Regulatory Perspective of the Use of EHRs in RCTs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Advertisements

Regulatory Clinical Trials Clinical Trials. Clinical Trials Definition: research studies to find ways to improve health Definition: research studies to.
Comparator Selection in Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Introduction to the User’s Guide for Developing a Protocol for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research.
Safety and Extrapolation Steven Hirschfeld, MD PhD Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapy Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research FDA.
Substantiation of Health Claims in Advertising: Probiotics Richard L. Cleland Division of Advertising Practices Federal Trade Commission.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Clinical Trials — A Closer Look. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the main consumer watchdog for numerous products: Drugs and biologics (prescription.
John Naim, PhD Director Clinical Trials Research Unit
The ICH E5 Question and Answer Document Status and Content Robert T. O’Neill, Ph.D. Director, Office of Biostatistics, CDER, FDA Presented at the 4th Kitasato-Harvard.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
Clinical Trials Hanyan Yang
Guidance for Industry Establishing Pregnancy Registries Pregnancy Registry Working Group Pregnancy Labeling Taskforce March, 2000 Evelyn M. Rodriguez M.D.,
By Dr. Ahmed Mostafa Assist. Prof. of anesthesia & I.C.U. Evidence-based medicine.
Principles of New Animal Drug Effectiveness: An Overview
Selection of Data Sources for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Malini M. Wileman, PhD, RAC Animal Biotechnology Interdisciplinary Group Center for Veterinary Medicine U.S. Food and Drug Administration Regulation of.
Mrs. Brandi Robinson Office of New Animal Drug Evaluation Center for Veterinary Medicine Regulating Animal Drugs.
IPhVWP Polish Presidency, Warsaw October 6 th 2011 Almath Spooner Irish Medicines Board Monitoring the outcome of risk minimisation activities.
Yesterday, today, and tomorrow
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA ACPS Subcommittee on Manufacturing Science: Identification and Prioritization.
0 IRIS A Qualified Clinical Data Registry Consumer-Purchaser Alliance September 9, 2014.
IPhVWP Polish Presidency, Warsaw October 6 th 2011 Almath Spooner Irish Medicines Board Monitoring the outcome of risk minimisation activities.
Compliance with FDA Regulations: Collecting, Transmitting and Managing Clinical Information Dan C Pettus Senior Vice President iMetrikus, Inc.
Humanitarian Use Devices September 23, 2011 Theodore Stevens, MS, RAC Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Center for Biologics Evaluation and.
TERRENCE F. ACKERMAN, PH.D. PROFESSOR OF BIOETHICS CHAIR, UTHSC IRB.
Evidence Based Practice RCS /9/05. Definitions  Rosenthal and Donald (1996) defined evidence-based medicine as a process of turning clinical problems.
UPCOMING CHANGES TO IN-VITRO DIAGNOSTICS (IVDs) AND LABORATORY DEVELOPED TESTS (LDTs) REGULATIONS Moj Eram, PhD November 5, 2015.
General Regulatory Issues in the Development of Drugs Intended for Treatment of Chronic Illness Sharon Hertz, M.D. Medical Officer Division of Anesthetic,
October 28, F OOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION AMENDMENTS ACT OF 2007 (FDAAA) and Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) Presented to the Ninth.
Gwendolyn Ryals, Look at Me Artwork from The Creative Center Janey Shin, Director, Real World Evidence Government Affairs and Market Access CADTH Symposium.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
PRAGMATIC Study Designs: Elderly Cancer Trials
Clinical Trials for Comparative Effectiveness Research Mark Hlatky MD Mark Hlatky MD Stanford University January 10, 2012.
Patient Engagement in Drug Development: Experiences, Good Practices and Lessons Learned Lana Skirboll VP Science Policy Sanofi October 28, 2016, National.
November 9, 2015 February 20, 2017 Using real world evidence – industry perspective Pma indication expansion Melissa hasenbank, phd Sr. Clinical Research.
Regulatory Considerations for Approval: FDA perspective
Rachel Neubrander, PhD Division of Cardiovascular Devices
Division of Cardiovascular Devices
Patient Focused Drug Development An FDA Perspective
U.S. FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health Update
21st Century Cures Act An overview and a focus on Real World Evidence Section 3022 January 18, 2017 | Presented by Kimberly Belsky, Sr Director Regulatory.
Clinical Research Contribution towards improving Clinical Care
Chrissie Fletcher, Amgen Ltd on behalf of IMI GetReal
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
Clinical Trials — A Closer Look
Balancing Regulation and Innovation: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Clinical Studies Continuum
21st Century Cures Act An overview and a focus on Real World Evidence Section 3022 January 18, 2017 | Presented by Kimberly Belsky, Sr Director Regulatory.
Deputy Director, Division of Biostatistics No Conflict of Interest
Introduction of New Technology: An FDA Division of Cardiovascular Devices Perspective Bram Zuckerman, MD, FACC Director, FDA Division of Cardiovascular.
Lessons Learned Through HBD: The Regulator’s View - US FDA
Regulatory perspective
PCORTF Common Data Model Harmonization Project and the Oncology Use case January 30, 2018.
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
Use of Real-World Data in Clinical Drug Development
Progress Report on the Patient Reported Outcomes Harmonization Team
Issues in Hypothesis Testing in the Context of Extrapolation
Friends of Cancer Research
Tim Auton, Astellas September 2014
Observational Studies vs. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT)
Linda M. Chatwin, Esq. RAC Business Manager, UL LLC
FDA Sentinel Initiative
Opening an IND: Investigator Perspective
Development Plans: Study Design and Dose Selection
Martin Ho Associate Director for Quantitative Innovations
Pediatric Drug Development A Regulatory Perspective
Journal Editor Perspectives
Gregory Levin, FDA/CDER/OTS/OB/DBIII
Real World Data and Evidence Projects at FDA
Presentation transcript:

