SIDIS Rates and Projection for SoLID with CLEO (&CDF)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
Advertisements

Measuring the Proton Spin Polarizabilities in Real Compton Scattering Philippe Martel – UMass Amherst Advisor: Rory Miskimen TUNL (Triangle Universities.
LHCb PatVeloTT Performance Adam Webber. Why Upgrade?  Currently we de-focus the beams o LHCb Luminosity ~ 2x10 32 cm -2 s -1 o ~ 1 interaction per bunch.
09/30/'06SPIN2006, T. Horaguchi1 Measurement of the direct photon production in polarized proton-proton collisions at  s= 200GeV with PHENIX CNS, University.
10/03/'06 SPIN2006, T. Horaguchi 1 Measurement of the direct photon production in polarized proton-proton collisions at  s= 200GeV with PHENIX CNS, University.
Monte-Carlo simulations and reconstruction for 12-degree ep-elastic Luminosity Monitor A.Kiselev OLYMPUS Collaboration Meeting DESY, Hamburg,
Count rate estimates from TDR Assuming beam intenisties from previous slide and acc *rec from SIM LH2 case [counts/24h] p [GeV/c] beam momentum Solid.
Simulations of Single-Spin Asymmetries from EIC Xin Qian Kellogg, Caltech EIC Meeting at CUA, July 29-31, TMD in SIDIS 2.Simulation of SIDIS.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
SoLID simulation Zhiwen Zhao Uva SoLID Collaboration Meeting 2011/6/2 1.
Event generator comparison Zhiwen Zhao 2013/12/03 original 2014/02/12 update 2014/11/04 update.
Kinematics of  + n   p   0  p reaction Susumu Oda 2007/04/10-19.
Background from pion beam interactions with LH2 & solid state targets J.Biernat/I.Koenig/J. Markert/W.Przygoda/P.Salabura.
A search for deeply-bound kaonic nuclear states in (in-flight K -, N) reaction Hiroaki Ohnishi RIKEN.
M. Dugger, February Triplet polarimeter study Michael Dugger* Arizona State University *Work at ASU is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation.
SIDIS Background and Trigger Zhiwen Zhao 2013/11/18 Created 2014/07/06 Updated.
SoLID simulation Zhiwen Zhao UVa 2011/03/25 1. GEMC, written by Maurizio Ungaro, used for CLAS12 2.
Jin Huang M.I.T. For Transversity Collaboration Meeting Mar 26, JLab.
Inclusive Measurements of inelastic electron/positron scattering on unpolarized H and D targets at Lara De Nardo for the HERMES COLLABORATION.
Study of SoLID Baffle, Background and Trigger Zhiwen Zhao UVa, ODU&JLab 2014/07/09 1.
E.C. AschenauerEIC INT Program, Seattle Week 51.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
04/06/07I.Larin pi0 systematic error 1  0 error budget Completed items (review) Updated and new items (not reported yet) Items to be completed.
SoLID Background Update Zhiwen Zhao UVa 2013/11/08 1.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
HES-HKS & KaoS meeting 21/Oct/2011 Toshi Gogami 11/Mar/2010, E End-Run Party at Kappo Nara, Newport News, US.
L0 trigger update Bruno Angelucci INFN & University of Pisa.
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
HES-HKS analysis meeting 30 Aug 2013 Toshiyuki Gogami.
Can we detect a marble tomb with cosmic muons ? Corinne Goy, Max Chefdeville, Jean Jacquemier, Yannis Karyotakis 21 December 2015.
Jixie’s Analysis Status Jixie Zhang Sep. 22th, 2010.
Example 3 Slides for PAC. Measurement of Target Single Spin Asymmetry in Semi-Inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering with 3 He Map Collins moments to provide.
Electroweak physics at an EIC
Nick Markov, UCONN Valery Kubarovsky, JLAB
Charles Hyde Old Dominion University
Radiative Corrections for Heavy Nuclei
Pi0 Simulation for BigCal
Pi0 Simulation for BigCal
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab
Co-Spokespersons: Zafar Ahmed, University of Regina
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
The LHC collider in Geneva
Gordon Cates, Xiaochao Zheng, Yuxiang Zhao LOI
New Results for Transverse Spin Effects at COMPASS
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
Quarkonium production in ALICE
presented by Werner Boeglin Florida International University Miami
Update on Geometry Tagging (01/19/17)
Lc+ Status Report Heavy Flavor Working Group
on behalf of the COMPASS collaboration
PIXEL patch efficiency
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Parasitic Run Physics Simulations
Special Considerations for SIDIS
SoLID Simulation Zhiwen Zhao (UVa) SoLID Jlab Physics Division
Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS
SoLID SIDIS He3 Detection
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
The np -> d p0 reaction measured with g11 data
(only proton; conditional approved)
August 19th 2013 Alexandre Camsonne
p0 ALL analysis in PHENIX
Physics event timing Use Pythia to generate hadronic decays at 125 GeV
Search for rare decays of W bosons
25.5 days at 11.0 GeV & 6.5 days at 8.8 GeV = 32 days total
Deuteron Electro-Disintegration at Very High Missing Momenta PR Hall C Collaboration Experiment Probe two nucleon dynamics at short space-time distances.
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Zhiwen Zhao,UVa for EC group
Presentation transcript:

