Key findings: Which work best – Advertising or content marketing?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multichannel Personalization At Scale: Building Incremental Value With #dunnhumby.
Advertisements

Skoda Creative Benchmarking May About Newspaper Creative Benchmarking.
The Proof 1 Newspapers reveal their unrivalled ability to increase the numbers of buyers who would ‘definitely consider’ a ford.
Agenda Background & methodology Sponsorship details Impact on key brand metrics Shifts in brand positioning & perceptions Insights from the behavioural.
Hearst digital: We Know Women Online. Online Survey Ran 7 th July to 6 th August 40 questions across 5 key insight areas Sample 4566 Methodology Cosmopolitan.
The importance of environment for online advertising 1.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Medibank Private Pet Insurance June 2011.
It’s a component of the Newspaper Effectiveness Metric which is run by the newspaper industry marketing body, The Newspaper Works. A monthly study designed;
The Case For Magazine Advertising The research evidence - Irish and international Guy Consterdine Guy Consterdine Associates 24 February 2009.
It’s a component of the Newspaper Effectiveness Metric which is run by the newspaper industry marketing body, The Newspaper Works. A monthly study designed;
The Newspaper Effectiveness Metric. Content Why create a Newspaper Effectiveness Metric? The Newspaper Effectiveness Metric in summary Validation of the.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Shoe Super Store June 2011.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Jetstar / Tourism Tasmania April 2011.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Whiskas May 2011.
Citroen Creative Benchmarking May About Newspaper Creative Benchmarking.
Mitsubishi Creative Benchmarking May About Newspaper Creative Benchmarking.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report ING Direct November 2010.
Established in 2006 by the major Australian newspaper publishers: – News Limited – Fairfax Media (including Rural Press) – APN News and Media – West Australian.
Newspaper Creative Benchmarking AUGUST Significantly different to Retail Average at 90% c.l. All Newspaper Norms Heart Foundation Ad size: HPC Appeared:
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Dan Murphy’s February 2011.
Newspaper Creative Benchmark Report Shell July 2011.
Content Marketing Supermarket Research --- October 2012.
A Snapshot Review of Long Copy Ads 27 th April 2011 (Revised July 13 th 2011)
Test 1 Dynamic & Animated Static Digital & Paper Liverpool Street
Wake up and smell the bacon
Value of Advertising: Global Survey Results
3. Advertising Influence and Reaction:
Left vs right – who wins?.
Creative Ways to Communicate with Residents
The multi-platform study
MARKETING MANAGEMENT ASSIGNMENT.
Image-based ads outperform price-based ads on almost every measure
Print vs Digital – who wins?
What’s the best part of the week to advertise?
Which work best – text or images?
Supermarkets.
4 How Brand Advertising in Newspapers works best   AAMI   June 2009.
Motors.
Advertising vs content marketing – which works best?
Why digital newsbrands deserve their premium
Methodology: RAMetrics
Print newsbrand ads are increasing in effectiveness
Training Deck – Overview of Lee
Mobile.
Integrating Marketing Communications to Build Brand Equity
The multi-platform study
Travel.
Marketing Your Product
What’s the best part of the week to advertise?
RAMetrics funnel: All ads
Cengage Learning Australia hereby permits the usage and posting of our copyright controlled PowerPoint slide content for all courses wherein the associated.
Does size matter?.
Telecoms.
Which work best – text or images?
Updated April 2018 Left vs right – who wins?.
Bottle Your Brilliance Get More Clients
Marketing Your Product
Mobile.
Marketing Your Product
Marketing Your Product
Social Media Management
Image-based ads outperform price-based ads on almost all measure
Print vs Digital – who wins?
Travel.
Main 8 Reasons Why Digital Marketing Is Crucial For The Companies
Best Useful Social Media Tips For Online Reputation Presented By:- Abhinav Shashtri.
Helpful Things To Know For Successful Digital Marketing Strategy Presented By:- Abhinav Shashtri.
Retail.
Mobile.
Finance.
Presentation transcript:

