Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We will tackle accelerator physics the way we tackle most problems in classical physics – ie, with 18 th and 19 th century mathematics!
Advertisements

1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Syllabus and slides Lecture 1: Overview and history of Particle accelerators (EW) Lecture 2: Beam optics I (transverse) (EW) Lecture 3: Beam optics II.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  Our previous discussion implicitly assumed that all particles were at the same momentum  Each quad has a constant focal length 
Synchrotron Radiation What is it ? Rate of energy loss Longitudinal damping Transverse damping Quantum fluctuations Wigglers Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
Transverse optics 2: Hill’s equation Phase Space Emittance & Acceptance Matrix formalism Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
M. LindroosNUFACT06 School Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Mats Lindroos.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Lattice calculations: Lattices Tune Calculations Dispersion Momentum Compaction Chromaticity Sextupoles Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende.
Accelerator Physics  Basic Formalism  Linear Accelerators  Circular Accelerators  Magnets  Beam Optics  Our Accelerator Greg LeBlanc Lead Accelerator.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  Our previous discussion implicitly assumed that all particles were at the same momentum  Each quad has a constant focal length 
Quadrupole Transverse Beam Optics Chris Rogers 2 June 05.
Lecture 3 - E. Wilson - 22 Oct 2014 –- Slide 1 Lecture 3 - Magnets and Transverse Dynamics I ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  Let’s look at the Hill’ equation again…  We can write the general solution as a linear combination of a “sine-like” and “cosine-like”
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U. S. Department of Energy USPAS.
Motion in a constant uniform magnetic field Section 21.
Analytical considerations for Theoretical Minimum Emittance Cell Optics 17 April 2008 F. Antoniou, E. Gazis (NTUA, CERN) and Y. Papaphilippou (CERN)
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Synchrotron Radiation
Zeuten 19 - E. Wilson - 1/18/ Slide 1 Recap. of Transverse Dynamics E. Wilson – 15 th September 2003  Transverse Coordinates  Relativistic definitions.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson - 23 Oct 2014 –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
Lecture 4 - E. Wilson –- Slide 1 Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.
Damping rings, Linear Collider School Linear beam dynamics overview Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU Accelerator and Beam Physics group Beams Department CERN.
Collective Effect II Giuliano Franchetti, GSI CERN Accelerator – School Prague 11/9/14G. Franchetti1.
Lecture A3: Damping Rings
Longitudinal Dynamics of Charged Particle
Lecture A3: Damping Rings
Academic Training Lecture 2 : Beam Dynamics
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2011 E. J. N. Wilson.
Review of Accelerator Physics Concepts
Longitudinal Dynamics & RF Capture
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2015 E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Accelerator Physics G. A. Krafft, A. Bogacz, and H. Sayed
Lecture 4 - Transverse Optics II
PHY 554 Fundamentals of Accelerator Physics Lecture 12: Longitudinal Dynamics October 10, 2018 Vladimir N. Litvinenko
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 8
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 1
Physics 451/551 Theoretical Mechanics
Accelerator Physics G. A. Krafft, A. Bogacz, and H. Sayed
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 3
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 4
AXEL-2011 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
Accelerator Physics Weak Focussing
Accelerator Physics NMI and Synchrotron Radiation
Accelerator Physics Particle Acceleration
Accelerator Physics G. A. Krafft, A. Bogacz, and H. Sayed
Accelerator Physics Coupling Control
Accelerator Physics Statistical Effects
Accelerator Physics Synchrotron Radiation
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 2
Physics 696 Topics in Advanced Accelerator Design I
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 7
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
Accelerator Physics G. A. Krafft, A. Bogacz, and H. Sayed
Lecture 2 - Transverse motion
Accelerator Physics G. A. Krafft, A. Bogacz, and H. Sayed
ΑΡΙΣΤΟΤΕΛΕΙΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗΣ
Longitudinal Focusing & The Gamma Transition
Accelerator Physics Statistical Effects
Presentation transcript:

Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Jefferson Lab Professor of Physics Old Dominion University G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab

Pseudoharmonic Solution gives Using the x(s) equation above and the definition of ε, the solution may be written in the standard “pseudoharmonic” form The the origin of the terminology “phase advance” is now obvious.

Case II: K(s) not periodic In a linac or a recirculating linac there is no closed orbit or natural machine periodicity. Designing the transverse optics consists of arranging a focusing lattice that assures the beam particles coming into the front end of the accelerator are accelerated (and sometimes decelerated!) with as small beam loss as is possible. Therefore, it is imperative to know the initial beam phase space injected into the accelerator, in addition to the transfer matrices of all the elements making up the focusing lattice of the machine. An initial ellipse, or a set of initial conditions that somehow bound the phase space of the injected beam, are tracked through the acceleration system element by element to determine the transmission of the beam through the accelerator. The designs are usually made up of well-understood “modules” that yield known and understood transverse beam optical properties.

