Volume 10, Issue 19, Pages (October 2000)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fig. 1. Structure of the DR4 and rGH TRE and Schematic of the Different TR Isoforms A, The nucleotide sequence of a consensus DR4 and the native rGH TRE.
Advertisements

Fig. 7 Localization of the element(s) responsible for the transcriptional suppression by PPAR-γ. A, Rat VSMCs were transfected with either −1969/+104-luc,
Figure 5. Both IDs Are Capable of Functionally Interacting with the TR on Positive TREs CV-1 cells were cotransfected with 1.7 μg of LYS (A) PAL (B), or.
by Hanna S. Radomska, Anne B
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Volume 126, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
by Toshibumi Shimokawa, and Chisei Ra
by Hong Hao, Huiling Qi, and Manohar Ratnam
The homeodomain protein Cdx2 regulates lactase gene promoter activity during enterocyte differentiation  Rixun Fang, Nilda A. Santiago, Lynne C. Olds,
by Milind C. Mahajan, and Sherman M. Weissman
Substance P Enhances the Production of Interferon-induced Protein of 10 kDa by Human Keratinocytes in Synergy with Interferon-γ  Naoko Kanda, Shinichi.
Histone deacetylase 3 associates with and represses the transcription factor GATA-2 by Yukiyasu Ozawa, Masayuki Towatari, Shinobu Tsuzuki, Fumihiko Hayakawa,
IFN-γ Upregulates Expression of the Mouse Complement C1rA Gene in Keratinocytes via IFN-Regulatory Factor-1  Sung June Byun, Ik-Soo Jeon, Hyangkyu Lee,
The interferon regulatory factor ICSBP/IRF-8 in combination with PU
M. Ushita, T. Saito, T. Ikeda, F. Yano, A. Higashikawa, N. Ogata, U
Sp1 Is Required for Glucose-Induced Transcriptional Regulation of Mouse Vesicular Glutamate Transporter 2 Gene  Tao Li, Liqun Bai, Jing Li, Suzu Igarashi,
Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara Birkaya, Satrajit Sinha 
Transcriptional activation of transforming growth factor-β1 in mesangial cell culture by high glucose concentration  Brenda B. Hoffman, Kumar Sharma,
High Mobility Group Protein I(Y) Is Required for Function and for c-Rel Binding to CD28 Response Elements within the GM-CSF and IL-2 Promoters  S.Roy.
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Jason Park, Stephanie Schulz, Scott A. Waldman  Gastroenterology 
Qiujie Jiang, Yasushi Matsuzaki, Kehua Li, Jouni Uitto 
Transcriptional Control of the Mouse Col7a1 Gene in Keratinocytes: Basal and Transforming Growth Factor-β Regulated Expression  Michael Naso, Jouni Uitto,
Volume 122, Issue 7, Pages (June 2002)
Volume 75, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
Yin-Yang 1 Negatively Regulates the Differentiation-Specific Transcription of Mouse Loricrin Gene in Undifferentiated Keratinocytes  Xuezhu Xu, Yasuhiro.
17β-Estradiol Inhibits MCP-1 Production in Human Keratinocytes
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages (May 1998)
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
A T Cell–Specific Enhancer in the Interleukin-3 Locus Is Activated Cooperatively by Oct and NFAT Elements within a DNase I–Hypersensitive Site  Kym N.
Transcriptional Regulation of ATP2C1 Gene by Sp1 and YY1 and Reduced Function of its Promoter in Hailey–Hailey Disease Keratinocytes  Hiroshi Kawada,
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 1998)
