BC Council of Administrative Tribunals ADJUDICATOR BOOT CAMP

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Municipal Board Making Your Case to the Board Presented by: William Barlow, Chair Lori Lavoie, Vice Chair.
Advertisements

Rule-Making Book II EU Administrative Procedures – The ReNEUAL Draft Model Rules 2014 Brussels, May th Herwig C.H. Hofmann University of Luxembourg.
1 FIFTH ANNUAL COAT CONFERENCE NSW CHAPTER DEALING WITH DIFFICULTIES IN THE ABSENCE OF LEGAL REPRESENTATION The Hearing Process In the Absence of Legal.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
Agreement on a Procedure for the Resolution of Grievances Presentation by the The Staff Union Committee 26 May 2000.
Federalism and the judiciary Nathalie Des Rosiers Dean, Civil Law University of Ottawa, Canada.
2007 Annual Conference Professional Discipline Ruby E. Brice, J.D. S.C. Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation.
Federal Court Procedure – Aboriginal Law Case Study A.2 Federal Court Workshop CBA Legal Conference 2014 St. John’s Newfoundland.
Last Topic - Administrative Tribunals
The Adjudication Process Virginia Department of Health Professions New Board Member Training October 2008.
DUE PROCESS DEVELOPMENTS IN TERMINATION AND GRIEVANCES.
CONDUCTING SECTION 188A ENQUIRIES. Introduction The proposed amendments to section 188A of the Labour Relations Act may result in increased usage of the.
Procedural Fairness: Striking the Balance Elisabeth Wentworth Banking and Financial Services Ombudsman Ltd National Consumer Congress March 2007.
The New Mediation Regulation October 16, 2012 Commissioner Derrick L. Williams.
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
CAMPUT 2015 Energy Regulation Course Donald Gordon Conference Centre Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Role of Tribunal Staff, Interveners and Independent.
© 2007 Robinson & Cole LLP How to Improve Land Use Decision-Making COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS OF CENTRAL NAUGATUCK VALLEY JANUARY 29, 2007.
Workplace Discipline: Limiting delay in disciplinary processes.
Grievance. Some important points from collective agreement Leaves Wages Designated University holidays Hours of work and work assignment.
Taking privacy cases through the Human Rights Review Tribunal Some observations on process and the roles of the Privacy Commissioner and the Director of.
2008 Commissioners Indaba 19 – 21 st November 2008 Sun City, North West Province HOW to CONDUCT ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS RANDALL van VOORE.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Module 2 Slide 1 NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REGULATORY PRACTICES WORKSHOP MODULE: 2 A The Independent Regulator.
Registration and Certification of Unions in Canada Presentation at the Government-to-Government Session and Seminar for an Exchange of Information on Topics.
UNRWA Dispute Tribunal Professionalized Transparent Independent & Impartial Judge –Selection of Judge by Internal Justice Committee comprised of staff.
 We use the Adversary system of trial.  HOWEVER, the Coroner’s Court, Family Court, Children’s Cases Program, some tribunals and some alternative methods.
Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication LA 310.
Administrative Law The Enactment of Rules and Regulations.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
April 23, Due Process: Views from the Sides Linda J. Deal, Teacher of the Gifted and Jay Clark, Parent and Attorney for Gifted Students.
Part 1 – Introduction to the Law Chapter 3 – Business Regulation Prepared by Michael Bozzo, Mohawk College © 2015 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 3-1.
Seminar on the Swiss Rules of International Arbitration Evidence & Hearings under the Swiss Rules Belgrade, 9 December 2015 University.
Nebraska Liquor Control Commission Hobert Rupe Executive Director.
Tribunal Member Refresher Training 14 May Hammersmith.
HANDLING DISCIPLINARY AND GRIEVANCE CASES – INCLUDING INVESTIGATIONS BY GAIL ESCOLME EMPLOYMENT LAW SOLICITOR.
HN2100 Collective Agreement Administration
Student Judicial Affairs Conference Student Discipline: How to Prepare Written Reasons Katrina Haymond March 24, 2006.
1 American Hospital Association Does the Board have the legal authority under the NLRA to adopt a rule determining eight presumptively appropriate bargaining.
1 Diocesan Canonical Changes Duncan A. Bayne Vice-chancellor Diocese of Olympia Title IV.
GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES
PREPARING AND PURSUING A GRIEVANCE
Code of Ethics and Ethics Panel
Mason County School District
SDAB HEARINGS ROLE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
NATIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND LABOUR COUNCIL (NEDLAC)
GUKEYEH GUK’EH GU’SANI Kaska Dena Good Governance Act
Administrative law Ch1 scope and Nature of Administrative Law.
The Role of Experts in Construction Arbitration
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
ICASA AMENDMENT BILL Vodacom’s Presentation to the
ORAL/EXTEMPORE JUDGMENTS The Hon. Dame Linda Dobbs DBE
A comparative study in Saudi Arabia and China
Catherine Pape, Specialist SLT and lay member of SENTW
Proposed Rule Changes Overview Stan Floras Tribunal Counsel
Chapter 3 Introduction to Adjudications
a Successful Arbitration
Reporting by Auditors under the Companies Act, 2013
STUDENT COURT HOW TO GUIDE
Historical Role Established as an Industrial relations tribunal in 1946 Concerned with resolving and avoiding industrial disputes Established a repudiation.
Principles of Evidence
Writs of Mandate A Primer on Traditional and Administrative Writs
Essentials of the legal environment today, 5e
Key Knowledge The purposes and appropriateness of consumer affairs Victoria in resolving civil disputes Key Skills Discuss and justify the appropriateness.
UNFAIR LABOUR PRACTICE COMPLAINTS
WORKSHOP DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN UKRAINE JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY PRACTICE: PROVING JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT, HEARING OF EVIDENCE.
Chapter 43 Administrative Law and Regulatory Agencies
Making Local Government a Participatory Sport
Wyoming Administrative Procedure Act
Introduction to International Commercial Arbitration
Hearing Officer Guidelines
Presentation transcript:

