet data in the validation of SCIAMACHY cloud height products Ping Wang Piet Stammes KNMI, De Bilt, The Netherlands CESAR Science day,
Exploiting multiple scattering in CALIPSO measurements to retrieve liquid cloud properties Nicola Pounder, Robin Hogan, Lee Hawkness-Smith, Andrew Barrett.
Review of model/obs/products. Models Fluxes –ECMWF fluxes will added v soon (Openshaw) UKMO Global model data –In testing –Damian to provide more data.
Stratus Cloud parameters retrieval from Doppler radar Virendra P. Ghate.
Nicolas Gaussiat and Robin Hogan Progress meeting 4 – Toulouse – Oct 2003 Dual wavelength retrieval of LWC and IWC at Chilbolton.
EGU-Boers (2006) Accuracy assessment of an integrated profiling technique for temperature, humidity and liquid water content profiles U. Lohnert (1), E.
Depolarization lidar for water cloud remote sensing 1.Background: MS and Depolaization 2.Short overview of the MC model used in this work 3.Depol-lidar.
Microphysical and radiative properties of ice clouds Evaluation of the representation of clouds in models J. Delanoë and A. Protat IPSL / CETP Assessment.
Aerosol and Cloud Microphysics Working Group Dietrich Althausen, Andrea Riede, Herman Russchenberg, Aldo Amodeo, Susanne Crewell, Paolo Di Girolamo, Stephen.
Atmospheric structure from lidar and radar Jens Bösenberg 1.Motivation 2.Layer structure 3.Water vapour profiling 4.Turbulence structure 5.Cloud profiling.
Bredbeck Workshop, 7 – 10 July 2003 Jörg Schulz Meteorological Institute, University of Bonn Harald Czekala RPG Radiometer.
Ewan O’Connor Anthony Illingworth Comparison of observed cloud properties at the AMF COPS site with NWP models.
1 H.W.J Russchenberg 1, C.L. Brandau 1, U. Loehnert 2 and K. Ebell 2 (1) International Research Centre for Telecommunication and Radar (IRCTR), Delft Technical.
IRCTR - International Research Centre for Telecommunication and Radar ATMOS Ice crystals properties retrieval within ice and mixed-phase clouds using the.
Observed and modelled long-term water cloud statistics for the Murg Valley Kerstin Ebell, Susanne Crewell, Ulrich Löhnert Institute for Geophysics and.
Lidar algorithms to retrieve cloud distribution, phase and optical depth Y. Morille, M. Haeffelin, B. Cadet, V. Noel Institut Pierre Simon Laplace SYMPOSIUM.
2013 DOE/EU Retrieval Workshop, Köln “Common Algorithm Evaluation Approaches ” Session Shaocheng Xie, Kerstin Ebell, Dave Turner, and Ulrich Lohnert EU/DOE.
Remote-sensing of the environment (RSE) ATMOS Analysis of the Composition of Clouds with Extended Polarization Techniques L. Pfitzenmaier, H. Russchenbergs.
Delft University of Technology 1 Do eddy dissipation rate retrievals work for precipitation profiling Doppler radar?, CESAR Science Day, June 18th, 2014.
WMO Cloud Modelling Workshop, Hamburg, 12. Juli 2004 The BALTEX BRIDGE Campaign (BBC) cases Susanne Crewell, Nicole van Lipzig, Wenchieh Yen Meteorological.
Gerd-Jan van Zadelhoff & Dave Donovan Comparing ice-cloud microphysical properties using Cloudnet & ARM data.
Characterization of Arctic Mixed-Phase Cloudy Boundary Layers with the Adiabatic Assumption Paquita Zuidema*, Janet Intrieri, Sergey Matrosov, Matthew.
Diagnosing Climate Change from Satellite Sounding Measurements – From Filter Radiometers to Spectrometers William L. Smith Sr 1,2., Elisabeth Weisz 1,
CloudNet: TARA status and database H. Russchenberg, O. Krasnov Delft University of Technology – IRCTR, The Netherlands.
International Research Centre for Telecommunications and Radar High resolution 3D wind profiling using an S-band polarimetric FM-CW radar: dealiasing techniques.
Chalmers (Sweden), CNRS (France), DWD (Germany), GKSS (Germany), HUT (Finland), IAP Bern (Switzerland), IRE Moscow (Russia), KNMI (The Netherlands), RAL.
Page 1 Validation by Balloons and Aircraft - ESRIN - 9– 13 December 2002 Observations of aerosol and clouds obtained during the M-55 Geophysica ENVISAT.
Cabauw Experimental Site for Atmospheric Research - CESAR - Henk Klein Baltink Atmospheric Research Section.
Institute of Environmental Physics and Remote Sensing IUP/IFE-UB Physics/Electrical Engineering Department 1 Measurements.
Depolarization lidar for water cloud remote sensing 1.Background MS and MC 2.Short overview of the MC model used in this work 3.Depol-lidar for Water Cld.
Anthony Illingworth, Robin Hogan, Ewan O’Connor, U of Reading, UK Nicolas Gaussiat Damian Wilson, Malcolm Brooks Met Office, UK Dominique Bouniol, Alain.
Calibration/Validation Efforts at Calibration/Validation Efforts at UPRM Hamed Parsiani, Electrical & Computer Engineering Department University of Puerto.
BBC Workshop DeBilt, 18.–19. October 2004 Reconstruction of three dimensional cloud fields from two dimensional input datasets Klemens Barfus & Franz H.
Water cloud retrievals O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research Centre for Telecommunications-transmission and Radar, Faculty of.
Lidar+Radar ice cloud remote sensing within CLOUDNET. D.Donovan, G-J Zadelhof (KNMI) and the CLOUDNET team With outside contributions from… Z. Wang (NASA/GSFC)
The retrieval of the LWC in water clouds: the comparison of Frisch and Radar-Lidar techniques O. A. Krasnov and H. W. J. Russchenberg International Research.
Robin Hogan Ewan O’Connor The Instrument Synergy/ Target Categorization product.
1 Susanne Crewell 1 & MICAM Team 2 1 Meteorologisches Institut Universität Bonn 2 Laurent Chardenal (CETP), Gunnar Elgered (Chalmers), Catherine Gaffard.
Radiometer Physics GmbH
KNMI 35 GHz Cloud Radar & Cloud Classification* Henk Klein Baltink * Robin Hogan (Univ. of Reading, UK)
Introduction to cloud structure generators Victor Venema — Clemens Simmer.
Comparing various Lidar/Radar inversion strategies using Raman Lidar data (part II) D.Donovan, G-J Zadelhof (KNMI) Z. Wang (NASA/GSFC) D. Whiteman (NASA/GSFC)
Instrument location ceilo pyro radar 10m Ground-based remote sensing instruments of clouds and precip at Princess Elisabeth.
THE PUZZLING DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RADAR OBSERVATIONS OF STRATOCUMULUS AND AIRBORNE IN SITU DATA H. Russchenberg, O. Krasnov, S. Crewell, U. Loehnert, M.
K. Pfeilsticker Institut für Umweltphysik, University of Heidelberg, Germany K. Pfeilsticker, and T. Scholl, IUP, University of Heidelberg, Germany A.
Page 1 Envisat Validation Workshop, ACVT-GBMCD, GOMOS O 3 (r) 12/12/2002 ACVT-GBMCD subgroup GOMOS ozone profiles, analysis of comparison with GMBCD datasets.
Charles L Wrench RCRU Determining Cloud Liquid Water Path from Radiometer measurements at Chilbolton.
Validation of Cloud Top Temperature with CLOUDNET cloud radar data during the BBC2 Period Erwin Wolters (D. Donovan Presenting)
Rob Roebeling CloudNET meeting 18 – 19 October 2004, Delft METEOSAT-8 OBSERVATIONS AND DERIVED CLOUD MICROPHYSICAL PROPERTIES.
Comparing various Lidar/Radar inversion strategies using Raman Lidar data D.Donovan, G-J Zadelhof (KNMI) Z. Wang (NASA/GSFC) D. Whiteman (NASA/GSFC)
Charles L Wrench RCRU Status of Observations at Chilbolton (CFARR) October 2004.
Nicolas Gaussiat, Anthony Illingworth and Robin Hogan Beeskow, 12 Oct 2005 Liquid Water Path from radiometers and lidar.
UNIVERSITY OF BASILICATA CNR-IMAA (Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Metodologie per l’Analisi Ambientale) Tito Scalo (PZ) Analysis and interpretation.
The study of cloud and aerosol properties during CalNex using newly developed spectral methods Patrick J. McBride, Samuel LeBlanc, K. Sebastian Schmidt,
© Crown copyright Met Office Cloud observations at Cardington Simon Osborne (OBR, Cardington) OBR Conference, 11 th -13 th December 2012.
Cloud Property Retrievals over the Arctic from the NASA A-Train Satellites Aqua, CloudSat and CALIPSO Douglas Spangenberg1, Patrick Minnis2, Michele L.
Radiometer Physics GmbH
Radar-lidar synergy for the retrieval of water cloud parameters
TARA data for CloudNet H. Russchenberg , O. Krasnov Delft University of Technology – IRCTR, The Netherlands.
M. De Graaf1,2, K. Sarna2, J. Brown3, E. Tenner2, M. Schenkels4, and D
Radiometer retrievals of LWP
Presentation transcript:

