Annabel E Todd, Christine A Orengo, Janet M Thornton  Structure 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 4, Issue 9, Pages (September 1996)
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Conservation of Structure and Mechanism between Eukaryotic Topoisomerase I and Site-Specific Recombinases  Chonghui Cheng, Paul Kussie, Nikola Pavletich,
Volume 5, Issue 11, Pages (November 1997)
Intrinsic Cellular Defenses against Human Immunodeficiency Viruses
Sandeep Kumar, Ruth Nussinov  Biophysical Journal 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Solution Structure of a Cyanovirin-N:Manα1-2Manα Complex
Crystal Structure of Maltose Phosphorylase from Lactobacillus brevis
by Alexey Dementiev, Abel Silva, Calvin Yee, Zhe Li, Michael T
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 93, Issue 4, Pages (May 1998)
Mark Ultsch, Nathalie A Lokker, Paul J Godowski, Abraham M de Vos 
Yael T. Aminetzach, John R. Srouji, Chung Yin Kong, Hopi E. Hoekstra 
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Prolyl Oligopeptidase
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
Volume 6, Issue 12, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Crystal Structure of Human CD38 Extracellular Domain
The structural basis for pyrophosphatase catalysis
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages (October 1998)
Crystal Structure of a DinB Lesion Bypass DNA Polymerase Catalytic Fragment Reveals a Classic Polymerase Catalytic Domain  Bo-Lu Zhou, Janice D. Pata,
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 5, Issue 7, Pages (July 1997)
“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Volume 83, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 92, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 4, Issue 9, Pages (September 1996)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
The Structure of Chorismate Synthase Reveals a Novel Flavin Binding Site Fundamental to a Unique Chemical Reaction  John Maclean, Sohail Ali  Structure 
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Crystal Structure of Human CD38 Extracellular Domain
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterase elucidates the structure and function of a new family of hydrolases  Anne Mølgaard, Sakari Kauppinen, Sine Larsen  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 1999)
Active and Inactive Protein Kinases: Structural Basis for Regulation
Crystal Structure of the N-Terminal Domain of Sialoadhesin in Complex with 3′ Sialyllactose at 1.85 Å Resolution  A.P. May, R.C. Robinson, M. Vinson,
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Crystal structure of the apoptotic suppressor CrmA in its cleaved form
Active and Inactive Protein Kinases: Structural Basis for Regulation
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages (October 1997)
Structure and Dynamics of Zymogen Human Blood Coagulation Factor X
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (May 2000)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Luhua Lai, Hisao Yokota, Li-Wei Hung, Rosalind Kim, Sung-Hou Kim 
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (August 2006)
Presentation transcript:

Sequence and Structural Differences between Enzyme and Nonenzyme Homologs  Annabel E Todd, Christine A Orengo, Janet M Thornton  Structure  Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages 1435-1451 (October 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00861-4

Figure 1 Distribution of the Pairwise Sequence Identities of the Closest Enzyme Relatives of Nonenzymes Only single-domain proteins are considered. The gray line graph illustrates the number of closest enzyme relatives that fall within each level of sequence identity, and the black line graph is a cumulative percentage of closest relatives with increasing sequence identity. All single-domain proteins in the CATH structural classification [53, 54] were used as probes for PSI-BLAST [55] sequence searches. For each nonenzyme in the expanded classification (structural and SWISS-PROT [56] sequence data), its closest enzyme having one or more EC numbers assigned was identified. Of 3642 nonidentical nonenzymes in the classification, 664, contained in 29 homologous superfamilies, have one or more enzyme relatives. Structure 2002 10, 1435-1451DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00861-4)

Figure 2 Homologous Enzyme and Nonenzyme Proteins and Evolutionary Paradigms Circles labeled with and without the letter “E” denote enzymatic and nonenzymatic genes, respectively. These paradigms are discussed in the text. The direction of evolution for five enzyme and nonenzyme pairs and their superfamilies is more complicated or else not clear, explaining why the figures do not add up. Structure 2002 10, 1435-1451DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00861-4)

Figure 3 Examples of Homologous Enzyme and Nonenzyme Proteins Very brief explanations for the basis of loss/gain of enzyme activity are provided. See Table 2 for further details. These diagrams were created with MolScript [57]. (A) Residues in the Ser-His-Asp catalytic triad in neutrophil elastase and the equivalent residues in heparin binding protein are shown in ball and stick representation. (B) The Glu general acid in chitinase A and the equivalent Glu in narbonin, together with the Arg and Asp residues in narbonin with which the Glu is involved in a salt bridge, are shown. (C) The Tyr nucleophile, Arg-His-Arg catalytic triad, and functional Trp in Cre recombinase are shown. (D) The gray spheres represent bound Cu ions. The topmost Cu in L-ascorbate oxidase is equivalent to the single type I Cu ion in azurin. Each of the three cupredoxin domains in the oxidase is represented by a different color. Structure 2002 10, 1435-1451DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00861-4)

Figure 4 Oligomerization, Internal Domain Duplication, and Evolutionary Paradigms Circles labeled with and without the letter “E” denote enzymatic and nonenzymatic genes, respectively. These paradigms are discussed in the text. Structure 2002 10, 1435-1451DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00861-4)