Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e3 (April 2017)
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2009)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
Jinwei Zhu, Yuan Shang, Yitian Xia, Rongguang Zhang, Mingjie Zhang 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Callum Smits, Peter E. Czabotar, Mark G. Hinds, Catherine L. Day 
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Structural Basis for the Specific Recognition of Methylated Histone H3 Lysine 4 by the WD-40 Protein WDR5  Zhifu Han, Lan Guo, Huayi Wang, Yue Shen, Xing.
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Structure of the TPR Domain of p67phox in Complex with Rac·GTP
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Crystal Structure of Recombinant Human Interleukin-22
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Structural Basis for Protein Recognition by B30.2/SPRY Domains
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Graham D. Bailey, Jae K. Hyun, Alok K. Mitra, Richard L. Kingston 
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e4 (November 2017)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Structural Basis of Caspase-7 Inhibition by XIAP
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
How a Single T Cell Receptor Recognizes Both Self and Foreign MHC
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Structural Basis for the Recognition of Phosphorylated Histone H3 by the Survivin Subunit of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  A. Arockia Jeyaprakash,
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Robert S. Magin, Glen P. Liszczak, Ronen Marmorstein  Structure 
Structural Basis for Apelin Control of the Human Apelin Receptor
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 1192-1200 (July 2016) Molecular Mechanism for Fungal Cell Wall Recognition by Rice Chitin Receptor OsCEBiP  Simiao Liu, Jizong Wang, Zhifu Han, Xinqi Gong, Heqiao Zhang, Jijie Chai  Structure  Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages 1192-1200 (July 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2016.04.014 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overall Structure of OsCEBiP-ECD in Chitin Binding Form (A) Quantification of chitin binding affinity of OsCEBiP-ECD by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). Raw data (upper panel) and integrated heat measurements (lower panel) from ITC of the chitin tetramer binding to OsCEBiP-ECD are shown. The binding constant (K), the calculated stoichiometry (N), and the dissociation constant (Kd) are indicated. (B) ITC of chitin octamer binding to OsCEBiP-ECD. (C) ITC of titration of chitin tetramer into OsCERK1-ECD. (D) ITC of titration of chitin octamer into OsCERK1-ECD. (E) Colored-coded domain architecture of full-length OsCEBiP. The same color scheme is used in structure figures. SP, signal peptide; LysM, lysine motif; CRD, cysteine-rich domain; TM, transmembrane domain. (F) Overall structure of OsCEBiP-ECD in complex with chitin tetramer in two different orientations. The bound chitin oligomer is labeled with NAG and shown as green sticks. The secondary-structure elements are labeled. (G) Structure superposition of the three LysMs in OsCEBiP ectodomain. The secondary-structure elements of LysM1 are labeled. The color codes are indicated. See also Figure S1. Structure 2016 24, 1192-1200DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.04.014) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structural and Functional Analysis of the Novel Structural Fold of CRD (A) Overall structure of CRD. The cysteine residues forming the disulfide bridges are indicated. The disulfide bonds are colored yellow and marked by red numbers. (B) Detailed interaction of βA sheet from CRD with α2 helix from LysM1. The side chains from βA sheet and α2 helix are shown in gray and yellow, respectively. (C) ITC of chitin tetramer binding to OsCEBiP-ECDΔCRD. (D) ITC of chitin octamer binding to OsCEBiP-ECDΔCRD. (E) Overall structure of OsCEBiP-ECDΔCRD. The color codes are indicated. (F) Structural superposition of OsCEBiP-ECDΔCRD and chitin-bound OsCEBiP-ECD. The structure of OsCEBiP-ECDΔCRD (residues 29–223) was used as the template for alignment with that of chitin-bound OsCEBiP-ECD (residues 29–223) with a root-mean-square deviation of 0.83 Å. See also Figure S2. Structure 2016 24, 1192-1200DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.04.014) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Recognition Mechanism of NAG Oligomers by LysM-Containing Receptors (A) Chitin residues are labeled (NAG-1, -2, -3) and the omit electron density (Fo-Fc, 2.7σ) around the bound chitin oligomer is shown in blue mesh. LysM2 is shown in electrostatic surface and cartoon. (B) Detailed interactions between chitin tetramer and the OsCEBiP-ECD. The side chains from OsCEBiP-ECD are shown in yellow. (C) Mutations of amino acids critical for the interaction of OsCEBiP with chitin compromise the chitin tetramer (NAG)4 binding activity of OsCEBiP-ECD. The data summarized here represent the dissociation constants (Kd) derived from ITC experiments. The raw data are shown in Figure S1. (D) The detailed model of hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interaction between three NAG oligomers and one LysM. Seven critical residues (R1–R7) can be defined and labeled. (E) (Top) Structure-based sequence alignment indicates the conserved position of R1–R7 in the secondary structures. R1 is before the conserved Asp (D) on loop L1. R2, R3 is the first and second residue of helix α1, respectively. R4 is the first residue of helix α2. R5 is slightly variable and is boxed in red. R6 is the conserved Ile (I) or Leu (L) on loop L2. R7 is insulated one residue backward of R6. (Bottom ) Sequence alignment of LysM2 in several LysMs-containing RLKs and RLPs can predict potential critical residues (labeled R1–R7) for NAG oligomer binding according to the rules described above. The residues boxed in red can be the other candidates for R5. Consensus and similar amino acid residues for all sequences are highlighted in red and shown in blue boxes, respectively. See also Figures S1–S3. Structure 2016 24, 1192-1200DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.04.014) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Structure-Based Models of Chitin-Induced Homodimerization of OsCEBiP-ECD (A) Structure alignment of LysM2 in OsCEBiP-ECD to the LysM in the (NAG)6-mediated NlpC/P60-LysM homodimer (yellow, PDB: 4UZ3). Color codes are indicated. (B) Modeled structure of hexachitin-induced OsCEBiP-ECD homodimer with HoDock methods. Color codes are indicated. (C) Detailed interaction of hexachitin and two OsCEBiP-ECD boxed in solid black and red in (B). The side chains are shown in yellow. The critical residues of OsCEBiP-ECD-1 are marked in black and those of OsCEBiP-ECD-2 are marked in red. (D) The structure details boxed by black dashed line in (B). It forms the interface between the two OsCEBiP and shows slight interaction. See also Figures S3 and S4. Structure 2016 24, 1192-1200DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.04.014) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions