Contribution to a workshop by Andreas Gross (Switzerland)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Legitimacy of the parliament: an ongoing challenge, effort and process by Andreas Gross (Switzerland) (Political Scientist, MP, PACE)
Advertisements

Peace in Europe - the role of the Council of Europe in comparison with the two other institutions OSCE/EU A contribution to the VI. Political Academy on.
Minority(s) representation and recognition through intensive participation in a Direct Democracy A presentation to the JEF&YES’ European Seminar “Majorities.
Is there a clash between the individual citizen and democracy? Keynote speech for the JMK/FES - Conference on “Values of Social Democracy yesterday, today.
Deliberation is the soul of Direct Democracy (DD) The design of the Referendum process determines the quality of DD - well designed it helps to contribute.
The role of parliamentarians in strengthening democracy The distribution of power is not a zero-sum-issue: Increasing citizens power makes representative.
The role of politics for social responsibility in a globalising world New and old forums of expression and actors Andreas Gross, Switzerland, M.P./C o.
I.Why? – Neccessity of Party Programmes II.How? – Elaboration of Party Programmes III. Idendity – The Political Spectrum IV. Examples – Different Political.
Strengthening democracy by increasing citizen participation would catalyze ecological change The way individuals think about and act in nature reflects.
National Government I will: Discuss the benefits of living in a democratic society and the importance of voting. Know how a government is elected and run.
The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy The soul of Direct Democracy: Legitimation by communication The potentials of Direct Democracy.
The philosophy of Direct Democracy - why we need it in order to democratize Democracy and what has been achieved so far in Europe Contribution to the seminar.
Chapter 4 The Human World
The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy A presentation for southkorean.
Lessons from the history of the Swiss Democracy for the Making of a European Constitution Budapest Forum “Towards a More Democratic Europe” November 20.
“ Ensuring the integrity of Elections”: A common effort ! Some thesis for deliberations to the OSCE Chairmanship Expert Seminar on Electoral Management.
The double crises of today’s democracies: Too indirect and too national - we need more direct and more transnational democracies An introduction to a debate.
Creating legitimacy and integrating diversity by empowering citizens The challenge of election law design for Democracy and Democracy building Workshop.
The quality of a referendum process depends from it’s design In order to create a dynamic relation between citizens and the political system (Direct) Democracy.
”E-Democracy” is only a tool we need - To overcome the double crises of Democracy we have to realize serious constitutional reforms which provides citizens.
The role of citizens, MP’s, Rule of law and Separation of Powers in strengthening democracy The distribution of power is not a zero-sum-issue: Increasing.
Direct Democracy as a opportunity for collective political learning The Swiss foreign policy as a ambivalent example An introduction to a debate at the.
Diversity and Integration as challenges for Democracy Ten hypothesis to be discussed concerning the question, if Switzerland and Hannah Arendt might be.
IFAP presentation. WHAT IS IFAP? IFAP is the world farmers organisation representing > 600 million farm families A global network in which farmers from.
“The role of political parties in electoral processes”: What parties might do to build and strengthen democracy Contribution to a workshop by Andreas Gross.
Ways to Direct Citizen Participation in the political decision making of the European Union Some hypothesis and impulses from Andreas Gross, MP/Political.
Challenging the Empire Armando De Negri Filho WSFHSS PHM Brasil and LA member PHA 3 – Cape Town july 2012.
Ideology and Public Opinion 20 October, Review: The American Political System Designed to protect against majority rule and protect minority rights.
The creation of the Canton Jura: Looking from the outside with a special focus on federalism and (republican) democracy A contribution for a Discussion.
The political system of Switzerland: ”Built and driven by the society and the sub-national societies” 7 hypothesis as a contribution to the Training program.
Conceptual considerations for entering the Crises Exit by Andreas Gross (Zurich / St.Ursanne) (Political Scientist, MP, PACE) in the NISC 2006 of the GCSP.
The Role of the Political Parties in a Parliamentary Democracy by Andreas Gross (Switzerland) (Political Scientist/Director Atelier for Direct Democracy.
Ancient Democracies and Republics
Government.
Chapter 5: Political Parties Section 1
How would you feel about changing the drinking age? Would you argue for it or against it? Why? Tie your arguments to concepts we have learned.
The Parliament – the Heart of Democracy and engine for Nation building
Today's Political Parties
Sustainable Communities Act 2007
Essentials of Economics
The functions of parties
Legitimacy deficit and Direct democracy: Bulgaria and the EU The design determines the quality of DD - a good design focuses on deliberation, participation.
Chapter 17 Political Parties
PRINCIPLES OF DEMOCRACY
Be an Effective Council Member
“How To” Series How to Organize in Politics
Chapter 9 Section 2&3 Mr. Gordon.
Ideology and Public Opinion
Chapter 5: Political Parties Section 1
Democracy What is democracy? Is democracy a good or bad system? Why?
by Andreas Gross , Dr.h.c. (Switzerland)
The soul of Direct Democracy: Legitimation by communication The potentials of Direct Democracy to democratize Democracy A presentation for Dutch MP’s.
Duties and Responsibilities of Citizenship
The Parliament – the Heart of Democracy: Role and Responsibility of the Parliamentary majority and opposition in policy making by Andreas Gross, Dr.h.c.
UNIT 1 A tradition of democracy
Chapter 5: Political Parties Section 1
Chapter 5: Political Parties Section 1
Chapter 5: Political Parties Section 1
Challenges of the Democratisation of Democracy from the ECI to local Direct Democracy- “in a non-successful 3rd wave democracy” by Andreas Gross (Switzerland)
by Andreas Gross (Switzerland)
Chapter 5: Political Parties Section 1
Chapter 5: Political Parties Section 1
by Andreas Gross (Switzerland)
Introducing Government in America
Chapter 5: Political Parties Section 1
Chapter 5: Political Parties Section 1
The freedom potentials of Direct Democracy (DD) might still be improved - by more and better DD, not less DD ! DD as a modern achievement and an important.
DEMOCRATIC STRUCTURES.
Political Parties 5.1 and 5.2.
The Citizen and Government
Presentation transcript:

Contribution to a workshop by Andreas Gross (Switzerland) “The role of political parties in electoral processes”: What parties might do to build and strengthen democracy Contribution to a workshop by Andreas Gross (Switzerland) (Political Scientist, MP, Leader of the Socialdemocrats in the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe) Info@andigross.ch www.andigross.ch at the 5th “Forum for the Future of Democracy” of the CoE « Electoral Systems: strengthening democracy in the 21st century » Kiew, October 22nd 2009

One expression of the current banalisation of Democracy is the regression of political parties to power machines run by one man shows In order to be able to build and strengthen Democracy political parties should be and function in a smaller scale how they think the state should function and develop itself

Today - the classical duties of politi-cal parties have to be (re-)established in all parts of Europe Opportunities to regular deliberations in order to find political orientation and generate democratic power Opportunities for (mutual) political education and learning Places to elaborate programs to propose solutions for the most important problems of the society Links between representatives and members and electors: Both have to listen to each-other

By doing this they are (would be) (again) essential parts of an improved democracy building processes Legitimacy of political decisions Understanding of political situations and social realities Social and political learning Inspiring and designing policy change in time and substance

Officials have to defend their actions, non-actions, shortcomings In countries with a strong democracy the main parties have active sections in every bigger village and town There one listens, speaks, thinks, exchanges experiences, alternative propositions and hopes with each other Formulates interests and tries to transform them into concepts, programs and practical suggestions for parliaments and governments or common collective actions Officials have to defend their actions, non-actions, shortcomings

Nobody knows what “the general interest” and “the public cause” is: That ‘s why we need different parties who try to formulate them based on different philosophical believes, interests and priorities Parties are places where different people with different philosophical convictions, interests and perspectives try to formulate how they understand the General Interest and the Public Cause and where they try to find others who share their views in order to organise themselves, adress and convince others and generate together political power.

Today the big media are transforming parties to the worst and/or trying even to overtake their duties “ Media create realities and do not longer only deliberate it” “Agenda setter + Gate keeper” (not only Watch-Dog) by Prof. Pippa Norris (USA) Instead of organisations of engaged citizens and active members just fans (uncritical followers) ,sponsors, voters and future power holders Power-Machines and power-clans to get power and distribute money, posts, privileges, influence, policies Parties follow big-media logics and sacrify Democracy

Such a transformation sacrifices Democracy for what sells well, creates profits and is “sexy” No other tradition and collective knowledge End of big (industrial) camps and regression of politics to state administration which serves the interest of economy Citizens became consumers and have no time anymore to read, discuss, meet others and engage Diversification of politics, issue orientation, voters are switching parties, personality prevails values, interest, ideas and interests

The more a party on all levels is marked not only by professionals but also “ordinary citizens”, the stronger the party and representative Democracy are The more ordinary citizens are, the more they bring the experiences of “daily life” into politics The better citizens can speak, express their needs and observations, the more all others, especially officials may learn and the better Democracy will get

In order to restore Democracy political party’s first have to restore themselves Back to the better roots under new (partially also better ) historical circumstances New interface between individual and collective group Intellectual policy Laboratory of deliberation, acting and learning Open workshops for interested citizens to provide orientation