Cardiac transplant coronary artery disease: A multivariable analysis of pretransplantation risk factors for disease development and morbid events  David.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
James K. Kirklin, MD, Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD, Robert L
Advertisements

Is return of angina after coronary artery bypass grafting immutable, can it be delayed, and is it important?  P. Sergeant, MD, E. Blackstone, MD*, B.
Robert J. Dabal, MD, James K
Advising complex patients who require complex heart operations
Should lung transplantation be performed for patients on mechanical respiratory support? The US experience  David P. Mason, MD, Lucy Thuita, MS, Edward.
Lars G. Svensson, MD, PhD, Lillian H. Batizy, MS, Eugene H
Determinants of repair type, reintervention, and mortality in 393 children with double- outlet right ventricle  Timothy J. Bradley, MD, Tara Karamlou,
Kathy J. Jenkins, MD, MPH, Kimberlee Gauvreau, ScD, Jane W
Long-term outcome of myocardial revascularization in patients with Kawasaki coronary artery disease  Soichiro Kitamura, MDa (by invitation), Yoichi Kameda,
Phillips B. Harrington, MD, William W. McAlexander, MD, Ayesha S
Hancock II Bioprosthesis for Aortic Valve Replacement: The Gold Standard of Bioprosthetic Valves Durability?  Tirone E. David, MD, Susan Armstrong, MS,
Effect of changes in postoperative spirometry on survival after lung transplantation  David P. Mason, MD, Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, MSc, Liang Li, PhD,
Outcomes After Late Reoperation in Patients With Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot: The Impact of Arrhythmia and Arrhythmia Surgery  Tara Karamlou, MD, Ilana.
Endovascular versus open elephant trunk completion for extensive aortic disease  Eric E. Roselli, MD, Sreekumar Subramanian, MD, Zhiyuan Sun, BS, Jahanzaib.
Surgical treatment of pseudoaneurysm of the thoracic aorta
Factors influencing early and late outcome of the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries  Gil Wernovsky, MD* (by invitation),
Michael Frenken, MD, Arno Krian, MD  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 
Bruce W. Lytle, MD, Eugene H. Blackstone, MD, Joseph F
Jean Paul A. Couetil, MDa, Didier P
Is return of angina after coronary artery bypass grafting immutable, can it be delayed, and is it important?  P. Sergeant, MD, E. Blackstone, MD*, B.
Clostridium difficile infection after cardiac surgery: Prevalence, morbidity, mortality, and resource utilization  Suresh Keshavamurthy, MBBS, MS, Colleen.
Too High for Transplantation
Thomas L. Gentles, FRACPa. , John E
Outcomes of heart transplantation in children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome previously palliated with the Norwood procedure  Bahaaldin Alsoufi,
Does a similar procedure result in similar survival for women and men undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting?  Tamer Attia, MD, MSc, Colleen.
A prospective trial of tacrolimus (FK 506) in clinical heart transplantation: Intermediate- term results  Si M. Pham, MDa §, Robert L. Kormos, MDa, Brack.
Aortic valve replacement: Is valve size important?
Improved lung allograft function after fundoplication in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease undergoing lung transplantation  R.Duane Davis,
William G. Williams, MDa, Jan M. Quaegebeur, MDb, John W
Right Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Is a Strong Predictor of Cardiovascular Death After Coronary Bypass Grafting 
Pediatric pacemaker infections: Twenty years of experience
Actuarial versus actual risk of porcine structural valve deterioration
Reduced survival in women after valve surgery for aortic regurgitationEffect of aortic enlargement and late aortic rupture  Monica L. McDonald, MDa, Nicholas.
A time-related parametric risk factor analysis for postoperative atrial fibrillation after heart surgery  Spencer J. Melby, MD, James F. George, PhD,
Eugene H. Blackstone, MDa,b, Bruce W. Lytle, MDb 
Aggressive management of lung donors classified as unacceptable: Excellent recipient survival one year after transplantation  Michaela Straznicka, MDa,
Scott B. Capps, MSa, Ronald C. Elkins, MDb, David M. Fronk, MSa 
Are allografts the biologic valve of choice for aortic valve replacement in nonelderly patients? Comparison of explantation for structural valve deterioration.
Mortality in patients with premature lower extremity atherosclerosis
Intermediate-Term Outcome Of Mitral Reconstruction In Cardiomyopathy
Long-term effectiveness of operations for ascending aortic dissections
Bahaaldin Alsoufi, MD, Cedric Manlhiot, BSc, Brian W
Characteristics of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma in Women
Intermediate survival in neonates with aortic atresia: A multi-institutional study  Marshall L. Jacobs, MD, Eugene H. Blackstone, MD, Leonard L. Bailey,
M1a/M1b esophageal carcinoma: Clinical relevance
Yuji Tachimori, MD, Hoichi Kato, MD, Hiroshi Watanabe, MD 
Isolated bypass grafting of the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery  Rosalyn Scott, MDa, Eugene H. Blackstone,
Mohammed A Quader, MD, Patrick M McCarthy, MD, A
Elspeth M. Brown, MRCP, Anthony P. Salmon, FRCP, Robert K. Lamb, FRCS 
Endocarditis after mitral valve repair
Age and valve size effect on the long-term durability of the Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthesis  Michael K Banbury, MD, Delos M Cosgrove,
Long-term results of the lateral tunnel Fontan operation
Superior sulcus lung tumors: Impact of local control on survival
Mitral valve repair with aortic valve replacement is superior to double valve replacement  A.Marc Gillinov, MD, Eugene H Blackstone, MD, Delos M Cosgrove,
Siva Raja, MD, PhD, Jay J. Idrees, MD, Eugene H
Arvind K. Agnihotri, MD (by invitation), David C
Thirty years of cardiac transplantation at stanford university
Results of 102 cases of complete repair of congenital heart defects in patients weighing 700 to 2500 grams  V.Mohan Reddy, MDa, Doff B. McElhinney, MDa,
Primary repair is superior to initial palliation in children with atrioventricular septal defect and tetralogy of fallot  Hani K. Najm, MDa, Glen S. Van.
Long-term results of heart transplantation in patients older than 60 years  Philippe Demers, MD, MSc, FRCSC, Susan Moffatt, MD, PhD, FRCSC, Philip E Oyer,
Thomas J. Kirby, MDa (by invitation), Michael J
Similar neurobehavioral outcome after valve or coronary artery operations despite differing carotid embolic counts  Michael J. Neville, MDa, John Butterworth,
Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, and stent placement for left main stenosis  William.
Thomas M. Egan, MDa (by invitation), Frank C
International Normalized Ratio Self-Management Lowers the Risk of Thromboembolic Events After Prosthetic Heart Valve Replacement  Thomas Eitz, MD, Soren.
Esophagectomy for T1 Esophageal Cancer: Outcomes in 100 Patients and Implications for Endoscopic Therapy  Arjun Pennathur, MD, Andrew Farkas, BA, Alyssa.
George E. Sarris, MDa, Kathleen A. Moore, BSa, John S
Nael Martini, MDa, Valerie W. Rusch, MDa, Manjit S. Bains, MDa, Mark G
Pulmonary transplantation for advanced bronchioloalveolar carcinoma
Kathleen E. Simpson, MD, Elizabeth Pruitt, MSPH, James K
Presentation transcript:

Cardiac transplant coronary artery disease: A multivariable analysis of pretransplantation risk factors for disease development and morbid events  David C. McGiffin, MDa (by invitation), Timo Savunen, MDa (by invitation), James K. Kirklin, MDa, David C. Naftel, PhDa (by invitation), Robert C. Bourge, MDb (by invitation), Thomas D. Paine, MDb (by invitation), Connie White-Williams, RNa (by invitation), Tero Sisto, MDa (by invitation), Lesley Early, RNa (by invitation)  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery  Volume 109, Issue 6, Pages 1081-1089 (June 1995) DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70191-5 Copyright © 1995 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Actuarial (Kaplan-Meier) freedom from the angiographic (or autopsy) appearance of any cardiac transplant CAD (angiographic score greater than 0). Open circles represent actuarial appearance of CAD. The solid line represents the parametric estimate surrounded by the 70% confidence limits (dashed lines). UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1995 109, 1081-1089DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70191-5) Copyright © 1995 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Hazard function for the angiographic appearance of any cardiac transplant CAD, represented on the vertical axis as the number of patients per month in whom any CAD develops. It consists of a constant and a late phase. The hazard function (instantaneous risk) is represented by the solid line and is surrounded by the 70% confidence limits (dashed lines). UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1995 109, 1081-1089DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70191-5) Copyright © 1995 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Actuarial (Kaplan-Meier) freedom from the angiographic (or autopsy) appearance of any cardiac transplant CAD stratified by recipient gender. Circles, Female; squares, male. The error bars indicate 70% confidence limits. UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1995 109, 1081-1089DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70191-5) Copyright © 1995 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Actuarial (Kaplan-Meier) freedom from the angiographic (or autopsy) appearance of any cardiac transplant CAD (angiographic score greater than 0) stratified by recipient pretransplantation CMV serologic status. Circles, negative; squares, positive. Error bars indicate 70% confidence limits. UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1995 109, 1081-1089DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70191-5) Copyright © 1995 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Actuarial (Kaplan-Meier) freedom from angiographic (or autopsy) appearance of any cardiac transplant CAD stratified by donor age. Circles, less than 20 years; squares, 20 to 35 years; triangles, greater than 35 years. The error bars indicate 70% confidence limits. UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1995 109, 1081-1089DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70191-5) Copyright © 1995 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 6 Relationship between mean CAD score and increasing time from transplantation stratified by recipient gender. Circles, Male; squares, female. The error bars indicate 70% confidence limits. UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1995 109, 1081-1089DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70191-5) Copyright © 1995 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 7 Regression lines for rate of increase in mean CAD score according to the year of first angiographic detection of CAD. UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1995 109, 1081-1089DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70191-5) Copyright © 1995 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 8 Actuarial (Kaplan-Meier) and parametric freedom from a CAD event. Open circles indicate individual CAD events depicted actuarially. The solid line represents the parametric depiction with its 70% confidence limits. UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1995 109, 1081-1089DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70191-5) Copyright © 1995 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 9 Hazard function for a CAD event. It consists of a late phase only. The hazard function (instantaneous risk) is represented by the solid line and is surrounded by the 70% confidence limits (dashed lines). UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1995 109, 1081-1089DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70191-5) Copyright © 1995 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions

Fig. 10 Actuarial (Kaplan-Meier) freedom from a CAD event stratified by recipient gender. Circles, Female; squares, male. The error bars indicate 70% confidence limits. UAB, University of Alabama at Birmingham. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 1995 109, 1081-1089DOI: (10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70191-5) Copyright © 1995 Mosby, Inc. Terms and Conditions