Theory Casey Parsons.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mike Shackelford. Factors that make a good counterplan Does it solve the aff better? Is it competitive Does it solve the aff or a portion of the aff.
Advertisements

Anatomy of a debate Austin Layton.
Introduction to Kritiks Ryan Galloway Samford University.
PICs….. In spaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace!.  Cp text  Net benefit  Must be competitive ◦ Uniquely beneficial ◦ Mutually exclusive.
Theory CODI 2014 Lecture. Rules of Debate Debate has surprisingly few rules Time limits and speaking order There must be a winner and loser No outside.
The 1ar: Debate’s Paramedic Get the patient to the hospital…alive.
UNDERSTANDING THE KRITIK by Lurp Lank and Alex Kosmachavelli.
Final Focus The best two minutes of your (debate) life.
Matt Gomez Ph.D in Theoretical Objections to Negative and Affirmative argumentation (Bingham Campus) SCFI 2011 THEORY.
The Value/Criterion Debate and Voters. Aaron Overheim.
Introduction to Debate -Negative- To access audio: Skype: freeconferencecallhd and enter # Or call and enter # © L. Husick,
Counterplans CODI 2014 Lecture 2. What is a counterplan? A plan offered by the negative to solve some or all of the affirmative’s advantages The negative.
Counterplans Debate Central Workshop August 30, 2008.
Observations By Chanise. Observation One Definitions.
Most important things Keep your personal views outside the room Debaters must adapt to you Be honest about your judging experience.
 The 2 nd stock issue is Inherency.  The term INHERENCY is a noun derived from the base word “INHERENT” which is an adjective and means: “…EXISTING.
SUMMARY AND FINAL FOCUS. Summary Basics  2 minute speech, after the rebuttals.  It’s a time to clear up for the judge what she should really be paying.
FLOWING! (AND FILING BASICS). Filing basics Many new debaters lose debates because they have misplaced parts of their files. Following these simple rules.
4 minute Affirmative Constructive This speech is prepared ahead, rehearsed and should be perfectly timed. It is a presentation of the affirmative's position.
Counterplans The Negative’s Best Friend The Negative’s Best Friend.
The Stock Issues of Debate 5 Things Every Debater Needs, and Needs to Know!
Opposition Strategy NCFA Rookie Debate Camp. Agenda ❖ A Brief Word on Trichotomy ❖ Basic Path to Winning ❖ Opposition Strategies by Position* ❖ Quick.
Theory Debating Baxter MDAW  It Really is  There are 4 Components of a Theory Argument  Interp  Violation  Standards  Voting Issue  You.
The Disadvantage Provides an added measure to vote against the affirmative plan and vote for the present system.
How to Flow And why you should do it – always, all the time, in every round.
Intro to Counterplans Casey Parsons. Introduction to Counterplans Thus far in debate, we have assumed that the neg defends the status quo In the vast.
Impact Calculus 101 Casey Parsons. What is impact calculus? You might remember on the first powerpoint that something called “impact calculus” was referenced.
SCFI 2011 SJK. Understand how to structure and write basic LD constructives Understand the basic components of contention-level argumentation Begin to.
How to Debate Disadvantages. DA Uniqueness: Status of a key issue in the SQ – Example: The economy is improving Link: how the plan disrupts the SQ – Example:
How to Flow And why you should do it – always, all the time, in every round.
GDI 2015 THE NEGATIVE.  The counter to the Affirmative  Negates the course of action proposed  So much variety! Many ways to negate  What makes someone.
Counterplans. Counterplan Burdens Competitiveness To be competitive, CP must be: – Mutually exclusive – Net beneficial Topicality – Traditional theory.
Judge Psychology JEFFREY MILLER MARIST SCHOOL 2015 GEORGIA DEBATE INSTITUTES.
POLICY DEBATE. WHAT IS POLICY DEBATE? A structured format for fairly arguing a topic of policy TEAM DEBATE: two teams of two students each 8 speeches.
Wellesley Speech & Debate Workshops Parli Basics Forming a Case Guide to Speeches and Responsibilities Leader of Opposition Prime Minister Members of.
Judge training- Warwick IV What did that person just say?
FILING BASICS Staying organized is crucial.
Affirmative vs. negative
WHAT IS A CRITIQUE? For the purposes of this presentation, we will focus on critiques run by the negative. It is a philosophical argument against the.
KRITIKS Melissa Witt.
The Politics DA.
Policy Debate Speaker Duties
To start: What do you think an eco-town is?
How to be negative Gabi Yamout.
LD Debate (yay!).
Plan B Essentials Samantha Bridger.
UNDERSTANDING THE KRITIK
Hegemony (Heg) Economic, military, and political influence a nation has. It’s America’s street cred Soft Power + Hard Power= Heg Amount of Soft + Amount.
Separation of Powers: What’s for Lunch?
Negotiation Game Rules
Answering the CP Casey Parsons.
Wining the DA Casey Parsons.
Separation of Powers: What’s for Lunch?
Debate What is Debate?.
The 2AC: Answering Disads
What’s Constitutional?
Times and Tasks in an LD Round or What Do I Do Now?
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF POLICY SPEECHES
Welcome to Debate! Cross-examination
Year 12 reading for Religious Studies!
E PLURIBUS HUGO “Out of the Many, a Hugo” v0.92.
Ooh La La! The mini handbook!.
Affirmative Action Warm-up
Negative Attacks.
Topicality Casey Parsons.
The Politics DA Casey Parsons.
Reading to Synthesize Information
Thinking like a Policy Debater
Getting To Know Debate:
Debates.
Presentation transcript:

Theory Casey Parsons

What is theory? You might have noticed that there’s not really a policy rule book Theory is a question of what the rules of debate should be It’s structured exactly like a T shell: Interpretation – what you think the rule should be Violation – why they violate the rule Standards – internal links Voters – impacts

What theory do I read? Counterplan theory is by far the most common This can include: Conditionality Bad PICs bad Multiple CPs bad Agent CPs bad Etc

How do I go for theory? Ideally you don’t Theory is the most last ditch effort in debate If you think theory is your best option for the round, either the other team actually did something really bad or you can’t possibly win on anything else If you’re going for theory, you’re fighting a really uphill battle. Most judges really don’t want to vote on theory I made a helpful flow chart on the next slide

Yes – they did not put ink on the page Can you possibly win any other argument? Did the other team actually do something that should be against the rules? Did the other team completely drop your theory argument? Fine, go for theory For the love of God… do NOT go for theory Yes – they did not put ink on the page No Yes – They deserve to lose No No – we’re pretty screwed Yes