Naoko Kanda, Shinichi Watanabe  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Keratinocyte growth factor promotes goblet cell differentiation through regulation of goblet cell silencer inhibitor  Dai Iwakiri, Daniel K. Podolsky 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
17β-estradiol Inhibits the Production of RANTES in Human Keratinocytes
MyoD Targets TAF3/TRF3 to Activate Myogenin Transcription
The G/G Genotype of a Resistin Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism at −420 Increases Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Susceptibility by Inducing Promoter Activity.
A Molecular Switch for Photoperiod Responsiveness in Mammals
Regulation of the Melanoma Cell Adhesion Molecule Gene in Melanoma: Modulation of mRNA Synthesis by Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate, Phorbol Ester, and.
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Characterization of a palindromic enhancer element in the promoters of IL4 , IL5 , and IL13 cytokine genes  Sandra Codlin, PhD*, Cecilia Soh, PhD, Tak.
Identification of Rare, Disease-Associated Variants in the Promoter Region of the RNF114 Psoriasis Susceptibility Gene  Alexandros Onoufriadis, Michael.
Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (March 1999)
TBX22 Missense Mutations Found in Patients with X-Linked Cleft Palate Affect DNA Binding, Sumoylation, and Transcriptional Repression  Artemisia M. Andreou,
The α and η Isoforms of Protein Kinase C Stimulate Transcription of Human Involucrin Gene  Hidetoshi Takahashi, Kazuhiro Asano, Akira Manabe, Motoshi.
Yi-Tang Tseng, PhD, Rajan Wadhawan, MD, Joan P. Stabila, BS, Bethany G
IFN-γ Represses IL-4 Expression via IRF-1 and IRF-2
Volume 119, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Transcriptional Control of SLC26A4 Is Involved in Pendred Syndrome and Nonsyndromic Enlargement of Vestibular Aqueduct (DFNB4)  Tao Yang, Hilmar Vidarsson,
Defining the Regulatory Elements in the Proximal Promoter of ΔNp63 in Keratinocytes: Potential Roles for Sp1/Sp3, NF-Y, and p63  Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara.
TNF Regulates the In Vivo Occupancy of Both Distal and Proximal Regulatory Regions of the MCP-1/JE Gene  Dongsheng Ping, Peter L. Jones, Jeremy M. Boss 
The NF-κB-binding site of the uPAR promoter is required forβ 3-endonexin-mediated downregulation of the uPAR gene transcription. The NF-κB-binding site.
Naoko Kanda, Shinichi Watanabe  Journal of Investigative Dermatology 
Bart A. Jessen, Marjorie A. Phillips, Robert H. Rice 
Endogenous GATA Factors Bind the Core Sequence of the tetO and Influence Gene Regulation with the Tetracycline System  David J. Gould, Yuti Chernajovsky 
Nuclear factor of activated T cells and YY1 combine to repress IL-5 expression in a human T-cell line  Gretchen T.F. Schwenger, PhD, Régis Fournier, PhD,
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
The Vitamin D Response Element of the Involucrin Gene Mediates its Regulation by 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3  Daniel D. Bikle, Dean Ng, Yuko Oda, Karen Hanley,
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (December 2004)
Volume 13, Issue 14, Pages (July 2003)
Stéphane Karlen, Lasse R. Braathen 
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Keiji Miyazawa, MSc, Akio Mori, MD, PhD, Hirokazu Okudaira, MD, PhD 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