Key findings: Which work best – Advertising or content marketing? When it comes to impact, advertising outperforms branded content, across both print and digital platforms – 68% of respondents recall seeing print ads, compared with 42% of respondents who read the branded content in print. Likewise, 37% of respondents recall seeing digital ads and 16% read the branded content. At first glance, advertising seems to be winning – it is better liked (30% vs 26% for content marketing), readers find it more familiar (42% vs 24% for content marketing) and more appealing (29% vs 23% for content marketing), however when we start taking a deeper look the narrative shifts. Looking at respondents who noticed the advertising in print against those who read the printed branded content, we can see that readers find the latter more engaging (easy to understand: 67% vs 72% for content marketing), (positive: 46% vs 56% for content marketing) and it even provokes a stronger emotional response (26% vs 36% for content marketing). It is not surprising then that branded content that gets consumed is superior at encouraging readers to take action (have bought/will buy: 16% vs 20% for content marketing, discuss: 18% vs 32% for content marketing). Similarly, when looking at respondents who noticed the advertising in digital versus respondents who engaged with the digital branded content, branded content comes out on top – it grabs the readers’ attention (27% vs 48% for content marketing), they are more likely to gauge new information from it (36% vs 57% for content marketing) and find it beneficial (20% vs 40% for content marketing) Printed branded content generates marginally better responses than its digital counterpart – readers find it easier to recognise the brand (branding: 45% vs 40% for digital branded content), they find it more entertaining (51% vs 48% for content marketing) and they’re more likely to read it again (54% vs 50% for content marketing). In today’s media landscape, brands are seeking out different and deeper conversations with their target consumers, they want to convey brand purpose in a more authentic way, and some even want to talk to consumers about subjects that are too niche for most advertising campaigns. These new strategies have given rise to the amount of branded content available to consumers, but despite this there is a lack of published data regarding the effects and effectiveness of content marketing. In advertising, brands often operate with long-standing guidelines and shared expectations about both quality of output and consumer response, however in branded content the question is more open to debate as there is little clarity around how to create high-quality and engaging content. So we thought to take the matter in our own hands and do a comparison using the RAMetrics database, which tests hundreds of UK newsbrand ads (2007 onwards) and content marketing case studies (2016 onwards). Now, we have had to add some print case studies from Ireland and online case studies from Ireland, Norway and Sweden to ensure robust samples, but please be assured that these are consistent with results from the UK. At first glance, it’s obvious that advertising has a greater impact and initial engagement than content marketing across both print and digital platforms. 68% of respondents recall seeing the print newspaper ads, compared with 42% of respondents who read the branded content in print. Likewise, 37% of respondents recall seeing digital ads and 16% read the branded content online. As we have previously found, print activity scores considerably higher than digital communications. As a result of the lower initial impact and engagement, all other scores for content marketing, whether in print or digital, are lower than those for conventional advertising, with one exception – talkability (discuss: 13% vs 14% for printed content marketing, 4% vs 5% for digital content marketing). Even though, the difference is small, it gives an indication of where content marketing is more relevant and successful than advertising – a key strength for both print and digital. Looking at respondents who noticed the advertising in print against those who read the printed branded content, we can see that readers find the latter more engaging (easy to understand: 67% vs 72% for content marketing), (positive: 46% vs 56% for content marketing) and it even provokes a stronger emotional response (26% vs 36% for content marketing). Likewise, focusing on engaged readers across digital, we find that branded content scores higher across the majority of brand measures (familiarity: 52% vs 58% for content marketing, like ad: 30% vs 51% for content marketing) and action metrics (visit advertiser: 14% vs 26% for content marketing). The analysis shows that there is a wide variation in creative strength for content marketing and it is clearly possible for content partnerships to out-perform straight advertising. The best performing print content was read by 72% of the newspaper readers, the lowest by only 25%. The most read digital content marketing scored 39%, the lowest was read by 10%. Brand recognition needs to be a serious consideration – scores for branding and familiarity metrics are considerably lower for content marketing than for conventional advertising, across both print and digital. Perhaps brands should consider being more overt about their sponsorships? In conclusion, the analysis shows that conventional advertising is still the best way to get the highest number of readers to engage with your brand’s messaging. That being said, if it is deeper levels of engagement that you’re after, with a self-selecting smaller target who finds the content personally relevant, then branded content is king.

Which work best – Advertising or content marketing? Updated June 2018 Which work best – Advertising or content marketing?

Advertising vs content marketing – Print impact Adverising ad recall: Do you recall seeing the ad? % saying yes Content marketing content reading: Did you read this content? % saying yes Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland, 01/06/2016 – 31/05/2018, Advertising: 313 ads, Content marketing: 51 cases, Score base: Read the newspaper.

Advertising vs content marketing – Print – All readers brand measures attention + recognition engagement action Advertising (ad recall) Content marketing (content reading) Attention: How closely did you read/look at the ad/content? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Branding: How difficult or easy was it to understand the source/sender of the ad/How easy was it to identify the company/organisation that sponsored this content? % scoring above 9 on 10 pt scale Familiarity: How well did you previously know the advertiser/How well did you previously know the company/organisation behind the content? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Like ad: How did you like the ad/How much did you like this particular content? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Easy to understand: The ad/content is easy to understand. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale New Information: The ad/content contains news or new information. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Positive: The ad/content makes me feel positive towards the advertiser/company/organisation behind the content. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Appeals to me: Ad/content appeals to you. % Yes Benefit: Have you benefited or will you benefit from something in the ad/in this content? % Yes Interesting: The ad/content is interesting. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Emotional Reaction: Did you react to the advertisement emotionally?/I reacted emotionally to the content % Yes Look for more information: Have you looked for or will you look for more information as a result of seeing the ad/this content? % Yes Visit advertiser: Have/will you visit this advertiser/website as a result of seeing this ad? /Have you visited or will you visit the company's store or website as a result of seeing this content? % Yes Have bought/will buy: Have you bought or will you buy something as a result of seeing this ad/this content? % Yes Discuss: Have you been talking about / discussing the company, offer or product as a result of seeing the advertising/I have discussed or plan to discuss the content with friends? % Yes Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland, 01/06/2016 – 31/05/2018, Advertising: 313 ads, Content marketing: 51 cases, Score base: Read the newspaper.

Advertising vs content marketing – Print – Readers who noticed activity brand measures attention + recognition engagement action Advertising (ad recall) Content marketing (content reading) Attention: How closely did you read/look at the ad/content? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Branding: How difficult or easy was it to understand the source/sender of the ad/How easy was it to identify the company/organisation that sponsored this content? % scoring above 9 on 10 pt scale Familiarity: How well did you previously know the advertiser/How well did you previously know the company/organisation behind the content? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Like ad: How did you like the ad/How much did you like this particular content? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Easy to understand: The ad/content is easy to understand. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale New Information: The ad/content contains news or new information. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Positive: The ad/content makes me feel positive towards the advertiser/company/organisation behind the content. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Appeals to me: Ad/content appeals to you. % Yes Benefit: Have you benefited or will you benefit from something in the ad/in this content? % Yes Interesting: The ad/content is interesting. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Emotional Reaction: Did you react to the advertisement emotionally?/I reacted emotionally to the content % Yes Look for more information: Have you looked for or will you look for more information as a result of seeing the ad/this content? % Yes Visit advertiser: Have/will you visit this advertiser/website as a result of seeing this ad? /Have you visited or will you visit the company's store or website as a result of seeing this content? % Yes Have bought/will buy: Have you bought or will you buy something as a result of seeing this ad/this content? % Yes Discuss: Have you been talking about / discussing the company, offer or product as a result of seeing the advertising/I have discussed or plan to discuss the content with friends? % Yes Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland, 01/06/2016 – 31/05/2018, Advertising: 313 ads, Content marketing: 51 cases, Score base: Noticed ad/Read article

Advertising vs content marketing – Digital impact Adverising ad recall: Do you recall seeing the ad? % saying yes Content marketing content reading: Did you read this content? % saying yes Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Ireland/Sweden, 01/06/2016 – 31/05/2018, Advertising: 773 ads, Content marketing: 34 cases, Score base: Read the newspaper.