Regulatory Perspective of the Use of EHRs in RCTs Mark Levenson, Ph.D. Office of Biostatistics Center for Drug Evaluation and Research U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Disclaimer This talk reflects the views of the author and should not be construed to represent FDA’s views or policies.

FDA Definitions Real World Data (RWD) are data relating to patient health status and/or the delivery of health care routinely collected from a variety of sources. electronic health records (EHRs) claims and billing data data from product and disease registries patient-generated data including in home-use settings data gathered from other sources that can inform on health status, such as mobile devices Real World Evidence (RWE) is the clinical evidence regarding the usage and potential benefits or risks of a medical product derived from analysis of RWD. Generated using many different study designs, including but not limited to, randomized trials, such as large simple trials, pragmatic clinical trials, and observational studies.

Spectrum of Potential Uses of Real-World Data

RWD/RWE: What Are the Goals? Traditional RCTs typically Use select groups of patients Involve special infrastructure and data collection Maximized sensitivity RWD/RWE Goals Reflect the diversity of patients and actual health-care practices Improve efficiency by making use of existing data and infrastructure Maintain evidentiary standards

PRECIS-2 Tool: Loudon et al., BMJ 2015

Real Patients and Healthcare RWE Give and Take Real Patients and Healthcare Efficiency

Substantial Evidence Efficacy “evidence consisting of adequate and well-controlled investigations, including clinical investigations, by experts qualified by scientific training and experience to evaluate the effectiveness of the drug involve on the basis of which it could fairly and responsibly be concluded by such experts that the drug will have the effect it purports or is represented to have under the conditions of use prescribed, recommended, or suggested in the labeling or proposed labeling thereof.” Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 1962 Drug Regulation History: https://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/History/ProductRegulation/ucm593465.htm

Adequate and Well-Controlled Study Reserved for special circumstances Clear objectives, summary of methods and results Design permits a valid comparison with a control (concurrent and historical controls) Adequate selection of patients Assigning patients to treatment and control groups minimizes bias Adequate measures to minimize biases on subjects, observers, and analysts Well-defined and reliable assessment of subjects’ responses Adequate analysis to assess drug results Ordinarily randomization Blinding Regulations 21CFR314.126

No change in evidentiary standard 21st Century Cures Act (2016) establish a program to evaluate the potential use of real world evidence- to help to support the approval of a new indication for a drug approved under section 355(c) of this title; and to help to support or satisfy postapproval study requirements. No change in evidentiary standard SEC. 505F. UTILIZING REAL WORLD EVIDENCE. Amended by Food and Drug Administration Reauthorization Act 2017

Intended for drug and biological products Outlines FDA’s plan to implement the RWE program Multifaceted program Internal processes Guidance development Stakeholder engagement Demonstration projects https://www.fda.gov/downloads/ScienceResearch/SpecialTopics/RealWorldEvidence/UCM627769.pdf

Framework for Evaluating RWD/RWE for Use in Regulatory Decisions

RWD Fitness for Use Data uses Data reliability, validity, relevance Population selection Outcome ascertainment Safety and study monitoring Data reliability, validity, relevance Multiple data sources may be needed

RWE Study Design Population selection Comparator groups Outcome ascertainment, blinding Exposures patterns, dropouts Treatment definition (estimand) Hypothesis (eg, non-inferiority)

Regulatory Considerations Human subject protection Data traceability, auditing, and record keeping Safety reporting Study integrity and responsibility

Foundation for Use of Electronic Source Data

Final Thoughts EHR use is not synonymous with pragmatic Data fitness, study design, and regulatory issues should be considered Multiple sources of data may be needed How and when EHR/RWD/RWE may provide strong evidence is under development

Acknowledgements Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay Robert Temple

Thank you mark.levenson@fda.hhs.gov