SLAM Family Markers Resolve Functionally Distinct Subpopulations of Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Multipotent Progenitors  Hideyuki Oguro, Lei Ding, Sean J.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Roles of Lysosomal Acid Lipase in Myelopoiesis
Advertisements

Maintenance of the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Pool by CXCL12-CXCR4 Chemokine Signaling in Bone Marrow Stromal Cell Niches  Tatsuki Sugiyama, Hiroshi Kohara,
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 4, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Yumi Matsuzaki, Kentaro Kinjo, Richard C Mulligan, Hideyuki Okano 
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
Francesca Ficara, Mark J. Murphy, Min Lin, Michael L. Cleary 
Tumorigenic Cells Are Common in Mouse MPNSTs but Their Frequency Depends upon Tumor Genotype and Assay Conditions  Johanna Buchstaller, Paul E. McKeever,
Low c-Kit Expression Level Induced by Stem Cell Factor Does Not Compromise Transplantation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells  Chia-Ling Chen, Katerina Faltusova,
TLR5 signaling in murine bone marrow induces hematopoietic progenitor cell proliferation and aids survival from radiation by Benyue Zhang, Damilola Oyewole-Said,
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Cited2 Is an Essential Regulator of Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cells
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
by Hairui Su, Chiao-Wang Sun, Szu-Mam Liu, Xin He, Hao Hu, Kevin M
Cytotoxic CD8+ T Cells Stimulate Hematopoietic Progenitors by Promoting Cytokine Release from Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells  Christian M. Schürch,
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Targeting Tetramer-Forming GABPβ Isoforms Impairs Self-Renewal of Hematopoietic and Leukemic Stem Cells  Shuyang Yu, Xuefang Jing, John D. Colgan, Dong-Mei.
Mark J. Kiel, Melih Acar, Glenn L. Radice, Sean J. Morrison 
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (November 2003)
The Competitive Nature of HOXB4-Transduced HSC Is Limited by PBX1
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2018)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (November 2018)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (March 2016)
SHIP is required for a functional hematopoietic stem cell niche
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Ravindra Majeti, Christopher Y. Park, Irving L. Weissman 
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Deletion of the Scl +19 enhancer increases the blood stem cell compartment without affecting the formation of mature blood lineages  Dominik Spensberger,
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 121, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Identification of a T Lineage-Committed Progenitor in Adult Blood
Imaging Hematopoietic Precursor Division in Real Time
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Masayuki Yamashita, Eriko Nitta, Toshio Suda  Cell Stem Cell 
Oncogenic N-Ras and Tet2 haploinsufficiency collaborate to dysregulate hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells by Xi Jin, Tingting Qin, Meiling Zhao, Nathanael.
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 1, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Kiran Batta, Magdalena Florkowska, Valerie Kouskoff, Georges Lacaud 
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilizes dormant hematopoietic stem cells without proliferation in mice by Jeffrey M. Bernitz, Michael G. Daniel,
Presentation transcript:

SLAM Family Markers Resolve Functionally Distinct Subpopulations of Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Multipotent Progenitors  Hideyuki Oguro, Lei Ding, Sean J. Morrison  Cell Stem Cell  Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 102-116 (July 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2013.05.014 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Expression of the SLAM Family Markers CD84, Ly108, CD229, and CD244 by LSK Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells (A) Gating strategy for LSK cells (left and middle left) and expression of CD150 and CD48 by LSK cells (middle right). The CD150+CD48−/lowLSK, CD150−CD48−/lowLSK, CD150−CD48+LSK, and CD150+CD48+LSK fractions were labeled as HSC, MPP, HPC-1, and HPC-2, respectively (right). Doublets, red blood cells, and dead cells were excluded prior to analysis. (B–E) Cell surface staining for CD84/Slamf5 (B), Ly108/Slamf6 (C), CD229/Slamf3 (D), and CD244/Slamf4 (E). Solid lines indicate staining with antibodies against the indicated antigens and shaded areas indicate background fluorescence