Volume 111, Issue 11, Pages (December 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Advertisements

Maryam Sayadi, Seiichiro Tanizaki, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
(Un)Folding Mechanisms of the FBP28 WW Domain in Explicit Solvent Revealed by Multiple Rare Event Simulation Methods  Jarek Juraszek, Peter G. Bolhuis 
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Young Min Rhee, Vijay S. Pande  Biophysical Journal 
Folding Pathways of Prion and Doppel
Urea-Induced Unfolding of the Immunity Protein Im9 Monitored by spFRET
Volume 112, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 112, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Mechanical Anisotropy of Ankyrin Repeats
Investigating How Peptide Length and a Pathogenic Mutation Modify the Structural Ensemble of Amyloid Beta Monomer  Yu-Shan Lin, Gregory R. Bowman, Kyle A.
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 96, Issue 9, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Meng Qin, Jian Zhang, Wei Wang  Biophysical Journal 
Monika Sharma, Alexander V. Predeus, Nicholas Kovacs, Michael Feig 
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
A Comparison of Genotype-Phenotype Maps for RNA and Proteins
Mechanism of the αβ Conformational Change in F1-ATPase after ATP Hydrolysis: Free- Energy Simulations  Yuko Ito, Mitsunori Ikeguchi  Biophysical Journal 
Anton Arkhipov, Wouter H. Roos, Gijs J.L. Wuite, Klaus Schulten 
Influence of Protein Scaffold on Side-Chain Transfer Free Energies
Christian Kappel, Ulrich Zachariae, Nicole Dölker, Helmut Grubmüller 
Brittny C. Davis, Jodian A. Brown, Ian F. Thorpe  Biophysical Journal 
Greta Faccio, Stefan Salentinig  Biophysical Journal 
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages (August 2017)
SAXS-Oriented Ensemble Refinement of Flexible Biomolecules
High-Pressure SAXS Study of Folded and Unfolded Ensembles of Proteins
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)
Yusuke Nakasone, Kazunori Zikihara, Satoru Tokutomi, Masahide Terazima 
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Till Siebenmorgen, Martin Zacharias  Biophysical Journal 
The Two-State Prehensile Tail of the Antibacterial Toxin Colicin N
Atomistic Ensemble Modeling and Small-Angle Neutron Scattering of Intrinsically Disordered Protein Complexes: Applied to Minichromosome Maintenance Protein 
Validating Solution Ensembles from Molecular Dynamics Simulation by Wide-Angle X- ray Scattering Data  Po-chia Chen, Jochen S. Hub  Biophysical Journal 
Dissecting DNA-Histone Interactions in the Nucleosome by Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA Unwrapping  Ramona Ettig, Nick Kepper, Rene Stehr, Gero.
Protein-Protein Docking: From Interaction to Interactome
Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations Provide Insight into Substrate Recognition by Small Heat Shock Proteins  Sunita Patel, Elizabeth Vierling,
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Assessing Exhaustiveness of Stochastic Sampling for Integrative Modeling of Macromolecular Structures  Shruthi Viswanath, Ilan E. Chemmama, Peter Cimermancic,
Min Wang, Mary Prorok, Francis J. Castellino  Biophysical Journal 
Logan S. Ahlstrom, Osamu Miyashita  Biophysical Journal 
Two Latent and Two Hyperstable Polymeric Forms of Human Neuroserpin
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Flow-Induced β-Hairpin Folding of the Glycoprotein Ibα β-Switch
Feng Ding, Sergey V. Buldyrev, Nikolay V. Dokholyan 
Christina Bergonzo, Thomas E. Cheatham  Biophysical Journal 
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Rotary Motor F0 under External Electric Fields across the Membrane  Yang-Shan Lin, Jung-Hsin Lin, Chien-Cheng Chang 
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages (October 2015)
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Amir Marcovitz, Yaakov Levy  Biophysical Journal 
Kinetic Folding Mechanism of Erythropoietin
A Delocalized Proton-Binding Site within a Membrane Protein
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 94, Issue 11, Pages (June 2008)
Zackary N. Scholl, Weitao Yang, Piotr E. Marszalek  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages L7-L9 (January 2009)
Seongwon Kim, Takako Takeda, Dmitri K. Klimov  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 111, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
Evolution of Specificity in Protein-Protein Interactions
Presentation transcript:

Volume 111, Issue 11, Pages 2368-2376 (December 2016) High-Resolution Mapping of a Repeat Protein Folding Free Energy Landscape  Martin J. Fossat, Thuy P. Dao, Kelly Jenkins, Mariano Dellarole, Yinshan Yang, Scott A. McCallum, Angel E. Garcia, Doug Barrick, Christian Roumestand, Catherine A. Royer  Biophysical Journal  Volume 111, Issue 11, Pages 2368-2376 (December 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.08.027 Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Ribbon diagram of the crystal structure of the leucine-rich repeat protein pp32 (PDB: 2JE0) (16). The N-terminal cap is shown in yellow, the first repeat is colored in red, the second in green, the third in blue, the fourth in purple, the fifth in brown, and the C-terminal cap in cyan. The major cavity is displayed in gray. The cavity was visualized using the software HOLLOW (34) with a grid of 0.25 Å and a probe radius of 1.2 Å. Rendered using the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.8 Schrödinger, LLC. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 111, 2368-2376DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.08.027) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 NMR detected high pressure unfolding of pp32 at 303 K and 1.4 M urea. (A–C) Examples of 1H-15N HSQC spectra at different pressures as indicated. (D) Examples of three residues exhibiting distinct unfolding profiles. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 111, 2368-2376DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.08.027) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Distribution of the apparent ΔVf and ΔGf0 values (top and middle panels, respectively) obtained from fits of the residue-specific pressure unfolding profiles at each temperature as indicated. The lines in the top and middle panels represent a Gaussian fits to each parameter distribution. The bottom panels provide the means and SDs of the distributions at each temperature; the error bars represent the SD of the fitted Gaussian distributions. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 111, 2368-2376DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.08.027) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Fractional contact maps for pp32 calculated from the NMR HSQC peak intensity as described in the text at 900 bar, 1.4 M urea, and at different temperatures as indicated. Fraction represents the probability that a contact is formed in the ensemble. The color scale is the same for all temperatures. Gray dots above the diagonal correspond to native contacts calculated from the crystal structure (PDB: 2JE0), colored dots below the diagonal correspond to contact probabilities calculated from the NMR data as described in the text. The full color scale corresponds to fractional contacts between 60 and 90%. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 111, 2368-2376DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.08.027) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Histograms of the probability of native contact at 900 bar and 1.4 M urea at all four tested temperatures, as listed. The histogram is colored for each repeat and cap using the color code in Fig. 1. Each residue contributing to a contact is counted in the repeat it belongs to, such that interfacial contacts are counted once in each repeat, and those involved in a residue pair within a repeat are counted twice in the repeat. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 111, 2368-2376DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.08.027) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Heat maps of RMSD versus Q (percentage of native contacts) for conformational ensembles of pp32 obtained from the coarse-grained simulations at 298, 293, 298, and 303 K in 1.4 M urea. Note the heat map scale is logarithmic. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 111, 2368-2376DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.08.027) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 (Inset) Pseudo-free energy landscape as extracted from the simulations using the data obtained at 293 K. The displayed structures are reconstructed from the free energy regions indicated by the corresponding letters (A–F). Representative structures were obtained as described in the Materials and Methods. Structures are colored as in Fig. 1. Similar figures for other temperatures can be found in the Supporting Material. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2016 111, 2368-2376DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.08.027) Copyright © 2016 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions