Polarized Positrons in JLEIC

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SuperB and the ILC Damping Rings Andy Wolski University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute 27 April, 2006.
Advertisements

A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Toward a Test Facility for an ERL Circulator Ring Based e-Cooler MEIC Electron Cooler Test Facility Planning Retreat January 31, 2012.
MEIC Electron Cooling Simulation He Zhang 03/18/2014, EIC 14 Newport News, VA.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
After Posipol In my opinion we are still too much dispersed. We have to re compact our community if we want to succeed in presenting a Compton version.
EIC Users Meeting, SBU, 6/27/14 Polarized Electron Beams in the MEIC at JLab Fanglei Lin for MEIC Study Group EIC Users Meeting, Stony Brook University,
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
MEIC Electron Ring Injection from CEBAF
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
FCC-ee injector complex including Booster Yannis Papaphilippou, CERN Thanks to: M.Aiba (PSI), Ö.Etisken (Ankara Un.), K.Oide (KEK), L.Rinolfi (ESI-JUAS),
LDRD Brainstorming Session
Calculation of Beam Equilibrium and Luminosities for
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Polarized Electron Source for eRHIC (the ring-ring option)
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
Large Booster and Collider Ring
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Injector Chain General and more about p-RCS
eRHIC with Self-Polarizing Electron Ring
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
PEPPo Based Polarized Positron Beam Formation for JLEIC
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Joe Grames, Jiquan Guo, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov, Yuhong Zhang
JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Spring 2017
Why CeC is needed? High luminosity of US future electron-ion collider(EIC) is critical for success of its physics program 2018 NAS Assessment of U.S.-Based.
JLEIC ELECTRON COOLING SIMULATION
JLEIC electron injection demo
JLEIC electron injection demo
CEBAF Pulsed Operation for JLEIC Electron Injection
Low Energy Electron-Ion Collision
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Injection design of CEPC
JLEIC Reaching 140 GeV CM Energy: Concept and Luminosity Estimate
MEIC New Baseline: Part 10
Ion bunch formation options for 400GeV JLEIC
JLEIC 200 GeV Ion Injector Chain and Bunch Formation
Fanglei Lin, Andrew Hutton, Vasiliy S. Morozov, Yuhong Zhang
MEIC New Baseline: Luminosity Performance and Upgrade Path
CDR2 – Injection System Injection system overview (Seeman) (2 pages)
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
Deuteron and Small Aperture
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
HE-JLEIC: Boosting Luminosity at High Energy
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
JLEIC Main Parameters with Strong Electron Cooling
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
MEIC low rep-rate operation and path length
JLEIC Collider Rings’ Geometry Options (II)
Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
Possibility of MEIC Arc Cell Using PEP-II Dipole
More on MEIC Beam Synchronization
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, August 20, 2014
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
Some Thoughts on the JLEIC Ion Injector
SC Magnets with Small Apertures for JLEIC*
Summary and Plan for Electron Polarization Study in the JLEIC
Optimization of JLEIC Integrated Luminosity Without On-Energy Cooling*
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
JLEIC electron ring with damping wigglers
HE-JLEIC Luminosity Estimate
Presentation transcript:

Polarized Positrons in JLEIC Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang, Jiquan Guo, Vasiliy S. Morozov, JLEIC R&D Meeting, April 21, 2016 F. Lin

Positron Beams The question always comes up “what about positron beams at an EIC?” We can dream about polarized positron beams of similar luminosity and polarization as the electron beams foreseen for EIC, and some science would drive/require that, but… We should give our accelerator colleagues some ROUGH idea about a reasonable lower threshold for Luminosity Polarization requirements for valuable science at an EIC to give them a target. Caveat: we do NOT want our accelerator colleagues to make this a direct priority, but more have them to keep such options in the back of their minds. So, a discussion on what thresholds are in the ballpark will be useful for them. Here my bold proposal for valuable science with polarized positron beams: Luminosity > 1033 Polarization > 40% from Rolf Ent

JLEIC Primary Positron Parameters For a full acceptance detector Achieved with a single pass ERL cooler CM energy GeV 33.5 40 52.9 p e+ Beam energy 70 4 100 7 Collision frequency MHz 476/3=159 Particles per bunch 1010 1.8 0.59 2.0 Beam current A 0.46 0.15 0.5 Polarization % >70% ~40% Bunch length, RMS cm 2 1.2 Norm. emitt., vert./horz. μm 0.5/0.25 36/18 190/95 Horizontal & vertical β* 4/2 5.8/2.9 2/4 4.1/2.0 7.1/3.55 2.4/1.2 Vert. beam-beam 0.002 0.03 Laslett tune-shift 0.056 small 0.028 Det. space, up/down m 3.6/7 3/3.2 Hour-glass reduction 0.89 0.87 0.82 Lumi./IP, w/HG, 1033 cm-2s-1 0.9 0.7 For a high(er) luminosity detector Horizontal & vertical β* cm 1.6/0.8 2.3/1.2 1.6/0.82 4.8/2.4 Vert. beam-beam 0.002 0.15 0.03 Det. space, up/down m ±4.5 3 Hour-glass reduction 0.67 0.63 0.71 Lumi./IP, w/HG, 1033 cm-2s-1 1.7 2.3 0.9

Luminosity of JLEIC w/ Positrons Assume that the positron beam current is 0.15 A

Formation of Positron Beam collider CEBAF Beam current mA 150 0.05 Bunch freq. MHz 158.8 22.68 Bunch spacing ns 6.3 44.1 m 1.89 13.2 Bunch number 1138 Bunch charge pC 945 2.2 Bunch intensity 109 5.9 0.014 Energy GeV 3 5 6.95 9.3 10 Electron current A 1.4 0.95 0.71 SR power MW 0.16 2.65 Damping time ms 376 81 26 14 Polarization lifetime hour 66 8 2.2 0.9 0.3 Beam lifetime Positron current mA 150 SR power w/o wigglers 0.017 0.13 0.5 1.6 2.1 Initial injection time w/o wigglers min 43.6 9.4 3.5 1.5 1.2 Damping time w/ wigglers 20 Damping time reduction 19.6 4.2 2.6 SR power w/ wigglers 0.32 0.54 0.75 4.0 4.3 Initial injection time w/wigglers 2.3 0.6 Initial injection times are still reasonable short comparing to the beam and polarization lifetimes without wigglers. Dipole wigglers in the straight should not affect the polarization direction at IPs, but may affect the polarization lifetime.

Injected Polarized Positron Structure τd=20ms 44 ns 22.7 MHz bunch train, 3.23µs, 73 bunches (Ipulse = 50 A) injector pulse train up polarization from CEBAF …… injector pulse train down polarization from CEBAF 2.2 pC bunch 73 bunches (Ipulse = 50 A) τd=20ms 25 Hz, 40 ms, Iave=8.1 nA Positron Polarization % > 40 Pulse current Ipulse A 50 Bunch charge pC 2.2 Bunch rep. rate in pulses MHz 22.7 Bunch spacing in pulses ns 44 Pulse rep. rate Hz 25 Average current Iave nA 8.1

Continuous Injection Polarization w/ continuous injection Equilibrium polarization A relatively low average injected beam current of tens-of-nA level can maintain a high equilibrium polarization in the whole energy range.

Positron Production Scheme I It seems easier to stack “cold” electrons than “hot” positrons 1000 turn phase space painting sounds aggressive but it is “only” a factor of ~10 increase of 2D emittance (1  ~10 m) in case of 6D phase space painting or a factor of ~32 increase of 2D emittance (1  ~32 m) in case of 4D phase space painting Option with optimistic assumption about electron stacking 26.5 m accumulator ring with 1000 turn phase-space painting bunch focusing and compression if needed e+ collection system x 10-2 1 mm W target x 10-3 to CEBAF 5-7 MeV Polarized e+ 2 x 0.44 pC @ 11.3 kHz = 10 nA 10 MeV polarized e- 44.1 pC @ 22.7 MHz = 1 mA 10 MeV pol e- 2 x 44.1 nC bunches @ 11.3 MHz = 1 A 10 MeV polarized e- 2 x 44.1 nC @ 11.3 kHz = 1 mA 0-9.5 MeV polarized e+ 2 x 44.1 pC @ 11.3 kHz = 1 A

Positron Production Scheme II Option with less optimistic assumption about electron stacking 26.5 m accumulator ring with 100 turn phase-space painting bunch focusing and compression if needed e+ collection system x 10-2 1 mm W target x 10-2 to CEBAF ~60 MeV polarized e+ 2 x 0.44 pC @ 11.3 kHz = 10 nA 10 MeV polarized e- 44.1 pC @ 22.7 MHz with 10% duty factor = 0.1 mA acceleration to 100 MeV 10 MeV pol e- 2 x 4.41 nC bunches @ 11.3 MHz = 0.1 A 10 MeV polarized e- 2 x 4.41 nC @ 11.3 kHz = 0.1 mA 0-99.5 MeV polarized e+ 2 x 44.1 pC @ 11.3 kHz = 1 A

Experimental Test Minimum experimental setup e+ collection system 1 mm W target x 10-3 to diagnostics 5-7 MeV Polarized e+ 0.0007 fC @ 1497 MHz = 1 nA 10 MeV polarized e- 70 fC @ 1497 MHz = 100 A 0-9.5 MeV polarized e+ 0.07 fC @ 1497 MHz = 0.1 A