The Structure of the Mammalian 20S Proteasome at 2.75 Å Resolution

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Catalytic Mechanism of Chymotrypsin slide 1 Chymotrypsin –Protease: catalyze hydrolysis of proteins in small intestine –Specificity: Peptide bond on carboxyl.
Advertisements

The Nature of the Active Site Questions we want to ask: 1.Looking at the reactants and products, what type of reaction has occurred Hydrolysis, Condensation,
Chymotrypsin Lecture Aims: to understand (1) the catalytic strategies used by enzymes and (2) the mechanism of chymotrypsin.
Mechanism of lysozyme Lysozyme digests bacterial cell walls by breaking  (1- 4) glycosidic bonds between (N- acetylmuramic acid (NAM) and N-acetylglucosamine.
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Philippe Derreumaux, Tamar Schlick  Biophysical Journal 
The Nature of the Active Site
Probing Structural Determinants Distal to the Site of Hydrolysis that Control Substrate Specificity of the 20S Proteasome  Michael Groll, Tamim Nazif,
Structure of β2-bungarotoxin: potassium channel binding by Kunitz modules and targeted phospholipase action  Peter D Kwong, Neil Q McDonald, Paul B Sigler,
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Serine proteases Named because they use a serine residue to cut peptide bonds Possess a catalytic triad His 57 Asp 102 Ser 195 Use 2 different types of.
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Yu Luo, Su-Chen Li, Min-Yuan Chou, Yu-Teh Li, Ming Luo  Structure 
by Alexey Dementiev, Abel Silva, Calvin Yee, Zhe Li, Michael T
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (June 1995)
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages (July 2000)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
UG Wagner, M Hasslacher, H Griengl, H Schwab, C Kratky  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Xiao Tao, Zhiru Yang, Liang Tong  Structure 
The three-dimensional structure of PNGase F, a glycosyl asparaginase from Flavobacterium meningosepticum  Gillian E Norris, Timothy J Stillman, Bryan.
A Model for How Ribosomal Release Factors Induce Peptidyl-tRNA Cleavage in Termination of Protein Synthesis  Stefan Trobro, Johan Åqvist  Molecular Cell 
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
Crystal Structure of ARF1•Sec7 Complexed with Brefeldin A and Its Implications for the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Mechanism  Elena Mossessova, Richard.
Kevin G. Hoff, José L. Avalos, Kristin Sens, Cynthia Wolberger 
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (February 1995)
Crystal Structure of the λ Repressor C-Terminal Domain Provides a Model for Cooperative Operator Binding  Charles E. Bell, Paolo Frescura, Ann Hochschild,
Peter Trickey, Mary Ann Wagner, Marilyn Schuman Jorns, F Scott Mathews 
The 1.9 Å Structure of α-N-Acetylgalactosaminidase
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2002)
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 2, Issue 7, Pages (July 1994)
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Collagen Stabilization at Atomic Level
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1998)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Crystal Structure of Carnitine Acetyltransferase and Implications for the Catalytic Mechanism and Fatty Acid Transport  Gerwald Jogl, Liang Tong  Cell 
Qun Liu, Qingqiu Huang, Xin Gen Lei, Quan Hao  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Crystal Structure of 4-Amino-5-Hydroxymethyl-2- Methylpyrimidine Phosphate Kinase from Salmonella typhimurium at 2.3 Å Resolution  Gong Cheng, Eric M.
The crystal structure of endoglucanase CelA, a family 8 glycosyl hydrolase from Clostridium thermocellum  Pedro M Alzari, Hélè ne Souchon, Roberto Dominguez 
How glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase selects glutamine
Binding Structure of Elastase Inhibitor Scyptolin A
Mathias Baedeker, Georg E Schulz  Structure 
T Barrett, CG Suresh, SP Tolley, EJ Dodson, MA Hughes  Structure 
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 1999)
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Volume 97, Issue 3, Pages (April 1999)
Crystal structure of diisopropylfluorophosphatase from Loligo vulgaris
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Restriction Enzyme BsoBI–DNA Complex
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Presentation transcript:

The Structure of the Mammalian 20S Proteasome at 2.75 Å Resolution Masaki Unno, Tsunehiro Mizushima, Yukio Morimoto, Yoshikazu Tomisugi, Keiji Tanaka, Noritake Yasuoka, Tomitake Tsukihara  Structure  Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 609-618 (May 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00748-7

Figure 1 Superposition of the α2 Subunits of the Bovine and Yeast Proteasomes Are Shown by a Stereo Pair Bovine subunit, blue; yeast subunit, yellow. Structure 2002 10, 609-618DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00748-7)

Figure 2 Superposition of the β1, β5, β6, and β7 Subunits (from Top to Bottom) of the Bovine and Yeast Proteasomes Are Drawn as in Figure 1 Structure 2002 10, 609-618DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00748-7)

Figure 3 Stereoviews of the New Ntn-Hydrolase Active Site Projected along Almost the Same Directions (A) Residues included in the catalysis are shown by the single letter notation with the residue number of the bovine subunit. β1 subunit, yellow; β7 subunits, sky blue. The red sphere is a water molecule. (B) Predicted structure of the model substrate Phe-Gly-Pro-Ala-Gly-Gly-Tyr fitted in the β7 active site. β1 subunit, yellow; β7 subunit, sky blue; model substrate, red. (C) The active site was drawn by a space-filling model to show its hollow surface. Thr1 (red) is located at the bottom of this hollow. (D) The predicted substrate structures in the 20S proteasome. The red model is the substrate of the novel β7 active site; the three yellow models are those of β1, β2, and β5 active sites. The α ring, β ring, and trans β (β′) ring are depicted in part for convenience. The novel Ntn catalytic site is in a different position and a different orientation (red) from the other three active sites (yellow). Structure 2002 10, 609-618DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00748-7)

Figure 4 Putative Catalytic Mechanism of the Novel Active Site in β7 The reaction begins when the nucleophilic oxygen of Thr1 donates its proton to its own α-amino group and attacks the carbonyl carbon of the substrate. The negatively charged tetrahedral intermediate is stabilized by hydrogen bonding. The acylation step is complete when the α-amino group of Thr donates a proton to the nitrogen of the scissile peptide bond. The covalent bond between part of the substrate and the enzyme is formed, and the part of the substrate is released. The deacylation step begins when the hydroxyl group of water attacks the carbonyl carbon of the acyl-enzyme product and the basic α-amino group of the nucleophile accepts the proton from the water molecule. The negatively charged intermediate is stabilized, as in the acylation step. The reaction is completed when the α-amino group donates a proton to the nucleophile. Structure 2002 10, 609-618DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00748-7)

Figure 5 Structure Comparison of the Active Centers of the Constitutive Proteasome with the Active Centers of the Immunoproteasome (A and B) Diagrams of electrostatic surface potential of S1 pockets for the β1 and β1i active sites. Negative potentials, red; positive potentials, blue. The S1 pocket is surrounded by a dotted circle. The S1 pocket of the β1 active center is formed by both β1 and β2 subunits. (A) The S1 pocket of the β1 active center is charged positively at the β2 subunit side and negatively at the β1 subunit side. (B) The S1 pocket of the β1i active center of the immunoproteasome is almost apolar. (C) Structure comparison of the β2 and β2i active centers in a stereo pair. Amino acid residues are represented by the single letter notations with residue numbers. Both Ser32 and Asp53 in the constitutive subunit β2 (sky blue) are replaced by Glu in inducible subunit β2i (red). The green peptide is part of the β3 subunit, and the yellow peptide is a model substrate. Structure 2002 10, 609-618DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00748-7)

Figure 6 Locations of NLSs in the Bovine 20S Proteasome α subunits, sky blue; β subunits, green; NLSs, red. Structure 2002 10, 609-618DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00748-7)

Figure 7 Structural Comparisons of the Bovine α and β Rings with the Yeast α and β Rings Are Shown by Stereoscopic Drawings Bovine subunits, blue; yeast subunits, yellow. Several subunit names are shown in each drawing. (A) Top views of the α rings show the structural difference between residues 124–134 of the bovine α5 (red) and the corresponding residues of the yeast α5 subunit (pink). (B) Side views of the α rings clearly show the structural differences of the α1, α3, α5, and α7 subunits between the bovine and the yeast enzyme. Note that each α ring interacts with a β ring at the bottom. (C) Side views of the β rings. The bottom side interacts with the β ring related by 2-fold symmetry. Structure 2002 10, 609-618DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00748-7)