Board work session – Saturday, January 21, 2017

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January 7, PUSD has two “buckets” to pay for it’s day-to- day and yearly operations: Maintenance and Operations (M & O) Things that are considered.
Advertisements

AASBO Legislative Update Chuck Essigs 53 rd Annual Conference July 2006.
ARIZONA FRAMEWORK FOR SCHOOL FINANCE Dr. Debra Bergman Assistant Superintendent & Hector M. Encinas Chief Financial Officer.
Chuck Essigs Arizona Association of School Business Officials April 2010.
Red Oak COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT FY2010 BUDGET HEARING March 30, :00 P.M. SUE WAGAMAN BOARD ROOM WEBSTER BUILDING.
Budget Update for School Year Chuck Essigs April 22, 2009.
Tuba City Unified School District Governing Board School & Finance Work Study Saturday, December 10, 2011.
Kansas Legislative Research Department SCHOOL FINANCE BASICS 1 January 2013.
School Finance: A Framework School Finance: A Framework, Attachment 1.
Tuba City Unified School District Governing Board Retreat February 24 – 25, 2012.
1 Proposed Budget For Adoption Fiscal Year Michael E. Finn, CFO.
Budget Study Session Berryessa Union School District April 23, 2008.
Thornton Township High School District 205 September 8, /2011 Budget Presentation.
REVIEW SESSION ONE When does the Fiscal Year begin each year? What are the five parts of a budget? There are four funds. Name them and provide a brief.
SCHOOL FINANCE EA756. Finance The budget is one of the most important legal documents of a school district. It is not a static document, but rather a.
1 Proposed Budget for Adoption Fiscal Year Michael E. Finn, CFO.
April 8, Budget Committee Meeting Budget Overview and Discussion.
Arizona School Funding AASBO Vendor/Buyer Conference Gerrick Monroe February 18, 2010.
Arizona School Finance The Equalization Formula. How many parents? Does treating your kids fairly mean: Spending equally on them? Spending equally on.
Preparing an AELR Meghan Hieger and Megan Smith Office of the Auditor General Accounting Services Division.
Understanding the Tax Calculation Teddy Dumlao. Key Questions What are the sources of income? What is the relationship between tax rates and tax amounts?
Understanding the Tax Calculation Teddy Dumlao. Key Questions What is the relationship between tax rates and tax amounts? What governing board decisions.
Leanne Emm, Associate Commissioner – School Finance Update League of Charter Schools Annual Finance.
Chuck Essigs Arizona Association of School Business Officials April 22, 2010.
1 Your LOGO HERE. 2 Funding Associated with School Districts Calculating A Local Tax Rate Understanding The Expenditure Budget.
FY2010 Budget and 2009 Legislative Session Update July 15, 2009 Janice Palmer Arizona School Boards Association Jeremy Calles Arizona Department of Education.
Charter School Meeting Department of Public Instruction October 20, 2014 Charter School Meeting Department of Public Instruction October 20,
Charter School Finance School Business Alexis Schauss, Director October 2015.
Arizona School Finance Module II: Outside the RCL.
CAPITAL EXPANSION FUND (F41) LONG-TERM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT TRUST FUND (F46) CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS CAPITAL EXPANSION FUND (F41) LONG-TERM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT.
Alliance Policy & Management Group TAX YEAR 2015 UPDATE SEPTEMBER 18,
Alliance Policy & Management Group Tax Year 2014 Update September 19, 2014.
Goodhue School District 2015 Payable 2016 Truth In Taxation Public Meeting Time: 6:30pm Date: December 21, 2015 at the Goodhue School District Board Room.
2008 PROPERTY TAX LEVY RICHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEVY INFORMATION.
College Community School District 4 Budget Calculations for General Fund Budget Year.
State Aid. State Aid makes up 31.4% or $9.7M of the District’s funding for the General Fund. Funding is based on previous year enrollment and expenditures.
June 19, ADOPTED BUDGET.  Governor’s January budget proposal  Governor’s May revision  PUHSD’s Budget  Built upon the May revision.
School Finance in Arizona Chuck Essigs AASBO. Funding of Schools  Very little state assistance  Very little state control  Ability to fund.
1 School Finance: State & County Funding Rebecca Troutman NCACC Intergovernmental Relations Director.
N OVATO U NIFIED S CHOOL D ISTRICT October 15, 2013 Local Control Funding Formula.
Drexel R-IV School District
Excellence In Education
Minneapolis Public Schools Finance Office
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Proposed Budget for Adoption
Presentation To Board of Education
Winship-Robbins School District
Trimble County Public Schools
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Kingsport City Schools
St. Francis Public School Proposed Levy Payable 2018
BUDGET TOWN HALL MEETING
Charter School Operations
Budget Overview Review of Last Years Budget
SPECIAL EDUCATION FUNDING OVERVIEW House Ways and Means Committee
Minnesota School Finance Trends and Issues
Initial Submission March 27, 2018
Proposed Expenditure Budget
Leanne Emm, Associate Commissioner School Finance Division
The Conversation Has Just Begun
December 3, 2018 Presented By: Ann-Marie Foucault Superintendent
California Community College Funding and Budgeting
BARBOUR COUNTY SCHOOLS SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET HEARING October 8th, 2018
System Budget FY 2018 Board of Education May 2, 2017.
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #883
Town Hall on Budget & Taxes
BUDGET UPDATE May 21, 2019 For 5/21/19 Budget Work Session
School Finance Update CASE Nuts & Bolts
Iowa K-12 Public School Finance
Presentation transcript:

Board work session – Saturday, January 21, 2017 Tuba City Unified School District Review of School District Revenue & Expenditure Budget Board work session – Saturday, January 21, 2017

Outline School Finance Terminology, Funding Formulas Factors Impacting Tuba City Budget Review of Prior Year Expenditures, Future Needs Estimated Budget Projections – FY18

School Budget History In the early 1980’s, AZ Legislature refined its school finance system to provide equal dollars per pupil for school operations. This concept commonly referred to as the “equalization formula” allowed public school districts across the state to experience similar education dollars regardless of property values.