Volume 10, Issue 19, Pages 1205-1208 (October 2000) A ‘non-canonical’ DNA-binding element mediates the response of the Fas-ligand promoter to c-Myc  Shailaja Kasibhatla, Helen M. Beere, Thomas Brunner, Fernando Echeverri, Douglas R. Green  Current Biology  Volume 10, Issue 19, Pages 1205-1208 (October 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00727-2

Fig. 1 Identification of a c-Myc-responsive element in the FasL promoter. (a) Comparison of the consensus Myc-binding site (E box) with a number of previously identified non-canonical Myc-responsive elements [15, 22–24], including the putative site in the FasL promoter. (b) Overexpression of c-Myc enhances FasL promoter activity. Jurkat cells were transiently co-transfected with the 1.2kb FasL promoter reporter construct (FasLPr) and increasing concentrations of c-Myc expression vector or empty vector (pSP271) as indicated. Data are expressed as mean relative luciferase units (±SD) and normalized to β-galactosidase activity. (c) A mutation in the c-Myc-binding site decreases c-Myc responsiveness of the FasL promoter. Jurkat cells were transiently co-transfected with a mutant reporter construct and increasing amounts of c-Myc expression vector as indicated. Data are expressed as fold increase in luciferase activity. The results in (b,c) are representative of at least three independent experiments, each carried out in triplicate. The error bars indicate SD. Current Biology 2000 10, 1205-1208DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00727-2)

Fig. 2 Recombinant Myc–Max heterodimers, but not c-Myc alone, bind directly to the non-canonical Myc-binding site in the FasL promoter. (a) Sequence of the FasL promoter region containing the putative c-Myc responsive element (underlined) at –120bp upstream of the translation start site. This sequence was used as a double-stranded oligonucleotide for the EMSA experiments. (b) Binding of nuclear proteins to the non-canonical c-Myc-binding site in the FasL promoter. Left, nuclear extracts were incubated with the radiolabeled oligonucleotide described in (a) and binding was competed with increasing amounts of the unlabelled consensus oligonucleotide (CACGTG). Right, nuclear extracts were incubated with radiolabeled probe (ATTCTCT) described in (a) and binding was competed with oligonucleotide containing either a consensus Myc site or a mutated Myc site in the FasL promoter. (c) Binding of recombinant GST–Myc and GST–Max to the Myc-binding site in the FasL promoter. Left, the 32P-labeled oligonucleotide from (a) was incubated with GST–Myc and GST–Max proteins as indicated and binding was assessed by EMSA. Right, comparison of binding of recombinant GST–Myc and GST–Max to the consensus Myc-binding site. Incubations are as follows: A, GST–Myc (100 ng); B, GST–Myc (200ng); C, GST–Myc (500ng); D, GST–Max (100 ng); E, GST–Myc (200ng) + GST–Max (100 ng); F, GST–Myc (200 ng) + GST–Max (200 ng); Probe (probe alone). (d) Binding of recombinant GST–Myc and Max (no GST tag) to the canonical and non-canonical c-Myc-binding sites can be supershifted using an anti-GST antibody. Current Biology 2000 10, 1205-1208DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00727-2)

Fig. 3 Replacement of the consensus Myc-binding site(s) in the ODC promoter with the non-canonical Myc-binding sites from the FasL promoter sustains Myc responsiveness. (a) Constructs. One or both of the consensus Myc-binding sites (#1 and #2) in the wild-type ODC promoter (ODCwt) and the mutant Myc-binding sites in the ODCΔ5A promoter [11] were replaced with the non-canonical Myc-binding site from the FasL promoter to generate a series of promoter reporter constructs. (b) The non-canonical Myc-binding site from the FasL promoter sustains Myc responsiveness in the ODC promoter. Replacement of one (ODCΔ5A–FasL#1) or both (ODCΔ5A–FasL#1,#2) the mutant c-Myc elements in the ODCΔ5A promoter with the non-canonical Myc sequence from the FasL promoter. Jurkat T cells were transiently co-transfected with these constructs in the presence or absence of a c-Myc expression vector and luciferase activity assessed. (c) Replacement of one (ODCwt–FasL#1 or ODCwt–FasL#2) or both (ODCwt–FasL#1, #2) the consensus c-Myc elements in the ODCwt promoter with the non-canonical Myc sequence from the FasL promoter. Jurkat cells were transiently co-transfected with the ODCwt promoter chimeras in the presence or absence of a c-Myc expression construct. Data in (b,c) are expressed as relative luciferase units and normalised to β-galactosidase activity. These results are representative of at least three independent experiments, each carried out in triplicate. The error bars indicate SD. Current Biology 2000 10, 1205-1208DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00727-2)