Radar-lidar retrievals of water cloud parameters O. Krasnov, H. Russchenberg Delft University of Technology – IRCTR, The Netherlands

Radar-lidar technique Input vars Klett inversion Lidar (b) Z/a Radar (Z) -30 -20 -1 1.8 W.Clouds & Precipitation Categorization W.Cloud LWC=f1(Z) MWRM’s LWP L.Drizzle LWC=f2(Z) H.Drizzle LWC=f3(Z) Z Frisch retrievals Validation LWP(t) LWC(t,H)

The limitation in optical extinction retrievals

The Histogramms for Optical Extinction and Thickness May 19, 2003, Cabauw July 04, 2003, Chilbolton a < 5.7 10-3 1/m a < 8.3 10-3 1/m

Optical thickness from lidar’s profile Max optical extinction vs. Optical thickness May 19, 2003, Cabauw July 04, 2003, Chilbolton Optical thickness from lidar’s profile a < 5.7 10-3 1/m a < 8.3 10-3 1/m

The cloud classification The Reading’s «categorization» files

July 04, 2003, Chilbolton Reading’s classes in Z-a terms

July 04, 2003, Chilbolton All obserations

July 04, 2003, Chilbolton Class ICE

Class WATER = PRECIPITATION + WATER CLOUDS July 04, 2003, Chilbolton Class WATER = PRECIPITATION + WATER CLOUDS

July 04, 2003, Chilbolton Class PRECIPITATION

July 04, 2003, Chilbolton Class WATER CLOUDS

The Reading’s classification July 04, 2003, Chilbolton

The Delft’s classification July 04, 2003, Chilbolton

July 04, 2003, Chilbolton

July 05, 2003, Chilbolton

July 05, 2003, Chilbolton All obserations

July 05, 2003, Chilbolton Class ICE

Class WATER = PRECIPITATION + WATER CLOUDS July 05, 2003, Chilbolton Class WATER = PRECIPITATION + WATER CLOUDS

July 05, 2003, Chilbolton Class PRECIPITATION

July 05, 2003, Chilbolton Class WATER CLOUDS

The Reading’s classification July 05, 2003, Chilbolton

The Delft’s classification July 05, 2003, Chilbolton

July 05, 2003, Chilbolton

May 22, 2003, Cabauw

May 22, 2003, Cabauw All observations

May 22, 2003, Cabauw Class ICE

Class WATER = PRECIPITATION + WATER CLOUDS May 22, 2003, Cabauw Class WATER = PRECIPITATION + WATER CLOUDS

May 22, 2003, Cabauw Class PRECIPITATION

May 22, 2003, Cabauw Class WATER CLOUDS

The Reading’s classification May 22, 2003, Cabauw

The Delft’s classification May 22, 2003, Cabauw

May 22, 2003, Cabauw

The problem with «categorization» (?) or radiometer LWP retrievals (?)

LWC retrievals (Z/a)

May 02, 2003, Cabauw

May 09, 2003, Cabauw

May 19, 2003, Cabauw

May 19, 2003, 21.00 - 23.00 UTC Cabauw

May 19, 2003, 21.00 - 23.00 UTC Cabauw

May 21, 2003, 3.00 - 10.00 UTC Cabauw

May 21, 2003, 3.00 - 10.00 UTC Cabauw

July 04, 2003, Chilbolton

July 05, 2003, Chilbolton

MICCY, GKSS 95 GHz radar, Frisch method BBC-1, 05.09.2001, 9:42-10:42 MICCY, GKSS 95 GHz radar, Frisch method

Conclusions Database created The statistical analysis of the lidar inversions shows some limitations - instruments comparison, cross-calibration (?) The further development for clouds categorization technique is necessary (including Z/a ratio, cloud base height, water presence in ice regions) LWC retrievals Problems with poor water clouds still exist