SIDIS Rates and Projection for SoLID with CLEO (&CDF) Zhihong Ye 08/19/2014

Acceptance: CLEO Black: Forward Angle Green: Large Angle CDF

Simulation: CDF with Geant3 by Xin: (1) SIDIS cross section in FORTRAN, calculated both SIDIS XS and inclusive XS. (2) He3 data was simulated by running Proton and Deuteron targets then summing them together. (3) I only has his simulated Ntuples and ROOT files. I am not able to trace the parameters he put into the simulation. (4) The simulation data in these Ntuples has the acceptance weight already. (5) Estimate noise from accidental coincidence with single- inclusive XS. CLEO with GEMC by Zhiwen and me: (1) Updated SIDIS model “collider”, no inclusive XS. (2) CLEO acceptance is simulated by GEMC w/o SIDIS physics (3) Events were generated with “collider” and weighted by SIDIS cross sections+CLEO acceptance

CLEO has about 39%(pi+) and 41%(pi-) more SIDIS Rate CDF: values in the PAC35 proposal KHz 11GeV (FA/LA) 8.8GeV (FA/LA) Total (e, e’pi+) 1.467 / 0.192 0.810 / 0.117 (2.586kHZ) (e, e’pi-) 1.010 / 0.120 0.554 / 0.073 (1.757kHZ) CLEO: (does not include detector efficiencies) (e, e’pi+): 2.305 / 0.083 1.788 / 0.053 (85% det eff) 1.959 / 0.071 1.520 / 0.045 (3.595kHZ) (e, e’pi-): 1.600 / 0.051 1.224 / 0.033 (85% det eff) 1.360 / 0.043 1.040 / 0.028 (2.471kHz) CLEO has about 39%(pi+) and 41%(pi-) more

Projections: Method: (a) Bin in Z, Q2, pt and x: 1, Z-binning: 0.30 ~ 0.70, bin-size = 0.05 (8 bins) 2, Q2-bining: 1.0 ~ 8.0, bin-size = 1, (6 bins, last bin from 6~8 GeV^2) 3, pt-binning: 0.0 ~ 1.6, bin-size = 0.2 (<=8 bins, double bin-size when total event < 5e6) 4, x-binning: depending on statistics : ~max(2e6, Sum_in_pt_bin/8.0 ) (b) Calculation: Astats = 1/sqrt(N_x) N_x = N_raw * weight * Acceptance * Lumi * time * (pol*target_factor/sqrt(2))^2 * dilution^2 *det_eff weight = cs * Phase_Space /N_simulated * 1e-33(cm^2), Phase_Space= Phase_Space_e * Phase_Space_h where, Phase_Space_e = (cos Th_min – cos Th_max)*2*Pi*(11-0.5), Phase_Space_e = (cos Th_min – cos Th_max)*2*Pi*(6-0.5), Th_min --Th_max, 11—0.5GeV/c and 6—0.5GeV/c are the phase ranges in the generator. Acceptance = (Accept_FA_e*Accept_FA_h+Accept_LA_e*Accept_LA_h) Lumi = 1e36 (cm^-2 * s^-1) time = 48 days * 24 *3600 s for 11GeV or 21 days *24 * 3600s for 8.8GeV pol = 60%, target_factor = 0.865, dilution = dxs_n / dxs_He3 det_eff = det_eff_e * det_eff_h, assume to be overall 85% for e and pi.

Projections: Compared Xin’s results and my results: N_x = N_raw * weight * Acceptance * Lumi * time * (pol*target_factor/sqrt(2))^2 * dilution^2 *det_eff My x-bining method: Each xbj bin much has the events, N_bin ~ max (2e6/det_eff, Sum/8.), where N_bin = N_raw * weight * Acceptance * Lumi * time, Sum = all event in one pt bin and Xin’s x-binning method: N_bin = N_raw * weight * Acceptance * Lumi * time * det_eff, So his x-binning condition is actually ~ max (2e6, Sum/8.). (2) Dilution Factors are calculated differently: Mine  directly from “collider”, in the code, di = dxs_p/dxs_n, so for He3, dilute = 1/(1+2*di) For Xin  dilution=(di_mean_D2 – di_mean_P)/di_mean_He3, “mean” means the mean value in each x-bin. (3) and I don’t know how he calculated weight * Acceptance (4) Xin estimated the Signal/Noise but did not apply on the projection plots. I don’t calculate Signal/Noise since I need inclusive XS models with is not included in “collider”

Projections: Z-bining and Q2-binning should have no problem, so I check the events distribution in one particular (Z,Q2) bin and check how it depends on pt and x. CDF CLEO (e,e’pi-)

Projections: -- Results For all results please click the link: https://userweb.jlab.org/~yez/Work/solid/CDF_Projection/ https://userweb.jlab.org/~yez/Work/solid/CLEO_Projection/ Next Step, check the “Counts” (1/Astat/Astat) for each (Z,Q) bin for CDF and CLEO, And also count the total events

Projections: -- Results N=6.2 x 10^9

Projections: -- Results N=9.1 x 10^9

Projections: -- Results (pi-, Collins, CDF)

Projections: -- Results (pi-, Collins, CLEO)

Projections: -- Results (pi-, collins) CLEO CDF

Projections: -- Results N=9.16 x 10^9

Projections: -- Results N=13.2 x 10^9

Projections: -- Results (pi+, Collins, CDF)

Projections: -- Results (pi+, Collins, CLEO)

Projections: -- Results (pi+, collins) CLEO CDF

Projections: -- Results The total number of events for the entire bins: Pi+ Pi- CDF: 9.16e9 6.20e9 CLEO: 13.20e9 9.12e9 Difference: 44% 47% (events in one bin will be discarded if Astat in this bin is >0.05) Rate difference: 39% 41%