IESBA CAG Meeting New York, USA March 4, 2019

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 Innovation Working Group Dan Montgomery, Chair, Innovation Working Group Agenda Item 8-A IAASB Meeting, September 15-19, 2014 New York, USA.
Advertisements

International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants Monitoring Group Report Ken Dakdduk Paris June 2010.
Page 1 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information Structure of the Code Don Thomson, Task Force Chair IESBA Meeting New York, USA November 30 – December.
Page 1 Structure of the Code Don Thomson, Working Group Chair and IESBA Member IESBA CAG Meeting April 10, 2013 New York.
Page 1 | Confidential and Proprietary Information IESBA Strategy Survey Ken Siong, IESBA Technical Director IESBA CAG Meeting April 10, 2013.
Page 1 Future Strategy and Work Plan IESBA CAG Meeting September 11, 2013 New York Ken Siong, IESBA Technical Director.
Page 1 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information Structure of the Code Don Thomson, Task Force Chair IESBA Meeting New York, USA September 15-16, 2015.
Page 1 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information Professional Skepticism Richard Fleck, IESBA Deputy Chair Tone Sakshaug, IESBA Technical Advisor IESBA.
Professional Skepticism
Fees Briefing Paper Chishala Kateka, IESBA Member and Fees Working Group Chair IESBA Meeting March 13-15, 2017.
Structure of the Code – Phase 1
IESBA CAG Meeting Madrid September 13, 2017
Professional Skepticism
Professional Skepticism (PS)
Safeguards- Feedback on Safeguards ED-2 and Task Force Proposals
Review of Part C Phase 2 - Applicability
Review of Part C of the Code – Applicability
Structure of the Code – Phases 1 and 2
IESBA Meeting New York March 12-14, 2018
Structure of the Code – Phase 2 TF Comments and Proposals
Structure of the Code Don Thomson, Task Force Chair IESBA Meeting
Professional Skepticism
Professional Skepticism and Professional Judgment
IESBA CAG Meeting New York March 6, 2017
IAASB-IESBA Coordination
IESBA Meeting New York March 14, 2017
Structure of the Code Phase 1
IESBA Meeting New York, USA September 17-20, 2018
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
IESBA Meeting New York March 12-14, 2018
IESBA Meeting Athens, Greece June, 2018
Non-assurance Services
Inducements Mike Ashley – IESBA Member and Task Force Chair
Review of Part C of the Code – Inducements & Applicability
IESBA CAG Meeting New York March 5, 2018
IESBA Meeting New York September 19-22, 2017
Revised and Restructured Code Rollout
Professional Skepticism – Longer-Term Initiative
IAASB-IESBA Coordination
Structure–Feedback on Structure ED-2 and Task Force Proposals
Non-assurance Services
Don Thomson, Task Force Chair IESBA Meeting New York July 7-9, 2014
Fees Chishala Kateka, IESBA Member and Fees Working Group Chair
Professional Skepticism
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
IESBA Meeting New York September 17-20, 2018
IESBA Meeting Athens June 18-20, 2018
Professional Skepticism
Professional Skepticism
IESBA Meeting New York, USA December 3-5, 2018
IESBA Meeting New York December 3-5, 2018
Fees Initiative Chishala Kateka, Working Group Chair IESBA Meeting
Inducements Mike Ashley – IESBA Member and Task Force Chair
Structure of the Code Don Thomson, Task Force Chair IESBA CAG Meeting
IESBA Meeting New York December 3-5, 2018
Promoting the Role and Mindset Expected of Professional Accountants
Audit Evidence Bob Dohrer, Technology Working Group Chair and Audit Evidence Working Group Chair IAASB CAG Meeting, New York Agenda Item D March 5, 2019.
Future Strategy and Work Plan
IESBA Meeting New York September 17-20, 2018
Non-assurance Services
IESBA Meeting New York March 11-13, 2019
Fees – Issues and Proposals
IESBA CAG Meeting New York March 4, 2019
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
Emerging Issues and Outreach Working Group
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
IESBA Meeting Nashville, TN USA June 17-19, 2019
Supporting Adoption and Implementation of Standards
Technology Bob Dohrer, Technology Working Group Chair
Audit Evidence Bob Dohrer, Audit Evidence Working Group Chair
Presentation transcript:

IESBA CAG Meeting New York, USA March 4, 2019 Technology Patricia Mulvaney, IESBA Member, Technology Working Group Chair IESBA CAG Meeting New York, USA March 4, 2019

Objectives of the Session To provide: Background information about IESBA’s technology initiative Update on the Technology WG activities To receive CAG input on emerging themes observed by WG to date

Background – IESBA Technology Initiatives April 2018 IESBA issued 2019-2023 SWP consultation paper (CP) which identified technology as an imperative priority June 2018 Technology WG established by IESBA September 2018 IESBA discussed comments received on the CP including strong support to prioritize the topic and preliminary thinking from the Technology WG December 2018 IESBA approved WG’s Terms of Reference

