Evaluation of Loss of Control

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DEFENCES TO CRIMINAL CHARGES
Advertisements

Topic 10 Intoxication Topic 10 Intoxication. Topic 10 Intoxication Introduction A defendant can become intoxicated by means of alcohol or drugs or both.
Defences Alibi Best defence possible Best defence possible Proof that the accused could not have possibly committed the offence Proof that the accused.
CHAPTER 2: CRIME Area of Study 2: Criminal Law. The need for criminal law Read The need for criminal law, Definition of a crime, Elements of a crime,
Critical Evaluation: Voluntary Manslaughter September 2014.
Homicide - Murder Evaluation and Reform.
INTOXICATION AS A DEFENCE Mark Hage 5 Basic points on defence of intoxication Covers, drink, drugs or other substances, eg glue sniffing. Based on whether.
Q: How do we prove murder? Learning Objectives 1. Recall the law relating to Voluntary Manslaughter- Diminished Responsibility Q: What is voluntary manslaughter?
Homicide – Voluntary Manslaughter
Practise Exam Questions DR AND PROVOCATION. Ibby, a woman of 28, has been married to Zaky for seven years. Zaky is an alcoholic and often returns home.
Provocation- now called Loss of Self Control
Topic 2 Murder.
Diminished Responsibility ALL will be able to identify where the defence of diminished responsibility comes from MOST will be able to explain the effect.
VOLUNTARY MANSLAUGHTER In this lecture, we will consider the reduction of liability from murder to voluntary manslaughter on the grounds of: Diminished.
Topic 12 Attempts Topic 12 Attempts. Topic 12 Attempts Introduction If a defendant fully intends to commit a crime but for some reason fails to complete.
A Judicial Case Study: AG for Jersey v Holley (2005)
Murder and Voluntary Manslaughter
Topic 4 Involuntary manslaughter. Topic 4 Actus reus Involuntary manslaughter has the same actus reus as murder (unlawful killing) but a different mens.
Criticisms and Reform of Involuntary Manslaughter
Evaluation of Murder and Voluntary Manslaughter
Defences Self-defence/Prevention of Crime. Lesson Objectives I will be able to state the definition of the defence of self-defence/prevention of crime.
Topic 7 Self-defence. Topic 7 Self-defence Introduction There are three situations where the use of force may be justified: Self-defence: this is a common-law.
CRIMES AGAINST PERSON INCLUDE – Homicide – Kidnapping – Assault – Battery – Robbery – Rape.
Criminal Law Provocation. Provocation Violence often involves words or actions by the victim which contribute or precipitate offence  sometimes force.
Fatal Offences – Voluntary Manslaughter – Loss of Control.
 The killing of one human being by another Most serious of all acts Can be criminal or noncriminal  Criminal Homicide: Murder = most serious form of.
Crimes Against the Person. Personal Crimes Crimes against the person include: Homicide, assault, battery, and rape.
Chapter 9. Homicide  The killing of one human being by another.  Criminal – committed with intent or a plan  Negligent – a person’s reckless actions,
Defences For the Accused
Objective Test -This test asks the question “Would a reasonable man have lost his self-control in the circumstances?” -This test comes from the case Bedder.
Criminal Defences CLN4U. Defences Every person is entitled to present a defence at trial Every person is entitled to present a defence at trial A defence.
DEFENCES. Types of defences:  JUSTIFICATIONS  Self-defence - Criminal Code allows one to defend oneself, those under one’s protection, and one’s property.
Chapter 9 Crimes Against the Person. Question of the Day “Crime and the fear of crime have permeated the fabric of American life.” – Warren E. Burger.
Voluntary manslaughter
Defences For The Accused Adapted from Halifax Regional School Board.
Exam Technique As you work through each offence use the following structure: I dentify – the appropriate offence/defence D efine – the offence/defence.
Diminished Responsibility.  The Homicide Act 1957 s2(1) provides a defence where D:  ‘...was suffering from such abnormality of mind (whether arising.
Grade Boundaries A* = 22/25 – 86% A = 20/25 – 79% B = 18/25 – 71% C = 16/25 – 64% D = 14/25 – 56% E = 12.5/25 – 50% Difference between each grade is only.
Voluntary Manslaughter Provocation. Difference between voluntary and involuntary Voluntary requires the same level of intention as murder, involuntary.
DEFENCES. HISTORY OF THE DEFENCES DR and provocation were put into statutory form in 1957 by the Homicide Act DR has always been considered a good defence.
HOMICIDE MRS. ORTEGA, LAW STUDIES. HOMICIDE INCLUDES TWO BASIC CRIMES MURDER: USUALLY 3: 1 ST DEGREE, 2 ND DEGREE AND FELONY MURDER MANSLAUGHTER: 2: VOLUNTARY.
Evaluation of Murder and Voluntary Manslaughter. Evaluation of Murder Main areas of the law of murder considered to be in need of change or clarification.
Evaluation of Fatal Offences
Evaluation of Murder.
Capacity defences of insanity and intoxication
Diminished Responsibility
Voluntary Manslaughter.
Unit 4 Word power.
Evaluation of the law of Murder
10/24/07 BR- Describe the elements of a pizza.
Insanity.
Voluntary Manslaughter
Evaluation of Self-Defence
Voluntary Manslaughter
Chapter 9- Crimes against the person
Self Defence/Prevention of a Crime
Chapter 9: Part I “Crimes Against the Person”
Chapter 9: Part I “Crimes Against the Person”
Crimes Against the Person
Voluntary Manslaughter… Loss of Control!
Homicide Eliseo Lugo III.
The Crown Court and homicide
Criminal homicide is the purposeful, knowing, reckless, or negligent killing of another person. If the killing of another person is done while carrying.
Evaluation of Diminished Responsibility
Chapter 10.2 Justifications.
“The Way to a Man’s Heart” Activity
Criminal Defences CLN4U.
Criminal Law 2.2 Crimes Against the Person
Homicide Mrs. Ortega, Law Studies.
Criminal Law 2.3 Crimes Against the Person
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of Loss of Control