in controls stained with all antibodies except for the indicated antigen. (F) Flow cytometry plots showing combined CD229 and CD244 staining in each cell fraction. (G) Summary of LSK stem and progenitor cell fractions subdivided according to CD229 and CD244 staining. Data represent mean ± SD from 3 (B and C) or 11 (A and D–G) independent experiments. See also Figures S1 and S2. Cell Stem Cell 2013 13, 102-116DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2013.05.014) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Cell-Cycle Status of Each Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cell Fraction (A–C) The frequency of cells in G0 (A; Ki-67−, 2N DNA content), G1 (B; Ki-67+, 2N DNA content), and S/G2/M (C; Ki-67+, >2N DNA content) phases of the cell cycle. (D and E) The frequency of BrdU+ cells in each fraction after 24 hr (D) or 7 days (E) of BrdU administration. (F–H) Expression of histone H2B-GFP was induced in hematopoietic cells by doxycycline administration for 6 weeks then chased for 6 weeks (F), 12 weeks (G), or 24 weeks (H) without doxycycline to monitor the rate of H2B-GFP dilution. Filled and open bars represent the proportion of GFPhi and GFPlow cells, respectively, in each population. The gating scheme used to identify GFPhi and GFPlow cells is shown in Figures S3B and S3C. Data represent mean ± SD from two independent experiments with a total of four mice (F and G) or three independent experiments with a total of three to seven mice (A–E and H). ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by Student’s t test. Statistical analyses in (F)–(H) compared only the frequency of GFPhi cells among cell populations. See also Figure S3. Cell Stem Cell 2013 13, 102-116DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2013.05.014) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The HSC-1 and HSC-2 Populations Form a Hierarchy of Long-Term Multilineage Reconstituting Cells (A and B) Long-term competitive reconstitution assay in which five GFP+ donor cells from the HSC-1 (A) or HSC-2 (B) population were transplanted into irradiated recipient mice along with 200,000 recipient bone marrow cells. Each line represents the frequency of donor-derived cells in the blood of a single recipient. (C) Summary of the results from the primary transplants in (A) and (B). Recipients were considered long-term reconstituted if donor myeloid cells were more than 1% of blood cells for at least 16 weeks after transplantation. M, Mac-1+ myeloid cells; B, B220+ B cells; T, CD3+ T cells. (D and E) The frequencies of donor-derived hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in the bone marrow of mice that were long-term reconstituted by five HSC-1 (D) or five HSC-2 (E) cells at 17 to 25 weeks after primary transplantation. (F and G) Clonal analysis of HSC-1 and HSC-2 cells. Single GFP+ HSC-1 (F) or HSC-2 (G) cells were transplanted into 30 irradiated recipient mice per population along with 200,000 recipient bone marrow cells. Some of these mice were long-term multilineage reconstituted and some were transiently multilineage reconstituted. (H) Long-term competitive reconstitution assay in which five CD45.1+ HSC-1 cells and five CD45.2+ HSC-2 cells were transplanted into irradiated CD45.1+CD45.2+ recipient mice along with 200,000 CD45.1+CD45.2+ bone marrow cells. Data represent mean ± SD from one experiment with a total of 13 recipient mice per treatment. Data in other panels are from two (A, B, D, and E) or three (C and G) independent experiments. ∗p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 by Student’s t test. See also Figure S4. Cell Stem Cell 2013 13, 102-116DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2013.05.014) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Serial Transplantation Reveals that HSC-1 Cells Have More Self-Renewal Potential than HSC-2 Cells (A and B) Five million bone marrow cells from primary recipients that were long-term reconstituted by five HSC-1 (A) or five HSC-2 (B) cells were transplanted into secondary recipient mice. The secondary recipient mice were assigned numbers that corresponded to the numbers of the primary recipient mice shown in Figures 3A and 3B. For example, the mean ± SD for the frequency of donor blood cells in secondary recipients of cells from primary recipient 1 in Figure 3A is shown as line 1 in (A). Data are from two independent experiments with three to four secondary recipients per primary donor. (C) Summary of secondary transplantation results from (A) and (B). (D and E) The frequencies of donor-derived hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in the bone marrow of secondary recipient