BC Council of Administrative Tribunals ADJUDICATOR BOOT CAMP The Essentials of Conducting a Fair Hearing

KNOW YOUR ENABLING LEGISLATION Statute / Act Regulations Rules Policies Practice Directives Administrative Tribunals Act Interpretation Act Human Rights Code / Charter

CONSIDER YOUR TRIBUNAL CONTEXT FUNCTION: Resolve Disputes - between two or more individuals - between individual and government agency Rights Entitlement Regulatory Licensing / Disciplinary Appeals

TRIBUNAL CONTEXT RESOLUTION METHOD Adversarial Inquisitorial Mix of Both

TRIBUNAL CONTEXT III. FORM OF HEARING In-person Video Conference Telephone Conference Online Written Submissions Combination of any of the above

TRIBUNAL CONTEXT - legal or lay counsel - self represented IV. Other Considerations Who are the Parties - legal or lay counsel - self represented Expedited Hearing Process Statutory Timelines - holding a hearing - issuance of decision

ELEMENTS OF PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS Notice & Reply An Unbiased Decision Maker The Person Who Hears Must Decide The Provision of Reasons

PREPARING for the HEARING Check for Jurisdiction Sole Adjudicator or Panel Form of Hearing Thorough Knowledge of Statutory Provisions Background/File Materials Ensure Notice was Given Pre-hearing Case Management Prepare Hearing Book

DURING the HEARING Maintain Judicial Temperament Provide Opening Statement Ensure Participants Understand the Process Take Notes Mark Exhibits Oath or Affirmation Maintain Order Deal with Motions / Objections Make the Parties Feel Heard

CLOSING THE HEARING Establish Timing for Written Argument Indicate Timing of the Decision Close the Proceedings Thank the Participants

COMMON HEARING CHALLENGES Unintentional Bias Self-represented Parties Difficult Participants Motions / Objections Maintaining Focus on the Issue Maintaining Order Admissibility of Evidence Assessing Credibility

DECISION MAKING TECHNIQUES Focus on the Issue (s) Summarize Witnesses’ Evidence Identify the Relevant Evidence Identify Evidence Which Is Agreed Resolve Conflicts in the Evidence Find Facts Create an Outline

DEFINING THE ISSUE WHY? It determines what information is RELEVENT (both admission of evidence in hearing & inclusion of evidence in decision). It provides a framework for the decision. WHAT? The issue is a question you must decide to resolve the case. Can be factual, legal or both

DEFINING the ISSUE WHEN? Start drafting the issue after a first review of the file. Revise and/or refine the issue at the hearing. Let the parties know what you think the issue is. Use the issue to frame your decision. WHERE? Include the issue near the beginning of your decision.

DEFINING the ISSUE State the issue as a direct or indirect question. HOW? State the issue as a direct or indirect question. For example: Was the applicant the driver of the vehicle? If so, should their license be cancelled on the basis that their driving presents a danger to the public? OR The issues are whether the applicant was the driver of the vehicle and, if so, whether their license should be cancelled on the basis that their driving presents a danger to the public.

DEFINING the ISSUE HOW? Be as specific as possible. For example, do NOT write: This decision involves the cancellation of the applicant’s license.

WRITING TIPS Create an Outline Write to the Readers, not Yourself Revise as much as possible Create an Outline Write to the Readers, not Yourself Write in chunks: eg, Introduction, Issue, etc Use Headings Point First writing Plain Language Limit Quotations & Introduce Quotations Ensure Sufficiency of Reasons

QUOTATIONS Do NOT write: Section 12 of the Labour Relations Code reads as follows: Duty of Fair Representation 12(1) A trade union or council of trade unions must not act in a manner that is arbitrary, discriminatory or in bad faith (a) in representing any of the employees in an approprite bargaining unit, or (b) in the referral of persons to employment Whether or not the employees or persons are members of the trade union or a constituent union of the council of trade unions.

QUOTATIONS Rather, write: Section 12 is a provision in the Labour Relations Code that says a union cannot represent an employee in a manner that is arbitrary, discriminatory or in bad faith. OR The “duty of fair representation” as stated in Section 12 of the Code provides that a union shall not act in a manner that is arbitrary or discriminatory or in bad faith in representing or referring a person to employment.

CONCLUSION Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Thank You!