Joint Mathematics Meetings Hynes Convention Center, Boston, MA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stable Fluids A paper by Jos Stam.
Advertisements

Finite Difference Discretization of Hyperbolic Equations: Linear Problems Lectures 8, 9 and 10.
Sigal Gottlieb, UMass Dartmouth: SAMSI workshop November 15, 2007 STRONG STABILITY PRESERVING RUNGE-KUTTA & MULTI-STEP TIME DISCRETIZATIONS Sigal Gottlieb,
AMS 691 Special Topics in Applied Mathematics Review of Fluid Equations James Glimm Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University.
Finite Volume II Philip Mocz. Goals Construct a robust, 2nd order FV method for the Euler equation (Navier-Stokes without the viscous term, compressible)
EULER Code for Helicopter Rotors EROS - European Rotorcraft Software Romuald Morvant March 2001.
Cartesian Schemes Combined with a Cut-Cell Method, Evaluated with Richardson Extrapolation D.N. Vedder Prof. Dr. Ir. P. Wesseling Dr. Ir. C.Vuik Prof.
Numerical Uncertainty Assessment Reference: P.J. Roache, Verification and Validation in Computational Science and Engineering, Hermosa Press, Albuquerque.
Motivation The physics of inertial confinement fusion (ICF) combine hydrodynamics, plasma physics and radiation. One of the important hydrodynamic processes.
Coupling Continuum Model and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics Methods for Reactive Transport Yilin Fang, Timothy D Scheibe and Alexandre M Tartakovsky Pacific.
1 Internal Seminar, November 14 th Effects of non conformal mesh on LES S. Rolfo The University of Manchester, M60 1QD, UK School of Mechanical,
Network and Grid Computing –Modeling, Algorithms, and Software Mo Mu Joint work with Xiao Hong Zhu, Falcon Siu.
1/36 Gridless Method for Solving Moving Boundary Problems Wang Hong Department of Mathematical Information Technology University of Jyväskyklä
Computations of Fluid Dynamics using the Interface Tracking Method Zhiliang Xu Department of Mathematics University of Notre.
A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC CG Mingham, L Qian, DM Causon and DM Ingram Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Flow Analysis Manchester.
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Solving Euler Equations
Wind Modeling Studies by Dr. Xu at Tennessee State University
Zhaorui Li and Farhad Jaberi Department of Mechanical Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan Large-Scale Simulations of High Speed.
Finite Differences Finite Difference Approximations  Simple geophysical partial differential equations  Finite differences - definitions  Finite-difference.
Hybrid WENO-FD and RKDG Method for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws
A Look at High-Order Finite- Volume Schemes for Simulating Atmospheric Flows Paul Ullrich University of Michigan.
Matthew Fischels Aerospace Engineering Department Major Professor : Dr. R. Ganesh Rajagopalan REDUCING RUNTIME OF WIND TURBINE SIMULATION Los Alamos National.
The Finite Volume Method
C M C C Centro Euro-Mediterraneo per i Cambiamenti Climatici COSMO General Meeting - September 8th, 2009 COSMO WG 2 - CDC 1 An implicit solver based on.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review April , 2004, LBNL Target Simulation Roman Samulyak, in collaboration with.
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods and Strand Mesh Generation
Global Analysis of Floating Structures – M.H. Kim
CFD Lab - Department of Engineering - University of Liverpool Ken Badcock & Mark Woodgate Department of Engineering University of Liverpool Liverpool L69.
A particle-gridless hybrid methods for incompressible flows
Approximate Riemann Solvers for Multi-component flows Ben Thornber Academic Supervisor: D.Drikakis Industrial Mentor: D. Youngs (AWE) Aerospace Sciences.
Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Solving Euler Equations Andrey Andreyev Advisor: James Baeder Mid.
7. Introduction to the numerical integration of PDE. As an example, we consider the following PDE with one variable; Finite difference method is one of.
J.-Ph. Braeunig CEA DAM Ile-de-FrancePage 1 Jean-Philippe Braeunig CEA DAM Île-de-France, Bruyères-le-Châtel, LRC CEA-ENS Cachan
1 Direct Numerical Simulation of Compressible Turbulent Flows with Weighted Non-Linear Compact Schemes Alfred Gessow Rotorcraft Center Aerospace Engineering.
1 Flux Numerical Methods. 2 Flux Basics The finite-volume formulation of the conservation equations resulted in the equation where was the flux of the.
COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (AE 2402) Presented by IRISH ANGELIN S AP/AERO.
Gas-kineitc MHD Numerical Scheme and Its Applications to Solar Magneto-convection Tian Chunlin Beijing 2010.Dec.3.
AMS 691 Special Topics in Applied Mathematics Lecture 8
A Non-iterative Hyperbolic, First-order Conservation Law Approach to Divergence-free Solutions to Maxwell’s Equations Richard J. Thompson 1 and Trevor.
Requirements of High Accuracy Computing 1) Adopted numerical scheme must resolve all physical time and length scales. 2) Numerical scheme must be neutrally.
Uncertainties in fluid-structure interaction simulations
1 Zonal Boundary Conditions. 2 Some Basics The flow domain is divided into zones and grids are generated within each zone. The flow equations are solved.
1 Application of Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory Limiting to Compact Interpolation Schemes Debojyoti Ghosh Graduate Research Assistant Alfred Gessow.
Numerical Algorithm Development and Testing in HYCOM.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Flux form semi-Lagrangian transport in ICON: construction and results of idealised test cases Daniel Reinert Deutscher Wetterdienst.
School of Aerospace Engineering MITE Numerical Simulation of Centrifugal Compressor Stall and Surge Saeid NiaziAlex SteinLakshmi N. Sankar School of Aerospace.
Towards Future Navier-Stokes Schemes Uniform Accuracy, O(h) Time Step, Accurate Viscous/Heat Fluxes Hiroaki Nishikawa National Institute of Aerospace.
Efficient Simulation of Large Bodies of Water by Coupling Two and Three Dimensional Techniques Geoffrey Irving Stanford University Pixar Animation Studios.
Application of Compact- Reconstruction WENO Schemes to the Navier-Stokes Equations Alfred Gessow Rotorcraft Center Aerospace Engineering Department University.
Higher Order Runge-Kutta Methods for Fluid Mechanics Problems Abhishek Mishra Graduate Student, Aerospace Engineering Course Presentation MATH 6646.
Lecture 3 & 4 : Newtonian Numerical Hydrodynamics Contents 1. The Euler equation 2. Properties of the Euler equation 3. Shock tube problem 4. The Roe scheme.
Animating smoke with dynamic balance Jin-Kyung Hong Chang-Hun Kim 발표 윤종철.
Numerical Methods for Acoustic Problems with Complex Geometries Based on Cartesian Grids D.N. Vedder
Convection-Dominated Problems
Modeling of Traffic Flow Problems
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling
A TWO-FLUID NUMERICAL MODEL OF THE LIMPET OWC
Convergence in Computational Science
CI2 – Inviscid Strong Vortex-Shock Wave Interaction
AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINITIES
AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINTIES
Convergence in Numerical Science
Finite Volume Method Philip Mocz.
AIAA OBSERVATIONS ON CFD SIMULATION UNCERTAINTIES
CI2 – Inviscid Strong Vortex-Shock Wave Interaction
High Accuracy Schemes for Inviscid Traffic Models
Accurate Flow Prediction for Store Separation from Internal Bay M
Compact Higher-Order Interpolation at Overset mesh Boundaries
Comparison of CFEM and DG methods
Jean-Marie Le Gouez, Onera CFD Department
Presentation transcript:

Joint Mathematics Meetings Hynes Convention Center, Boston, MA Alfred Gessow Rotorcraft Center Aerospace Engineering Department University of Maryland, College Park High Order Compact Reconstruction Scheme with Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory Limiting Debojyoti Ghosh Graduate Research Assistant James D. Baeder Associate Professor Add graphic – maybe of riemann 2D or shock vortex interaction Joint Mathematics Meetings 4 – 7 January, 2012 Hynes Convention Center, Boston, MA

Background Scalar hyperbolic partial differential equation Discretization in time leads to an ordinary differential equation (solved by Euler explicit or TVD RK3) Reconstruction – interpolation of f at the interfaces from the cell centered/averaged values Upwinding – biased interpolation stencil to model wave nature of the solution

Smoothness Indicators Dispersion and dissipation relationships Motivation The Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory (WENO) schemes Convex combination of r-th order candidate interpolations Optimal weights in smooth regions  (2r-1)-th order interpolation Smoothness – dependent weights for discontinuous solutions  Non-oscillatory interpolation Optimal Weights WENO Weights Smoothness Indicators Replace with compact stencils? Dispersion and dissipation relationships Why Compact Reconstruction? High order accuracy with smaller stencils Better spectral resolution than explicit interpolation (bandwidth resolving efficiency) Lower dissipation at resolved frequencies Taylor series error order of magnitude lower

Objectives To construct Compact-Reconstruction WENO (CRWENO)schemes Identify candidate r-th order compact interpolations at each interface Find optimal weights such that combination results in (2r-1)-th order compact interpolation Apply WENO limiting on the weights to ensure non-oscillatory behavior across discontinuities Results in a tridiagonal system of equations Extend to the Euler equations of fluid dynamics Trivial extension to reconstruction of primitive and conservative variables Characteristic – based reconstruction results in non-oscillatory solutions for strong discontinuities Extension of CRWENO schemes to characteristic variables  Results in a block tridiagonal system of equations

5th Order CRWENO (r = 3) scheme

A Low Dissipation CRWENO scheme

Scalar Partial Differential Equations Schemes validated for the linear advection equation and the inviscid Burgers equation Discontinuous problems Non-oscillatory behavior validated across discontinuities CRWENO schemes show better resolution of discontinuous data (lower smearing and clipping) Smooth problems 5th order convergence verified for the new schemes Errors for CRWENO5 order of magnitude lower than WENO5, errors for CRWENO5-LD half those of CRWENO5 Linear Advection equation Inviscid Burgers equation

CRWENO5 for Euler Equations Characteristic based reconstruction respects the physics of the problem – 1D scalar wave propagation along each characteristic i i+1 Uavg (Roe averaged) Eigenvalues, left and right eigenvectors Results in a block tri-diagonal linear system along each dimension (as compared to tri-diagonal system for conservative variable reconstruction) For multi-dimensions, solution of linear system required along each grid line Upwinding – Left and right biased fluxes computed Roe-Fixed formulation used

Entropy Wave Advection (1D) Comparison of characteristic and conservative reconstructions Conservative Reconstruction Identical solutions with reconstruction of characteristic and conservative reconstructions 5th order convergence verified (smooth problem) for all schemes Errors for CRWENO5 order of magnitude lower than WENO5, Errors of CRWENO5-LD half those of CRWENO5

Shock Entropy Wave Interaction (1D) 6 points per wavelength Interaction of a shock wave with a density wave resulting in high- frequency waves and discontinuities CRWENO schemes show better resolution of high-resolution waves than WENO5 Mapping the WENO weights twice improves resolution w/o oscillations Effect of number of mappings (CRWENO)

Isentropic Vortex Convection (2D) Solution after travelling 1000 core radii Compact schemes show better shape and strength preservation for long term convection 12 points across core Initial WENO5 CRWENO5 CRWENO5-LD

Double Mach Reflection Problem Double Mach Reflection of a Mach 10 shock on a 480 X 120 grid CRWENO schemes validation for 2D problem with strong discontinuities Better capturing of the contact discontinuity roll-up WENO5 CRWENO5 CRWENO5-LD Density Entropy 720 X 180 grid T

Conclusions and Future Work Benefits of using the Compact-Reconstruction WENO scheme Smaller stencil for same order of convergence, lower absolute errors Lower dissipation leads to better resolution of discontinuities and better long-term convection properties Computational expense at same grid size is marginally more but coarser grids can be used for same error in solution Characteristic vs. Component-wise reconstruction Characteristic reconstruction is costlier, even more so for implicit reconstruction schemes (block tri-diagonal solver) More robust since physically more accurate – non-oscillatory results for sharp discontinuities Results similar in case of smooth flows Implementation of CRWENO for multi-dimensions 2D and 3D Navier-Stokes solvers Application to Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) of turbulent flows Application to airfoil cases, including pitching and plunging airfoils Simulation of flow field in a rotorcraft wake (convection and interaction of wake vortices)

Thank you