Definition of β function Now the pseudoharmonic solution applies even when K(s) is not periodic. Suppose there is an ellipse, the design injected ellipse, which tightly includes the phase space of the beam at injection to the accelerator. Let the ellipse parameters for this ellipse be α0, β0, and γ0. A function β(s) is simply defined by the ellipse transformation rule where

One might think to evaluate the phase advance by integrating the beta-function. Generally, it is far easier to evaluate the phase advance using the general formula, where β(s) and α(s) are the ellipse functions at the entrance of the region described by transport matrix Ms',s. Applied to the situation at hand yields

Beam Matching Fundamentally, in circular accelerators beam matching is applied in order to guarantee that the beam envelope of the real accelerator beam does not depend on time. This requirement is one part of the definition of having a stable beam. With periodic boundary conditions, this means making beam density contours in phase space align with the invariant ellipses (in particular at the injection location!) given by the ellipse functions. Once the particles are on the invariant ellipses they stay there (in the linear approximation!), and the density is preserved because the single particle motion is around the invariant ellipses. In linacs and recirculating linacs, usually different purposes are to be achieved. If there are regions with periodic focusing lattices within the linacs, matching as above ensures that the beam

envelope does not grow going down the lattice envelope does not grow going down the lattice. Sometimes it is advantageous to have specific values of the ellipse functions at specific longitudinal locations. Other times, re/matching is done to preserve the beam envelopes of a good beam solution as changes in the lattice are made to achieve other purposes, e.g. changing the dispersion function or changing the chromaticity of regions where there are bends (see the next chapter for definitions). At a minimum, there is usually a matching done in the first parts of the injector, to take the phase space that is generated by the particle source, and change this phase space in a way towards agreement with the nominal transverse focusing design of the rest of the accelerator. The ellipse transformation formulas, solved by computer, are essential for performing this process.

Dispersion Calculation Begin with the inhomogeneous Hill’s equation for the dispersion. Write the general solution to the inhomogeneous equation for the dispersion as before. Here Dp can be any particular solution. Suppose that the dispersion and it’s derivative are known at the location s1, and we wish to determine their values at s2. x1 and x2, because they are solutions to the homogeneous equations, must be transported by the transfer matrix solution Ms2,s1 already found.

To build up the general solution, choose that particular solution of the inhomogeneous equation with boundary conditions Evaluate A and B by the requirement that the dispersion and it’s derivative have the proper value at s1 (x1 and x2 need to be linearly independent!)

3 by 3 Matrices for Dispersion Tracking Particular solutions to inhomogeneous equation for constant K and constant ρ and vanishing dispersion and derivative at s = 0 K < 0 K = 0 K > 0 Dp,0(s) D'p,0(s)

M56 In addition to the transverse effects of the dispersion, there are important effects of the dispersion along the direction of motion. The primary effect is to change the time-of-arrival of the off-momentum particle compared to the on-momentum particle which traverses the design trajectory. Design Trajectory Dispersed Trajectory

Classical Microtron: Veksler (1945) Extraction Magnetic Field RF Cavity

Synchrotron Phase Stability Edwin McMillan discovered phase stability independently of Veksler and used the idea to design first large electron synchrotron. Harmonic number: # of RF oscillations in a revolution

Transition Energy Beam energy where speed increment effect balances path length change effect on accelerator revolution frequency. Revolution frequency independent of beam energy to linear order. We will calculate in a few weeks Below Transistion Energy: Particles arriving EARLY get less acceleration and speed increment, and arrive later, with repect to the center of the bunch, on the next pass. Applies to heavy particle synchrotrons during first part of acceleration when the beam is non-relativistic and accelerations still produce velocity changes. Above Transistion Energy: Particles arriving EARLY get more energy, have a longer path, and arrive later on the next pass. Applies for electron synchrotrons and heavy particle synchrotrons when approach relativistic velocities. As seen before, Microtrons operate here.

Phase Stability Condition “Synchronous” electron has Difference equation for differences after passing through cavity pass l + 1: Because for an electron passing the cavity

Phase Stability Condition

Microtron Phase Stability Condition Have Phase Stability if i.e.,

Synchrotrons Two basic generalizations needed Acceleration of non-relativistic particles Difference equation describing per turn dynamics becomes a differential equation with solution involving a new frequency, the synchrotron frequency RF Cavity

Acceleration of non-relativistic particles For microtron, racetrack microtrons and other polytrons, electron speed is at the speed of light. For non-relativistic particles the recirculation time also depends on the longitudinal velocity vz = βzc.

Momentum Compaction Transition Energy: Energy at which the change in the once around time becomes independent of momentum (energy)

Equation for Synchrotron Oscillations Assume momentum slowly changing (adiabatic acceleration) Phase advance per turn is

So change in phase advance per unit time is Yielding synchrotron oscillations with frequency