Criticism 1 - Fear trigger - Fear of Serious Violence Provocation Under law of provocation, had to be a sudden and temporary loss of control Created a problem – women who were being abused could often not use the defence - women are usually physically weaker than men and less likely to react straight away when attacked by a violent partner but if there was a time lapse, they could not show the loss of control was sudden and temporary In Ahluwalia D waited until husband was asleep and defence of provocation would not have been available to her Solution in LoC New law of LoC - First qualifying trigger of “fear of serious violence” attempts to address the problem faced by women who kill their partners after suffering abuse by them Removal of suddenness requirement is a positive change as is the recognition that killing through fear is as justified as killing through anger Problems that remain But – still a requirement that to lose self-control based on fear, and this may be difficult to prove as people do not typically lose self-control when afraid

Suggested Reform for Fear Trigger Law Commission suggests - remove the need for loss of self-control in relation to fear of serious violence – to protect abused women more adequately This means defence could be pleaded where D acts our of fear of serious violence without needing to prove a loss of self-control

Criticism 2 - Anger trigger – Sexual Infidelity Exception Provocation Old Law of provocation – allowed sexual infidelity to amount to provocation Solution in LoC S.55 excludes sexual infidelity from contributing to a qualifying trigger Parliament excluded sexual infidelity to prevent situations where men were provided with an excuse for killing an unfaithful partner and being treated more leniently – killing an unfaithful partner would always be classed as murder Problems that remain Defining what is meant by sexual infidelity is problematic Clinton – allowed the defence to be put to the jury as sexual infidelity was only part of the reason for D’s loss of control – this precedent dilutes the provision as in many cases the sexual infidelity is likely to be part of the context rather than the only factor so there are questions as to whether the judges really followed the intentions of Parliament in this case Also there is an argument that sexual infidelity is one of the most likely causes for someone losing their self-control and therefore should not have been excluded in the first place

Suggested Reform for Sexual Infidelity Exception Sexual infidelity exception may need to be removed or revised in light of the decision in Clinton

Criticism 3 - Anger trigger – Objective Test Provocation Criticism of defence of provocation was that almost any words or conduct could be considered to have provoked D to kill – e.g. Doughty – crying baby was said to amount to provocation Solution in LoC Qualifying triggers prevent such situations S.55 Coroners and Justice Act 2009 applies if D’s loss of control was attributable to things said or done which constituted circumstances of an extremely grave character and caused D to have a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged. Now the test is objective – situation in Doughty would not now be covered by the partial defence Problems that remain Some argue the 2nd trigger should be abolished altogether as there can be no excuse for killing in anger

Suggested Reform for Anger Trigger In New Zealand, following a case where a man stabbed his girlfriend over 200 times, claiming she had provoked him, the Government decided to abolish the defence of provocation altogether. Justice Minister of NZ said it provides a defence for lashing out in anger and “violent homicidal rage”. It “rewards lack of self-control by enabling intentional killing to be categorised as something other than murder” Some critics in the UK argue that the 1st qualifying trigger should be retained but the 2nd should be withdrawn Reclassification of Homicide – Law Commission Report 2006 – Voluntary Manslaughter would be reclassified as 2nd Degree Murder