mice 17–25 weeks after transplantation. As in (A) and (B), the secondary recipient mice are numbered according to the primary recipient from which they received cells. Data are mean ± SD from three to four secondary recipient mice per primary recipient. (F) The frequencies of donor-derived hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in all secondary recipients of HSC-1 (mean ± SD from the data in D, n = 32 secondary recipients total) and HSC-2 (mean ± SD from the data in E, n = 17 secondary recipients total) cells. Cell Stem Cell 2013 13, 102-116DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2013.05.014) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 MPP-1 Cells Contain a Mixture of Long-Term and Transiently Reconstituting Multipotent Progenitors (A) Five GFP+CD45.2+ donor cells were transplanted into irradiated CD45.1+ recipient mice along with 200,000 CD45.1+ recipient bone marrow cells. Each line represents the frequency of donor-derived blood cells in a single recipient mouse. (B) Summary of the primary transplantation results from (A). (C) Twenty-five GFP+CD45.2+ donor cells were competitively transplanted into irradiated CD45.1+ recipient mice. (D) Summary of the results in (C). (E) The frequencies of donor-derived hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in the bone marrow of mice reconstituted by 25 MPP-1 cells at 17 weeks after transplantation. (F) Summary of secondary transplantation experiments. Five million bone marrow cells from primary recipients of 25 MPP-1 cells were transplanted into four secondary recipient mice per primary recipient mouse. Cell Stem Cell 2013 13, 102-116DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2013.05.014) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 MPP-2 and MPP-3 Cells Are Transiently Reconstituting Multipotent Progenitors while HPC-1 and HPC-2 Cells Contain a Heterogeneous Mix of Restricted Progenitors (A and B) Twenty-five GFP+CD45.2+ MPP-2 (A) or MPP-3 (B) donor cells were transplanted into irradiated CD45.1+ recipient mice along with 200,000 CD45.1+ recipient bone marrow cells. Each line represents the frequency of donor-derived blood cells in a single recipient. (C) Summary of the reconstitution results from (A) and (B). (D and E) Twenty-five GFP+CD45.2+ HPC-1 (D) or HPC-2 (E) donor cells were transplanted into irradiated CD45.1+ recipient mice along with 200,000 CD45.1+ recipient bone marrow cells. Each line represents the frequency of donor-derived blood cells in a single recipient. (F) Summary of the reconstitution results from (D) and (E). See also Figures S5 and S6. Cell Stem Cell 2013 13, 102-116DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2013.05.014) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Quiescent HSC-1 Cells Are Maintained by a Perivascular Niche in which Scf Is Expressed by Endothelial and Perivascular Stromal Cells (A) Colony formation assay. Forty-eight cells from each HSC, MPP, and HPC fraction were sorted, one cell per well. Large (>2 mm in diameter), medium (>1 mm in diameter), and small (<1 mm in diameter) colonies were counted (left, mean ± SD) and their composition assessed by Giemsa staining after 14 days of culture (right, mean ± SD). g, granulocyte; m, macrophage; E, erythroblasts; M, megakaryocyte. Data represent six independent experiments. (B) Schematic summarizing the self-renewal potentials of each fraction of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells distinguished using SLAM family markers. (C) The number of HSC-1 and HSC-2 cells in femurs and tibias from 5- to 10-month-old adult wild-type (WT), Scf fl/− (Het), Tie2-cre; Scffl/− (Tie2), Lepr-cre; Scffl/− (Lepr), and Tie2-cre; Lepr-cre; Scffl/− (Double) mice (left). Statistical significance was separately analyzed for HSC-1 cells (black bars) and HSC-2 cells (gray bars). The ratio of HSC-1 to HSC-2 cells (right) is shown. Data represent mean ± SD from three independent experiments. (D) We transplanted 300,000 donor bone marrow cells from each genetic background into irradiated recipient mice along with 300,000 recipient bone marrow cells. Data represent mean ± SD from four independent experiments with a total of 15–20 recipient mice per genotype. (E) Summary of reconstitution results from (D). Recipient mice were considered long-term multilineage reconstituted if donor myeloid, B, and T cells represented more than 1% of blood cells in each lineage 16 weeks after transplantation. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by Student’s t test. See also Figure S7. Cell Stem Cell 2013 13, 102-116DOI: (10.1016/j.stem.2013.05.014) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions