J. García, F. Toral (CIEMAT) P. Fessia (CERN)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
D2 conceptual design and field quality optimization Ramesh Gupta, BNL Slide No. 1 Nov. 13, 2013 D2 Conceptual Design and Field Quality.
Advertisements

Integration study of dipole corrector (for the MB Quad of CLIC Module) A.Samoshkin, M. Modena (CTC, 06-Apr-2010) 1.
HL-LHC Corrector Magnet 3D design status Giovanni Volpini on behalf of the LASA team CERN, February 25, 2014.
J. García, F. Toral (CIEMAT) P. Fessia (CERN) November, 19 th 2014.
Method of beam extraction from a synchrotron by the instrumentality of multilayer Cu-Fe shield Bondarenko Alexey.
Magnetic Field Design of a Superconducting Magnet for the FFAG Accelerator T.Obana, T.Ogitsu A,T.Nakamoto A,K.Sasaki A A.Yamamoto A, M.Yoshimoto A, Y.Mori.
October, 2003 P. Fabbricatore and S. Farinon Spectrometer magnets – Possible layout of cryostat in the end region In order to define the cryostat layout.
Superconducting Large Bore Sextupole for ILC
J. García, F. Toral (CIEMAT) P. Fessia (CERN) May, 26 th 2015.
J. García, F. Toral (CIEMAT) P. Fessia (CERN) January, 26 th 2015.
First approaches J. García, F. Toral, J. Munilla – CIEMAT.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 0 Top-Off Safety Yongjun Li ASAC Meeting October 22, 2009.
E. Todesco HL-LHC: OUTLOOK ON PROTECTION FOR IR MAGNETS (WP3) E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland CERN, 23 rd April 2015 MPE meeting.
Superconducting Quadrupoles inside the HERA Experiments M. Bieler, DESY, LHC LUMI 05 Workshop, Arcidosso, September The HERA Interaction Region.
WP6 status Paolo Fessia. Summary Status of the WP6 and change of WP coordinator Lowβ quadrupole status Corrector status Cryostat status.
Orbit Correctors in D2 and Q4 Update J. Rysti and E. Todesco 1 4/11/2014.
New options for the new D1 magnet Qingjin Xu
SHMS Spectrometer Update Hall C 2008 Users Meeting Paul Brindza January 18, 2008.
Dipole design at the 16 T frontier - Magnet R&D for a Future Circular Collider (FCC) at Fermilab Alexander Zlobin Fermilab.
Vyacheslav Klyukhin, SINP MSU Simulation of magnetic toroids for CMS forward muon detection April 22, 2013V. Klyukhin, General Muon mtg, CERN1.
Muon Cooling Channel Superconducting Magnet Systems Muon Collider Task Force Meeting on July 31, 2006 V.S. Kashikhin.
Consolidation of the Booster Injection Quadrupole Magnets (part 2) A. Aloev 14 th February 2013.
D2 CONFIGURATIONS P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon INFN Genova  Starting from previous studies done at CERN, BNL and BLNL, possile cross sections of D2 dipole.
FCC week March 2015 Marriott Georgetown Hotel D2 for FCC P.Fabbricatore INFN Genova D2 for FCC P.Fabbricatore & S.Farinon INFN Genova Presented.
CLIC Stabilisation Day’08 18 th March 2008 Thomas Zickler AT/MCS/MNC/tz 1 CLIC Quadrupoles Th. Zickler CERN.
An Hybrid QD0 for SID ? Marco Oriunno (SLAC), Nov. 14, 2013 LCWS13, TOKYO.
Correctors magnets V. Zubko, IHEP, Protvino SIS 300 Pre-consortium Meeting Thursday 19 March 2009, Protvino.
E. Todesco INTERACTION REGION MAGNETS E. Todesco On behalf of the WP3 collaboration CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CERN, 27 th October 2015.
Cosine-theta configurations for S.C. Dipole Massimo Sorbi on behalf of: INFN LASA & Genova Team Giovanni Bellomo, Pasquale Fabbricarore, Stefania Farinon,
E. Todesco LAYOUT FOR INTERACTION REGIONS IN HI LUMI LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Acknowledgements: B. Dalena, M. Giovannozzi, R. De Maria,
Super Fragment Separator (Super-FRS) Machine and Magnets H. Leibrock, GSI Darmstadt Review on Cryogenics, February 27th, 2012, GSI Darmstadt.
IR Magnets for Muon Collider Alexander Zlobin and Vadim Kashikhin Muon Collider Physics Workshop, Fermilab November 12, 2009.
HL-LHC Meeting, November 2013D2 Status and Plans – G. Sabbi 1 D2 Conceptual Design Status and Next Steps G. Sabbi, X. Wang High Luminosity LHC Annual Meeting.
Preliminary analysis of a 16 T sc dipole with cos-theta lay-out INFN team October 2015.
Yingshun Zhu Design of Small Aperture Quadrupole Magnet for HEPS-TF
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Super-FRS multiplet field.
GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH Super-FRS magnet configurations.
TE-MSC-MDT. FTEC Follow-Up Meeting Juan Carlos Perez TE-MSC-MDT Jose Ferradas TE-MSC-MDT 28/04/2016.
HL-LHC Magnet components and assemblies
High Gradient Magnet Design for SPring-8 Upgrade Plan
SLHC –PP WP6 LHC IR Upgrade - Phase I.
Model magnet test results at FNAL
MCBXFB Short Orbit Corrector Prototype: Status update
Alexander Kalimov, State Polytechnic University, St.-Petersburg
MCBXFB Short Orbit Corrector Prototyping: Presentation to 927 staff
P. Abramian, J. Calero, J. A. García Matos, J. L. Gutierrez, D
Development of the Canted Cosine Theta Superconducting Magnet
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils (DRAFT)
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Bore quench field vs. critical current density
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
Main magnets for PERLE Test Facility
Analytical Cost Model (16 T dipole)
DESIGN OPTIONS IN THE T RANGE
Status of the short nested orbit corrector MCBXFB prototype
SEMI-ANALYTIC APPROACHES TO MAGNET DESIGN
Conceptual design of superconducting correctors for Hi-Lumi Project
11T Dipole for the LHC Collimation upgrade
DESIGN OPTIONS FOR ORBIT CORRECTORS IN D2 and Q4
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
Conceptual design of superconducting correctors for Hi-Lumi Project (v2) F. Toral - CIEMAT CIEMAT, March 7th, 2013.
Muon Collider Magnet Technologies/Challenges
Design of Nb3Sn IR quadrupoles with apertures larger than 120 mm
CEPC Collider Magnets CHEN, Fusan November 13, 2018.
A. Tsinganis, F. Cerutti (EN/STI/FDA)
An alternative approach to the design of the corrector magnets
Orbit Correctors in D2 and Q4 Design options
Qingjin XU Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP),
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
Presentation transcript:

J. García, F. Toral (CIEMAT) P. Fessia (CERN) Single Aperture Orbit Corrector: Progress on MCBXFB design Field Quality Report February, 19th 2015 J. García, F. Toral (CIEMAT) P. Fessia (CERN)

Index MCBXFB & MCBXFA: MCBXFA Base iron vs Iron outer diam. = 614 mm: Cross Sections. Field quality at 100% IN. Integrated Sextupoles variation with current. MCBXFA Base iron vs Iron outer diam. = 614 mm: Cross sections Conclusions

MCBXFB & MCBXFA

Cross sections MCBXFB MCBXFA

Field quality at 100% IN Field quality achieved, except for the sextupoles caused by iron saturation. Results below corresponding to 100% IN on both dipoles, iron & cryostat included. Same cross section and coil ends in both magnets. Inner Dipole (ID) & Outer Dipole (OD) parameters Units MCBXFB (Short Magnet) MCBXFA (Long Magnet) Inner dipole current A 1600 Integrated field B1 (ID) T 2.49 4.63 Integrated b3 units 17.37 -13.78 Integrated b5 -1.49 Integrated b7 0.62 1.02 Integrated b9 -0.75 0.056 Integrated b11 3.6 4.38 Outer dipole current 1470 Integrated field A1 (OD) 2.52 4.58 Integrated a3 -10.33 47.52 Integrated a5 -3.6 5.43 Integrated a7 -3.26 -3.86 Integrated a9 -0.58 -0.63 Integrated a11 0.12 0.02

Integrated sextupoles variation with the current It is not possible to centre the sextupoles variation simultaneously on both magnets with the same cross section and coil ends. Shifting a MCBXFB sextupole moves that sextupole in the same direction for MCBXFA.

MCBXFA Base iron vs Iron outer diam. = 614 mm

Cross sections MCBXFA (Base Iron) MCBXFA (Iron Outer Diam. = 614 mm)

Integrated sextupoles variation with the current Increasing the outer iron diameter reduces the saturation problems. The variation of a3 with the current is much lower for the thicker iron case.

Conclusions

Conclusions It is not possible to centre the sextupoles variation simultaneously on both magnets using the same cross section and coil ends. An increase of the outer iron diameter in MCBXFA reduces the saturation problems, leading to lower sextupoles variation with the current. Studying a narrower operation range for the magnet would allow to optimize sextupole values on critical operation points.