1980’s Reform Reduced disparities in tax rates Equalize per-pupil funding Decrease reliance on property taxes Limited property tax growth Continue local prerogative of voter-approved budget overrides with limits Distinguish between primary and secondary (voter-approved) taxes

Further Reform 1994 Students FIRST Fair and Immediate Resources for Students Today prior statutory formula for funding school facilities and equipment violated the Arizona Constitution Law enacted in 1998 Created minimal adequacy standards Tightly controls the capital funding School Facilities Board (SFB)

School Budget Terminology Chart of Accounts Uniform, comprehensive, data collection, reporting Uniform System of Financial Records (USFR) Minimum level of internal controls that school districts must follow Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Comprehensive Financial Report (CAFR) Annual Financial Report (AFR)

School Budget Terminology General Budget Limit The General Budget Limit results from a number of formulas heavily dependent upon the number of students or Average Daily Membership (ADM), the district has during years’ first 100 days. Support Level Weight The effect of Weighted Student Count, which allows a student to be worth more (for funding purposes), more than 1.0. This is how students with special needs generate additional funding based on their needs. Weighted Student Count The Weighted Student Count takes into consideration the associated cost of educating certain classifications of student without utilizing dollars to do it. Weighted Student Counts is specified by ARS 15-943. Group A and Group B

School Budget Terminology Local Taxes Property tax on property within the district provides a portion of M&O, Capital Outlay, All of Overrides, GO Bonds State Equalization State general fund revenues used to support education M&O, Capital Outlay, but not overrides & bonds County Equalization A countywide tax rate applied to offset the State Equalization State and Federal Grants State and Federal resources used to support supplemental programs Federal Impact Aid Federal funds paid directly to district in impacted areas (federal land) in lieu of property taxes.

School Budget Terminology Budget Controlled Funds Allocation based on formula (i.e., student count, need-based) Cash Controlled Funds Cash carried over from the prior year plus current year revenue

Funding Formula Maintenance & Operations (M&O) Base Support Level Weighted Student Count Group A Group B Base Level Amount Teacher Experience Index (TEI)

Funding Formula Maintenance & Operations (M&O) Transportation Revenue Control Limit Route Miles Approved daily route miles x 180 days Eligible Students State Support Level Less than .5 miles .5 to 1.0 mile More than 1.0 mile

Funding Formula Maintenance & Operations (M&O) Base Support Level (BSL) + Transportation Revenue Control Limit (TRCL) = Revenue Control Limit (RCL) x Override Authorizations (*if applicable) + Carry Forward, Tuition, Prop 123, DAA transfer = General Budget Limit (GBL)

Funding Formula District Additional Assistance (DAA) Unweighted ADM X CORL per Student = CORL Allocation Funding can be transferred into M&O budget

Funding Formula Impact Aid Programs include: Basic Support Payments Children with Disabilities Payments Construction Grants Funding based on District application in prior year (January 31). Application is based on federally connected students. Most recently, payments have equaled about 80-85% of allocation within the current year. Remaining is paid in later years.

Funding Formula Entitlement Grants District receives federal grants based on demographics ESEA Programs Title I – Education for Disadvantaged Title II – Teacher and Principal Professional Development Title III – Limited English Proficiency Title VII – Native American JOM – Johnson O’Malley

Funding Formula Proposition 301 (Prop 301) Statute requires distribution of funds 40% - Principal Site Fund 40% - Performance Pay 20% - Base Pay Group A weighted ADM x Per Pupil Limits on what Prop 301, Fund 013, can be used for class size reduction, teacher compensation, AIMS intervention, teacher development, dropout prevention

Funding Formula Instructional Improvement Fund (IIF) Statute allows for xx Up to 50% - Teacher Base Pay or Class Size Reduction Remaining purposes include dropout prevention and instructional improvement programs Group A weighted ADM x Per Pupil Funding is not known until received, therefore we cannot spend until the funds are received (January/July)

Funding Formula Proposition 123 Proposition that resolved the longstanding lawsuit regarding per pupil funding. Reset the per pupil funding in FY16 to $3,645 Provides for inflation increase each year (set by JLBC – CPI or 2% whichever is less) Allocates $50M across the state based % of statewide enrollment (increases to $75M in 2021-2025)

Factors Impacting Tuba City Budget Review FY16 AFR Review FY17 Budget Worksheets Review FY18 Budget Projections

FY16 AFR Annual Financial Report Completed in October of each year (no later than October 15) Report of actual expenditures Board approved Submitted to ADE Accessible publically on ADE website and District website

FY17 Adopted Budget Adopted in July Based on projected enrollment Will be revised by May 15, 2017 Board approved Submitted to ADE Accessible publically on ADE website and District website

FY18 Budget Proposal

Discussion, Future Topics