CW value after UL MU procedure

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1123r0 Submission September 2010 Zhu/Kim et al 1 Date: Authors: [TXOP Sharing for DL MU-MIMO Support]
Advertisements

Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /1092r0 Submission Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Incorporated September 2010 Slide 1 ACK Protocol and Backoff Procedure for MU-MIMO.
Doc.: IEEE /1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Random RU selection process upon TF-R reception Date: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /1052r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Bandwidth for UL MU Transmission Date: Authors: September 2015.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0085r1 January 2016 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 Congestion control for UL MU random access Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1340r2 November 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 NDP Announcement for HE Sequence Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1116r1 September 2015 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Trigger Frame Channel Access Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0662r0 May, 2016 Jing Ma, NICTSlide 1 Further consideration on channel access rule to facilitate MU transmission opportunity.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 NAV cancellation issues on MU protection Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon Issues related to OCW management Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Submission doc.: IEEE /0961r0 July 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 Consideration on Multi-STA BlockAck Optimization Date:
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
Multi-STA BA Design Date: Authors: March 2016 Month Year
A-MPDU Contents Date: Authors: Nov 2016 Liwen Chu Marvell
Location Measurement Protocol for Unassociated STAs
MU BAR Frame Format Date: Authors: November 2015 Month Year
MCS, NSS, BW and PPDU selection for 11ax
Discussions on Signaling for UL HE MU PPDU
UL OFDMA Random Access Control
WUR coexistence with existing power save mode
AP access procedure for UL MU operation
QoS Handling of Trigger Frame
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Flexible Wider Bandwidth Transmission
EHT features for Multi-Band Operation
Channel Access Efficiency
Channel Access for WUR FDMA
Considerations on Trigger Frame for Random Access Procedure
Issues related to OCW management
Regarding UL MU protection
MAC Clarifications Date: Authors: September 2016
Default UORA Parameters
Max Frame Length Changes
EHT features for Multi-Band Operation
Regarding HE fragmentation
Consideration of EDCA for WUR Signal
Duration/ID field in UL-MU
Comment Resolutions Date: Authors: February 2008
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Further Consideration for WUR Acknowledgement Indication
CW value after UL MU procedure
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
FDMA MAC Support Date: Authors: Liwen Chu Marvell
Regarding buffer status of UL-STAs in UL-OFDMA
Comment resolution on CID 20175
Explicit Block Ack Request in DL MU PPDU
PHY-CCA Indication doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date:
Comment resolution on CID 20175
Random Access UL MU Resource Allocation and Indication
Clarification on Beacon Transmission Rules
BSS Color Settings for a Multiple BSSID Set
Congestion control for UL MU random access
Regarding HE fragmentation
Consideration of EDCA for WUR Signal
Channel Access for WUR FDMA
Considerations on post wake-up sequences
Multiple Band Operation Discussion
NAV Update Rule Considering UL MU Operation
Considerations on Trigger Frame for Random Access Procedure
Further Consideration for WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Multiple Band Operation Discussion
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 May, 2016
Location Measurement Protocol for 11ax
FDMA MAC Support Date: Authors: Liwen Chu Marvell
Channel Access for Multi-link Operation
Discussion on Multi-link Acknowledgement
Multiple Band Operation Discussion
Latency enhancement for EHT
Channel Access for Multi-link Operation
Presentation transcript:

CW value after UL MU procedure Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 September 2016 CW value after UL MU procedure Date: 2016-09-13 Authors: Woojin Ahn et al., WILUS John Doe, Some Company

Recap: UL MU EDCA backoff procedure September 2016 Recap: UL MU EDCA backoff procedure STA resumes its EDCAF after UL MU procedure regardless of success or failure Woojin Ahn et al., WILUS

September 2016 EDCA rules after UL MU After UL MU, STA could use the remaining BO timer for SU transmission as usual The BO timer will decrease as soon as the channel gets idle The value of BO timer and CW of the corresponding AC will follow the general EDCA rules The CW and BO timer will be reconfigured depending on the result of SU STA1 AC BE AC BE EDCA queue[BE] empty Resume EDCA after UL MU BO[BE]: 4 BO[BE]: 4 BO[BE]: 0 BO[BE] TF BE VI M-BA SU AIFS Woojin Ahn et al., WILUS

September 2016 CW value after UL MU If every MSDUs of an AC are successfully transmitted in UL MU, EDCAF will resume for the empty queue The BO timer will decrease as soon as the channel gets idle The EDCAF will turn into idle state Unless any additional MSDUs are enqueued before the BO timer reaches zero The CW value may not be initialized appropriately after UL MU No description exists for CW value Such situation happens rarely in the existing 802.11 STA1 AC BE AC BE EDCA queue[BE] empty Resume EDCA after UL MU BO[BE]: 4 CW[BE]:127 BO[BE]: 4 CW[BE]:127 BO[BE]: 0 CW[BE]:127 BO[BE] TF BE VI M-BA Idle AIFS Woojin Ahn et al., WILUS

September 2016 CW value after UL MU It is necessary to define rules and conditions for CW initialization after UL MU procedure It is better to initialize CW[AC] value when the EDCAF enters into the idle state Unless, the STA may draw longer BO timer when the EDCA backoff procedure is invoked by new MSDUs Such AC is hardly expected to be scheduled at the subsequent UL MU as they reported its BSR as empty STA1 AC BE AC BE AC BE EDCA queue[BE] empty empty Resume EDCA after UL MU BO[BE]: 4 CW[BE]:127 BO[BE]: 4 CW[BE]:127 BO[BE]: 67 CW[BE]:127 BO[BE] TF BE VI M-BA Idle Busy AIFS Woojin Ahn et al., WILUS

September 2016 Proposal We propose to initialize CW[AC] when the remaining BO timer reaches zero and the channel gets idle and the EDCA queue[AC] is empty after UL MU procedure STA1 AC BE AC BE AC BE EDCA queue[BE] empty empty BO[BE]: 4 CW[BE]:127 BO[BE]: 4 CW[BE]:127 BO[BE]: 0 CW[BE]: CWmin[BE] BO[BE]: 9 CW[BE]: CWmin[BE] Reset CW to CWmin BO[BE] TF BE VI M-BA Idle Busy AIFS Woojin Ahn et al., WILUS

September 2016 Conclusion In this contribution, we have addressed an issue on CW values of non-AP STAs after UL MU procedure we proposed to define a rule for initializing CW values after UL MU procedure Woojin Ahn et al., WILUS

Strawpoll Do you agree to adopt the spec text change as below: September 2016 Strawpoll Do you agree to adopt the spec text change as below: 10.22.2.2 EDCA backoff procedure When an HE STA successfully receives the corresponding acknowledgement frame in response to the MPDU sent in HE trigger based PPDU, the backoff for the associated EDCAF resumes the backoff timer countdown. If the remaining backoff timer reaches zero and no data exists for that AC, the CW[AC] value shall be set to CWmin[AC] Y/N/A Woojin Ahn et al., WILUS