Terms of Reference Objectives of the WG: Background Terms of Reference Objectives of the WG: Identify implications of technology developments on the robustness and relevance of the Code Develop proposed responses including revisions to the Code, publication of non-authoritative material and discussion forums Identify outreach and partnership opportunities to share knowledge and to promote the Code

Terms of Reference Highlights of other key elements: Background Terms of Reference Highlights of other key elements: A phased approach (Phase 1 to be completed by December 2019) Initial information gathering focusing on AI/Robotic Process Automation (AI) and Big Data/Data Analytics (Data) A focus on ethical behavior of both PAPPs and PAIBs Information gathering encompasses desk research, stakeholder meetings and other channels such as focus groups and panel discussions; also partnership with other professional organizations/stakeholders Liaise internally with other IESBA TFs as well as coordination with IAASB and IAESB Phase 1 report to be presented to the Board in December 2019

Background Terms of Reference Any questions?

Information Gathering Activities to Date Desk research involving published articles; webcasts/webinars/podcasts Discussions with academics, ethics org leaders and other representatives from industry associations Participation at CPA Canada Public Trust Committee and Foresight: Reimagining the Professions meetings In person outreach meetings Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA) Institute of Business Ethics (IBE) Inflo (audit and accounting software vendor).

Five themes have emerged to date: Key Emerging Themes Five themes have emerged to date: Common ethical principles are also applicable to AI PAs need to have a growth mindset Bias in AI can be a significant risk Fairness and transparency are important elements in AI ethics Responsibility to advise on risks and benefits of technologies

Theme A – Common Ethical Principles Also Apply to AI Emerging Themes Theme A – Common Ethical Principles Also Apply to AI Stakeholders did not identify noticeable gaps in the FPs or rest of Code Guidance or supplementary material on how PAs can identify, evaluate and address technology related risks and ethical issues would be more useful than changes to the Code Frameworks for the development, use and application of AI have been developed - and are also of increasing interest to governmental bodies. Key framework principles include: Fairness, transparency, inclusiveness, reliability and safety, privacy and security, accountability

Theme B – PAs Need a “Growth Mindset” Emerging Themes Theme B – PAs Need a “Growth Mindset” Stakeholders mentioned the importance of PAs having a mindset appropriate for the digital age: Mindset that adapts to new technologies Shift from a compliance mindset (only) to advisory mindset Adopting a “growth mindset” Stakeholders also highlighted the importance of professional judgement in the midst of dynamic changes The WG intends to explore these concepts with the Role and Mindset TF

Theme C – Bias in AI is a Significant Risk Emerging Themes Theme C – Bias in AI is a Significant Risk Bias in AI (machine bias) can be present in the data AI consumes and in the algorithms used to analyze the data In order to rely on outputs from AI applications PAs need a sufficient understanding of the AI technology used and impact on PAs work PAs must accept responsibility for machine decisions used in their work Role and Mindset TF proposals include refinements to the definition of objectivity, including a reference to undue reliance on factors such as technology, and new provisions on bias The WG will explore our findings on bias with the Role and Mindset TF

Theme D – Addressing Fairness and Transparency Emerging Themes Theme D – Addressing Fairness and Transparency Ethical frameworks for AI often include fairness, transparency and accountability The WG intends to further explore how these ethical principles might intersect with the Code Some stakeholders also asked whether PAs might have a broader role in society as ethical leaders and champions in their organizations The WG will work in collaboration with the Role and Mindset TF to consider whether ethical leadership is behavior that should be expected of PAs

Theme E – Responsibility to Advise on Risks and Benefits Emerging Themes Theme E – Responsibility to Advise on Risks and Benefits Stakeholders suggested customers should be made aware of the risks and benefits of new technologies As firms continue to invest in technologies, questions arise as to whether clients and customers have sufficient knowledge of the risks and benefits associated with these technologies The WG will reflect on whether PAs have an ethical responsibility to their clients to inform them of the risks and benefits of technologies being implemented

Matters for CAG Consideration Emerging Themes Matters for CAG Consideration CAG’s views and reaction to the emerging themes? Common ethical principles are also applicable to AI PAs need to have a “growth mindset” Bias in AI can be a significant risk Addressing fairness and transparency Responsibility to advise on risks and benefits of technologies

Next Steps Upcoming Outreach Activities Non-Authoritative Material April 2019 - University of Waterloo 2019 Ethics Symposium in Canada May 2019 - IESBA-NSS meeting in Paris and European outreach sessions; add’l Canadian outreach June through November 2019 – ongoing research and stakeholder outreach sessions Non-Authoritative Material Update stakeholders of emerging themes and issues observed Board and CAG Meetings June 2019 - Discuss preliminary thinking with Board Sept 2019 - Discuss preliminary findings/recommendations with Board & CAG Dec 2019 – Present Phase 1 Final Report to Board

Matters for CAG Consideration Next Steps Matters for CAG Consideration CAG’s views and suggestions on opportunities to promote and discuss the work of the WG