Advertising vs content marketing – Digital – All readers brand measures attention + recognition engagement action Advertising (ad recall) Content marketing (content reading) Attention: How closely did you read/look at the ad/content? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Branding: How difficult or easy was it to understand the source/sender of the ad/How easy was it to identify the company/organisation that sponsored this content? % scoring above 9 on 10 pt scale Familiarity: How well did you previously know the advertiser/How well did you previously know the company/organisation behind the content? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Like ad: How did you like the ad/How much did you like this particular content? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Easy to understand: The ad/content is easy to understand. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale New Information: The ad/content contains news or new information. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Positive: The ad/content makes me feel positive towards the advertiser/company/organisation behind the content. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Appeals to me: Ad/content appeals to you. % Yes Benefit: Have you benefited or will you benefit from something in the ad/in this content? % Yes Interesting: The ad/content is interesting. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Emotional Reaction: Did you react to the advertisement emotionally?/I reacted emotionally to the content % Yes Look for more information: Have you looked for or will you look for more information as a result of seeing the ad/this content? % Yes Visit advertiser: Have/will you visit this advertiser/website as a result of seeing this ad? /Have you visited or will you visit the company's store or website as a result of seeing this content? % Yes Have bought/will buy: Have you bought or will you buy something as a result of seeing this ad/this content? % Yes Discuss: Have you been talking about / discussing the company, offer or product as a result of seeing the advertising/I have discussed or plan to discuss the content with friends? % Yes Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Ireland/Sweden, 01/06/2016 – 31/05/2018, Advertising: 773 ads, Content marketing: 34 cases, Score base: Read the newspaper.

Advertising vs content marketing – Digital – Readers who noticed activity brand measures attention + recognition engagement action Advertising (ad recall) Content marketing (content reading) Attention: How closely did you read/look at the ad/content? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Branding: How difficult or easy was it to understand the source/sender of the ad/How easy was it to identify the company/organisation that sponsored this content? % scoring above 9 on 10 pt scale Familiarity: How well did you previously know the advertiser/How well did you previously know the company/organisation behind the content? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Like ad: How did you like the ad/How much did you like this particular content? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Easy to understand: The ad/content is easy to understand. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale New Information: The ad/content contains news or new information. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Positive: The ad/content makes me feel positive towards the advertiser/company/organisation behind the content. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Appeals to me: Ad/content appeals to you. % Yes Benefit: Have you benefited or will you benefit from something in the ad/in this content? % Yes Interesting: The ad/content is interesting. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Emotional Reaction: Did you react to the advertisement emotionally?/I reacted emotionally to the content % Yes Look for more information: Have you looked for or will you look for more information as a result of seeing the ad/this content? % Yes Visit advertiser: Have/will you visit this advertiser/website as a result of seeing this ad? /Have you visited or will you visit the company's store or website as a result of seeing this content? % Yes Have bought/will buy: Have you bought or will you buy something as a result of seeing this ad/this content? % Yes Discuss: Have you been talking about / discussing the company, offer or product as a result of seeing the advertising/I have discussed or plan to discuss the content with friends? % Yes Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Ireland/Sweden, 01/06/2016 – 31/05/2018, Advertising: 773 ads, Content marketing: 34 cases, Score base: Read the newspaper.

specific content marketing metrics Content marketing – Print vs digital – Readers who noticed activity brand measures attention + recognition engagement action specific content marketing metrics Print Digital Attention: How closely did you read/look at the ad/content? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Branding: How difficult or easy was it to understand the source/sender of the ad/How easy was it to identify the company/organisation that sponsored this content? % scoring above 9 on 10 pt scale Familiarity: How well did you previously know the advertiser/How well did you previously know the company/organisation behind the content? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Like ad: How did you like the ad/How much did you like this particular content? % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Easy to understand: The ad/content is easy to understand. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale New Information: The ad/content contains news or new information. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Positive: The ad/content makes me feel positive towards the advertiser/company/organisation behind the content. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Appeals to me: Ad/content appeals to you. % Yes Benefit: Have you benefited or will you benefit from something in the ad/in this content? % Yes Interesting: The ad/content is interesting. % scoring above 7 on 10 pt scale Emotional Reaction: Did you react to the advertisement emotionally?/I reacted emotionally to the content % Yes Look for more information: Have you looked for or will you look for more information as a result of seeing the ad/this content? % Yes Visit advertiser: Have/will you visit this advertiser/website as a result of seeing this ad? /Have you visited or will you visit the company's store or website as a result of seeing this content? % Yes Have bought/will buy: Have you bought or will you buy something as a result of seeing this ad/this content? % Yes Discuss: Have you been talking about / discussing the company, offer or product as a result of seeing the advertising/I have discussed or plan to discuss the content with friends? % Yes Source: RAMetrics. Countries: England/Scotland, 01/06/2016 – 31/05/2018, Advertising: 313 ads, Content marketing: 51 cases, Score base: Noticed ad/Read article